Literature DB >> 31461033

Serial Visual Evoked Potentials in Patients with Craniosynostosis and Invasive Intracranial Pressure Monitoring.

Mostafa M Haredy1, Alki Liasis1, Valeria Fu1, Amani Davis1, Ian F Pollack1, Joseph E Losee1, Samia Saied1, Ken K Nischal1, Jesse A Goldstein1.   

Abstract

This study aimed to detect the ability of pattern visual evoked potentials to detect visual pathway dysfunction in a cohort of patients with craniosynostosis who also had invasive intracranial pressure measurement. A retrospective review was conducted on craniosynostosis patients who had invasive intracranial pressure measurement and at least one pattern visual evoked potentials test. Reversal pattern visual evoked potentials were performed with both eyes open. Thirteen patients met the inclusion criteria (mean age at intracranial pressure measurement, 5.7 years). Seven patients had raised intracranial pressure, and of these, five (71.4 percent) had abnormal or deteriorated pattern visual evoked potentials parameters on serial testing, whereas all patients (100 percent) with normal intracranial pressure had normal pattern visual evoked potentials amplitude and latency. Four of the five patients (80 percent) with raised intracranial pressure and abnormal pattern visual evoked potentials did not show evidence of papilledema. The mean latency in patients with raised intracranial pressure (118.7 msec) was longer than in those with normal intracranial pressure (108.1 msec), although it did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.09), whereas the mean amplitude in patients with raised intracranial pressure (12.4 µV) was significantly lower than in patients with normal intracranial pressure (23.3 µV) (p = 0.03). The authors' results showed that serial pattern visual evoked potentials testing was able to detect visual pathway dysfunction resulting from raised intracranial pressure in five of seven craniosynostosis patients, and of these five patients, 80 percent had no evidence of papilledema, demonstrating the utility of serial pattern visual evoked potentials in follow-up of the visual function in craniosynostosis patients. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:: Diagnostic, II.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31461033     DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005935

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  3 in total

Review 1.  Non-invasive detection of intracranial pressure related to the optic nerve.

Authors:  Jian Li; Chao Wan
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2021-06

2.  Electrophysiological Study of Visual Pathways in Nevoid Basal Cell Carcinoma Syndrome Patients.

Authors:  Antonietta Moramarco; Ludovico Alisi; Alessandro Lambiase; Sandra Giustini; Luca Lucchino; Emanuele Miraglia; Vincenzo Roberti; Marcella Nebbioso
Journal:  Eye Brain       Date:  2021-03-29

Review 3.  Clinical electrophysiology of the optic nerve and retinal ganglion cells.

Authors:  Oliver R Marmoy; Suresh Viswanathan
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 3.775

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.