Literature DB >> 31461040

Reconstruction of Posterior Mandibulectomy Defects in the Modern Era of Virtual Planning and Three-Dimensional Modeling.

Edward I Chang1, Stefanos Boukovalas1, Jun Liu1, Rene D Largo1, Matthew M Hanasono1, Patrick B Garvey1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Posterior mandibulectomy defects can be reconstructed using either soft tissue or vascularized bone. The authors hypothesize that advances in computer-aided design and manufacturing (CAD-CAM) have resulted in osteocutaneous free flaps now proving superior to soft-tissue flaps.
METHODS: The authors conducted a retrospective review of all free flap reconstructions of posterior mandibulectomy defects where the condyle was resected from 2005 to 2016.
RESULTS: Overall, 291 patients (mean age, 56.9 years; mean body mass index, 26.2 kg/m) underwent posterior mandible reconstruction with 169 soft-tissue flaps and 122 osteocutaneous free flaps (90 free-hand versus 32 CAD-CAM). Forty patients (13.7 percent) required two free flaps to reconstruct the defect, most commonly a fibula osteocutaneous flap for the mandibulectomy defect and a soft-tissue flap for external coverage. Postoperatively, there were no differences in the incidence of trismus between soft-tissue versus vascularized bone flaps; however, malocclusion was most common in patients with soft-tissue flaps (p < 0.001). Patients with CAD-CAM bone reconstruction experienced significantly less malocclusion (p < 0.001), were more likely to progress to a regular diet (p = 0.001), and trended to having superior speech (p = 0.057) compared with the other cohorts. There were six total flap losses, with no difference between soft-tissue and bony flaps.
CONCLUSIONS: Although reconstruction of posterior mandibulectomy defects should be based on the patient's comorbidities, surgeon comfort, and available resources, patients undergoing reconstruction of posterior mandibulectomy defects reconstructed with CAD-CAM-assisted fibulas experienced superior postoperative function compared with soft-tissue flaps or free-hand fibula flaps. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31461040     DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005954

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  5 in total

1.  The temporo-mandibular joint: Reconstruction of the condyle post-ablation.

Authors:  Rhodri Davies; Luke Cascarini
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2022-07-15

2.  Novel computer-aided reconstruction of soft tissue defects following resection of oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Jiajie Xu; Fangyuan Lai; Chao Chen; Minghua Ge; Yunfeng Liu; Zhuo Tan; Chuanming Zheng; Jiafeng Wang; Haiwei Guo; Liehao Jiang; Xinyang Ge; Xiabin Lan
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 3.253

3.  The Role of Three-Dimensional Reconstruction of Medical Images and Virtual Reality in Nursing Experimental Teaching.

Authors:  Min Zhu; Chunhui Li; Shuangping Zhao; Liang Chen; Xueping Zhao
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 2.682

4.  Short ramus reconstruction for hemi-mandibulectomy defect: Case reports.

Authors:  Eiji Hirai; Shunji Sarukawa; Jinsil Park; Seiko Fujii; Takeshi Nishikawa; Kozo Yamamoto
Journal:  JPRAS Open       Date:  2022-07-05

5.  Vascularized Fibula TMJ Reconstruction: A Report of Five Cases featuring Computerized Patient-specific Surgical Planning.

Authors:  David B Powers; John Breeze; Detlev Erdmann
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2022-08-18
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.