| Literature DB >> 31462752 |
Wiboonluk Pungrasmi1,2, Jirapa Intarasoontron3, Pitcha Jongvivatsakul4, Suched Likitlersuang5.
Abstract
Concrete cracks must be repaired promptly in order to prevent structural damage and to prolong the structural life of the building (or other such construction). Biological self-healing concrete is a recent alternative technology involving the biochemical reaction of microbial induced calcium carbonate precipitation (MICP). This study determined the most appropriate technique to encapsulate spores of Bacillus sphaericus LMG 22257 with sodium alginate so as to protect the bacterial spores during the concrete mixing and hardening period. Three techniques (extrusion, spray drying and freeze drying) to encapsulate the bacterial spores with sodium alginate were evaluated. The freeze-drying process provided the highest bacterial spore survival rate (100%), while the extruded and spray-dried processes had a lower spore survival rate of 93.8% and 79.9%, respectively. To investigate the viability of microencapsulated spores after being mixed with mortar, the decomposed urea analysis was conducted. The results revealed that the freeze-dried spores also showed the highest level of urea decomposition (metabolic activity assay used as a surrogate marker of spore germination and vegetative cell viability). Thus, the self-healing performance of concrete mixed with freeze-dried spores was evaluated. The results showed that the crack healing ratio observed from the mortar specimens with freeze-dried microencapsulated spores were significantly higher than those without bacteria. This study revealed that freeze drying has a high potential as a microencapsulation technique for application to self-healing concrete technology.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31462752 PMCID: PMC6713760 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-49002-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Preparation of the mortar with microencapsulated bacterial spores. OPC = ordinary Portland cement type 1.
Figure 2The linear calibration curve of urea standard solution.
Figure 3Representative physical and SEM images of the encapsulated capsules; showing the: (a) extruded capsule at 100x magnification, (b) spray-dried capsule at 10,000x magnification and (c) freeze dried capsule at 1,000x magnification. Images shown are representative of those seen from at least 3 such fields of view per sample and 3 samples.
Viable bacterial spore and encapsulation yield.
| Microencapsulation techniques | Viable bacterial spores × 106 (CFU/mL) | Encapsulation yield (EY) (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Before encapsulation | After encapsulation | ||
| Extrusion | 2.26 ± 0.87 | 2.12 ± 0.32 | 93.8 |
| Spray drying | 2.34 ± 0.31 | 1.87 ± 1.51 | 79.9 |
| Freeze drying | 1.37 ± 0.48 | 1.39 ± 0.67 | 100.0 |
Data are shown as the mean ± SE, derived from three replications. No means were significantly different (p > 0.05; KWT).
Figure 4Hydrolyzed urea concentration (M) by microencapsulated bacterial spores in mortar. Data are shown as the mean ± SE, derived from three replications. For the three encapsulation methods, no means were significantly different to the others (p > 0.05).
Figure 5Crack-healing activity in mortar by sodium alginate microencapsulated bacterial spores formed by freeze drying.
Crack width measurement.
| Mortar specimen | Crack width (mm) | |
|---|---|---|
| Day 0 | Day 7 | |
| Untreated | 0.19 ± 0.04 | 0.12 ± 0.09 |
| Treated with bacterial spores | 0.28 ± 0.03 | 0.02 ± 0.02 |
Data are shown as the mean ± SE, derived from three replications. Three measurements were made for each replication with a spacing of 1 mm. No means were significantly different (p > 0.05; KWT).