Literature DB >> 31463514

Minimum Travel Distance Among Publicly Insured Infants with Severe Congenital Heart Disease: Potential Impact of In-state Restrictions.

Joyce L Woo1, Brett R Anderson2, Daniel Gruenstein3, Rena Conti4, Kao-Ping Chua5.   

Abstract

Travel distance to surgical centers may be increased when coverage restrictions prevent children with congenital heart disease (CHD) from receiving care at out-of-state congenital heart surgery centers. We estimated the minimum travel distance to congenital heart surgery centers among publicly insured infants with time-sensitive CHD surgical needs, under two different scenarios: if they were and were not restricted to in-state centers. Using 2012 Medicaid Analytic eXtract data from 40 states, we identified 4598 infants with CHD that require surgery in the first year of life. We calculated the minimum travel distance between patients' homes and the nearest cardiac surgery center, assuming patients were and were not restricted to in-state centers. We used linear regression to identify demographic predictors of distance under both scenarios. When patients were not restricted to in-state centers, mean minimum travel distance was 43.7 miles, compared to 54.1 miles when they were restricted. For 5.9% of patients, the difference in travel distance under the two scenarios exceeded 50 miles. In six states, the difference in mean minimum travel distance exceeded 20 miles. Under both scenarios, distance was positively predicted by rural status, residence in middle-income zip codes, and white/non-Hispanic or American Indian/Alaskan Native race/ethnicity. For some publicly insured infants with severe CHD, facilitating the receipt of out-of-state care could mitigate access barriers. Existing efforts to regionalize care at fewer centers should be designed to avoid exacerbating access barriers among publicly insured CHD patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Congenital heart disease; Ethics and policy; Health services research

Year:  2019        PMID: 31463514      PMCID: PMC6851488          DOI: 10.1007/s00246-019-02193-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol        ISSN: 0172-0643            Impact factor:   1.655


  33 in total

1.  Impact of geographic proximity to cardiac revascularization services on service utilization.

Authors:  P M Gregory; E S Malka; J B Kostis; A C Wilson; J K Arora; G G Rhoads
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Hospital mortality for Norwood and arterial switch operations as a function of institutional volume.

Authors:  Jennifer C Hirsch; James G Gurney; Janet E Donohue; Achamyeleh Gebremariam; Edward L Bove; Richard G Ohye
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2007-12-14       Impact factor: 1.655

3.  Surgical volume, hospital quality, and hospitalization cost in congenital heart surgery in the United States.

Authors:  Titus Chan; Jaewhan Kim; L LuAnn Minich; Nelangi M Pinto; Norman J Waitzman
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 1.655

4.  Factors associated with increased resource utilization for congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Jean Anne Connor; Kimberlee Gauvreau; Kathy J Jenkins
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 7.124

5.  Should operations be regionalized? The empirical relation between surgical volume and mortality.

Authors:  H S Luft; J P Bunker; A C Enthoven
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1979-12-20       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Patient preferences for location of care: implications for regionalization.

Authors:  S R Finlayson; J D Birkmeyer; A N Tosteson; R F Nease
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 7.  Larger Centers Produce Better Outcomes in Pediatric Cardiac Surgery: Regionalization is a Superior Model - The Con Prospective.

Authors:  Mark H D Danton
Journal:  Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Pediatr Card Surg Annu       Date:  2016

8.  The impact of an infant's severe congenital heart disease on the family: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Helene Werner; Beatrice Latal; Emanuela Valsangiacomo Buechel; Ingrid Beck; Markus A Landolt
Journal:  Congenit Heart Dis       Date:  2013-07-22       Impact factor: 2.007

9.  Antidepressant use in pregnancy and the risk of cardiac defects.

Authors:  Krista F Huybrechts; Kristin Palmsten; Jerry Avorn; Lee S Cohen; Lewis B Holmes; Jessica M Franklin; Helen Mogun; Raisa Levin; Mary Kowal; Soko Setoguchi; Sonia Hernández-Díaz
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Pediatric and neonatal extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: does center volume impact mortality?*.

Authors:  Carrie L Freeman; Tellen D Bennett; T Charles Casper; Gitte Y Larsen; Ania Hubbard; Jacob Wilkes; Susan L Bratton
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 7.598

View more
  2 in total

1.  Social determinants of health and outcomes for children and adults with congenital heart disease: a systematic review.

Authors:  Brooke Davey; Raina Sinha; Ji Hyun Lee; Marissa Gauthier; Glenn Flores
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2020-10-17       Impact factor: 3.756

Review 2.  Addressing Social Determinants of Health and Mitigating Health Disparities Across the Lifespan in Congenital Heart Disease: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Keila N Lopez; Carissa Baker-Smith; Glenn Flores; Michelle Gurvitz; Tara Karamlou; Flora Nunez Gallegos; Sara Pasquali; Angira Patel; Jennifer K Peterson; Jason L Salemi; Clyde Yancy; Shabnam Peyvandi
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 6.106

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.