| Literature DB >> 31463278 |
Poonam K Jayaprakash1, Palash Modi2, Pranav Sapawat3, RudraPratap Singh Thakur4, Tanuj Choudhari4, Jayant Chandrakar4.
Abstract
AIM: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the radiographic length of velum (LV), width of velum (WV), velum angle (AV), depth of pharynx (PD), Need's ratio (NR), inclination angle (AI) in different morphological types of soft palate according to growth patterns in skeletal class I individuals.Entities:
Keywords: Lateral cephalogram; malocclusion; soft palate
Year: 2019 PMID: 31463278 PMCID: PMC6691440 DOI: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_322_19
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Family Med Prim Care ISSN: 2249-4863
Figure 1Types of soft palate on the basis of shape
Figure 2(1) PNS- S –velum length; (2) velum width (VW); (3) Pharyngeal depth (PD); (4) Velum angle (AV)
Types of soft palate according to shape
| TYPE | SHAPE | |
|---|---|---|
| I | leaf shaped | lanceolate shaped in which the middle portion of soft palate elevated to both naso and oro side |
| II | Rat tail shaped | when soft palate anterior portion is bulged and free margin has coarction |
| III | Butt like | shows shorter and flatter appearance and width has no distinct demarcation from anterior portion to free margin |
| IV | Straight line shaped | soft palate shows straight line |
| V | S-shaped | distortion of soft palate showing S shape |
| VI | Crook shaped | crook appearance revealed crook appearance in which posterior portion crook shaped anterosuperiorly |
Parameters considered for the lateral cephalograms
| 1 | Velum length (LV) | linear distance from anterior nasal spine to posterior nasal spine along palatal plane |
| 2 | Velum width (VW) | linear measurement of thickest portion perpendicular to length |
| 3 | Pharyngeal depth (PD) | linear measurement from posterior nasal spine to Posterior pharyngeal wall |
| 4 | Velum angle (AV) | angle formed by palatal plane and posterior nasal spine to tip of uvula |
| 5 | Need’s ratio (NR) | ratio of PD to LV in resting position |
Figure 3Shows the distribution of different types of soft palate in the sample
Comparison of length, width, velum angle and Need’s ratio in various types of soft palate
| Type I | Type II | Type III | Type IV | Type V | Type VI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VL | 30.86* | 30.39 | 22.16* | 30 | 29 | 25.66 |
| VW | 9.35* | 7.91 | 8.16* | 4.5 | 5 | 6 |
| AV | 127.9 | 127.6 | 128.16* | 121.5 | 129 | 128 |
| NR | 0.7* | 0.76* | 0.79* | 0.85 | 0.9 | 0.92* |
Comparison of Need’s ratio in different types of soft palate according to Growth pattern
| Horizontal | Average | Vertical | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type I | 0.68 | 0.67 | 0.77 |
| Type II | 0.71 | 0.74 | 0.84 |
| Type III | 0.82 | 0.74 | 0.85 |
| Type IV | - | 0.85 | - |
| Type V | 0.89 | - | - |
| Type VI | - | 0.84 | 0.92 |
Shows % distribution of various types of soft palate
| Types | Distribution in % |
|---|---|
| Type I leaf shaped | 63.1 |
| Type IIrat tail shaped | 18.4 |
| Type IIIbutt shaped | 8.5 |
| Type IV straight line shaped | 3.5 |
| Type V S shaped | 1 |
| Type VI crooked | 5.5 |