| Literature DB >> 31459978 |
Shaktivel Manavalan1, Pitchaimani Veerakumar2,3, Shen-Ming Chen1, Keerthi Murugan1, King-Chuen Lin2,3.
Abstract
In this study, Liquidambar formosana tree leaves have been used as a renewable biomass precursor for preparing porous carbons (PCs). The PCs were produced by pyrolysis of natural waste of leaves after 10% KOH activation under a nitrogen atmosphere and characterized by a variety of state-of-the-art techniques. The PCs possess a large surface area, micro-/mesoporosity, and functional groups on its surface. A glassy carbon electrode modified with high PCs was explored as an efficient binder-free electrocatalyst material for the voltammetric determination of nitro isomers such as 3-nitroaniline (3-NA) and 4-nitroaniline (4-NA). Under optimal experimental conditions, the electrochemical detection of 3-NA and 4-NA was found to have a wide linear range of 0.2-115.6 and 0.5-120 μM and a low detection limit of 0.0551 and 0.0326 μM, respectively, with appreciable selectivity. This route not only enhanced the benefit from biomass wastes but also reduced the cost of producing electrode materials for electrochemical sensors. Additionally, the sensor was successfully applied in the determination of nitro isomers even in the presence of other common electroactive interference and real samples analysis (beverage and pineapple jam solutions). Therefore, the proposed method is simple, rapid, stable, sensitive, specific, reproducible, and cost-effective and can be applicable for real sample detection.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31459978 PMCID: PMC6648727 DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.9b00622
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ACS Omega ISSN: 2470-1343
Figure 1(a) XRD patterns and (b) Raman spectra of the PC samples.
Figure 2(a–d) Nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherms and (a1–d1) the pore size distributions for prepared PCs with variable activation temperatures.
Figure 3SEM micrographs of (a,b) porous PC600, (c,d) PC700, (e,f) PC800, and (g,h) PC900 samples.
Figure 4(a–c) FE-TEM images of PC900 at different magnifications and the (d) SAED pattern.
Figure 5(a) XPS survey spectra of PC600, PC700, PC800, and PC900, and (b–e) the corresponding spectra of O 1s.
Scheme 1Proposed Redox Reactions on the Surface of PC
Figure 6CV profiles for the bare GCE and different modified electrodes (PC600, PC700, PC800, and PC900) in the presence of 100 μM of (a) 3-NA, (b) 4-NA, and (c) 3-NA and 4-NA with the N2-saturated 0.05 M PBS (pH 7.0) electrolyte. Inset of the panels (a1–c1) indicate the corresponding histogram of the reduction current with different modified electrodes, and (d) CVs obtained for the PC900-modified GCE at varied pHs from 3.0 to 11.0 in the presence of 100 μM of the 3-NA and 4-NA mixture. The insets of the panels (d1 and d2) correspond to the 3-NA and 4-NA peak current (Ipc) and peak potential (Epc) at the PC900-modified GCE, respectively. All measurements were recorded at a scan rate of 50 mV s–1 under N2-saturated 0.05 M PBS solution.
Scheme 2Proposed Electrochemical Mechanism of (a) 3-NA and (b) 4-NA at the PC-Modified Electrode
Figure 7CV profiles for the PC900-modified GCE in the presence of (a) 50–250 μM [3-NA], (b) 50–150 μM of [4-NA], (c) fixed [3-NA] and [4-NA] in the range of 100–200 μM at a scan rate of 50 mV s–1, and (d) 100 μM of [3-NA] and [4-NA] at varied scan rates (20–300 mV s–1); the insets (a1–c1) are the linear plots of the reduction peak current vs concentration of 3-NA, 4-NA, and their mixture, respectively; the inset (d1) indicates a linear plot of the reduction peak current vs square root of the scan rate for a mixture of 3-NA and 4-NA. All measurements were recorded under the N2-saturated 0.05 M PBS (pH 7.0) electrolyte.
Figure 8DPV response of the PC900-modified GCE in N2-saturated 0.05 M PBS (pH 7.0) under varied analyte concentrations of (a) [3-NA] 0.2–115.6 μM and (b) [4-NA] 0.5–120 μM. The inset panels (a1 and b1) show the corresponding calibration plots of the reduction peak current vs concentration for 3-NA and 4-NA, respectively.
Figure 9DPV profiles of the PC900-modified GCE in N2-saturated 0.05 M PBS (pH 7.0) under varied concentrations of (a) 3-NA and 50 μM 4-NA, (b) varied concentrations of 4-NA and 50 μM 3-NA, and (c) equal concentrations of 3-NA and 4-NA. The inset panels (a1–c1) show the corresponding calibration plots of the reduction peak current vs concentrations.
Comparisons of Analytical Parameters for Detection of 3-NA among Various Modified Electrodes
| electrode | method | electrolyte/pH | linear range (μM) | LOD (μM) | refs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| poly-DHCBAQS | DPV | B-R | 0.36–4.34 | 0.152 | ( |
| SWCNTs | DPV | PBS/7.0 | 0.01–7 | 0.008 | ( |
| PC900/GCE | DPV | PBS/7.0 | 0.2–115.6 | 0.0551 | this work |
7-[(2,4-Dihydroxy-5-carboxybenzene)azo]-8-hydroxyquinoline-5-sulfonic acid.
Graphene.
Nafion.
Single-walled CNTs.
Ionic liquid gel.
GCEs.
Differential pulse voltammetry.
Britton–Robinson buffer solution.
Comparisons of Analytical Parameters for Detection of 4-NA among Various Modified Electrodes
| modified electrodes | method | electrolyte/pH | linear range (μM) | LOD (μM) | refs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| poly-DHCBAQS | DPV | B-R | 0.36–4.34 | 0.137 | ( |
| Ag electrode | DPV | B-R/2.0 | 0.008–1000 | 0.00474 | ( |
| GCE | DPV | B-R/2.0 | 2–100 | 0.2 | ( |
| BMIMPF6-SWNT | LSV | PBS/4.0 | 0.01–7 | 0.008 | ( |
| SWNT/GCE | DPV | PBS/4.0 | 0.5–10 | 0.2 | ( |
| DTD | DPV | PBS/4.0 | 1.0–100 | 0.23 | ( |
| AgNPs-POSS | DPV | PBS/7.2 | 0.7–551.6 | 0.36 | ( |
| Ag/CPE | DPV | B-R/2.0 | 0.08–100 | 0.0418 | ( |
| GC/TPDT | SWV | PBS/7.2 | 0.50 | ( | |
| ZnO NRs | AMP | PBS/7.0 | 1–80 | 0.5 | ( |
| Ag@Pd NRDs/L@ERGO | DPV | 0.5 M KCl | 0.001–0.012 | 0.000018 | ( |
| Pt–Pd NPs/CNTs–rGO | DPV | 0.5 M KCl | 0.007–832.6 | 0.004 | ( |
| Ag/CPE | CV | B-R/2.0 | ( | ||
| PC900/GCE | DPV | PBS/7.0 | 0.5–120 | 0.0326 | this work |
7-[(2,4-Dihydroxy-5-carboxybenzene)azo]-8-hydroxyquinoline-5-sulfonic acid.
Graphene.
Nafion.
GCE.
1-Butyl-3-methylimidazolium hexafluorophosphate with single-walled CNT gel.
6,7,9,10,17,18,19,20,21,22-Decahydrodibenzo[h,r][1,4,7,11,15]trioxadiazacyclonanodecine-16,23-dione.
Carbon paste electrode.
Polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane.
Reduced graphene oxide.
N-[3-(Trimethoxysilyl)propyl]diethylenetriamine.
Silica.
Zinc oxide nanorods.
Fluorine-doped tin oxide.
Electrochemically reduced graphene oxide.
Differential pulse voltammetry.
Linear sweep voltammetry.
Square wave voltammetry.
Amperometry.
Britton–Robinson buffer solution.
Figure 10DPV profiles for PC900-modified GCE (a) 3-NA- and 4-NA-spiked beverage drink sample, (b) pineapple jam sample, and (c) 0.5 mM of potential interference species and 50 μM and 75 μM of 3-NA and 4-NA. All measurements were recorded under the N2-saturated 0.05 M PBS (pH 7.0) electrolyte.
Practical Analysis of PC900-Modified GCE for 3-NA + 4-NA-Spiked Samples
| sample | added (μM) | found (μM) | recovery (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| beverage (orange) | 10 | 9.98 | 99.0 |
| 20 | 20.03 | 101.5 | |
| 30 | 30.02 | 101.0 | |
| pineapple jam | 10 | 10.01 | 100.5 |
| 20 | 20.05 | 102.5 | |
| 30 | 30.01 | 100.5 |
Scheme 3Schematic Diagram for the Preparation and Application of PCs