Pyrazines are renowned heterocyclic compounds that have played an important role in drug design and are part of many polycyclic compounds of biological and industrial significance. In this article, a novel chitosan-immobilized ionic liquid, [DSIM][AlCl3] x -@CS, has been synthesized easily at ambient temperature and used for catalyzing the synthesis of a series of biologically relevant pyrazine derivatives. The catalyst is well characterized by various techniques such as Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, Raman spectroscopy, solid-state 13C MAS nuclear magnetic resonance, scanning electron microscopy/energy-dispersive X-ray, elemental mapping, transmission electron microscopy, powder X-ray diffraction, and thermal gravimetric analyses. The advantageous features of the present energy-sustainable methodology include high yield of product (>99%), shorter reaction time periods, and recyclability of the catalyst.
Pyrazines are renowned heterocycliccompounds that have played an important role in drug design and are part of many polycycliccompounds of biological and industrial significance. In this article, a novel chitosan-immobilized ionic liquid, [DSIM][AlCl3] x -@CS, has been synthesized easily at ambient temperature and used for catalyzing the synthesis of a series of biologically relevant pyrazine derivatives. The catalyst is well characterized by various techniques such as Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, Raman spectroscopy, solid-state 13C MAS nuclear magnetic resonance, scanning electron microscopy/energy-dispersive X-ray, elemental mapping, transmission electron microscopy, powder X-ray diffraction, and thermal gravimetric analyses. The advantageous features of the present energy-sustainable methodology include high yield of product (>99%), shorter reaction time periods, and recyclability of the catalyst.
Over
the last few decades, the popularity of ionic liquids (ILs)
has significantly increased because of their unique properties such
as non-inflammability, non-volatility, low vapor pressure, high chemical
and thermal stability, environmentalcompatibility, high selectivity,
potential recoverability, greater selectivity, and so forth.[1] Because of these properties, ILs have been extensively
employed in organic synthesis as green solvents and reagents,[2] catalysis,[3] electrochemistry,[4] and liquid–liquid extraction.[5] Many ILs, having a Brønsted acidiccharacter,
show useful characteristics of solid acids and mineral liquid acids.
Because of these properties, these ILs have been designed to replace
conventional mineral liquid acids, such as sulfuric acid and hydrochloric
acid, in a variety of organic transformations.[6] Solvent-free synthesis using ILs has attracted considerable attention
from a green chemistry view point.[7] Among
the ILs, sulfonic acid-functionalized imidazolium salts have been
used as homogeneous catalysts in various organic transformations such
as protection of hydroxyl groups,[8] nitration
of phenols,[9] synthesis of N-sulfonyl imines,[10] bis(indolyl)methanes,[11] benzimidazoles,[12] and so forth.One of the major drawbacks of homogeneous catalysis
using ILs is
the use of excess of ILs as a solvent or a catalyst producing a large
amount of waste materials. Moreover, disposal of these waste materials
is extremely difficult which makes the overall process unacceptable
from an environmental view point. To avoid the limitations of homogeneous
catalysis involving ILs, various ILs have been immobilized on solid
supports to combine the advantages of ILs and heterogeneous support
materials.[13] For this, different support
materials such as chitosan,[14] silica,[15] graphene oxide,[16] zeolite,[17] and so forth have been used
so far to synthesize supported ILs as heterogeneous catalysts. Among
the solid support materials, chitosan, a natural biopolymer, is an
excellent support material because of its exclusive properties such
as unique three-dimensional structure, biodegradable nature, chemical
reactivity due to the presence of hydroxyl and amino groups, excellent
chelating and mechanical properties, and so forth.[18] Particularly, IL-based catalysts have been widely used
in various organic reactions such as Baeyer–Villiger reactions,[19] hydroformylation,[20] hydrogenation,[21] alkylations,[22] nitration,[20a] and
acetal formation.[23] Moreover, IL-based
materials have also found application in electrochemical detection
of atrazine in wastewater,[24a] determination of rutin,[24b] determination of ceftizoxime,[24c] electrochemical
sensing of ractopamine,[24d] sensing of raloxifene,[24e] and electrocatalytic oxidation of methanol.[24f]Pyrazineconstitutes an important class
of nitrogencontaining
heterocycliccompounds that have been very much exploited for their
interesting pharmaceutical and biological activities such as anti-thrombotic,[25] COX-2 inhibiting, and analgesic effects;[26] relaxing cardiovascular and uterine smooth muscles;[27] antifungal,[28a] antibacterial,[28a] antitubercular,[28a] anticancer,[28b] antimalarial,[29] and
antimicrobial[30] properties, and so forth.In view of our ongoing research on supported heterogeneous catalysts,[31] combining the advantages of IL and solid support
materials, we, herein, report an efficient method for the synthesis
of a chitosan-supported IL, [DSIM][AlCl3]–@CS, at ambient temperature. The supported
IL has been studied for its catalytic activity by synthesizing a library
of biologically important pyrazines.
Results
and Discussion
Synthesis and Characterization
of the Catalyst
The catalyst, [DSIM][AlCl3]–@CS, was synthesized as
outlined in Scheme and well-characterized by
various techniques such as Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy,
Raman spectroscopy, solid-state 13C MAS NMR, scanning electron
microscopy/energy-dispersive X-ray (SEM/EDX), elemental mapping, transmission
electron microscopy (TEM), powder X-ray diffraction (XRD), and thermal
gravimetric analysis (TGA).
Scheme 1
Synthesis of the Catalyst [DSIM][AlCl3]–@CS
FTIR spectra of pure chitosan,
disulfonyl imidazolium chloride
([DSIM]Cl–), [DSIM]AlCl4–, [DSIM][AlCl3]–@CS, and recycled catalyst are shown in Figure . The spectrum of chitosan (Figure a) showed a characteristic
broad peak at 3421 cm–1 which corresponded to −OH
and −NH stretching vibrations of the chitosan framework, whereas
the −CH stretching mode of methylene groups of chitosan appeared
at 2923 cm–1. The other bands centered at 1589,
1381, and 1078 cm–1 corresponded to N–H bending,
C–N stretching, and C–OH stretching vibrations, respectively.[31c] In Figure b, a broad band at 3392 cm–1 indicated
the presence of two OH groups of a SO3H moiety in the IL
system.[32] The bands at 1626 and 1588 cm–1 were assigned to C=C and C=N stretching
vibrations,[32] respectively, whereas the
stretching band of the SO3H group appeared at 1192 cm–1.[33] The other peaks at
1179, 1050, and 885 were assigned to S–O symmetric stretching,
S–O antisymmetric stretching, and N–S stretching vibrations,
respectively,[32] whereas the band centered
at 576 cm–1 attributed to the bending vibration
of the SO3H group. When [DSIM]Cl– was
treated with AlCl3, no significant change in the FTIR spectrum
of [DSIM]AlCl4– was observed in the range
of 400–4000 cm–1 (Figure c). However, the presence of [(AlCl3)–] was confirmed
by the Raman spectrum of the catalyst (Figure b). In the spectrum of [DSIM][AlCl3]–@CS (Figure d), the characteristic peaks
for chitosan appeared at their appropriate values with some additional
bands at 1626, 1194, 1054, and 579 cm–1 which were
due to presence of IL {[DSIM]AlCl4–}.
The N–H bending mode of chitosan merged with C=N stretching
vibration of the IL and appeared at 1583 cm–1. The
band centered at 534 cm–1 was due to the Al–N
and Al–O bond (Figure d).[34]
Figure 1
FTIR spectra of (a) chitosan,
(b) [DSIM]Cl–,
(c) [DSIM]AlCl4–, (d) [DSIM][AlCl3]–@CS, and
(e) recycled catalyst after the sixth run.
Figure 2
Raman analysis of the (a) chitosan and (b) catalyst [DSIM][AlCl3]–@CS.
FTIR spectra of (a) chitosan,
(b) [DSIM]Cl–,
(c) [DSIM]AlCl4–, (d) [DSIM][AlCl3]–@CS, and
(e) recycled catalyst after the sixth run.Raman analysis of the (a) chitosan and (b) catalyst [DSIM][AlCl3]–@CS.Raman spectra of pure chitosan
and catalyst [DSIM][AlCl3]–@CS were obtained
in the range of 150–1650 cm–1 and are shown
in Figure . The presence
of bands at 942.04, 1101.47, and 1142.29 cm–1 was
attributed to the out-of-plane vibration of the amine group,[35] C–O–C stretching vibration,[19] and C–N stretching vibrations[36] of chitosan, respectively (Figure a). The strong band at 349.72
cm–1 was assigned to the (AlCl3)– ion present in the catalyst[37] (Figure b).In the solid-state 13C MAS NMR spectrum
of the catalyst,
two signals at 56.45 and 61.07 ppm were assigned to C2 and
C6 carbons of chitosan, whereas other signals present at
74.98, 83.72, and 101.68 ppm were attributed to C3, C4, and C1 carbons, respectively (Figure ). The two signals at 23.60
ppm and 175.14 were assigned to the N-glucosamine
unit of chitosan.[38] The carbon atoms of
the imidazoliumcation (Ca and Cb) appeared
at 120.79 and 135.64 ppm, respectively.[39]
Figure 3
13C MAS NMR spectra of the catalyst [DSIM][AlCl3]–@CS.
13C MAS NMR spectra of the catalyst [DSIM][AlCl3]–@CS.The surface morphology of chitosan showed clean
surfaces (Figure a,b),
but a morphologicalchange was obtained when IL ([DSIM][AlCl4–) was supported on chitosan (Figure c,d). EDX analysis (Figure ) confirmed the presence of C, N, S, O, Cl,
and Al elements, whereas elemental mapping of the catalyst indicated
the uniform distribution of these elements (Figure a–f) which confirmed the formation
of a desired catalytic system, that is, [DSIM][AlCl3]–@CS.
Figure 4
SEM images of (a) chitosan
at 1 mm, (b) chitosan at 200 μm,
(c) catalyst [DSIM][AlCl3]–@CS at 500 μm, (d) catalyst [DSIM][AlCl3]–@CS at 50
μm, (e) recycled catalyst at 500 μm, and (f) recycled
catalyst at 50 μm.
Figure 5
EDX analysis of the catalyst [DSIM][AlCl3]–@CS.
Figure 6
Elemental mapping of the elements (a) carbon, (b) oxygen, (c) nitrogen,
(d) sulfur, (e) chlorine, and (f) aluminum.
SEM images of (a) chitosan
at 1 mm, (b) chitosan at 200 μm,
(c) catalyst [DSIM][AlCl3]–@CS at 500 μm, (d) catalyst [DSIM][AlCl3]–@CS at 50
μm, (e) recycled catalyst at 500 μm, and (f) recycled
catalyst at 50 μm.EDX analysis of the catalyst [DSIM][AlCl3]–@CS.Elemental mapping of the elements (a) carbon, (b) oxygen, (c) nitrogen,
(d) sulfur, (e) chlorine, and (f) aluminum.TEM images of chitosan and the catalyst [DSIM][AlCl3]–@CS are shown in Figure . The presence of
IL [DSIM]AlCl4– on the surface of chitosan,
clearly shown in Figure b, further ascertains the proper immobilization of the IL on chitosan
to form [DSIM][AlCl3]–@CS.
Figure 7
TEM images of (a) chitosan and (b) catalyst [DSIM][AlCl3]–@CS.
TEM images of (a) chitosan and (b) catalyst [DSIM][AlCl3]–@CS.TGA of the catalyst showed two-stage
decomposition. First thermal
decomposition at 244.94 °C (weight loss = 41.023%) was due to
depolymerization and decomposition of the glucosamine unit of chitosan
and absorbed moisture which was trapped during synthesis of the catalyst.[40] Second thermal decomposition at 457.44 °C
(weight loss = 55.642%) was attributed to some other changes in the
catalytic system such as oxidative decomposition of the chitosan moiety[41] and removal of the organic functional group
such as the sulfonyl group (SO3H) of IL incorporated in
the material framework (Figure ).[42]
Figure 8
TGA of the catalyst [DSIM][AlCl3]–@CS.
TGA of the catalyst [DSIM][AlCl3]–@CS.In the XRD spectrum of the catalyst,
the appearance of characteristic
broad peaks at 2θ = 10° and 20° was attributed to
the chitosan moiety (Figure a).[43] The IL supported chitosan showed a similar XRD pattern to that of
chitosan which was due to the low amount and uniform distribution
of IL on the surface of the chitosan.
Figure 9
XRD pattern of (a) chitosan, (b) [DSIM][AlCl3]–@CS, and
(c) recycled catalyst.
XRD pattern of (a) chitosan, (b) [DSIM][AlCl3]–@CS, and
(c) recycled catalyst.
Catalytic Activity
In order to select
the most suitable reaction conditions, a reaction involving 1,2 diketone 1a (2 mmol) and diamine 2b (2 mmol) to give pyrazine 3a at room temperature was chosen as the model reaction (Scheme ) for optimizing
different reaction parameters such as different catalysts, solvents,
catalyst loadings, and catalyst amounts. First, we investigated the
effect of different catalysts on the model reaction. It was observed
that chitosanalone could not catalyze the reaction effectively and
afforded low yield of the product in a longer reaction time (Table , entry 1). The reaction
was then tested with sulfonyl imidazolium ILs with different anions
such as [DSIM]Cl–, [DSIM]HSO4–, and [DSIM]CH3COO– (Table , entries 2–4). Among
these ILs, [DSIM]Cl– catalyzed the reaction more
effectively than others (Table , entry 2). To improve the yield and reduce the reaction time
period, [DSIM]Cl– was further treated with different
metal salts to form new IL systems such as {[DSIM]AlCl4–}, {[DSIM]FeCl4–},
{[DSIM]NiCl4–}, and {[DSIM]ZnCl4–} (Table , entries 5–8). It was observed that among the ILs
containing metal halide anions, best results were obtained with {[DSIM]AlCl4–} in terms of product yield and reaction
time (Table , entry
5).
Scheme 2
Model Reaction for Optimization of Different Parameters
Table 1
Effect of Different
Catalysts on the
Model Reactiona
entry
catalyst
timeb
yieldc (%)
1
chitosan
6 h
43
2
[DSIM]Cl–
1.5 h
66
3
[DSIM]HSO4–
2 h
60
4
[DSIM]CH3COO–
2.5 h
54
5
[DSIM]AlCl4–
42 min
75
6
[DSIM]FeCl4–
52 min
64
7
[DSIM]NiCl4–
56 min
62
8
[DSIM]ZnCl4–
1.2 h
68
9
[DSIM][AlCl3]x–@SiO2
33 min
88
10
[DSIM][AlCl3]x–@ZrO2
37 min
83
11
[DSIM][AlCl3]x–@CS
<1 min
99
Reaction conditions: benzil 1a (2 mmol), o-phenylenediamine 2b (2 mmol), catalyst (100 mg), T = 25 °C, and
stirring.
Reaction progress
monitored by TLC.
Isolated
yield.
Reaction conditions: benzil 1a (2 mmol), o-phenylenediamine 2b (2 mmol), catalyst (100 mg), T = 25 °C, and
stirring.Reaction progress
monitored by TLC.Isolated
yield.The above results
showed that the rate of reaction was affected
by changing the anions of ILs and hence confirmed that the model reaction
was catalyzed by the synergic effect of both cations and anions present
in the catalysts (Table , entries 2–8). Furthermore, in order to choose an appropriate
support material, the model reaction was carried out with the IL supported
on SiO2, ZrO2, and chitosan (Table , entries 9–11). Among
these materials, chitosan was found as the best material for the said
reaction.A pH test was performed for [DSIM]Cl–, [DSIM]AlCl4–, and [DSIM][AlCl3]–@CS and pH
values were found to
be 1.2, 1.8, and 3.4, respectively. This confirmed that the finalcatalyst was acidic in nature because of the presence of sulfonic
acid groups in the catalytic system. The exact role of the catalyst
composition can be to provide the synergic effects of cationic and
anionic parts leading to increased activity. Individually, the role
of the imidazoliumcation was to provide enough acidity to the catalyst
(pH = 1.2) due to the presence of sulfonic acid groups which activated
the carbonyl carbons of diketones to facilitate the reaction,[32] the presence of AlCl4– provided the lewis acidic sites to bind with hydroxyl and amine
groups of chitosan,[20a] and the role of
chitosan was to introduce heterogeneity into the catalyst.We
then examined the model reaction with various green solvents
such as isopropanol, water, dimethyl sulfoxide, polyethylene glycols
(PEGs) (200 400 600), methanol, and ethanol (Figure ) and also under solvent-free conditions.
It was found that moderate to good yields of the product were obtained
when the reaction was carried out with green solvents (Figure , entries 1–7). On
the other hand, solvent-free reaction conditions afforded excellent
yield in a minimum reaction time (Figure , entry 8).
Figure 10
Effect of solvent on
the model reaction (reaction conditions: benzil 1a (2
mmol), o-phenylenediamine 2b (2 mmol),
[DSIM][AlCl3]–@CS (100 mg), T = 25 °C, and
stirring).
Effect of solvent on
the model reaction (reaction conditions: benzil 1a (2
mmol), o-phenylenediamine 2b (2 mmol),
[DSIM][AlCl3]–@CS (100 mg), T = 25 °C, and
stirring).In order to find out
the optimum loading amount of {[DSIM]AlCl4–} on chitosan, the model reaction was carried
out with different loading amounts varying from 5 to 25% w/w (Figure ). It was observed
that the maximum product yield was obtained with 25% w/w loading (Figure , entry 4).
Figure 11
Effect of
[DSIM]AlCl4– loading on
the support for the model reaction (reaction conditions: benzil 1a (2 mmol), o-phenylenediamine 2b (2 mmol), [DSIM][AlCl3]–@CS (100 mg), T = 25 °C, and
stirring).
Effect of
[DSIM]AlCl4– loading on
the support for the model reaction (reaction conditions: benzil 1a (2 mmol), o-phenylenediamine 2b (2 mmol), [DSIM][AlCl3]–@CS (100 mg), T = 25 °C, and
stirring).The amount of the catalyst
suitable to catalyze the reaction was
checked by varying the amount of catalyst (30, 50, 60, 80, and 100
mg) in the model reaction. It was found that the yield of the product
increased on increasing the amount of the catalyst from 30 to 100
mg (Figure ). Thus,
the optimum amount of catalyst required for the maximum conversion
of the reactant to product was found to be 100 mg (Figure , entry 5).
Figure 12
Effect of the amount
of catalyst on the model reaction (reaction
conditions: benzil 1a (2 mmol), o-phenylenediamine 2b (2 mmol), [DSIM][AlCl3]–@CS (30–100 mg), T = 25 °C, and stirring).
Effect of the amount
of catalyst on the model reaction (reaction
conditions: benzil 1a (2 mmol), o-phenylenediamine 2b (2 mmol), [DSIM][AlCl3]–@CS (30–100 mg), T = 25 °C, and stirring).After ascertaining optimized reaction conditions, a series
of pyrazine
derivatives were synthesized using an equimolar ratio of diamines
and diketones in the presence of the catalyst [DSIM][AlCl3]–@CS under solvent-free
conditions at room temperature (Scheme ).
Scheme 3
Synthesis of Substituted Pyrazines[444546]
Reaction conditions: 1a–e (2 mmol), 2a–c (2 mmol), [DSIM][AlCl3]–@CS (100 mg), T = 25 °C, and stirring. bReaction progress
monitored by TLC. cIsolated yield.
Synthesis of Substituted Pyrazines[444546]
Reaction conditions: 1a–e (2 mmol), 2a–c (2 mmol), [DSIM][AlCl3]–@CS (100 mg), T = 25 °C, and stirring. bReaction progress
monitored by TLC. cIsolated yield.Many efficient heterogeneous catalysts have been reported for the
synthesis of pyrazine derivatives. A comparison with these catalytic
systems reveals that the present catalyst was more efficient in terms
of time period and reaction temperature (Table ).
Table 2
Comparison of Catalytic
Performance
of [DSIM](AlCl3)–@CS with Previously Reported Procedures
entry
catalyst
solvent
temperature
time
% yield
refs
1
HClO4·SiO2
CH3CN
r.t.
15 min
92
(47a)
2
silica-bonded S-sulfonic acid
EtOH/H2O
r.t.
5 min
96
(47b)
3
polyvinylpolypyrrolidone
supported triflic acid
H2O
r.t.
1 h
95
(47c)
4
montmorillonite K-10
H2O
r.t.
2.5–6 h
100
(47d)
5
sulfated polyborate
Solvent free
100 °C
5 min
99
(47e)
6
Zr(IV) Schiff-base/SBA-15
H2O
reflux
6 min
99
(47f)
7
silica sulfuric acid/PEG
PEG-400
120 °C
2 h
90
(47g)
8
[DSIM](AlCl3)x–@CS
no solvent
r.t.
<1 min
99
this work
Stability and Recycling
Study of the Catalyst
Furthermore, recycling capability of
the catalyst was tested by
choosing the model reaction of benzil 1a and o-phenylene diamine 2b in the presence of 100
mg of the catalyst [DSIM][AlCl3]–@CS under solvent-free conditions at room
temperature. After completion of the reaction, the catalyst was separated
from the reaction mixture by extraction with ethyl acetate. The catalyst
was found to be active up to six runs with insignificant changes (Figure ). The FTIR spectrum
of the recycled catalyst after the sixth run showed a similar pattern
of peaks to that of the fresh catalyst showing characteristic bands
of chitosan and IL system at 3419, 1628, 1588, 1193, 1076, and 534
cm–1 (Figure e). The morphology of the recycled catalyst was almost similar
to that of the fresh catalyst (Figure e,f). An XRD pattern of the recycled catalyst was also
found to be similar to that of the fresh catalyst (Figure c).
Figure 13
Recycling data of the
catalyst [DSIM][AlCl3]–@CS.
Recycling data of the
catalyst [DSIM][AlCl3]–@CS.
Conclusions
In summary, we have synthesized an efficient chitosan-based IL
easily at ambient temperature. The catalyst shows good stability and
is found to be a suitable catalyst for the synthesis of six-membered
nitrogen heterocycles such as pyrazines. Simple operational procedure,
cost-effectiveness, high yield, and short reaction time period are
added features of the present energy sustainable protocol.
Experimental Section
Preparation of [DSIM][AlCl3]–@CS
The IL, [DSIM]Cl–, was prepared by the reported
procedure.[48] Imidazole (0.340 g, 5 mmol)
was taken in a round-bottom
(100 mL) flask containing 50 mL dry CH2Cl2,
and chlorosulfonic acid (1.1885 g, 10.2 mmol) was added drop-wise
over a period of 20 min at room temperature. After the complete addition,
the reaction mixture was stirred for 12 h under inert atmosphere and
stood for 5 min. A viscous pale yellow oil, settled down at the bottom,
was separated using a separating funnel, washed with dry CH2Cl2 (3 × 50 mL), and dried under vacuum to get [DSIM]Cl– as a viscous pale yellow oil. In the second step,
AlCl3 was added to the prepared [DSIM]Cl– and the mixture was heated at 50 °C for 30 min to get [DSIM]AlCl4–. The finalcatalyst [DSIM][AlCl3]–@CS was obtained
by employing an impregnation method. Chitosan powder was suspended
in the mixture containing IL [DSIM]AlCl4– in CH2Cl2 for 4 h. Excess solvent was evaporated
to dryness to give the catalyst [DSIM][AlCl3]–@CS as yellowish brown powder.
General Procedure for Synthesis of Pyrazine
Derivatives 3a–n
A mixture of diketones 1a–e (2 mmol), diamines 2a–c (2
mmol), and [DSIM][AlCl3]–@CS (100 mg) was stirred at room temperature for 1–2
min. The reaction progress was monitored by thin-layer chromatography
(TLC). After completion of the reaction, ethyl acetate was added to
the reaction mixture. The catalyst was filtered, washed with ethanol
thrice, and dried in an oven for reuse. The ethyl acetate solution
was concentrated and kept at room temperature to afford the products
(3a–n). Recrystallization of products was carried
out with ethanol.
Authors: Amanda C Cole; Jessica L Jensen; Ioanna Ntai; Kim Loan T Tran; Kristin J Weaver; David C Forbes; James H Davis Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2002-05-29 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Sunil K Singh; V Saibaba; V Ravikumar; Santosh V Rudrawar; Pankaj Daga; C Seshagiri Rao; V Akhila; P Hegde; Y Koteswar Rao Journal: Bioorg Med Chem Date: 2004-04-15 Impact factor: 3.641