| Literature DB >> 31462824 |
Noemi Pace1, Silvio Daidone2, Benjamin Davis3, Sudhanshu Handa4, Marco Knowles2, Robert Pickmans5.
Abstract
This paper investigates the interplay between the Social Cash Transfer Programme (SCTP) and the Farm Input Subsidy Programme (FISP) in Malawi. We take advantage of data collected from a seventeen-month evaluation of a sample of households eligible to receive SCTP, which also provided information about inclusion into FISP. We estimate two types of synergies: i) the complementarity between SCTP and FISP, i.e. whether the impact of both interventions run together is larger than the sum of the impacts of these interventions when run separately, and ii) the incremental impact of receiving FISP when a household already receives SCTP, as well as the incremental impact of receiving SCTP when a household already receives FISP. The analysis shows that there are synergies between the two policy interventions, mainly in terms of incremental impact of each programme over the other, in increasing expenditure, agricultural production and livestock.Entities:
Keywords: C93; D12; O12; Q12; agricultural subsidies; cash transfers; household expenditure; impact evaluation; productive impact; programme complementarity
Year: 2017 PMID: 31462824 PMCID: PMC6713287 DOI: 10.1080/00220388.2017.1380794
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Dev Stud ISSN: 0022-0388