Robert F Potter1, Carey-Ann D Burnham2,3,4, Gautam Dantas5,2,4,6. 1. The Edison Family Center for Genome Sciences and Systems Biology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO. 2. Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO. 3. Department of Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO. 4. Department of Molecular Microbiology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO. 5. The Edison Family Center for Genome Sciences and Systems Biology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO; dantas@wustl.edu. 6. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Gardnerella vaginalis is implicated as one of the causative agents of bacterial vaginosis, but it can also be isolated from the vagina of healthy women. Previous efforts to study G. vaginalis identified 4 to 6 clades, but average nucleotide identity analysis indicates that G. vaginalis may be multiple species. Recently, Gardnerella was determined to be 13 genomospecies, with Gardnerella piottii, Gardnerella leopoldii, and Gardnerella swidsinkii delineated as separate species. METHODS: We accessed 103 publicly available genomes annotated as G. vaginalis. We performed comprehensive taxonomic and phylogenomic analysis to quantify the number of species called G. vaginalis, the similarity of their core genes, and their burden of their accessory genes. We additionally analyzed publicly available metatranscriptomic data sets of bacterial vaginosis to determine whether the newly delineated genomospecies are present, and to identify putative conserved features of Gardnerella pathogenesis. RESULTS: Gardnerella could be classified into 8 to 14 genomospecies depending on the in silico classification tools used. Consensus classification identified 9 different Gardnerella genomospecies, here annotated as GS01 through GS09. The genomospecies could be readily distinguished by the phylogeny of their shared genes and burden of accessory genes. All of the new genomospecies were identified in metatranscriptomes of bacterial vaginosis. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple Gardnerella genomospecies operating in isolation or in concert with one another may be responsible for bacterial vaginosis. These results have important implications for future efforts to understand the evolution of the Gardnerella genomospecies, host-pathogen interactions of the genomospecies during bacterial vaginosis, diagnostic assay development for bacterial vaginosis, and metagenomic investigations of the vaginal microbiota.
BACKGROUND: Gardnerella vaginalis is implicated as one of the causative agents of bacterial vaginosis, but it can also be isolated from the vagina of healthy women. Previous efforts to study G. vaginalis identified 4 to 6 clades, but average nucleotide identity analysis indicates that G. vaginalis may be multiple species. Recently, Gardnerella was determined to be 13 genomospecies, with Gardnerella piottii, Gardnerella leopoldii, and Gardnerella swidsinkii delineated as separate species. METHODS: We accessed 103 publicly available genomes annotated as G. vaginalis. We performed comprehensive taxonomic and phylogenomic analysis to quantify the number of species called G. vaginalis, the similarity of their core genes, and their burden of their accessory genes. We additionally analyzed publicly available metatranscriptomic data sets of bacterial vaginosis to determine whether the newly delineated genomospecies are present, and to identify putative conserved features of Gardnerella pathogenesis. RESULTS: Gardnerella could be classified into 8 to 14 genomospecies depending on the in silico classification tools used. Consensus classification identified 9 different Gardnerella genomospecies, here annotated as GS01 through GS09. The genomospecies could be readily distinguished by the phylogeny of their shared genes and burden of accessory genes. All of the new genomospecies were identified in metatranscriptomes of bacterial vaginosis. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple Gardnerella genomospecies operating in isolation or in concert with one another may be responsible for bacterial vaginosis. These results have important implications for future efforts to understand the evolution of the Gardnerella genomospecies, host-pathogen interactions of the genomospecies during bacterial vaginosis, diagnostic assay development for bacterial vaginosis, and metagenomic investigations of the vaginal microbiota.
Authors: Azad Ahmed; Josh Earl; Adam Retchless; Sharon L Hillier; Lorna K Rabe; Thomas L Cherpes; Evan Powell; Benjamin Janto; Rory Eutsey; N Luisa Hiller; Robert Boissy; Margaret E Dahlgren; Barry G Hall; J William Costerton; J Christopher Post; Fen Z Hu; Garth D Ehrlich Journal: J Bacteriol Date: 2012-05-18 Impact factor: 3.490
Authors: Gerald L Murray; Kirill Tsyganov; Xenia P Kostoulias; Dieter M Bulach; David Powell; Darren J Creek; John D Boyce; Ian T Paulsen; Anton Y Peleg Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2017-02-15 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Carl J Yeoman; Suleyman Yildirim; Susan M Thomas; A Scott Durkin; Manolito Torralba; Granger Sutton; Christian J Buhay; Yan Ding; Shannon P Dugan-Rocha; Donna M Muzny; Xiang Qin; Richard A Gibbs; Steven R Leigh; Rebecca Stumpf; Bryan A White; Sarah K Highlander; Karen E Nelson; Brenda A Wilson Journal: PLoS One Date: 2010-08-26 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Scott Sherrill-Mix; Kaleigh Connors; Grace M Aldrovandi; Jason M Brenchley; Charles Boucher; Frederic D Bushman; Ronald G Collman; Satya Dandekar; Nichole R Klatt; Laurel A Lagenaur; Roger Paredes; Gilda Tachedjian; Jim A Turpin; Alan L Landay; Mimi Ghosh Journal: AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses Date: 2020-09-07 Impact factor: 2.205
Authors: Mustapha M Mustapha; Vatsala R Srinivasa; Marissa P Griffith; Shu-Ting Cho; Daniel R Evans; Kady Waggle; Chinelo Ezeonwuka; Daniel J Snyder; Jane W Marsh; Lee H Harrison; Vaughn S Cooper; Daria Van Tyne Journal: mSystems Date: 2022-06-13 Impact factor: 7.324
Authors: Sara Arroyo-Moreno; Matthew Cummings; David B Corcoran; Aidan Coffey; Ronan R McCarthy Journal: NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes Date: 2022-04-19 Impact factor: 8.462