Literature DB >> 31460108

Elucidation of Calcite Structure of Calcium Carbonate Formation Based on Hydrated Cement Mixed with Graphene Oxide and Reduced Graphene Oxide.

Sarah Abduljabbar Yaseen1, Ghadah Abdaljabar Yiseen2, Zongjin Li3.   

Abstract

In this study, the carbonation of Portland cement by direct chemical interaction with graphene oxide (GO) and reduced graphene oxide (rGO) at 7 and 28 days was examined. During the carbonation reaction, the calcium-bearing phases (calcium hydroxide, calcium silicate hydrate, and ettringite) formed calcium carbonate polymorphs, along with amorphous silica gel, gypsum, and alumina gel. These reaction products were examined using XRD (X-ray diffraction), XPS (energy-dispersive spectrometry), and FTIR (Fourier transform infrared). XRD patterns showed that the intensities of the calcium hydroxide and calcium carbonate peaks in the hydrated cement mixed with GO and/or rGO are higher than the corresponding peaks in the hydrated cement without any additives. The morphology of the reaction products was also characterized by SEM (scanning electron microscopy) measurements, which showed that a needle-like phase of calcium carbonate develops on the hydrated cement. The obtained microstructure parameters enabled the development of a more precise carbonation model.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31460108      PMCID: PMC6648997          DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.9b00042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ACS Omega        ISSN: 2470-1343


Introduction

Recently, the increased attention on civil infrastructure enhancement has motivated research on the possible modification of cement-based materials to fulfill the growing requirements for sustainability in the construction field.[1,2] Modification is performed by some selective additives and adjusting the cement composition. Several attempts have been done to enhance the hardness, durability, and tensile properties of the cement by utilizing different kinds of reinforcing materials, from carbon fibers, steel fibers, and polymer fibers[3−11] to nanomaterials,[12,13] such as carbon nanotubes, graphene derivatives, and nanosilica.[14−17] In addition, multiple studies have been committed to investigate the carbonation effects on the reinforced cement durability,[2,18−26] and environmental factors such as temperature, relative humidity, and partial pressure of carbon dioxide have been found to have enormous effects on the carbonation of hydrated cement.[19,20,24−26] Indeed, the carbonation of hydrated cement implies an intricate effect on the microstructure;[27−30] mild CO2 exposure enhances the compressive strength, while extended exposure might negatively influence the mechanical properties. More importantly, Pavlik[21,22] demonstrated that the reaction of the hydrated cement with atmospheric CO2 is generally a slow process and is highly dependent on some environmental factors such as the concentration of atmospheric CO2, temperature, and permeability of the material. Moreover, a few studies have been conducted on the combination of graphene oxide (GO) with cement-based materials,[31−34] but they were essentially focused on improving microstructural and mechanical properties, without realizing the possibility of the existence of a direct chemical interaction between GO and hydrated cement. Li et al.[35] showed that the addition of 0.04 wt % GO enhanced the tensile strength by 67% in comparison with the plain cement paste. Lv et al.[37] indicated that the addition of GO at ratios of 0.03, 0.05, and 0.07% increases the compressive strength values of the GO/cement composites from 150 to 177 MPa. With the 0.05% GO ratio, the compressive and flexural strengths were 176.64 and 31.6 MPa, respectively. Lu et al.[36] demonstrated that the addition of 0.05% GO to the cement paste increased the compressive and flexural strengths to 11.1 and 16.2%, respectively. Until now, there have been no reports on the direct interaction mechanism of GO with hydrated cement-based materials, although we previously reported that GO and/or reduced GO (rGO) in their direct chemical interaction with either Ca(OH)2 or CaO could be used to synthesize pure polymorph CaCO3 crystals with consistent morphology and size.[38,41−45] This is related to the oxygen functional groups that decomposed on the surfaces of GO or rGO in specific alkaline media releasing CO, CO2, and water.[38,41−46] The objective of the current research was to elucidate the mechanism of the chemical interaction of GO or rGO with hydrated cement-based materials, which is related to the oxygen functional groups that decomposed on the surfaces of GO or rGO in specific alkaline media to react with calcium-bearing phases in cement paste (CP), such as calcium hydroxide (CH), calcium silicate hydrate (C-S-H), and ettringite (AFt), which contributed substantially to CaCO3 polymorph formation, and showed that the formed CaCO3 amount far exceeded that which could be obtained from complete CH dissolution. On the other hand, the chemical interaction of the cement paste (CP) with GO or rGO could be utilized to achieve specific economic and environmental benefits. This can be viewed as a promising opportunity to take advantage of this chemical reaction.

Results and Discussion

Mechanism of GO and rGO Reaction with Hydrated Cement

Portland cement is a mixture of heterogeneous compounds in an anhydrous state. This mixture originally consists of alite (C3S, Ca3SiO5), belite (C2S, Ca2SiO4), tricalcium aluminate (C3A, Ca3Al2O6), and tetracalcium aluminoferrite (C4AF, Ca4(Al,Fe)2O10) as well as limited quantities of other impurities, such as magnesium sulfate (MgSO4), sodium sulfate (Na2SO4), potassium sulfate (K2SO4), and gypsum (CaSO4·2H2O).[1,2,47−49] During normal hydration, Portland cement will undergo a complex hydration reaction to form CH (Ca(OH)2), C-S-H gel (3CaO·2SiO2·4H2O), and ettringite (AFt, CaAl2(SO4)3(OH)12·26H2O and AFm, Ca4Al2(OH)2·SO4·6H2O).[1,44,45] In this regard, the direct chemical interactions of GO or rGO (with pH 3.01) with hydrated cement have a neutralizing effect on the highly alkaline medium of CP with a pH greater than 12.5 in the pore solution, inducing the acidic nature of the oxygen functional groups on the graphene layer surfaces in GO or rGO, such as carboxyl, hydroxyl, and epoxy.[18,21−23,38−46]

CH-Phase Carbonation

In a lower alkaline environment, CH (portlandite, Ca(OH)2) is the first component to start dissolution,[24−26] inducing the process of the oxygen functional group decomposition at the surfaces of GO or rGO to release CO2, CO, and H2O, which appears to be responsible for calcium carbonate (CaCO3) polymorph formation[18,24,38−46,52−54] according to eq : We believe that the reaction of GO or rGO with hydrated cement is governed by the total amount of the oxygen functional groups located on the surfaces of GO and/or rGO. The determination of oxygen groups on the surfaces of various carbon materials was analyzed by both the Boehm titration and the thermal-programmed desorption (TPD) methods.[41−45,65] TPD gives quantitative information about the total number of surface oxygen groups, which break down at various temperatures to release CO, CO2, and H2O, even though the Boehm titration method provides both qualitative and quantitative information solely regarding acidic and basic groups (which include phenols, lactone groups, and carboxylic acids). The acidic nature of the oxygen functional groups could be equalized by bases of various strengths such as NaHCO3, Na2CO3, and NaOH.

C-S-H-Phase Carbonation

The results strongly indicate that the direct reaction of C-S-H with GO or rGO results in the formation of amorphous silica gel and various CaCO3 polymorphs according to eq :

C-S-H Gel

As stated in our previous work,[38] the direct reaction of GO or rGO with Ca(OH)2 or CaO results in CaCO3 formation. Thus, the rate and degree of the carbonation of the C-S-H gel depend greatly on the amounts of CO2 and CO released during decomposition, which are associated to the total amount of the oxygen functional groups located on the surfaces of GO or rGO.[38−46] It is well established that carboxyl and lactone groups are responsible for CO2 production, while aldehyde, carbonyl, and phenols are responsible for the production of CO.[40−45] Taking into account weathering carbonation upon extended exposure to atmospheric CO2 in the process, C-S-H is believed to be more decalcified and to lose its binding ability accordingly.[24−26,53,54] Carbonation of the C-S-H gel generally results in calcite, aragonite, and vaterite formation.[26] Aragonite and vaterite formation are apparently related to the existence of highly decalcified C-S-H and consequently to high CO2 (GO or rGO decomposition product) concentrations.[24−26,38−46,52−54] Moreover, we expect that the direct chemical interactions of GO or rGO with hydrated cement-based materials do not necessarily result in full carbonation on the surface of the cement paste but rather that a completely carbonated zone can exist in the core of the paste.

Ettringite-Phase Carbonation

Our results also emphasize the effective chemical interactions of GO or rGO with other calcium-bearing phases. Apart from the CH and C-S-H phases, ettringite and aluminates are other cement phases that decompose upon reaction with GO or rGO, resulting in gypsum (CaSO4·2H2O) and alumina gel (Al2O3·mH2O) formation according to eq : The carbonation of ettringite may lead to vaterite crystal formation.[55−57] Carbonation of all calcium-bearing phases, such as CH, C-S-H, and ettringite, contributes substantially to CaCO3 polymorph formation, and it is frequently mentioned that the formed CaCO3 amount far exceeded that which could be obtained from the entire CH dissolution.[24,52−58] Moreover, during carbonation, both GO and rGO eventually decompose to form CO2, CO, and H2O, which completely react with hydrated cement (calcium-bearing phases, CH, C-S-H, and ettringite) to form CaCO3. The Boehm titration method reported that the acidity of the oxygen functional groups on the carbon materials can be equalized by bases of various strengths. The oxygen functional groups decompose at various temperatures to release CO, CO2, and water. During decomposition, the released CO and CO2 associated to the total amount of the oxygen functional groups located on the surfaces of GO or rGO. It is well established that carboxyl and lactone groups are responsible for CO2 production, while aldehyde, carbonyl, and phenols are responsible for the production of CO.[41−45,65] Calcium carbonate (CaCO3) formation was detected using Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra, X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns, etc., as will be discussed later. Therefore, this mechanism emphasizes the chemical interaction between hydrated cement and GO or rGO, resulting in the formation of CaCO3 (calcite polymorph), regardless of the variation between GO and rGO, specifically in terms of their physical properties, and the surface morphologies of GO and rGO.[38] Overall, the carbonation of hydrated cement (formation of CaCO3 with silica gel) can be useful for cement-based materials, as it has previously been reported to enhance the compressive and flexural strengths of cement and reduce the atmospheric carbonation of hydrated cementitious matrices.[24,31−34] Conversely, the prolonged carbonation of hydrated cement, such as CH and the C-S-H phase, may lead to corrosion of reinforcing steel bars due to a pH decrease to a certain level (less than 9.7), which may cause serious structural damage.

XRD Characterization

XRD characterization was implemented to identify the crystalline phases of the solid products. A representative set of diffraction data for the four hydrated cements is shown in Figure .
Figure 1

XRD patterns of hydrated cement and hydrated cement mixed with 0.07% of GO and 0.07% of rGO at 7 and 28 days.

XRD patterns of hydrated cement and hydrated cement mixed with 0.07% of GO and 0.07% of rGO at 7 and 28 days. A comparison of the peak intensities between hydrated cement and GO and/or rGO provides some insight into their relative compositions. Evidently, the acidic nature of the oxygen functional groups on the graphene-derivative layers, such as epoxy, hydroxyl, and carboxyl,[18,21−23,38−46] on the surfaces of GO or rGO (with pH 3.01) has a neutralizing effect on the highly alkaline medium of the hydrated cement with a pH greater than 12.5 in the pore solution. Therefore, the intensities of the CH and CaCO3 peaks in hydrated cement mixed with GO and/or rGO are higher than the corresponding peaks in the hydrated cement without any additives. The XRD patterns also show the CaCO3 peak intensity, which increases with GO and/or rGO addition due to the increase in CH, which is available for carbonation as a result of the presence of the oxygen functional groups that decompose on the surfaces of GO or rGO. This process releases CO2, CO, and H2O,[38−46] which can be precipitated in one or a mix of various polymorphs of CaCO3 (calcite, aragonite, and vaterite). Calcite appears to be the primary crystalline CaCO3 polymorph, with diffraction peaks at 2θ = 23°, 29.3°, 36°, 43°, 48.4°, and 64.3°, which are attributed to calcite. Characteristic peaks of vaterite and aragonite at 2θ = 25° and 45°, respectively, are evident, but they are relatively low compared with that of calcite. However, the XRD patterns show sharp calcite reflections, confirming the effective formation of calcite.[20,24−26,48,51,59] Further, a comparison of the XRD patterns for the CaCO3 particles acquired using GO and/or rGO reveals that the XRD peaks for the hydrated cement mixed with GO and/or rGO are sharper than those of the hydrated cement without any additives. Typical energy-dispersive spectrometry (XPS) spectra of the chemical interaction of GO or rGO with hydrated cement at 7 and 28 days are shown in Figure . The original and fitting curves of the Ca(OH)2 and CaCO3 phases match remarkably well.
Figure 2

XPS spectra of Ca 2p for hydrated cement: (a, b) with 0.07% of GO and (c, d) with 0.07% of rGO at 7 and 28 days.

XPS spectra of Ca 2p for hydrated cement: (a, b) with 0.07% of GO and (c, d) with 0.07% of rGO at 7 and 28 days. Indeed, a GO or rGO reaction with calcium-bearing phases (CH and C-S-H) in hydrated cement can cause chemical–mechanical changes in the microstructure.[24] Due to the acidic nature of the oxygen functional groups on the surfaces of GO or rGO, they will decompose in the highly alkaline medium releasing CO, CO2, and H2O, leading to faster carbonation, more Ca(OH)2 consumption, and consequently more CaCO3 generation.[25,29,38,60]

FTIR Spectrum Analysis

The FTIR spectra of hydrated cement and hydrated cement mixed with GO and/or rGO at 7 and 28 days are shown in Figures and 4. The positions of all of the infrared active modes of calcite found in hydrated cement mixed with GO and/or rGO precisely match those of the calcite reference bands.[38,50,64] It can be seen from the infrared spectra (Figures and 4) of hydrated cement mixed with GO and/or rGO that asymmetric stretching (v3) gives rise to a very sharp and broad infrared absorption at 1425 cm–1. Out-of-plane and in-plane bending (v2 and v4) correspond to the fundamental bands of calcite at 872 and 713 cm–1, respectively.[19,38] The clear presence of these absorption bands confirms the formation of the calcite phase of CaCO3 particles when either GO or rGO is mixed with hydrated cement.[38] It should be noted that no residual peaks of GO or rGO are observable, confirming our predictions about the eventual decomposition to form CO2, CO, and H2O.[38−46] In addition, it has been reported that thermal-programmed desorption (TPD) was used to characterize the oxygenated functional groups on the surfaces of the carbon materials, which break down at various temperatures releasing CO, CO2, and H2O.[65] This analysis also confirms the XRD and XPS analysis results presented in Figure . In addition, it is crucial to note that more intense/sharper characteristic peaks are observable in the FTIR spectra for the calcite particles acquired using either GO or rGO with hydrated cement than in the spectra for the hydrated cement without any additives. The peaks at 450 cm–1 falls in the range of 400–500 cm–1, which corresponds to the Si–O bending vibration (v2) in SiO4–2, according to refs (19) and (50). Furthermore, both spectra show peaks at 950 cm–1, corresponding to asymmetric Si–O stretching vibrations, which indicates limited polymerization in C-S-H.[19,50,61]
Figure 3

FTIR spectra of hydrated cement and hydrated cement mixed with 0.07% of GO and 0.07% of rGO at 7 days.

Figure 4

FTIR spectra of hydrated cement and hydrated cement mixed with 0.07% of GO and 0.07% of rGO at 28 days.

FTIR spectra of hydrated cement and hydrated cement mixed with 0.07% of GO and 0.07% of rGO at 7 days. FTIR spectra of hydrated cement and hydrated cement mixed with 0.07% of GO and 0.07% of rGO at 28 days. Moreover, the four spectra show weak bands at 1108 cm–1, falling in the range of 1100–1165 cm–1, which corresponds to SO4–2 vibration (v3) in sulfates.[50,62,63] This region has a range of peaks that may overlap due to the polymerization of SiO4–2 and the corresponding vibration (v3).[48,50] The water band peaks of the four spectra, which are located at 1642 cm–1, indicate the H–O–H bending vibration (v2) of the adsorbed water molecule.[19,50] Several additional weak bands between 3000 and 2000 cm–1 are overtone modes. Meanwhile, the peaks at 3390 cm–1, which fall in the range of 3100–3400 cm–1, correspond to the O–H stretching vibrations (v1 and v3) in the water molecules.[19,48] The peaks at 3640 cm–1 (Figures and 4) correspond to CH, which is formed as silicate phases in the hydrated cement. It is clear that the intensities of the characteristic peaks of CH decrease markedly when either GO and/or rGO is mixed with hydrated cement, compared to their intensities in the spectra of the hydrated cement without any additives. This difference is mainly due to the reaction of CH with liberated CO2 from the decomposition of the oxygen functional groups of GO or rGO.[19,38−46,48,50,62,63,65] These findings also confirm the XRD and XPS analysis results discussed previously and prove that GO and/or rGO have high reactivity with hydrated cement, leading to nano-calcium carbonate generation.[38] Nano-calcium carbonate can block the pores in the hardened cement, which may or may not improve the mechanical properties.

SEM

The microstructures of hydrated cement mixed with 0.07% of GO and/or rGO were examined using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The SEM results presented in Figures and 6 depict the microstructures of the hydrated cement mixed with GO and/or rGO at 7 and 28 days. Figure A,B shows the microstructure of the hydrated cement without any additives, proving that the microstructure is an amorphous solid with a large amount of microcracks, porosity, and pore size distribution. When compared with Figure C–F, the results prove that the hydrated cement composites mixed with a 0.07% dosage of GO and /or rGO have a certain amount of needle-like crystal products and form compacted microstructures, which strongly prove that, due to the acidic nature of the oxygen functional groups located on the surfaces of GO or rGO, they will decompose in a highly alkaline medium releasing CO, CO2, and H2O,[38,41−45] which accelerate the dissolution rate and the hydration of cement at the first few minutes of the starting reaction. The acceleration phase of CaCO3 formation starts due to the direct carbonation reaction of cement hydrates with GO and/or rGO at different times (Figure C–F). Moreover, the results indicate that the direct reaction of GO and/or rGO with hydrated cement produces a certain amount of CaCO3 crystals that participate in forming the cross-linking and interweaving microstructure, which leads to enhancing the mechanical behavior of the hydrated cement paste. Figure A–D shows different portions and magnifications of a relatively higher growth of the calcite phase of CaCO3 in the hydrated cement mixed with GO and/or rGO at 7 and 28 days. Simultaneously, a needle-like phase develops on the cement particles. This needle-like phase has been linked to the calcite structure in earlier studies.[38,48,50] The distribution of CaCO3 crystals in hydrated cement composites could be identified by inspecting the CaCO3 crystals in a whole SEM image using energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX). The EDX-inspected areas are marked as white boxes in Figure A–D. The EDX test results indicate that the needle-like crystals of CaCO3 is uniformly distributed within the whole inspected area (Figure ). These results also suggest that the needle-like phase formed continuously during hydration and grew even more after 28 days of hydration. As a matter of fact, the various morphologies of CaCO3 particles resulted from the variations in the concentration and type of the oxygen functional groups on the surfaces of GO and rGO, which serve as active sites and play an essential role in such reactions.[38−45] However, both GO and rGO eventually decompose to form CO2, CO, and H2O in a highly alkaline medium, which completely react with hydrated cement (calcium-bearing phases, CH, C-S-H, and ettringite) to form needle-like crystals of CaCO3. These findings also confirm the XRD, XPS, and FTIR analysis results and prove that GO and/or rGO have high reactivity with hydrated cement.
Figure 5

SEM images of the microstructure of hydrated cement: (A, B) without GO and/or rGO, (C, D) with 0.07% of GO, and (E, F) with 0.07% of rGO at 7 and 28 days.

Figure 6

SEM images of the microstructure of hydrated cement at different locations and magnifications: (A, B) with 0.07% of GO and (C, D) with 0.07% of rGO at 7 and 28 days. (The areas with white markings in the SEM images are selected areas for EDX detection.)

Figure 7

EDX analysis of CaCO3 particles obtained: (A) hydrated cement, (B, C) hydrated cement mixed with 0.07% of GO at 7 and 28 days, and (D, E) hydrated cement mixed with 0.07% of rGO at 7 and 28 days

SEM images of the microstructure of hydrated cement: (A, B) without GO and/or rGO, (C, D) with 0.07% of GO, and (E, F) with 0.07% of rGO at 7 and 28 days. SEM images of the microstructure of hydrated cement at different locations and magnifications: (A, B) with 0.07% of GO and (C, D) with 0.07% of rGO at 7 and 28 days. (The areas with white markings in the SEM images are selected areas for EDX detection.) EDX analysis of CaCO3 particles obtained: (A) hydrated cement, (B, C) hydrated cement mixed with 0.07% of GO at 7 and 28 days, and (D, E) hydrated cement mixed with 0.07% of rGO at 7 and 28 days

Conclusions

The development of GO and rGO cementation actions is a significant area of interest in the construction field. The impressive ability of GO to release CO2, CO, and H2O through the decomposition of the oxygen functional groups in certain alkaline media, which appears to be behind the carbonation of Portland cement, is a phenomenon that could be employed to elucidate the mechanism of this chemical interaction. Toward this end, this study was focused on investigating the critical reaction mechanism using GO, rGO, and Portland cement and on how these materials may influence CH, C-S-H, and ettringite carbonation. The rate and degree of CH and C-S-H gel carbonation depend fully on the quantities of CO2 and CO released during decomposition, which are associated to the total amount of the oxygen functional groups located on the surfaces of GO or rGO. These processes result in an obvious pH reduction to a certain level (less than 9.7). The ettringite and aluminate phases decompose upon reaction with GO or rGO, resulting in gypsum and alumina gel formation. XRD, XPS, and FTIR were used to confirm the CaCO3 polymorph formation. The SEM images also corroborated the needle-like phase attributed to the calcite polymorph. Principally, the current study has evidently established the usefulness of GO and/or rGO with hydrated cement for obtaining CaCO3, which could be beneficial for the cement industry, as it has previously been reported to increase the compressive and flexural strengths of CP and reduce the atmospheric carbonation of hydrated cementitious matrices.

Experimental Section

Preparation of Cement–GO

GO was synthesized from graphite powder (200 mesh, Alfa-Aesar) utilizing the Hummers’ method.[38,40] Ordinary Portland cement (type 52.5, Green Island, Hong Kong) was utilized in this work, and the chemical composition collected by X-ray fluorescence is listed in Table . Table details the mixture ratios of the GO and/or rGO with modified cement paste. The mixture was prepared first by ultrasonication of the aqueous solution of GO for 15 min, which was then slowly mixed with cement (at a ratio of 0.4 water to cement by weight) at the speed of a high rate for 8 min before casting into molds and covering with plastic sheets. The samples were cured in ambient conditions for 24 h, demolded, and placed into a curing room (25 °C/RH 95%) until testing.
Table 1

Chemical Composition of Cement

componentCaOSiO2SO4Al2O3Fe2O3MgOK2OTiO2
content (%)65.4019.475.713.863.001.580.490.26
Table 2

Mixed Proportions of GO- and rGO-Modified Cement Paste

samplecement (g)H2O (g)GO (mL)rGO (g)dosage (wt %)
hydrated cement400140.0  0.00
cement–GO40070.070.0 0.07
cement–rGO40070.0 70.00.07

Preparation of Cement–rGO

rGO was prepared following the same method that was reported previously.[38]Table details the mixture ratios of the GO and/or rGO with modified cement paste. The mixture was prepared first by ultrasonication of the aqueous solution of rGO for 15 min, which was then slowly mixed with cement (w/c = 0.4 by weight) at the speed of a high rate for 8 min before casting into molds and covering with plastic sheets. The samples were cured in ambient conditions for 24 h, demolded, and placed into a curing room (25 °C/RH 95%) until testing. For both GO or rGO with hydrated cement, the samples were aged for 7 and 28 days and subjected to hydration stoppage by immersing in acetone and then drying at 50 °C for 1 h. They were then kept in an air-tight container to prevent any air exposure until observations were performed.

Material Characterization

The produced samples were characterized by XRD patterns, which were collected by a PW1830 (Philips) system at 2 kW, using a Cu anode and a graphite monochromatic system. XPS measurements were performed by a Kratos Axis Ultra DLD Multitechnique using a monochromatic Al Kα X-ray source. The FTIR spectra were acquired using a Vertex 70 Hyperion 1000 (Bruker) spectrometer in the range of 400–4000 cm–1 averaged over 32 scans. The SEM images were carried out in a JEOLJSM-6700F scanning electron microscope equipped with an energy-dispersive X-ray analyzer.
  4 in total

1.  Morphological characteristics of calcium carbonate crystallization in CO2 pre-cured aerated concrete.

Authors:  Jiayu Lu; Shengqian Ruan; Yi Liu; Tao Wang; Qiang Zeng; Dongming Yan
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 4.036

2.  Using Fumed Silica to Develop Thermal Insulation Cement for Medium-Low Temperature Geothermal Wells.

Authors:  Lan Shen; Huijing Tan; You Ye; Wei He
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-21       Impact factor: 3.748

3.  Sustainable Management of Calcite Contaminated with Waste Toner Powder in the Construction Industry.

Authors:  Halyna Kominko; Piotr Radomski; Anna K Nowak; Zbigniew Wzorek
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 3.748

Review 4.  Electrical, Piezoresistive and Electromagnetic Properties of Graphene Reinforced Cement Composites: A Review.

Authors:  Shengchang Mu; Jianguang Yue; Yu Wang; Chuang Feng
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-27       Impact factor: 5.076

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.