| Literature DB >> 31461992 |
Jin-Jun Guo1, Kun Wang1, Ting Guo1, Zheng-Yun Yang1, Peng Zhang2.
Abstract
In order to explore the drying-wetting cycle test method of concrete under sulfate accelerating erosion, the influence of dry-wet time ratio on concrete sulfate erosion was studied. Under the condition of 7 days for one cycle, five different dry-wet time ratios were designed: 1:3, 1:1, 3:1, 5:1, and 10:1. The basic properties such as compressive strength, splitting tensile strength and dynamic elastic modulus of concrete were tested. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to analyze the microstructure of concrete before and after erosion. The test results show that under the environment of sulfate drying-wetting cycle erosion, the change of mechanical properties of concrete are divided into three stages: ascending period, fluctuating period and rapid descending period. Concrete is subjected to periodic damage process of initial damage followed by filling compaction, cracking, further filling, and cracking again, in that order. Dry-wet ratio has a significant effect on concrete sulfate attack. Under the same drying-wetting cycle period, as the dry-wet ratio increases, the degree of deterioration of concrete by sulfate attack increases first and then decreases. When the dry-wet ratio is 5:1, the deterioration is the most serious.Entities:
Keywords: concrete; dry–wetratio; microstructure; sulfate erosion
Year: 2019 PMID: 31461992 PMCID: PMC6747815 DOI: 10.3390/ma12172755
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Chemical composition of cement and fly ash.
| Constituent (wt%) | SiO2 | Al2O3 | CaO | MgO | SO3 | Fe2O3 | Na2O | K2O | LOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cement | 31.43 | 12.43 | 41.28 | 3.34 | 3.22 | 3.34 | 0.43 | 0.80 | 1.09 |
| Fly ash | 58 | 30 | 2.8 | 1.5 | 1.22 | 4.3 | 0.00 | 1.36 | 0.82 |
Physical properties of the cement.
| Standard Test Method for Water (%) | Stability (Boiling Method) | Setting Time (min) | Compressive Strength (MPa) | Flexural Strength (MPa) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Initial Setting | Final Setting | 3 d | 28 d | 3 d | 28 d | ||
| 26.74 | qualified | 90 | 300 | 26.6 | 54.5 | 5.42 | 8.74 |
Mix proportion and compressive strength of concrete.
| Water–Binderratio | Cement/ | Fly Ash/ | Water/ | Aggregate | Sand/ | Compressive Strength/(MPa) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.54 | 289 | 72 | 195 | 1178 | 722 | 35.5 |
Drying–wetting cycles test arrangements.
| Code | D1W3 | D1W1 | D3W1 | D5W1 | D10W1 | W |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ratio of dry and wet | 1:3 | 1:1 | 3:1 | 5:1 | 10:1 | 0:1 |
| Single time ratio/h | 42:126 | 84:84 | 126:42 | 140:28 | 152:16 | 0:168 |
Note: D1W3 represents the specimen having a dry–wet time ratio of 1:3.
Figure 1Concrete specimens exposed to sulfate solutions under drying–wetting cycles. (a) Wetting process; (b) drying process.
Figure 2Dynamic elastic modulus tester.
Figure 3Visual inspection of concrete exposed to sulfate solution under drying–wetting cycles.
Figure 4Comparison of salt crystal distribution on concrete surface between wetting and drying conditions.
Figure 5Mass change of specimens exposed to sulfate solution under different drying–wetting cycle systems.
Figure 6Change of RDEM of specimens exposed to sulfate solution under different drying–wetting cycle systems.
Figure 7Mechanical properties of concrete exposed to sulfate solution under different dry–wet ratio. (a) Relative compressive strength coefficient; (b) relative splitting tensile strength coefficient.
Figure 8Microstructure of sample D5W1 exposed to sulfate solution under drying–wetting cycles. (a) 0 d; (b) 28 d; (c) 140 d; (d) 252 d.