| Literature DB >> 31459858 |
Xiacong Zhang1, Ting Liu1, Jiatao Yan1, Kun Liu1, Wen Li1, Afang Zhang1.
Abstract
By combining topological structures of hyperbranched polymers with dendronized polymers, a series of hyperbranched poly(acylhydrazone)s pendanted with 3-fold branched dendritic oligoethylene glycol (OEG) units were efficiently prepared through A2 + B3 polycondensation. The constituents of these dendritic polymers can be mediated through dynamic covalent acylhydrazones. Owing to the dense OEG pendants, these dendronized hyperbranched polymers are biocompatible and thermoresponsive, and their cloud points (T cps) can be modulated by the branched architecture, solution pH, and addition of a third component. Cell viability in the presence of these hyperbranched poly(acylhydrazone)s can be maintained above 80%. Based on the unique dendritic architecture with rich acylhydrazine groups, dynamic hydrogels cross-linked via acylhydrazone linkages with good mechanical property were prepared, which inherit the characteristic thermoresponsive behavior of the polymer precursors and also show remarkable self-healing properties. This novel kind of topological polymers and their corresponding hydrogels with dynamic and multiple smart properties may have promising applications as biomaterials.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31459858 PMCID: PMC6649171 DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.9b00291
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ACS Omega ISSN: 2470-1343
Figure 1Schematic synthesis of thermoresponsive dendronized hyperbranched polymers and their corresponding hydrogels from dynamic covalent cross-linking.
Conditions for and Results from the Copolymerization
| GPC-LS | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| samples | A2/B3 | [A2] (mmol L–1) | yield (%) | DB | |||
| 0.8 | 6.5 | 84 | 0.60 | 4.0 | 1.38 | 47.2 | |
| 1.0 | 6.5 | 68 | 0.51 | 6.5 | 1.38 | 45.5 | |
| 1.5 | 6.5 | 75 | 0.30 | 11.9 | 1.70 | 39.4 | |
DBs of hyperbranched polymers were calculated based on proton integrations of the corresponding units according to the equation: DB = (D + T)/(D + T + L), where D, T, and L represent the fractions of the dendritic, terminal, and linear units, which correspond to the proton signals of 11.48, 9.01, and 5.05 ppm, respectively.
Tcps of the polymers in pH 7.0 buffer solutions were determined as the temperature at 50% of the initial transmittance at λ = 700 nm.
Figure 2(a) Plots of transmittance vs temperature for P1, P2, and P3 in pH 7.0 buffer solutions. (b) Influence of pH on Tcps of P1, P2, and P3 in aqueous solutions. (c) Plots of transmittance vs temperature at pH 2.0 for P1 and P1 with glutaraldehyde and P1 with methoxyl-terminated first-generation dendritic OEG cored with dialdehyde A2′ in pH 2.0 buffer solutions. Polymer concentration = 0.25 wt %, heating rate = 0.5 °C min–1.
Conditions of Gelation from P1 and PEGDAa,b
| entry | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| pH | 2.0 | 2.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| gelator concentration (wt %) | 15 | 10 | 15 | 20 |
| 4.5 | 3.0 | 12.0 | ||
| 0.55 | 0.48 | 1.32 |
P1/PEGDA (wt/wt) = 2:1, mole ratio of hydrazine/aldehyde = 2.1:1.
ω = 1 rad s–1, γ = 0.1%, 25 °C.
Figure 3(a) Photographs of sol–gel transitions (up) for P1 after the addition of PEGDA (15 wt % P1, in pH 2.0 buffer) and hydrogel GEL1 stored for 15 min after the addition of PEGDA (down). (b) Fourier transformed infrared (FTIR) spectra of P1, PEGDA, and GEL1. (c) scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image of lyophilized GEL1. (d) Rheological properties of GEL1, GEL2, and GEL3.
Figure 4Self-healing of GEL1 at room temperature. One of them is colored with disperse red 1 (DR1) for clarity.
Figure 5Plots of transmittance vs temperature for GEL1, GEL2, GEL3, and GEL4. Inset: photographs of GEL1 below and above Tcp, respectively.