Gabriela Vidal1, Leandro Machín1, Jessica Aschemann-Witzel2, Gastón Ares1,3. 1. Centro de Investigación Básica en Psicología, Facultad de Psicología, Universidad de la República, Tristán Narvaja 1674, CP 11200, Montevideo, Uruguay. 2. MAPP Centre for Research on Customer Relations in the Food Sector, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark. 3. Sensometrics & Consumer Science, Instituto Polo Tecnológico de Pando, Facultad de Química, Universidad de la República, By Pass de Rutas 8 y 101 s/n, CP 91000, Pando, Canelones, Uruguay.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of message framing on attitudes towards messages aimed at promoting the use of nutritional warnings, behavioural intention and actual behaviour, evaluated through visual attention to nutritional warnings and the choice of a snack product during a real choice task. DESIGN: Following a between-subjects design, participants were exposed to loss-framed nutrition messages, gain-framed nutrition messages or non-nutrition-related messages (control group). After evaluating the messages, participants were asked to select a snack product as a compensation for their participation. The experiment was conducted using an eye tracker. SETTING: Montevideo (Uruguay). PARTICIPANTS: Convenience sample of 201 people (18-51 years old, 58 % female). RESULTS: The average percentage of participants who fixated their gaze on the nutritional warnings during the choice task was slightly but significantly higher for participants who attended to nutrition messages (regardless of their framing) compared with the control group. Participants who attended to loss-framed messages fixated their gaze on the warnings for the longest period of time. In addition, the healthfulness of the snack choices was higher for participants exposed to nutrition-related messages compared with the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Results from the present work suggest that nutrition messages aimed at increasing awareness of nutritional warnings may increase consumers' visual attention and encourage more heathful choices. The framing of the messages only had a minor effect on their efficacy.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of message framing on attitudes towards messages aimed at promoting the use of nutritional warnings, behavioural intention and actual behaviour, evaluated through visual attention to nutritional warnings and the choice of a snack product during a real choice task. DESIGN: Following a between-subjects design, participants were exposed to loss-framed nutrition messages, gain-framed nutrition messages or non-nutrition-related messages (control group). After evaluating the messages, participants were asked to select a snack product as a compensation for their participation. The experiment was conducted using an eye tracker. SETTING: Montevideo (Uruguay). PARTICIPANTS: Convenience sample of 201 people (18-51 years old, 58 % female). RESULTS: The average percentage of participants who fixated their gaze on the nutritional warnings during the choice task was slightly but significantly higher for participants who attended to nutrition messages (regardless of their framing) compared with the control group. Participants who attended to loss-framed messages fixated their gaze on the warnings for the longest period of time. In addition, the healthfulness of the snack choices was higher for participants exposed to nutrition-related messages compared with the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Results from the present work suggest that nutrition messages aimed at increasing awareness of nutritional warnings may increase consumers' visual attention and encourage more heathful choices. The framing of the messages only had a minor effect on their efficacy.
Entities:
Keywords:
Communication campaign; Front of pack; Labelling; Nutrition information; Public policy; Warning labels
Authors: Rafaela Corrêa Pereira; João de Deus Souza Carneiro; Michel Cardoso de Angelis Pereira Journal: J Food Sci Technol Date: 2021-06-09 Impact factor: 2.701
Authors: Alice Wistar; Marissa G Hall; Maxime Bercholz; Lindsey Smith Taillie Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-03-02 Impact factor: 3.390