Hong Zhao1, Siyuan Chen2, Mengting Guo1, Dan Zhou1, Zhaobin Shen1, Wenjuan Wang1, Bing Feng1, Biao Jiang1,2. 1. Shanghai Advanced Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100 Haike Road, Zhangjiang Hi-Tech Park, Pudong, Shanghai 201210, P. R. China. 2. Shanghai Institute of Organic Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 345 Ling Ling Road, Shanghai 200032, P. R. China.
Abstract
The pyrolysis of 1,2-dichloroethane (EDC) is the most popular commercialized way of producing vinyl chloride monomers (VCM); however, it is plagued by high-energy consumption and the resulting coke formation. Here, a series of nitrogen-doped (N-doped) activated carbon catalysts (N-AC) were prepared conveniently for EDC dehydrochlorination. The structural and textural properties of N-doped catalysts were characterized by X-ray diffraction, transmission electron microscopy, Raman spectra, temperature-programmed desorption of VCM and EDC, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. The results revealed that doping N into activated carbon supports introduced basicity sites and caused partial graphitization on the catalyst surfaces. Thus, an improved absorption capacity to EDC and VCM and an accelerated desorption rate were obtained, which greatly enhanced EDC conversion and VCM selectivity. EDC was almost completely dehydrochlorided into vinyl chloride at a temperature of 300 °C and an EDC liquid hourly space velocity of 0.313 h-1. The high catalytic activity and selectivity as well as good stability suggested that the N-AC catalyst would be a promising dehydrochlorination catalyst on an industrial scale.
The pyrolysis of 1,2-dichloroethane (EDC) is the most popular commercialized way of producing vinyl chloride monomers (VCM); however, it is plagued by high-energy consumption and the resulting coke formation. Here, a series of nitrogen-doped (N-doped) activated carboncatalysts (N-AC) were prepared conveniently for EDC dehydrochlorination. The structural and textural properties of N-dopedcatalysts were characterized by X-ray diffraction, transmission electron microscopy, Raman spectra, temperature-programmed desorption of VCM and EDC, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. The results revealed that doping N into activated carbon supports introduced basicity sites and caused partial graphitization on thecatalyst surfaces. Thus, an improved absorption capacity to EDC and VCM and an accelerated desorption rate were obtained, which greatly enhanced EDCconversion and VCM selectivity. EDC was almost completely dehydrochlorided into vinyl chloride at a temperature of 300 °C and an EDC liquid hourly space velocity of 0.313 h-1. The high catalyticactivity and selectivity as well as good stability suggested that theN-ACcatalyst would be a promising dehydrochlorination catalyst on an industrial scale.
Poly(vinyl
chloride) (PVC) is one of the most widely used plastic
in the world. PVC’s monomer, vinyl chloride monomers (VCM),
is commercially produced by acetylene hydrochlorination on an HgCl2 catalyst[1,2] or by pyrolysis of 1,2-dichloroethane
(EDC).[3] Acetylene hydrochlorination is
a main process in coal-rich countries; however, due to the high toxicity
of mercury, huge environmental pressure has been exerted on this route,[4−6] especially since the implementation of Minamata Convention on Mercury.[7] EDC pyrolysis is a dominant commercialized way
in the west, in which oil-based ethylene is used as the raw material.
Now with the shale gas development and the decline of oil price, EDC
pyrolysis has been more competitive in the preparation of VCM.EDC pyrolysis runs at a temperature of about 500 °C and gives
a reasonable conversion of 50% and VCM selectivity of 98% on an industrial
scale.[8] However, there is a problem of
coke formation which is believed to be caused partly by the pyrolysis
of EDC itself via acetylene through its radical chain conversion.[9,10] This problem interrupts the long-term industrial operation and requires
decoking treatment every 2 months by burning coke deposit. Therefore,
it is vital for EDC dehydrochlorination to develop an active, selective,
and stable catalyst which can work in much lower temperatures and
result in less coke deposition.To explore suitable catalysts,
a wide range of materials have been
investigated for their catalytic performance in dehydrochlorination.
Activated carbon (AC) supported with alkaline earth metals or transition
elements were extensively studied from the 1940s. It has been firstly
reported that BaCl2/ACcan catalyze the dehydrochlorination
of 2,3-dichlorobutane to 2-chlorobutene at 215–235 °C,
but it gets deactivated in few hours.[11] Subsequently, CuCl3, CaCl2, LaCl3, and other metal chlorides supported on AC have also been extensively
explored as dehydrochlorination catalysts.[12−17] Other acidic and basiccatalysts, such as Al2O3, silica–alumina, ZSM-5, SAPO, polyacrylonitrile-based activated
carbon fibers, and so on, have been applied in the reaction,[8,18−21] too. Moreover, phosphonium chloride ionic liquid medium has also
been used as both a solvent and catalyst to the reaction in a bubbling
tank reactor.[22]In the last 10 years,
our group have done much work on the green
production of VCM. We have developed an industrial transformative
technology for VCM synthesis (called the J-ZH VCM process in China),
in which acetylene and EDC are highly efficient and atom economically
coupled to VCM over a bifunctional BaCl2/N@ACcatalyst.[23−26] Now, 200 000 t/year VCM industrial demonstration line based
on the new catalytic process is under construction in De Zhou, Shan
Dong province, China.In the J-Zh VCM process, the elimination of
HCl from EDC and the addition of HCl to acetylene occur in situ. N-Dopedactivated carboncatalyzes acetylene hydrochlorination and EDC dehydrochlorination
at the same time.In fact, in recent years, N-dopedcarbon materials
have been explored
as novel basiccatalysts for acetylene hydrochlorination,[2,27,28] although they have also been
reported as efficient catalysts for EDC dehydrochlorination, such
as N-doped ordered mesoporous carbon and N-dopedcoconut activated
carbon.[29,30] Although it has been claimed that N-dopedcarbon materials are effective dehydrochlorination catalysts, it is
still a great challenge to develop a reliable and facial fabrication
method of N-dopedcarboncatalysts for EDC dehydrochlorination on
an industrial scale.Based on these considerations and inspired
by the J-ZH VCM process,
in this investigation, we demonstrate a very convenient and stable
method to prepare N-dopedactivated carboncatalysts using poly(vinylpyrrolidone)
K-30 (PVP) as theN source and try to explore its performance in the
elimination of hydrogen chloride from EDC as a basiccatalyst. Careful
characterization of the prepared N-ACcatalyst, as well as systematic
investigation of theactivity and stability on dehydrochlorination
reaction were carried out. Based on the present study, thecorrelation
of thecatalyticactivities with their texture and structural properties
was attempted to build. The fine catalytic performance and the available
prepared method suggested that N-AC would be a potential dehydrochlorination
catalyst on an industrial scale.
Results
and Discussion
Structural Characterization
of N-AC Catalysts
To investigate the textural properties
of the obtained catalysts,
N2 adsorption–desorption isothermal analysis was
performed. TheN2 adsorption–desorption isotherms
and thecorresponding pore size distributions (PSD) on the surface
of theN-ACcatalysts are shown in Figures S1 and S2. The pore structure parameters of the samples are shown
in Table . Clearly,
all samples exhibited type-I adsorption–desorption isotherms
at low partial pressures (P/P0 < 0.2) and type-IV adsorption–desorption isotherms
at higher partial pressures (0.2 < P/P0 < 0.9). The results indicated thecoexistence of
micropores and mesopores in thecatalysts. The specific surface area
and total pore volume of samples decreased significantly as a function
of increasing amount of PVP added. When thePVP/AC mass ratio reached
16%, the specific surface area of the sample reduced to 645.5 m2 g–1, and the pore volume was only 0.31
cm3 g–1. The results indicated that nitrogen
had successfully doped within the micropores and mesopores on theAC surface altering the textural properties.
Table 1
Textual
Parameters and Dehydrochlorination
Performances of N-AC Samples
N (atom %)a
samples
pyridinic
graphitic
N-oxides
P + Gc
all
SBET (m2 g–1)
Vtotal (cm3 g–1)
conversion (%)c
N-AC(0)
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.02
1058.5
0.52
31.8
N-AC(2)
0.15
0.40
0.07
0.56
0.63
975.9
0.49
50.1
N-AC(4)
0.21
0.47
0.09
0.67
0.77
976.2
0.49
57.2
N-AC(8)
0.25
0.53
0.08
0.79
0.87
845.6
0.42
60.4
N-C(16)
0.35
0.76
0.12
1.12
1.25
645.5
0.31
59.9
AM-AC
0.03
0.27
0.09
0.29
0.38
979.4
0.50
39.8
CO(NH2)2-AC
0.15
0.21
0.08
0.35
0.43
997.3
0.51
42.1
pyridine-AC
0.04
0.34
0.01
0.38
0.39
879.1
0.49
43.3
NH4Cl-AC
0.16
0.28
0.11
0.45
0.56
912.7
0.52
47.6
melamine-AC
0.12
0.34
0.05
0.46
0.51
894.2
0.46
52.7
N content was analyzed by X-ray
photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS).
Reactions were carried out at 260
°C, atmospheric pressure, EDC liquid hourly space velocity (LHSV)
of 0.313 h–1, VCM selectivity is above 99%.
Pyridinic and graphitic N.
Ncontent was analyzed by X-ray
photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS).Reactions were carried out at 260
°C, atmospheric pressure, EDC liquid hourly space velocity (LHSV)
of 0.313 h–1, VCM selectivity is above 99%.Pyridinic and graphitic N.XPS measurement was performed to
further distinguish thechemical
valence of nitrogen on the surface of thecatalysts and N bonding
configuration in N-AC. As shown in Figure a, the spectra of theN-dopedcatalysts showed
a peak at ∼400 eV, which was assigned to theN 1s photoelectron
excitation and absent in AC supporter, demonstrating the successful
incorporation of nitrogen into theAC surface. Moreover, theNcontent
of N-AC, shown in Table , increased obviously with thePVP/AC mass ratio. Figure b shows the valence states
of N species in theN-ACcatalysts. Clearly, there were three nitrogen
species coexisting in the obtained N-AC samples. The distinct peak
at a binding energy of 398.6 eV was assigned to pyridinicN, the other
two peaks at 400.9 and 403.2 eV were assigned to graphitic N and nitrogen
oxide,[31] respectively. Noticeably, although
N was originated from PVP in which N is in a C–N five membered
ring, no distinctive sp3pyrrolic-N, which should be presented
at about 400.2 eV, was observed in N-AC samples.[30] This was probably because pyrrolic-Ncould be converted
into pyridinic- and graphitic-N at the elevated carbonization temperature,[25] as shown in Figure S3. Because of similar bond lengths of C–N (1.41 Å) and
C–C (1.42 Å) in sp2 hybridized hexagonal ring,[32] theN dopants in N-AC should exert less impact
on the planar structure of the samples.
Figure 1
(a) XPS data of the N-AC
catalysts and AC and (b) high-resolution
XPS N 1s spectra of N-AC catalyst samples.
(a) XPS data of theN-ACcatalysts and AC and (b) high-resolution
XPS N 1s spectra of N-ACcatalyst samples.The X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of N-AC are shown in Figure a. Clearly, two broad
peaks were observed at ∼24.6 and ∼43.1°, which
were corresponding to the (002) and (100) planes of a typical graphite
structure. The small peak at 26.6° should be attributed to silica,
which was not completely washed away by acid-treatment in theAC supporter.
The high-resolution electron micrograph of the typical catalyst sample
N-AC(4) is shown in Figure b. As shown in Figure b, two different carbon structures were distinctly observed.
One was amorphous carbon, the other was thecrystal lattice planes
associated with the typical graphite structure.[35,36] The results indicated that surface graphitization over theN-dopedAC samples occurred.[33,34]
Figure 2
(a) XRD patterns of AC-N(x) samples and (b) the
high-resolution electron micrograph of N-AC(4).
(a) XRD patterns of AC-N(x) samples and (b) the
high-resolution electron micrograph of N-AC(4).Raman spectra shown in Figure were performed to verify the influence of theN-dopant
on the interfacial carbon structure. Clearly, there were two explicit
Raman bands. The Raman peak at about 1590 cm–1 was
due to the G-band and the other peak at 1335 cm–1 was due to the D-band.[36,37] Compared with theAC
supporter, the high-temperature-treated samples including N-AC(0),
N-AC(4), and N-AC(8) showed narrower full width at half maximums and
deeper valleys between the two bands, which indicated the structural
change of graphite during the high temperature treatment process.[36] However, for these sintered samples, the intensity
ratio of the D band to the G band (ID/IG) slightly increased with thePVP/AC mass ratio
and thecontent of N dopants. Because ID/IG provides an indication of the number
of structural defects and a quantitative measure of the edge plane
exposure, the Raman results indicated the successful N-dopant of theN-AC samples.
Figure 3
Raman spectra of the AC parent prepared by acid treatment
(a) and
N-AC(x) samples, x = 0 (b), 4 (c),
and 8 (d).
Raman spectra of theAC parent prepared by acid treatment
(a) and
N-AC(x) samples, x = 0 (b), 4 (c),
and 8 (d).
Catalytic
Performance of N-AC
To
understand the performance of theN-ACcatalyst, N doping levels,
reaction temperature, and space velocity were varied. Figure a,b show the influence of N
doping levels on the performance of the prepared N-ACcatalysts. As
shown in Figure ,
N-AC(0) displayed low EDCconversion (∼32%) and 96% VCM selectivity.
N-DopedACcatalysts dramatically enhanced thecatalyticactivity
with much higher EDCconversions and above 99.5% VCM selectivities.
Over the obtained N-doped samples, EDCconversion firstly increased
sharply with the increase of Ncontent, and then increased slowly
when the addition amount of PVP was more than 4%. Over theN-AC(8)
catalyst sample, which had a total nitrogencontent of 1.01%, EDCconversion reached 60%, which was even higher than that of EDC thermal
pyrolysis reaction at about 500 °C. Further increasing thenitrogencontent to 1.44% in sample N-AC(16), no obvious improvement in EDCconversion and a negligible effect on selectivity were observed. The
above results suggested that the number of effective active centers
that the reactants can reach out in the prepared N-AC samples did
not increase when the amount of PVP added exceeded more than 8%.
Figure 4
Catalytic
performance of N-AC catalysts. (a, b) The influence of
N content. (c, d) The influence of EDC LHSV. (e, f) The influence
of reaction temperature. Reactions were carried out at 260 °C,
atmospheric pressure, EDC LHSV of 0.313 h–1 unless
otherwise stated.
Catalytic
performance of N-ACcatalysts. (a, b) The influence of
Ncontent. (c, d) The influence of EDC LHSV. (e, f) The influence
of reaction temperature. Reactions were carried out at 260 °C,
atmospheric pressure, EDC LHSV of 0.313 h–1 unless
otherwise stated.In a further set of experiments,
the effect of space velocity on
the reaction over the typical catalyst sample N-AC(4) was investigated
and is shown in Figure c,d. As expected, EDCconversion decreased along with the rise of
space velocity, whereas VCM selectivities declined slightly with the
decrease of EDC LHSV. WhenEDC LHSV was 0.125 h–1, theconversion was about 90% and VCM selectivity was above 98.8%,
and whenEDC LHSV was 0.2 h–1, theconversion was
about 80% and VCM selectivity was above 99.1%. WhenEDC LHSV increased
to 0.5 h–1, theconversion was about 40% and VCM
selectivity was above 99.5%. The results meant that too much long
contact time would cause side reactions.Figure e,f demonstrates
the effect of the reaction temperature on the reaction over N-AC(4).
Clearly, EDCconversion increased with the rise of the temperature
and VCM selectivity decreased slightly when the reaction temperature
was raised. When the reaction temperature was as high as 300 °C,
theconversion of EDC was near 100% and the selectivity to VCM decreased
slightly but was still above 98.5%. This behavior indicated the excellent
catalytic performance of N-AC on thecatalyticcracking of EDC into
VCM.
Active Sites of N-AC
As described,
the novel activity of thecatalyst N-AC mainly originated from N-doping
on the surface of AC. However, XPS analysis revealed that three types
of N species coexisted in the obtained N-AC samples. Although great
efforts have been made to identify theactive sites of N-dopedcarboncatalysts, there are heated arguments on the role of different N specials
in active sites. To confirm theactive site in N-AC samples, except
for N-AC, another series of catalyst samples denoted as acrylamide
(AM)-AC, CO(NH2)2-AC, pyridine-AC, NH4Cl-AC, and melamine-AC were synthesized and used as dehydrochlorination
catalysts, in which N was originated from acrylamide (AM), CO(NH2)2, pyridine, NH4Cl, and melamine, respectively.
Because melamine is insoluble in water, methanol was used as solution
instead of water. The textual parameters, Ncontent of samples, and
their performance in dehydrochlorination of EDC are summarized in Table , too. From Table we can see that all
of these samples showed similar textual parameters. The surface area
varied slightly from 900 to 1000 m2 g–1 and the total pore volume was 0.46–0.52 cm3 g–1, so the effect of textural properties on thecatalytic
performance could be ignored. XPS measurements demonstrated the successful
incorporation of nitrogen into theAC. Similar to N-AC, there were
three N species including pyridinicN, graphitic N, and nitrogen oxideN. The total Ncontent varied from 0.3 to 0.8 atom % in these samples,
and the distributions of N species in the samples were different.
Meanwhile, the performance of these samples on EDC dehydrochlorination
is listed in Table , too. Clearly, the inconsistent result of theEDCconversion and
the total Ncontent was observed. As noted from Table , the total Ncontent of NH4Cl-AC
samples was the highest among them, but EDCconversion over it was
lower than that over melamine-AC.So we correlated thecatalytic
properties with their nitrogen species that originated from all nitrogenous
compounds including PVP, AM, CO(NH2)2, pyridine,
NH4Cl, and melamine. Because the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller
(BET) surface of AC-N(16) was much smaller than the others, it was
not considered in the fitting process. Thus, the difference of thecatalytic performances of all samples including N-AC(0) was mainly
caused by different amounts of N species in the samples. The result
is shown in Figure . As shown in Figure , theEDCconversion linearly increased with the increasing amount
of both pyridinicN and graphitic N (y = 37.63x + 30.91), irrespective of the varying N resources, inferring
that pyridinicN and graphitic N were closely correlated with thecatalytic dehydrochlorination of EDC and were effective N atoms.
Figure 5
Fitting
between both pyridinic N and graphitic N species and reactivity
towards dehydrochlorination.
Fitting
between both pyridinicN and graphitic N species and reactivity
towards dehydrochlorination.It is generally known that pyridinic and graphitic-N refer
to sp2 hybridized nitrogen atoms bonding with C atoms in
thehexagonal
ring.[38,39] PyridinicNcontributes three electrons
to fill two σ-bonds and one aromatic π-bond and leave
a lone electron pair in the plane of thecarbon matrix, whereas graphitic-Ncontributes four valence electrons forming three σ-bonds and
one π-bond with the neighboring carbon (or hydrogen) atoms,
and the fifth electron is shared by thegraphitic-N dopant itself
and the π* state of theconduction band. In thecase of the
prepared N-ACcatalysts, pyridinic-N and graphitic-N species increased
the electron–donor property of theactivated carbon and thus
introduced basiccenters into thecarbon material, so the derived
N-ACcould be used as a solid-base catalyst. Although it was reported
that pyridinic and pyrrolicN species were critical for the reaction
but quaternary N species caused catalyst deactivation,[30] the above results verified that both pyridinicN and graphitic N introduced basic sites and made for catalytic dehydrochlorination
of EDC.The adsorptive properties of EDC and VCM on N-AC(4)
and N-AC(0)
were further studied by temperature-programmed desorption (TPD) analysis.
The results are shown in Figure . Clearly, the peak areas of N-AC(4) in both theEDC-TPD
profile and VCM-TPD profile were much larger than those of N-AC(0),
suggesting the enhanced adsorption capacity in N-AC(4) which should
be associated with the introduced basiccenters verified by XPS results.
However, it was worth noting that the peak positions of N-AC(4) in
the VCM-TPD profile and EDC-TPD profile were 106.6 and 171.7 °C,
respectively, whereas thecorresponding peaks of N-AC(0) was 110.2
°C in the VCM-TPD profile and was 188.6 °C in theEDC-TPD
profile. The much lower desorption temperatures of N-AC suggested
that both reactant EDC and product VCM could be easier and faster
to dissociate from theN-dopedAC surface. The distinguished adsorption
properties of N-AC should not only make for higher EDCconversion,
but also avoid deep side reactions caused by excessive contact time
and favor better VCM selectivity.
Figure 6
TPD profiles of the catalysts. (a) 1,2-EDC-TPD
and (b) VCM-TPD.
TPD profiles of thecatalysts. (a) 1,2-EDC-TPD
and (b) VCM-TPD.
Stability
and Deactivation of N-AC
To explore the stability of N-AC
samples, a series of experiments
were carried out on the typical catalyst sample N-AC(4), and the results
are shown in Figure . Figure a shows
the effect of EDC LHSV on the stability of N-AC(4) at the reaction
temperature of 260 °C. As demonstrated in Figure a, theconversion of EDC over N-AC(4) was
95% at an EDC LHSV of 0.125 h–1. After 10 h, EDCLHSV was raised to 0.313 h–1, whereas the other
conditions were kept constant; here, thecorresponding conversion
of EDC lowered to 67%. After maintaining this condition for 12 h,
theEDC LHSV was readjusted to 0.125 h–1; here,
theconversion of EDC recovered to about 94%, which was very close
to the initial lever. Meanwhile, VCM selectivity was consistent and
stable in the whole process.
Figure 7
Stability of catalyst N-AC. (a) The influence
of EDC LHSV at 260
°C. (b) The influence of reaction temperature at EDC LHSV of
0.313 h–1. (c) Long-time stability test over N-AC(4)
at 260 °C and EDC LHSV of 0.313 h–1.
Stability of catalyst N-AC. (a) The influence
of EDC LHSV at 260
°C. (b) The influence of reaction temperature at EDC LHSV of
0.313 h–1. (c) Long-time stability test over N-AC(4)
at 260 °C and EDC LHSV of 0.313 h–1.Figure b shows
the effect of the reaction temperature on the stability of N-AC(4)
at an EDC LHSV of 0.313 h–1. As shown in Figure b, EDCconversion
was 37% at a temperature of 250 °C. After 10 h, the reaction
temperature was raised to 290 °C and thecorresponding EDCconversion
was about 90%. When the reaction temperature was readjusted to 250
°C 10 h later, EDCconversion returned back to about 38%. Meanwhile,
VCM selectivity in all cases were relatively static and above 99%.
The results indicated that the intermittent changes of a space velocity
and reaction temperature had little influence on thecatalyst activities,
which was very critical for the industrial catalyst.To explore
the long-term stability and deactivation of the prepared
N-ACcatalyst, the amplified single tube test (φ = 30 mm, EDCLHSV 0.313 h–1) was carried out over 120 g N-AC(4),
and the result is exhibited in Figure c. As can be noted from Figure c, theEDCconversion was half of the initial
one after 560 h, whereas the VCM selectivity was above 99% at all
times. The results suggested the good stability of theN-ACcatalyst.
To explore thecause of deactivation, the used N-AC(4) was carefully
characterized by XPS measurement, N2 gas adsorption and
thermogravimetric (TG) analysis.As shown in Table , Ncontent in the used N-AC(4)
decreased greatly. The total Ncontent
downed from 0.89% in the fresh sample to 0.21%. The further deconvolution
of the XPS N 1s profile proved that the used N-AC(4) retained three
N species including pyridinic-N, graphitic-N, and N-oxides, and no
other N species was produced in the reaction. Moreover, the proportions
of pyridinic-N, graphitic-N, and N-oxides were, respectively, 28.57,
57.14, and 14.29%, which were very close to theN species distribution
in the fresh AC-N(4) (26.97, 60.67, and 12.36%). No obvious change
of thenitrogen species distribution was observed before and after
thecatalytic reaction. The results suggested that N species in the
sample were very stable, and no obvious transformation of nitrogen
species to each other occurred. The reduction of nitrogencontent,
especially pyridinic-N and graphitic-N, rather than the transformation
of nitrogen species,[30] contributed to partial
deactivation of thecatalyst.
Table 2
Textual Parameters
and Elemental Composition
of the Fresh and Used N-AC(4) Catalyst
N (atom %)a
samples
all
pyridinic
graphitic
N-oxides
Cl
SBET (m2 g–1)
Vtotal (cm3 g–1)
fresh
0.77
0.21
0.47
0.09
0.00
976.2
0.49
used
0.18
0.05
0.10
0.03
0.35
260.8
0.02
N and Cl content were analyzed by
XPS.
N and Cl content were analyzed by
XPS.In contrast to the
decrease in nitrogencontent, chlorinecontent
in the spent sample increased greatly. As can be noted in Table , a large amount of
chlorine occurred in the used catalyst, whereas only a trace amount
was checked in the fresh sample, which should be caused by hydrochloricacid pretreatment. The further convolution of Cl 2p3/2 and
2p1/2 shown in Figure c suggested that some chlorinated organiccompounds
such as chlorobenzenes and poly(vinyl chloride)covered the surface
of the used catalyst, which was further approved by the high-resolution
electron micrographs shown in Figure .
Figure 8
(a) XPS N 1s spectrum of fresh N-AC(4) and (b) used N-AC(4),
(c)
XPS Cl 2p3/2 and p1/2 of the fresh and used
N-AC(4), and (d) TGA results of fresh and used N-AC(4).
Figure 9
High-resolution electron micrographs of coke deposited
on the used
N-AC(4).
(a) XPS N 1s spectrum of fresh N-AC(4) and (b) used N-AC(4),
(c)
XPS Cl 2p3/2 and p1/2 of the fresh and used
N-AC(4), and (d) TGA results of fresh and used N-AC(4).High-resolution electron micrographs of coke deposited
on the used
N-AC(4).The textural properties of the
used N-AC(4) were further estimated
and are also shown in Table . As listed in Table , the surface area of the used N-AC(4) decreased from 976.2
to 260.8 m2 g–1 and the total pore volume
downed from 0.49 to 0.02 cm3 g–1, suggesting
that thecatalyst pores were partly blocked after thecatalytic reaction.
Further TG analysis under a N2 atmosphere shown in Figure d confirmed much
higher mass loss in the temperature range of 250–650 °Ccompared with the fresh one. Without doubt, the extra part of weightlessness
should be attributed to thechemicals such as coke deposited on thecatalyst surface which caused the decrease of the surface area and
pore volume after the reaction. Meanwhile, the deposited chemicals
covered the surface of thecatalyst and caused the decreased N specials.
Thus, it could be concluded that coke deposition, that caused the
pore blocking and Ncontent decrease within the micropores and mesopores
on theAC surface, was the main reason for the partial inactivation
of theN-ACcatalyst.
Conclusions
In conclusion,
we have demonstrated here a series of N-ACcatalysts
prepared by a simple and reliable method and their excellent performance
in EDC dehydrochlorination. The results revealed that doping N into
AC supports introduced surface-basicity sites and caused partial graphitization
on thecatalyst surfaces. Further experimental results indicated that
both pyridinicN and graphitic N introduced basic sites for catalytic
dehydrochlorination of EDC. The high catalyticactivity and selectivity
as well as good stability suggested N-AC to be a promising dehydrochlorination
catalyst on an industrial scale.
Experimental
Section
Raw Materials
In our research, columnar
commercial coal-based activated carbon (AC) was supplied by Ningxia
Bethel Activated CarbonCo., Ltd. (Ningxia, China), poly(vinylpyrrolidone)
K-30 (PVP), urea (CO(NH2)2), acrylamide (AM),
pyridine, NH4Cl, melamine, methanol, hydrochloric acid
(37.5 wt % aqueous solution), and EDC were purchased from Titan Technology
Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). All of these commercial guaranteed reagents
(GR grade) were used without further purification.
N-AC Catalyst Preparation
In our
research, N-ACcatalyst samples were prepared by an incipient wet
impregnation technique using columnar commercial AC as thecarrier
and PVP as theN source. First, columnar commercial AC was washed
with dilute aqueous hydrogen chloride (2 mol L–1) at 50 °C overnight to remove metal ions, which would affect
thecatalytic dehydrochlorination reaction, and then was filtered
by pure water five times and dried 120 °C overnight. Typically,
100 g of acid-washed AC was added to 150 mL of PVP aqueous solution
(the mass ratios of PVP to AC is 2, 4, 8, and 16%), and sonicated
for 5 min. The mixture was incubated at 60 °C for 10 h and dried
at 100 °C for 24 h. After being sintered for 6 h at 650 °C
with a heating rate of 2 °C min–1 under the
protection of N2, theN-AC samples were obtained and denoted
as N-AC(2), N-AC(4), N-AC(8), and N-AC(16). N-AC(0) was obtained from
theN-AC parent by sintering in N2 for 6 h without N doping.
To confirm theactive site in N-AC samples, another series of catalyst
samples denoted as AM-AC, CO(NH2)2-AC, pyridine-AC,
NH4Cl-AC, and melamine-AC were synthesized by the same
method, in which N originated from acrylamide, urea, pyridine, NH4Cl, and melamine, respectively. Because melamine was insoluble
in water, methanol was used as a solution instead of water when themelamine-AC sample was prepared.
Characterization
of Catalyst Samples
Powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns
of various synthesized samples
were recorded on a D8 Advance Da Vinci with a Cu source (40 kV, 20
mA). The high-resolution transmission electron micrograph was operated
at an FEI Talos F200X at 300 kV. N2 adsorption at −196
°C was carried out on a Micromeritics ASAP 2460 apparatus. XPS
was carried out on a Kratos AXIS ULTRA DLD spectroscope with Al Kα
X-rays as the excitation source at 1000 meV and 150 W. The binding
energies were calibrated by thecontaminant carbon (C 1s 284.6 eV).
The pressed powder pellet method was used to minimize the analytic
error, which would be caused by the limit of the electron escape depth
based on XPS analysis. Raman spectra were obtained with a Senterra
R200-L using a 514.5 nm AR line as an excitation source. Thermogravimetric
(TG) analysis was carried out on TA Instruments-Waters LLC Q-600 STD,
in which the temperature was ramped to 800 °C at a heating rate
of 10 °C min–1. TPD was performed on a Micromeritics
AutoChem II 2920 equipped with a thermal conductivity detector in
the temperature range of 50–600 °C. Theheating rate was
10 °C min–1, and the gas flow rate was 20 mL
min–1. Temperature-programmed desorption (TPD) experiments
were initiated by pretreatment of thecatalyst with He for 30 min
at 600 °C. Subsequently, thecatalyst temperature was cooled
down to 150 °C and an adsorption gas was introduced for 20 min.
Thecatalyst temperature was then kept constant for 20 min to flush
away any loosely bound surface species. Subsequently, thecatalyst
temperature was decreased to 50 °C. The step of desorption was
thencarried out in the temperature range of 50–600 °C.
Catalytic Reactions
Dehydrochlorination
of EDC was carried out in a fixed-bed quartz tube reactor (diameter
= 14 mm, length = 700 mm) at atmospheric pressure and 220–300
°C. Generally, 15 g of catalyst was used. The pipeline and quartz
tube reactor were flushed with nitrogen to remove water and air from
the system before the reaction. Pure EDC was then fed into the entrance
of the reactor by a double-plunger micro-pump, and then vaporized.
The reactant and products were analyzed by a gas chromatograph (GC)
(Shimadzu GC-2014), and HCl was analyzed by acid base titration.