Literature DB >> 31463723

Laparoscopy versus laparotomy approach of a radical resection for gallbladder cancer: a retrospective comparative study.

Changwei Dou1, Yuhua Zhang1, Jie Liu1, Fangqiang Wei1, Hongwu Chu1, Junjun Han1, Qifeng Yao1, Jianyi Ding1, Chengwu Zhang2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic approach for gallbladder cancer (GBC) has long been contraindicated, but few recent studies have demonstrated the oncologic outcomes of this treatment. The purpose of this study was to compare the perioperative outcomes and long-term survival for laparoscopic surgery versus traditional open surgery of GBC.
METHOD: Between January 2014 and December 2018, 63 GBC patients who received radical resection were enrolled in this study, with 32 patients in laparoscopic group and 31 cases in laparotomy group. Perioperative data and postoperative survival were retrospectively evaluated.
RESULTS: Laparoscopic approach was associated with less intraoperative bleeding (267.20 ± 47.07 vs. 502.60 ± 69.70, P = 0.007), fewer postoperative days of oral diet recovery (2.34 ± 0.31 vs. 3.32 ± 0.35, P = 0.041), and hospital stay (11.03 ± 0.99 vs. 14.35 ± 1.11, P = 0.028). There were no significant differences between two groups regarding other perioperative outcomes. Patients in laparoscopic group showed better 1-year overall survival than those in laparotomy group (72.91% vs. 47.82%, P = 0.086). Subgroup analysis for GBC patients in T3 stages revealed that laparoscopic approach was associated with less intraoperative bleeding (268.00 ± 57.19 vs. 541.50 ± 101.30, P = 0.009), fewer postoperative days of hospital stay (9.87 ± 1.10 vs. 14.90 ± 1.53, P = 0.017), and improved 1-year overall survival (P = 0.023). Subgroup analysis for GBCs in TNM III and TNM IV stages showed comparable intraoperative parameters and postoperative survival between two groups.
CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic surgery for GBCs may offer the comparable perioperative outcomes as conventional laparotomy procedure, and tend to be associated with less intraoperative bleeding, faster oral diet recovery, shorter hospital stay, and improved 1-year overall survival.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gallbladder cancer; Laparoscopy; Radical resection

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31463723     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-019-07075-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  3 in total

1.  Comparison of 2D 4K vs. 3D HD laparoscopic imaging systems using a pelvitrainer model: a randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Tibor A Zwimpfer; Claudine Wismer; Bernhard Fellmann-Fischer; James Geiger; Andreas Schötzau; Viola Heinzelmann-Schwarz
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2021-10-26

2.  A Comparison Between the Prognosis of Simultaneous and Salvage Radical Resection in Incidental Gallbladder Cancer.

Authors:  Shilin He; Tunan Yu; Parikshit Asutosh Khadaroo; Liuxin Cai; Yeyuan Chu; Fangqiang Wei; Xiao Liang
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2020-12-30       Impact factor: 3.989

3.  Laparoscopic surgery for oncologic extended resection of T1b and T2 incidental gallbladder carcinoma at a high-volume center: a single-center experience in China.

Authors:  Parbatraj Regmi; Hai-Jie Hu; Yin Chang-Hao; Fei Liu; Wen-Jie Ma; Cong-Dun Ran; Jun-Ke Wang; Aliza Paudyal; Nan-Sheng Cheng; Fu-Yu Li
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 4.584

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.