| Literature DB >> 31460168 |
Naveen Kumar Reddy Bogireddy1, Victor Barba2, Vivechana Agarwal1.
Abstract
Fluorescent class="Chemical">nitrogen-dopedEntities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31460168 PMCID: PMC6648105 DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.9b00858
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ACS Omega ISSN: 2470-1343
Figure 1(a) TEM image of as-prepared NGODs and (b) size distribution analysis from (a). (c) Fluorescence emission spectra of NGODs after excitation of 290–400 nm, (d) analysis of excitation wavelength vs intensity from PL spectra, and (e) UV–visible spectra and PLE spectra of NGODs at 441 nm. The inset shows NGODs illuminated under daylight and UV light 365 nm.
Figure 2(a) XRD patterns of as-prepared NGODs (the inset shows enlarged view of the NGOD peak); deconvoluted XPS spectra of (b) C 1s, (c) O 1s, and (d) N 1s peaks of NGODs.
Figure 3PL quenching pattern of NGODs in deionized water with the presence of different concentrations of H2O2 (a) PL vs wavelength for λex = 344 nm, (b) PL peak intensity vs H2O2 concentration (the inset shows linear fit at low concentrations; R2 = 0.974), and (c) possible quenching mechanism due to H2O2 adsorption on NGODs, wherein the alcohol groups are oxidized to aldehyde groups.
Figure 4Selectivity of Hg2+ and Au3+ using NGODs as probes using PL spectroscopy (a) PL intensity vs wavelength at λex = 344 nm for different metal ions at 250 μM concentration (except Au3+ at 300 μM) and (b) corresponding normalized graph at λem = 441 nm (F0 = NGOD PL intensity in deionized water and F1 = PL intensity with the metal ions). The selectivity was additionally checked with Ag+, Mn2+, Mg2+, and Zn2+ (ref to Figure S3).
Figure 5(a,c) PL quenching pattern of the signal intensity of NGODs in deionized water after the presence of Hg2+ and Au3+ ions, and their corresponding (b,d) concentration vs intensity analysis graphs (the inset shows linear fit of respective analysis graphs; R2 values corresponding to Hg2+ and Au3+ are 0.954 and 0.995, respectively) and high-resolution TEM images of before (e) and after the addition of (f) agglomeration due to the formation of the Hg2+–NGODs complex.
Figure 6(a) Comparison of PL recovery: PL intensity ratio before and after the addition of 100 μM of l-AA, l-Cys, l-Glu, and l-Tyr (F1 and F2 correspond to PL intensities before and after the addition of the PL recovering agents, respectively) and (b) % regained PL at three different concentrations of AA and cystine.
Figure 8(a) Schematic representation of logic functions of NGODs with two chemical inputs Hg2+ and l-Cys/l-AA and (b) truth table for input A and output A (Al) with its corresponding digital input and output signals representing NOT gate, and (c) truth table for input 1 (from the output of input A) and input 2 (l-Cys/l-AA) strings with its corresponding digital input and output signals representing OR gate, respectively. As conventionally accepted notations, the 0/OFF state represents no luminescence and 1 represents luminescence. (d) Bar diagram representing the change in the emission intensity of NGODs (chemical inputs were represented as A = l-AA; H = Hg2+; F = off state and O = on state, respectively) and (e) schematic representation of a KSL model using NGODs as the molecular fluorescence system.
Scheme 1Schematic Illustration of the Proposed Mechanism: Hg2+ Detection and PL Recovery Using AA and Cystine (Upper Part of the Schematic) and Au3+ Detection Using l-Cys (Bottom Part of the Schematic)
Figure 7Comparison of sustainable PL recovery from Hg2+ detection: PL intensity ratio before and after the addition of different concentrations of various citrus fruits: (a) green lemon, (b) fanta lemon, (c) mandarin orange, (d) tangerine orange, and (e) cotton candy grapes. The citrus fruit juice was filtered using a filter paper and then diluted to 1/100 times with respect to the original concentration.
Figure 9Reversibility of NGOD probe with the alternate addition of (a) Hg2+ and l-Cys, (b) Hg2+ and l-AA, (c) l-Cys and Hg2+, (d) l-AA and Hg2+ (the concentration of Hg2+, l-Cys, and l-AA was maintained at 250 μM), and (e) feedback loops with write–read–erase–read function, (f) sequential logic circuit of the memory unit, and (g) truth table of the memory unit. In Figures (a)–(d), X-axis represents sequence of addition.