Seung-Suk Seo1, Chang-Wan Kim2, Chang-Rack Lee3, Yong-Uk Kwon2, Minkyung Oh4, Ok-Gul Kim5, Chang-Kyu Kim1. 1. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Haeundae Bumin Hospital, 584, Haeundae-ro, Haeundae-gu, Busan, 48094, Republic of Korea. 2. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Inje University Busan Paik Hospital, 75, Bokji-ro, Busanjin-gu, Busan, 47392, Republic of Korea. 3. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Inje University Busan Paik Hospital, 75, Bokji-ro, Busanjin-gu, Busan, 47392, Republic of Korea. leechangrack@inje.ac.kr. 4. Department of Pharmacology, Inje University College of Medicine, 75, Bokji-ro, Busanjin-gu, Busan, 47392, Republic of Korea. 5. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Bumin Hospital, 59, Mandeok-daero, Buk-gu, Busan, 46555, Republic of Korea.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: To evaluate the long-term survival of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) in the Asian population and assess differences in clinical outcomes between mobile- and fixed-bearing UKA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Among 111 cases of UKA that were performed by 1 surgeon from January 2002 to December 2009, we retrospectively reviewed 96 cases (36 mobile-bearing, 62 fixed-bearing) for this study. We examined cause of revision or failure, type of reoperation/revision, and duration from the surgery date to the revision upon reviewing the medical record. Survival analysis was conducted using the Kaplan-Meier method. Functional outcomes were evaluated based on range of motion and patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures (Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score) for cases with at least 8 years of follow-up (average, 10.2 years). RESULTS: Overall, the 10-year survival was 88% [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.81-0.95], and the estimated mean survival time was 13.4 years (95% CI 12.5-14.2). In a comparison of survival between the mobile- and fixed-bearing groups, the former had a 10-year survival of 85% (95% CI, 0.72-0.97) and an estimated mean survival time of 13.5 years (95% CI 12.2-14.7) and the latter had a 10-year survival of 90% (95% CI 0.82-0.99) and an estimated mean survival time of 13.4 years (95% CI 12.3-14.4). Thus, there was no significant difference in survival between the two groups (log-rank test, p = 0.718). In addition, no significant difference in functional outcomes was observed between the two groups (p > 0.05 for all). CONCLUSIONS: UKA performed in the Asian population showed a relatively good functional outcome and survival rate at an average 10-year follow-up. No difference in survival and PROs was observed according to the bearing type. Although the present study demonstrated a good survival rate, similar to that in other Western studies, further studies investigating the impact of the Asian lifestyle on the long-term survival of UKA is necessary.
INTRODUCTION: To evaluate the long-term survival of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) in the Asian population and assess differences in clinical outcomes between mobile- and fixed-bearing UKA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Among 111 cases of UKA that were performed by 1 surgeon from January 2002 to December 2009, we retrospectively reviewed 96 cases (36 mobile-bearing, 62 fixed-bearing) for this study. We examined cause of revision or failure, type of reoperation/revision, and duration from the surgery date to the revision upon reviewing the medical record. Survival analysis was conducted using the Kaplan-Meier method. Functional outcomes were evaluated based on range of motion and patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures (Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score) for cases with at least 8 years of follow-up (average, 10.2 years). RESULTS: Overall, the 10-year survival was 88% [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.81-0.95], and the estimated mean survival time was 13.4 years (95% CI 12.5-14.2). In a comparison of survival between the mobile- and fixed-bearing groups, the former had a 10-year survival of 85% (95% CI, 0.72-0.97) and an estimated mean survival time of 13.5 years (95% CI 12.2-14.7) and the latter had a 10-year survival of 90% (95% CI 0.82-0.99) and an estimated mean survival time of 13.4 years (95% CI 12.3-14.4). Thus, there was no significant difference in survival between the two groups (log-rank test, p = 0.718). In addition, no significant difference in functional outcomes was observed between the two groups (p > 0.05 for all). CONCLUSIONS: UKA performed in the Asian population showed a relatively good functional outcome and survival rate at an average 10-year follow-up. No difference in survival and PROs was observed according to the bearing type. Although the present study demonstrated a good survival rate, similar to that in other Western studies, further studies investigating the impact of the Asian lifestyle on the long-term survival of UKA is necessary.
Entities:
Keywords:
Asian population; Outcome; Survival; Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty