| Literature DB >> 31460442 |
Siddarth Jain1, Abhiram Panigrahi1, Tridib K Sarma1.
Abstract
Development of nanozymes, which are nanomaterials with intrinsic enzymatic properties, has emerged as an appealing alternative to the natural enzymes with tremendous application potential from the chemical industry to biomedicine. The self-asseEntities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31460442 PMCID: PMC6705086 DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.9b01201
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ACS Omega ISSN: 2470-1343
Scheme 1Schematic Representation of Counter Anion-Dependent Evolution of Variable Shaped Iron Oxides via a Polyol-Based Microwave-Assisted Method
Figure 1(a) Scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) image, (b) TEM image (scale bar 1 μm) of Fe3O4 microrods; inset: HRTEM image of nanoparticles decorated on the microrod (scale bar 5 nm), and (c) Elemental mapping of Fe3O4 microrods obtained under microwave condition at 150 °C for 60 min in a water–PEG mixture (1:9) using nitrate salt as a precursor.
Figure 2(a) XRD spectrum, (b) Raman spectrum, (c) wide range XPS spectrum, and (d) room-temperature magnetization curves as a function of the field (M–H curve) of Fe3O4 microrods obtained under microwave condition at 150 °C for 60 min in a water–PEG mixture (1:9) using nitrate salt as a precursor.
Figure 3(a) SEM micrograph of Fe3O4 microrods obtained under microwave condition at 150 °C for 15 min (water–PEG ratio 1:9) and (b) schematic presentation depicting the formation mechanism of Fe3O4 microrods obtained under microwave condition at 150 °C using Fe(NO3)3 precursor salt and water–PEG as a solvent.
Figure 4(a) SEM image of Fe2O3 microparticles obtained using FeCl3 salt as a precursor under microwave irradiation at 150 °C for 60 min in a water–PEG mixture (1:9), (b) XRD spectrum of Fe2O3 microparticles; (c) SEM image of Fe3O4 obtained using Fe(OAc)3 as a salt precursor, and (d) SEM image of Fe3O4 microrods obtained using Fe(NO3)3·9H2O under a hydrothermal treatment at 180 °C for 12 h.
Figure 5(a) UV–visible spectra of TMB-Fe3O4, TMB-Fe3O4-H2O2, and TMB-H2O2 reaction system; (b) pH-dependent relative activity of Fe3O4 at room temperature; (c) concentration-dependent relative activity of Fe3O4 at 25 °C using H2O2 as a substrate and (d) TMB as a substrate (the maximum point in the curve was set as 100%); (e) UV–visible steady-state kinetic study of Fe3O4 at fixed H2O2 concentration (4 mM) while TMB concentration was varied; (f) UV–visible steady-state kinetic study of Fe3O4 at fixed TMB concentration (0.1 mM) and variable H2O2 concentration; (insets of (e) and (f)) double-reciprocal plots of Fe3O4 activity at a fixed concentration of one substrate (TMB and H2O2) versus varying concentration of the other.
Figure 6(a) Schematic presentation of terephthalic acid catalytic oxidation by hydroxyl radical and (b) bar plot of the fluorescence spectrum at 440 nm at different time intervals as a result of terephthalic acid oxidation by Fe3O4 and H2O2. Inset: Normalized fluorescence spectra of the oxidation of terephthalic acid solution containing terephthalic acid, Fe3O4, and H2O2.
Figure 7(a) UV–visible steady-state kinetic study of Fe3O4 at a fixed H2O2 concentration (40 mM) while pyrogallol concentration is varied and (b) UV–visible steady-state kinetic study of Fe3O4 at fixed pyrogallol concentration (10 mM) and variable H2O2 concentration; (insets c and d) double-reciprocal plots of Fe3O4 activity at a set concentration of one substrate (pyrogallol and H2O2) compared with different concentrations of another.
Figure 8Catalytic degradation of dyes with H2O2 on Fe3O4 microrods as catalysts: (a) time-dependent absorbance changes at 553 nm for rhodamine B, (b) time-dependent UV–visible spectra of an aqueous solution of rhodamine B; (c, d) time-dependent absorbance changes at 663 nm for MB and 463 nm for MO, (e) dye removal efficiency in the absence or presence of H2O2; and (f) repeating utilization rate of catalyst after the degradation procedure is repeated five times.