Renzhe Qian1, Thomas Kalina1, Jeannie Horak2, Samuele Giberti3, Giuseppe Forlani3, Friedrich Hammerschmidt1. 1. Institute of Organic Chemistry, University of Vienna, Währingerstrasse 38, A-1090 Vienna, Austria. 2. Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Pharmaceutical (Bio-)Analysis, Eberhard-Karls-University Tübingen, Auf der Morgensstelle 8, 72076 Tübingen, Germany. 3. Department of Life Science and Biotechnology, University of Ferrara, via L. Borsari 46, 44121 Ferrara, Italy.
Abstract
Racemic 1-hydroxy-3-butenyl-, 3-chloro-1-hydroxypropyl-, and 3-bromo-1-hydroxypropylphosphonate and the corresponding (S)-enantiomers obtained by lipase-catalyzed resolution of the respective racemic chloroacetates were subjected to functional group manipulations. These comprised ozonolysis, Mitsunobu reactions with hydrazoic acid and N-hydroxyphthalimide, alkylation of hydrazine derivative, removal of phthaloyl group followed by intramolecular substitution, and global deprotection to deliver the racemates and (R)-enantiomers (ee 92-99% by chiral high-performance liquid chromatography) of pyrrolidin-2-yl-, oxazolidin-3-yl-, oxazolidin-5-yl-, pyrazolidin-3-yl-, and 1,2-oxazinan-3-ylphosphonic acids. These phosphonic acids were evaluated as analogues of proline and proline analogues for the ability to inhibit γ-glutamyl kinase, δ1-pyrroline-5-carboxylate synthetase, and δ1-pyrroline-5-carboxylate reductase. Only the latter enzyme was inhibited by two of them at concentrations exceeding 1 mM.
Racemic1-hydroxy-3-butenyl-, 3-chloro-1-hydroxypropyl-, and 3-bromo-1-hydroxypropylphosphonate and the corresponding (S)-enantiomers obtained by lipase-catalyzed resolution of the respective racemicchloroacetates were subjected to functional group manipulations. These comprised ozonolysis, Mitsunobu reactions with hydrazoic acid and N-hydroxyphthalimide, alkylation of hydrazine derivative, removal of phthaloyl group followed by intramolecular substitution, and global deprotection to deliver the racemates and (R)-enantiomers (ee 92-99% by chiral high-performance liquid chromatography) of pyrrolidin-2-yl-, oxazolidin-3-yl-, oxazolidin-5-yl-, pyrazolidin-3-yl-, and 1,2-oxazinan-3-ylphosphonic acids. These phosphonic acids were evaluated as analogues of proline and proline analogues for the ability to inhibit γ-glutamyl kinase, δ1-pyrroline-5-carboxylate synthetase, and δ1-pyrroline-5-carboxylate reductase. Only the latter enzyme was inhibited by two of them at concentrations exceeding 1 mM.
Herbicides
with favorable properties such as high activity, crop
tolerance, and low toxicity to insects and mammals are essential for
weed control in modern agriculture to secure food supply for the growing
world population.[1] Furthermore, persistence
of these agrochemicals should be minimal and biodegradation by the
soil microflora should be complete in a short time span. Rapid development
of resistant weeds in combination with diffusion of the acquired resistance
in the biosphere is a publicconcern and has forced companies to search
for new herbicide targets and active ingredients. Amino acid metabolism
is an attractive target for herbicide development.[2] However, little attention has so far been paid to interference
with proline biosynthesis. It is accessed by two routes, the ornithine
and glutamate pathways, the latter being the main one in plants. Both
the pathways share the last reaction step catalyzed by the NAD(P)H-dependent
δ1-pyrroline-5-carboxylate (P5C) reductase.[3] Luckily, this fact allows to block both ways
with only one inhibitor.Forlani and Kafarski et al. found that N-phenyl-substituted
aminomethylenebisphosphonic acidsare inhibitors of P5C reductase
with activity in the micromolar to millimolar range.[4−6] These compounds also demonstrated phytotoxicity in vivo, which could
be reversed by exogenously supplied amino acids.[7] We reasoned that phosphonic acid analogues of l-proline and proline analogues could be inhibitors of the reductase
and other enzymes in the proline metabolism. To test this idea, a
series of racemic, chiral nonracemic, and achiral phosphonic acids
were synthesized for evaluation first with P5C reductase of plants
(Figure ). The selection
of compounds comprised five- (1–4) and six-membered
(5 and 6) ring systems with one or two heteroatoms,
all with an attached phosphonic acid group. The (R)-configured enantiomers of 1–6 correspond to
the (S)- or l-configured ones in the carboxyl
acid series because of the higher priority of PO3H2compared to CO2H according to the Cahn–Ingold–Prelog
rules. Many azaheterocyclic phosphonates have been synthesized and
biologically evaluated in the past.[8]
Figure 1
Phosphonic
acid analogues of proline and proline analogues.
Phosphonic
acid analogues of proline and proline analogues.
Results and Discussion
Synthesis of (±)-, (R)-, and (S)-Phosphaproline
Although racemic,
(R)-, and (S)-phosphaproline [(±)-,
(R)-, and (S)-1] have
been
described in the literature,[9−17] we present here a new access from recently prepared racemic and
enantiomeric1-hydroxy-3-butenylphosphonate 7 (Scheme ).[18] It also served as a starting material for phosphonic acids
racemic 2 and 6. Hydroxyphosphonate (±)-7 was resolved by lipase-catalyzed kinetic hydrolysis of the
chloroacetic ester and delivered the enantiomers with ee >97%.[18] The enantiomer (S)-7 was transformed into (R)-1, (R)-2, and (R)-6 and the enantiomer (R)-7 into phosphaproline
(S)-1 by functional group manipulation.
Furthermore, (±)- and (S)-7 were
already converted to phosphaaspartic acids via azides (±)- and
(S)-8 prepared by Mitsunobu reaction.[18] Evans and Weber[19] and later others[20,21] described the formation of pyrrolidines
from homoallyl azides upon hydroboration with dicyclohexylborane.
As we hoped that azides 8 prepared by the Mitsunobu reaction[18,22] would undergo the same cylization, we reacted them with dicyclohexylborane.[23] Trialkylboranes 9 were unstable
and underwent migration of an alkyl group from the boron to nitrogen
atom, with loss of nitrogen after attack of the azido group on the
boron atom.[19] The phosphaproline derivatives 10 were globally deprotected by refluxing 6 M HCl. Phosphaprolines 1 were isolated by cation-exchange chromatography (Dowex 50W
× 8, H+) and crystallized. The enantiomers of 8 delivered the enantiomers of 1 of known configuration,
correctly assigned[17] recently.
Scheme 1
Preparation
of (±)-, (R)-, and (S)-Proline
[(±)-, (R)-, and (S)-1]
The ee of (R)- and (S)-1 was the same
(>99%) as that of the starting α-hydroxyphosphonates 7 (>99%), which was proven by chiral high-performance liquid
chromatography (HPLC) (Figure S1).
Synthesis
of (±)- and (R)-Isoxazolidin-3-ylphosphonic
Acid
These phosphonic acid analogues of structural analogues
of proline were obtained by functional group manipulation of (±)-
and (S)-11[18] (Scheme ). Ozonolysis
gave both hydroxyphosphonates 12 in 91% yield. The following
Mitsunobu reaction[22] with N-hydroxyphthalimide delivered protected O-alkylhydroxylamines
(±)- and (S)-13 in yields of 83
and 84%, respectively. Hydrazinolysis in iPrOH effected
removal of the phthaloyl group. The open-chain O-alkylhydroxylamines
(±)- and (S)-14 with a leaving
group at C-1 immediately cyclized to isoxazolidin-3-ylphosphonates 15. As the 4-nitrobenzenesulfonyloxy (nosyloxy) group was
replaced with inversion of configuration, the (S)-enantiomer
of 13 was transformed into (R)-15. The crude isoxazolidin-3-ylphosphonates 15 were deprotected with HBr in AcOH at room temperature in 16 h.[24] The phosphonic acids were purified by cation-exchange
chromatography (Dowex 50W × 8, H+) and crystallization.
The overall yields of (±)- and (R)-2[25] starting from 13 were
79 and 74% (ee 99%, Figure S2), respectively.
Surprisingly, deprotection of 15 with bromotrimethylsilane
(TMSBr)/allyltrimethylsilane (allylTMS)[26] had a detrimental effect on the yield of (R)-2 (15%).
Scheme 2
Preparation of (±)- and (R)-Isoxazolidin-3-ylphosphonic
Acid [(±)- and (R)-2]
Nos = 4-nitrobenzenesulfonyl;
DIAD = diisopropyl azodicarboxylate, PhthNOH = N-hydroxyphthalimide.
Preparation of (±)- and (R)-Isoxazolidin-3-ylphosphonic
Acid [(±)- and (R)-2]
Nos = 4-nitrobenzenesulfonyl;
DIAD = diisopropyl azodicarboxylate, PhthNOH = N-hydroxyphthalimide.
Synthesis of Phosphapipecolic Acid (±)-5
and (±)-
and (R)-1,2-Oxazinan-3-ylphosphonic Acid [(±)-
and (R)-6]
Phosphonic acids 5 and 6 differ from phosphaproline by replacing
the five-membered ring by a six-membered ring containing an additional
CH2 group or an oxygen atom. The preparation of racemicphosphapipecolic acid was recently published.[14] The synthesis of analogues 6 was accomplished starting
from 4-hydroxybutylphosphonates 16, derived from nosylates
(±)- and (S)-11 (ee 85%) by hydroboration
with H3B × tetrahydrofuran (THF), followed by oxidative
cleavage of the B–C bond with H2O2/NaHCO3 (Scheme ).[18] The Mitsunobu reaction and the ensuing cyclization
induced by hydrazine hydrate were similarly performed for the transformation
of 12 into 15 in Scheme and delivered 1,2-oxazinanes (±)- and
(R)-18, cyclic oxime ethers.[27] However, this time the hydroxylamine derivatives,
the two 1,2-oxazinan-3-ylphosphonates (±)- and (R)-18, were first isolated as homogeneous compounds by
flash column chromatography, fully characterized and finally deprotected.
Although the five-membered analogue 15 suffered partial
decomposition on attempted deprotection with refluxing 6 M HCl, 1,2-oxazinan-3-ylphosphonates
(±)- and (R)-18 were smoothly deprotected,
as evidenced by their high yields of 94 and 91%, respectively. The
ee of 83% for phosphonic acid (R)-6 was
increased to 92% upon crystallization from H2O/EtOH (Figure S5).
Scheme 3
Preparation of (±)- and (R)-(−)-1,2-Oxazinan-3-ylphosphonic
Acid [(±)- and (R)-6]
Nos = 4-nitrobenzenesulfonyl;
DIAD = diisopropyl azodicarboxylate, PhthNOH = N-hydroxyphthalimide.
Preparation of (±)- and (R)-(−)-1,2-Oxazinan-3-ylphosphonic
Acid [(±)- and (R)-6]
Nos = 4-nitrobenzenesulfonyl;
DIAD = diisopropyl azodicarboxylate, PhthNOH = N-hydroxyphthalimide.
Synthesis of (±)- and (R)-(+)-Isoxazolidin-5-ylphosphonic
Acid [(±)- and (R)-3]
For the preparation of these heterocyclicphosphonic acids, isomeric
to (±)- and (R)-2, a separate entry
had to be developed (Scheme ). We reasoned that racemic 3-chloro-1-hydroxypropylphosphonate
(±)-20 could be the key intermediate for both isoxazolidin-5-ylphosphonic
acids, as it could be easily prepared as racemate and resolved enzymatically.
Ethyl β-chloropropionate (19) was reduced to the
aldehyde with diisobutylaluminium hydride (DIBALH) in dry toluene
at −78 °C, to which diisopropyl trimethylsilyl phosphite
was added to give α-hydroxyphosphonate (±)-20 in 84% yield in a one-pot reaction.[28] Chloroacetylation with (ClH2CC(O))2O/pyridine furnished α-chloroacetoxyphosphonate (±)-21. This ester was subjected[14] to
lipase-catalyzed kinetic hydrolysis in a biphasic system on a preparative
scale with 16.3 mmol of substrate. When the enzymatic hydrolysis was
stopped at 40% conversion, 5.14 mmol of α-hydroxyphosphonate
(+)-20 with an ee of 97% and (S)-configuration
were obtained, determined[28,29] by using (R)-(+)-t-Bu(Ph)P(O)SH as the chiral solvating agent
in combination with 31P nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR)
spectroscopy. Satisfyingly, α-hydroxyphosphonates (±)-
and (S)-20 were converted to N-protected O-alkylhydroxylamines (±)-
and (R)-22 in yields of 88 and 72% (ee
95% by HPLC, Figure S6), respectively.
Luckily, the chloride on the primary C-3 position was a much weaker
leaving group than Ph3PO and did not compete with the displacement
reaction at C-1. The cleavage of the phthaloyl group was again induced
with hydrazine hydrate. Precursors 22 were cyclized to
isoxazolidin-5-ylphosphonic acids (±)- and (R)-23, which were directly used for the next step. Global
deprotection was accomplished as outlined above. The overall yields
of (±)- and (R)-3 starting from 23 were 81 and 63% (ee 97%, Figure S3), respectively. The crystalline isoxazolidinylphosphonic acids 2 and 3 had to be stored at −18 °C
to prevent gradual decomposition at room temperature.
Scheme 4
Preparation
of (±)- and (R)-(+)-Isoxazolidin-5-ylphosphonic
Acid [(±)- and (R)-3]
Synthesis of (±)- and (R)-(−)-Pyrazolidin-3-ylphosphonic
Acids [(±)- and (R)-4]
Initially, we reasoned that these phosphonic acidscould easily be
prepared by the reaction of a modified propylphosphonate, with leaving
groups at C-1 and C-3, with a protected hydrazine derivative, but
were convinced of the contrary. At first, 3-chloro-1-hydroxypropylphosphonate
(±)-20 was converted to triflate (±)-24 in 71% yield (Scheme ). It was added to a mixture of N,N′-bis(Boc)-hydrazine[31] and NaH in dimethylformamide (DMF), which had been stirred for 30
min at room temperature and was allowed to react for 18 h at 20 °C
and 2 h at 50 °C. The crude product, which did not contain the
starting material, was a complex mixture and was therefore discarded.
The failure of this experiment was attributed to a combination of
the low reactivity from Cl– as the leaving group
at C-3 and the high reactivity[32] of TfO– at C-1. The first step, that is, the intermolecular
reaction of the deprotonated hydrazine derivative will prefer attack
at C-3. The cyclization of the N-substituted hydrazine intermediate
should easily proceed to pyrazolidin-3-ylphosphonate (±)-25, as it is an intramolecular process, and TfO– is an excellent leaving group. Substitution at C-1 of phosphonates
was first considered unlikely for steric reasons and low reactivity
in general. The size of the attacking nucleophile and the shielding
of C-1 by the isopropyl-protecting groups at the phosphorus atom disfavor
a SN2 reaction. Base-induced elimination of TfOH was more
likely than substitution. Consequently, a better leaving group had
to be placed at C-3 or/and a less reactive one at C-1.
Scheme 5
Attempted
Preparation of Protected (±)-Pyrazolidin-3-ylphosphonic
Acid [(±)-27]
To replace chloride by bromide, β-bromopropionate 26 was transformed into 3-bromo-1-hydroxyphosphonate (±)-29 and then into bromo triflate (±)-30a by
the same procedures as used for the chloro derivative (Scheme ). It was reacted with N,N′-bis(Boc)-hydrazine in a biphasic
system[33] (20% NaOH/toluene) under phase-transfer
conditions at room temperature. The extractively obtained crude product
was again a complex mixture without a starting material, but contained
elimination products as judged by NMR spectroscopy. As found later,
when we had compound (±)-25 in hand, this mixture
already contained some of it. Importantly, this experiment demonstrated
that the trifluoromethanesulfonyloxy group had to be replaced by a
less reactive leaving group such as a mesyloxy or 4-nitrobenzenesulfonyloxy
(nosyloxy) group to interfere with elimination. The corresponding
mesylate (±)-28b and nosylate (±)-28c were obtained in 93 and 86% yield, respectively, by esterification
of 3-bromo-1-hydroxyphosphonate (±)-27 with mesyl
chloride/Et3N or NosCl/Et3N/dimethylaminopyridine
(DMAP) (Scheme ).
When the experiment with bis(Boc)-hydrazine/NaOH was repeated with
mesylate (±)-28b instead of the triflate at 0 °C
and followed by thin-layer chromatography (TLC) monitoring, no new
product could be detected besides the starting material after a reaction
time of 1 h. Then, the temperature was increased to 19–20 °C.
After 1 h, a spot of a new compound less polar than the substrate
appeared on the TLC plate, and its intensity increased with the reaction
time. After 5 h at 19–20 °C, the reaction mixture was
worked up. The 31PNMR spectrum of the crude product displayed
resonances for the cyclic phosphonate (±)-25, the
open chain product (±)-29b, a compound of unknown
structure, and the starting material (±)-28b in
molar ratios of 4:100:16:1. Flash column chromatography gave the open
chain hydrazine derivative (±)-29b in 75% yield
as a colorless gum. As expected, the first substitution occurred at
C-3, and the second one at C-1 virtually did not take place at 20
°C. When hydrazine derivative (±)-29b was heated
at 80 °C under the same reaction conditions as before except
for the higher reaction temperature, cyclization smoothly proceeded
to pyrazolidine (±)-25 and was finished after 2.5
h. Workup and purification delivered pyrazolidin-3-ylphosphonate (±)-25 in 75% yield. The reaction with nosylate (±)-29c was performed analogously (56% yield) except that the
reaction temperature for both steps was 50 °C instead of 20 °C
at the beginning and 80 °C later, owing to the nosyloxy group
being a better leaving group than the mesyloxy one. When cyclization
was carried out in DMF with KOtBu as the base for
1.5 h at 0 °C and 1.5 h at 20 °C, the yield was somewhat
higher (65%). The yield could not be improved any further despite
many experiments. It seemed likely that the partial removal of an
isopropyl group would give a water-soluble salt and thus decrease
the yield. Global deprotection of (±)-25 was more
sensitive to forcing conditions such as refluxing 6 M HCl than to
the milder conditions with TMSBr/allylTMS at 50 °C. Purification
of the crude product by cation-exchange chromatography (Dowex 50W
× 8, H+) and crystallization furnished racemic pyrazolidin-3-ylphosphonic
acids [(±)-4] in 55% yield.
Scheme 6
Preparation of (±)-Pyrazolidin-3-ylphosphonic
Acid [(±)-4]
Nos
= 4-nitrobenzenesulfonyl,
Tf = trifluoromethanesulfonyl, Ms = methanesulfonyl.
Preparation of (±)-Pyrazolidin-3-ylphosphonic
Acid [(±)-4]
Nos
= 4-nitrobenzenesulfonyl,
Tf = trifluoromethanesulfonyl, Ms = methanesulfonyl.To prepare its enantiomer (R)-4,
bromohydroxyphosphonate (±)-27 was chloroacetylated
and kinetically resolved in the same way as the chloro analogue (±)-21 (Scheme ). Stopping hydrolysis at a conversion of 40% delivered (+)-α-hydroxyphosphonate(S)-27 of 95% ee, as determined via
(R)-Mosher ester in combination with 31PNMR spectroscopy. This enantiomer was nosylated (ee 95% by HPLC, Figure S7) and then cyclized with inversion of
configuration at C-1 in analogy to the racemate in a basic biphasic
system mediated by a phase-transfer catalyst at 50 °C. Global
deprotection of (R)-25 delivered pyrazolidin-3-ylphosphonic
acid [(R)-4, ee 92%, Figure S4] by isolation from the crude product as for the
racemate.
Scheme 7
Preparation of (R)-Pyrazolidin-3-ylphosphonic
Acid
[(R)-4]
Nos
= 4-nitrobenzenesulfonyl.
Preparation of (R)-Pyrazolidin-3-ylphosphonic
Acid
[(R)-4]
Nos
= 4-nitrobenzenesulfonyl.
Inhibition of Plant P5C
Reductase by Phosphonic Acid Analogues
of Proline and Proline Analogues
The ability of all obtained
compounds to interfere with the catalytic activity of P5C reductase,
purified from Arabidopsis thalianacultured
cells,[34] was then evaluated. In the range
from 10–4 to 10–3 M, their addition
to the assay mixture was found ineffective. On the contrary, when
millimolarconcentrations of compounds (R)-, (S)-1, and(R)-6 were used, a significant inhibition was evident that was proportional
to the dose (Figure ). Interestingly, their effectiveness was higher than that of proline,
which exerts product inhibition in the range from 10 to 200 mM.[34,35] The calculated IC50 values were 84 ± 3, 24 ±
4, 21 ± 2, and 45 ± 19 mM for proline, (R)-, (S)-1, and (R)-6, respectively. However, these concentrations were 3–4
orders of magnitude higher than those found for bisphosphonate
inhibitors of P5C reductases from higher plants.[4−7] Therefore, although potentially
useful for molecular-docking studies aimed at a better comprehension
of the product inhibition mechanism, the use of these analogues for
weed control seems unfeasible. The ability of phosphonic acid analogues
of proline and proline analogues to interfere with the activity of
the enzymes that catalyze the first step in proline biosynthesis in
bacteria and plants, namely γ-glutamyl kinase and P5C synthetase
from Escherichia coli and rice, respectively,
was also assessed. However, in no case was their catalytic rate significantly
inhibited (data not shown).
Figure 2
Effect of millimolar concentrations of compounds
(R)-, (S)-1, and (R)-6 on the activity of A. thaliana P5C reductase. The inhibition brought about by the physiological
product of the enzyme, proline, is also shown as a term of comparison.
Effect of millimolarconcentrations of compounds
(R)-, (S)-1, and (R)-6 on the activity of A. thalianaP5C reductase. The inhibition brought about by the physiological
product of the enzyme, proline, is also shown as a term of comparison.
Conclusions
In
summary, we have prepared the racemic 1-hydroxy-3-butenyl-,
3-chloro-1-hydroxypropyl-, and 3-bromo-1-hydroxypropylphosphonate
and converted them to chloroacetates for lipase-catalyzed enantioselective
hydrolysis. The racemates and (S)-enantiomers of
these α-hydroxyphosphonates were transformed into racemic and
(R)-configured pyrrolidin-2-yl-, oxazolidin-3-yl-,
oxazolidin-5-yl-, pyrazolidin-3-yl-, and 1,2-oxazinan-3-ylphosphonicphosphonic acids by a variety of functional group manipulations. The
ee (92–99%) of the (R)-enantiomers were determined
after derivatization using chiral HPLC on quinine and quinidine-derived
anion-exchange columns. These phosphonic acids, structural analogues
of proline and proline analogues, were tested as P5C reductase inhibitors,
but displayed negligible activity. They also did not interfere with
the enzymes of bacteria and plants catalyzing the first step in proline
biosynthesis. These phosphonic acids may also be evaluated as inhibitors
of proline-metabolizing enzymes.
Experimental Section
General
Information
1H, 13C (J-modulated) and 31PNMR spectra were recorded
in CDCl3 or D2O on a Bruker AV 400 (1H: 400.13 MHz, 13C: 100.61 MHz, 31P: 161.98
MHz), AV III 400 (1H: 400.27 MHz, 13C: 100.65
MHz, 31P: 162.03 MHz), AV II+ 500 (1H: 500.32 MHz, 31P: 202.53 MHz), and AV III 600 (1H: 600.25 MHz, 13C: 150.93 MHz, 31P:
242.99 MHz) at 25 °C unless otherwise indicated. Chemical shifts
(δ) are reported in parts per million (ppm) relative to CHCl3/CDCl3 (δH 7.24; δC 77.00), toluene-d8 (δH 2.09 for HD2C of toluene-d7), HOD (δH 4.80) and external H3PO4 (85%; δP 0.00) and coupling constants (J) in Hz. Infrared (IR) spectra were recorded on a Bruker
VERTEX 70 IR spectrometer in the attenuated total reflection (ATR)
mode or of films on a silicon disc.[36] High-resolution
mass spectra (HRMS) were obtained using a Brucker Maxis Q-TOF mass
spectrometer [electrospray ionization (ESI)]. Optical rotations were
measured on a PerkinElmer 341 polarimeter in a 1 dm quartz cell. Analytical
HPLC: Shimadzu system comprising components LC-20AT, SIL-20A HT, CTO-20AC,
SPD-20A, CMB-20A, column: CHIRALPAK IA (250 mm × 4.6 mm, particle
size 5 μm, 1 mL/min, 25 °C). Melting points were measured
on a Leica Galen III Thermovar instrument and are uncorrected.Anhydrous THF was refluxed over potassium and distilled prior to
use. Pyridine was dried by refluxing over powdered CaH2, then distilled, and stored over molecular sieves (4 Å). All
other solvents, also dry ones, and chemicals were used as purchased.
Flash column chromatography was performed using silica gel (particle
size 0.040–0.063 mm). Reactions were monitored by analytical
TLC using precoated silica gel plates (60 F254, 250 μm
thickness). Spots were visualized by ultraviolet (UV) and/or dipping
into a solution of (NH4)6Mo7O24·4H2O (25.0 g) and Ce(SO4)2·4H2O (1.0 g) in 10% aqueous H2SO4 (500 mL), followed by heating with a heat gun. The
solvent for TLC of phosphonic acids was iPrOH/H2O/NH3 (25%) in the ratio of 6:3:1. Spots of phosphonic
acids were visualized by dipping the silica gel plate into a solution
of 2% ninhydrin in EtOH and heating with a heat gun.
Determination
of Enantiomeric Excesses of Aminophosphonic Acids
The analytical
determination of enantiomeric excesses was performed
with a commercial CHIRALPAK tert-butyl-QD-AX (150
mm × 4 mm, 5 μm) column and an in-house prepared underivatized
OH-QN-AXcolumn[37] (150 mm × 4 mm,
5 μm; CSP1). The mobile phase comprised an aqueous H3PO4 solution in MeOH in the ratio of 1:9 (v/v). Note that
the molarity of the aqueous phase as well as the apparent pH (adjusted
with triethylamine) of the polar organic mobile phase and the flow
rates were optimized depending on the amino phosphonic acid, the column
type, and the derivatization type. These chromatographicconditions
are provided in the respective figure legends of the corresponding
chromatograms summarized in the Supporting Information.The instrumentation used were a thermoshaker PHMT with PSC24N
from Grant-bio (Cambridgeshire, UK) and an Agilent 1100 HPLC–UV–fluorescence
detector (FLD) system from Agilent (Waldbronn, Germany), which comprised
a binary pump, a temperature controlled column oven, an autosampler,
a multiwavelength detector (MWD) and a FLD. For the FLD, a gain of
10, an excitation wavelength of 254 nm, and an emission wavelength
of 395 nm were chosen, whereas the MWD was set to 254 nm.For
compounds 1 and 2, a derivatization
with the Sanger’s reagent (1-fluoro-2,4-dinitrobenzene, DNFB
from Sigma Aldrich) and chiral separation on the CHIRALPAK tert-butyl-QD-AXcolumn were chosen. For compounds 3, 4, and 6, a derivatization with
6-aminoquinolyl-N-hydroxysuccinimidyl carbamate (AQC
from Synchem) and chiral separation on an underivatized OH-QN-AXcolumn
provided the best results.
AQC Derivatization
Phospha amino
acid (10 μL,
20 mM in water) was added to 0.2 M borate buffer (pH 8.8, 70 μL),
followed by the addition of AQC (3 mg/mL in dry acetonitrile, 20 μL).
The reaction mixture was immediately heated at 55 °C for 10 min.
DNFB Derivatization
To a solution (150 μL, 10
mM) of phospha amino acid in sodium carbonate buffer (0.1 M, pH 9.5),
Sanger reagent [2.5% (v/v) in acetonitrile, 50 μL] was added
and heated for 15 min at 50 °C. After reaching room temperature
and centrifugation, the respective mobile phase (350 μL) was
added.Chromatographic results are summarized in the Supporting Information in Figure S1 [compounds
(R)-, (S)-, and (R,S)-1], Figure S2 [compounds (R)- and (R,S)-2], Figure S3 [compounds (R)- and (R,S)-3], Figure S4 [compound (R)-4], and Figure S5 [compounds (R)- and (R,S)-5].Note that for DNFB-derivatized compounds 1 and 2, an elution order of the (S)-enantiomer
before the (R)-enantiomer was observed on the CHIRALPAK tert-butyl-QD-AXcolumn with separation factors of 1.32
and 1.23, respectively. Concerning enantiomeric excess, an ee of 99.3%
was determined for compound (R)-1, 99.99%
for (S)-1, and 99.2% for (R)-2. The same elution order, (S)- before
(R)-enantiomer, was also observed for AQC-derivatized
compounds 3 and 4 using the unmodified QN-AX
column, providing separation factors of 1.14 and 1.38, respectively.
The determined ee values were 97.2% for compound (R)-3 and 98.8% for (R)-4 after crystallization (values for mother liquor and before crystallization:
76.9 and 92.2%). Although compound 6 was an analogue
of compound 2, an elution order of (R) before (S) was observed with a separation factor
of 1.23 and an ee value of 91.6% after crystallization (values for
mother liquor and before crystallization: 56.3 and 83.1%) using AQC
derivatization and separation on an unmodified QN-AX column. A control
experiment for compound 2 derivatized with AQC and separation
on the same unmodified QN-AX column showed the same elution order,
(R) before (S), as observed for
compound 6; however, no baseline separation could be
achieved under standard test conditions (data not shown). The deviation
in the elution order was the result of using different derivatization
reagents combined with different chiral selector types (QN-AX vs QD-AX)
and selector modifications (tert-butyl type vs unmodified
CSP) for enantiomer separation.
(±)-, (R)-(+)-, and (S)-(−)-Pyrrolidin-2-ylphosphonic
Acid (Phosphaproline) [(±)-,
(R)-, and (S)-1]
Cyclohexene (598 mg, 0.74 mL, 7.28 mmol, 4 equiv) was added to
a solution of H3B × Me2S (277 mg, 0.35
mL, 3.64 mmol, 2 equiv) in freshly distilled dry 1,2-dimethoxyethane
(DME, 5.5 mL) under an argon atmosphere at 0 °C. The reaction
mixture was stirred for 15 min at 0 °C and 1 h at room temperature.
The resulting suspension of dicyclohexylborane[23] was again cooled at 0 °C. Racemic 1-azido-3-butenylphosphonate
(±)-8[18] (475 mg, 1.82
mmol) dissolved in dry DME (1 mL) was added. After stirring for 1
h at 0 °C and 2 h at room temperature, the reaction was quenched
with concd HCl (2 mL) and water (5 mL). The organic phase was removed,
and the aq one was concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue
was refluxed with a mixture of concd HCl (8 mL) and water (5 mL) for
18 h. The solution was cooled and concentrated under reduced pressure.
The residue was dried over KOH in a vacuum desiccator and purified
by cation-exchange chromatography (Dowex 50W × 8, H+, elution with water). Fractions containing the product (TLC: iPrOH/H2O/NH3 (25%), 6:3:1, Rf = 0.25) were pooled and concentrated under
reduced pressure to furnish racemicphosphaproline [(±)-1] (179 mg, 65%) as colorless crystals; mp 270–273
°C (H2O/EtOH). Similarly, (R)-(−)-1-azido-3-butenylphosphonate
(R)-8[18] {533
mg, 2.04 mmol; [α]D20 −31.3 (c 1.2, acetone)} was converted
to (R)-phosphaproline [(R)-1] (191 mg, 62%); [α]D22 −46.6 (c 0.5, 1 M
NaOH) {lit.:[14] [α]D21 −49.1 (c 1.1, 1 M NaOH); lit.:[17] [α]D21 −49.8
(c 1.1, 1 M NaOH); lit.:[9] [α]57820 +64 (c 1.0, 1 M NaOH), +64 (c 1.0,
1 M NaOH)}. Similarly, (S)-(+)-azide [(S)-8] [1.09 g, 4.17 mmol; [α]D20 +32.0 (c 1.08,
acetone)] was converted to (S)-(+)-phosphaproline
[(S)-1] (451 mg, 71%): [α]57823 +49.5 (c 0.55, 1 M NaOH); [α]D20 +47.3 (c 0.55, 1 M
NaOH); mp 280 °C (decomp). Azide(S)-8 (1.670 g, 80%) was prepared from 1-hydroxy-3-butenylphosphonate(R)-7 (1.89 g, 8.0 mmol, 99% ee) by
a literature procedure;[18] [α]D20 +32.0 (c 1.08, acetone). The NMR spectra of (±)-, (R)-, and (S)-phosphaproline were identical
to those reported in the literature.[14]
(±)- and (S)-(+)-3-Hydroxy-1-(4-nitrobenzenesulfonyloxy)propylphosphonate
[(±)- and (S)-12]
Racemicnosylate (±)-11[18] (993
mg, 2.36 mmol) was dissolved in a mixture of methanol (5 mL) and CH2Cl2 (5 mL). Ozone was bubbled through the stirred
solution at −78 °C until the blue color persisted. Excess
ozone was removed by passing air through the solution. NaBH4 (107 mg, 2.83 mmol, 1.2 equiv, dissolved in 1 mL of ethanol) was
added and stirring was continued for 2.5 h at room temperature. The
reaction mixture was concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue
was dissolved in water (10 mL) and EtOAc (10 mL). The organic layer
was separated, and the aq one was extracted with EtOAc (2 × 10
mL). The combined organic layers were dried (Na2SO4) and concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue was
purified by flash chromatography (hexanes/EtOAc, 1:1, Rf 0.17) to yield 3-hydroxypropylphosphonate (±)-12 (912 mg, 91%) as colorless crystals; mp 103 °C (CH2Cl2/hexanes). Similarly, nosylate(S)-11[18] (1.334 g, 3.166 mmol)
was converted to hydroxypropylphosphonate(S)-12 (1.227 g, 91%) as colorless crystals; mp 93 °C (CH2Cl2/hexanes); [α]D20 +25.5 (c 1.15, acetone).
The NMR spectra of (±)- and (S)-12 were identical.IR (ATR) of (S)-enantiomer
ν: 3358, 2985, 1608, 1534, 1375, 1350, 1242, 1186, 988 cm–1. 1HNMR (400.13 MHz, CDCl3):
δ 8.40–8.34 (m, 2H), 8.20–8.13 (m, 2H), 5.08 (td, J = 9.4, 4.5 Hz, 1H), 4.68 (2 oct overlapping to a dec, J = 6.4 Hz, 2H), 3.79 (td, J = 11.8, 4.4
Hz, 1H), 3.70 (td, J = 11.8, 3.5 Hz, 1H), 2.55 (br
s, 1H, OH), 2.22–2.07 (m, 1H), 2.01–1.93 (m, 1H), 1.298
(d, J = 6.4 Hz, 3H), 1.294 (d, J = 6.4 Hz, 3H), 1.264 (d, J = 6.4 Hz, 3H), 1.248
(d, J = 6.4 Hz, 3H); 13CNMR (100.61 MHz,
CDCl3): δ 150.8, 142.3, 129.5 (2C), 124.2 (2C), 75.1
(d, J = 172.6 Hz), 72.6 (d, J =
6.3 Hz), 72.6 (d, J = 6.5 Hz), 57.3 (d, J = 10.3 Hz), 33.5, 24.0 (d, J = 5.2 Hz), 24.0 (d, J = 5.2 Hz), 23.9 (d, J = 5.1 Hz), 23.7
(d, J = 4.9 Hz); 31PNMR (162.03 MHz,
CDCl3): δ 16.7. Anal. Calcd for C15H24NO9PS: C, 42.35; H, 5.69; N, 3.29. Found: C, 42.40;
H, 5.72; N, 3.29.
(±)- and (S)-(+)-Diisopropyl
1-(4-nitrobenzenesulfonyloxy)-3-(phthalimidooxy)propylphosphonate
[(±)- and (S)-13]
Racemic
3-hydroxypropylphosphonate (±)-12 (1.260 g, 2.96
mmol), N-hydroxyphthalimide (507 mg, 3.11 mmol, 1.05
equiv) and Ph3P (1.010 g, 3.85 mmol, 1.3 equiv) were dissolved
with stirring in dry THF (12 mL) and dry CH2Cl2 (1.5 mL) under argon. DIAD (779 mg, 0.76 mL, 3.85 mmol, 1.3 equiv)
was added dropwise at 0 °C, and the solution was slowly warmed
to room temperature in a cooling bath and stirred overnight. Water
(a few drops) was added, and after 15 min, the reaction mixture was
concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue was flash-chromatographed
(hexanes/EtOAc, 3:2, Rf 0.33 for hexanes/EtOAc,
1:1) to yield racemic phthalimidooxyphosphonate (±)-13 (1.399 g, 83%) as a colorless foam. Similarly, (S)-hydroxypropylphosphonate(S)-12 (1.572
g, 2.96 mmol; 97% ee) was converted to (S)-(+)-phthalimidooxyphosphonate(S)-13 (1.399 g, 84%) as a colorless
foam; [α]D20 +15.1 (c 0.35, acetone). The NMR spectra of (±)-
and (S)-13 were identical.IR
(ATR) of (±)-15 ν: 2981, 1732, 1531, 1373,
1349, 1255, 1185, 984 cm–1. 1HNMR (600.25
MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.45–8.39 (m, 2H), 8.30–8.24
(m, 2H), 7.89–7.84 (m, 2H), 7.81–7.76 (m, 2H), 5.35
(td, J = 9.1, 4.2 Hz, 1H), 4.74 (oct, J = 6.2 Hz, 1H), 4.70 (oct, J = 6.2 Hz, 1H), 4.45–4.38
(m, 1H), 4.32 (ddd, J = 10.2, 8.2, 5.5 Hz, 1H), 2.48–2.39
(m, 1H), 2.27–2.18 (m, 1H), 1.34 (d, J = 6.2
Hz, 3H), 1.32 (d, J = 6.2 Hz, 3H), 1.31 (d, J = 6.2 Hz, 3H), 1.30 (d, J = 6.2 Hz, 3H); 13CNMR (150.93 MHz, CDCl3): δ 163.4 (2C),
150.7, 142.1, 134.6 (2C), 129.7 (2C), 128.7 (2C), 124.2 (2C), 123.6
(2C), 74.1 (d, J = 172.4 Hz), 73.5 (d, J = 10.9 Hz), 72.7 (d, J = 6.1 Hz), 72.6 (d, J = 6.4 Hz), 29.7, 24.0 (d, J = 3.6 Hz),
24.0 (d, J = 3.7 Hz), 23.8 (d, J = 5.0 Hz), 23.7 (d, J = 5.0 Hz); 31PNMR (242.99 MHz, CDCl3): δ 14.2. HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M + Na]+ calcd C23H27N2O11PSNa, 593.0966; found, 593.0961.
(±)- and (R)-(+)-Isoxazolidin-3-ylphosphonic
Acid [(±)- and (R)-2]
Racemic phthalimidooxyphosphonate (±)-13 (762 mg,
1.34 mmol) was dissolved in iPrOH (4 mL) and heated
and stirred at 60 °C after addition of N2H4 × H2O (334 mg, 6.68 mmol, 0.33 mL). A crystalline
solid was formed rapidly. After 1 h, the solvent was removed at reduced
pressure (1 mbar). Diisopropyl ether was added, and the residue was
converted to a paste by stirring and breaking up the lumps with a
spatula. The mixture was filtered through a Celite pad with suction
and carefully washed with iPr2O. The filtrate
was concentrated under reduced pressure. The oily, faint yellow residue
(355 mg) was mixed with AcOH/HBr[24] (7 mL,
30%) under argon at room temperature and stirred for 16 h. Volatile
compounds were removed under vacuum (1 mbar). The residue was purified
by cation-exchange chromatography (Dowex 50W × 8, H+; column: o.d. 2 cm × 38 cm, elution with water, fractions of
10 mL; Rf 0.33). Ninhydrin-positive fractions
were pooled and concentrated under reduced pressure to give racemic
isoxazolidin-3-ylphosphonic acid (±)-2 (162 mg,
79% combined yield for two steps) as colorless crystals; mp 148 °C
(decomp) (H2O/iPrOH). Similarly, (S)-(+)-phthalimidooxyphosphonate(S)-13 (928 mg, 1.63 mmol) was converted to (R)-(+)-isoxazolidin-3-ylphosphonic acid(R)-2 (148 mg, 74%) as colorless crystals; mp 180 °C (decomp)
(water/ethanol); ee 99% (Figure S2); [α]D20 +6.4 (c 0.63, water) {lit.:[25] [α]D20 +30.8 (c 1.0, CF3CO2H)}. The NMR spectra
of (±)- and (R)-2 were identical.IR (ATR) of (±)-2 ν: 3100–1500 (very
br), 1447, 1232, 1169, 1076, 963, 927, 858 cm–1. 1HNMR (600.25 MHz, D2O): δ 4.34 (qd, J = 8.0, 4.0 Hz, 1H), 4.18 (qd, J = 8.0,
0.5 Hz, 1H), 3.84 (td, J = 9.9, 8.4 Hz, 1H), 2.76–2.68
(m, 1H), 2.53–2.42 (m, 1H); 13CNMR (150.93 MHz,
D2O): δ 71.1 (d, J = 8.2 Hz), 56.8
(d, J = 139.9 Hz, 30.7); 31PNMR (242.99
MHz, D2O): δ 7.8. Anal. Calcd for C3H8NO4P: C, 23.54; H, 5.27; N, 9.15. Found: C, 23.56;
H, 5.05; N, 25.
(±)- and (S)-(+)-Diisopropyl
1-(4-Nitrobenzenesulfonyloxy)-4-(phthalimidooxy)butylphosphonate
[(±)- and (S)-17]
The
mixture of racemic ω-hydroxynosylate (±)-16[18] (2.334 g, 5.31 mmol), N-hydroxyphthalimide (1.039 g, 6.37 mmol, 1.2 equiv) and dry toluene
(30 mL) was concentrated under reduced pressure and dried in vacuo.
Triphenylphosphane (1.95 g, 7.43 mmol, 1.4 equiv) was added to the
residue, followed by dry THF (20 mL) under argon atmosphere. After
cooling at 0 °C, DIAD (1.502 g, 7.43 mmol, 1.4 equiv, 1.46 mL)
was added dropwise. Stirring was continued for 3 min at 0 °C
and 4 h at room temperature before H2O (0.5 mL) was added.
After 5 min, the reaction mixture was concentrated under reduced pressure.
The residue was flash-chromatographed (heptanes/EtOAc, 1:1, Rf 0.38) to yield racemic phthalimidooxyphosphonate
(±)-17 (2.275 g, 73%) as colorless crystals; mp
130–132 °C [1,2-dichloroethane (DCE)/heptanes]. Similarly,
(S)-(+)-ω-hydroxynosylate (S)-18 {2.580 g, 5.87 mmol; [α]D27 +7.7 (c 1.25,
acetone), derived from 1-hydroxy-3-butenylphosphonate[18] of 85% ee} was converted to (S)-phthalimidooxyphosphonate
(S)-17 (2.574 g, 75%) as colorless crystals;
mp 128 °C (CH2Cl2/hexanes); [α]D20 +5.0 (c 1.29, acetone). The NMR spectra of (±)- and (S)-19 were identical.IR (ATR) of (±)-19 ν: 2978, 2960, 1732, 1367, 1345, 1268, 1182, 1007,
981 cm–1. 1HNMR (600.25 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.38–8.34 (m, 2H), 8.21–8.16 (m,
2H), 7.83–7.79 (m, 2H), 7.76–7.71 (m, 2H), 4.99 (td, J = 9.1, 4.4 Hz, 1H), 4.72 (oct, J = 6.2
Hz, 1H), 4.63 (oct, J = 6.2 Hz, 1H), 4.22–4.14
(m, 2H), 2.28–2.19 (m, 1H), 2.10–2.02 (m, 1H), 2.02–1.94
(m, 1H), 1.91–1.82 (m, 1H), 1.30 (d, J = 6.2
Hz, 3H), 1.298 (d, J = 6.2 Hz, 3H), 1.27 (d, J = 6.2 Hz, 3H), 1.25 (d, J = 6.2 Hz, 3H); 13CNMR (150.93 MHz, CDCl3): δ 163.5 (2C),
150.7, 142.5, 134.5 (2C), 129.4 (2C), 128.8 (2C), 124.2 (2C), 123.3
(2C), 77.7 (d, J = 171.5 Hz), 77.0, 72.4 (d, J = 7.1 Hz), 72.4 (d, J = 7.1 Hz), 26.7,
24.2 (d, J = 10.0 Hz), 24.1 (d, J = 3.6 Hz), 24.0 (d, J = 3.7 Hz), 23.9 (d, J = 5.0 Hz), 23.7 (d, J = 5.0 Hz); 31PNMR (242.99 MHz, CDCl3): δ 14.4. Anal.
Calcd for C24H29N2O11PS:
C, 49.31; H, 5.00; N, 4.79. Found: C, 49.40; H, 5.13; N, 4.98.
(±)-
and (R)-Diisopropyl 1,2-Oxazinan-3-ylphosphonate
[(±)- and (R)-18]
A mixture
of racemic phthalimidooxyphosphonate (±)-17 (873
mg, 1.49 mmol), N2H4 × H2O (374
mg, 7.47 mmol, 5 equiv, 0.36 mL) and iPrOH (5 mL)
were heated at 80 °C for 1 h. The mixture was cooled and diluted
with EtOAc (5 mL). The crystals were collected by suction and washed
with EtOAc. The combined filtrates were concentrated under reduced
pressure. The residue was flash-chromatographed (EtOAc, Rf 0.36) to give racemic1,2-oxazinan-3-ylphosphonate [(±)-18] (273 mg, 73%) as a colorless liquid. Similarly, (S)-(+)-phthalimidooxyphosphonate(S)-17 (1.40 g, 2.4 mmol) was converted to (R)-(−)-1,2-oxazinan-3-ylphosphonate(R)-18 (500 mg, 83%); [α]D23 −38.9 (c 0.9, MeOH).
The NMR spectra of (±)- and (R)-(−)-18 were identical.IR (ATR) ν: 3242, 2978, 2939,
1375, 1232, 1058, 974 cm–1. 1HNMR (600.25
MHz, CDCl3): δ 5.42 (br s, 1H), 4.76–4.65
(m, 2H), 3.99–3.93 (m, 1H), 3.73 (td, J =
11.3, 3.1 Hz, 1H), 3.43 (ddd, J = 15.4, 11.2, 3.0
Hz, 1H), 2.00–1.93 (m, 1H), 1.82–1.65 (m, 3H), 1.32
(d, J = 5.8 Hz, 3H), 1.31 (d, J =
6.6 Hz, 3H), 1.30 (d, J = 6.4 Hz, 6H); 13CNMR (150.93 MHz, CDCl3): δ 71.1 (d, J = 6.7 Hz), 71.0 (d, J = 7.0 Hz), 70.5, 56.5 (d, J = 150.7 Hz), 24.5 (d, J = 11.7 Hz), 24.1
(d, J = 3.6 Hz), 24.1 (d, J = 3.7
Hz), 24.0 (d, J = 4.5 Hz), 23.95 (d, J = 4.5 Hz), 23.64 (d, J = 3.7 Hz); 31PNMR (242.99 MHz, CDCl3): δ 20.1. Anal. Calcd for
C10H22NO4P: C, 47.80; H, 8.83; N,
5.57; O, 25.47. Found: C, 47.78; H, 9.19; N, 5.74; O, 25.53.
(±)-
and (R)-(−)-1,2-Oxazinan-3-ylphosphonic
Acid [(±)- and (R)-6]
Racemic1,2-oxazinan-3-ylphosphonate (±)-18 (479
mg, 1.906 mmol) was dissolved in 6 M HCl (10 mL) and refluxed for
4 h. The solution was concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue
was purified by cation-exchange chromatography (Dowex 50W × 8,
H+, water as eluent, Rf 0.61)
to furnish racemic 1,2-oxazinan-3-ylphosphonic acid (±)-6 (301 mg, 94%) as crystals; mp 183–86 °C (decomp.)
(H2O/EtOH). Similarly, (R)-(−)-1,2-oxazinan-3-ylphosphonate(R)-18 (480 mg, 1.91 mmol) was converted
to (R)-(−)-1,2-oxazinan-3-ylphosphonic acid
[(R)-6] (289 mg, 91%) as crystals; mp
183–85 °C (decomp) (H2O/EtOH); [α]D25 −22.3
(c 0.95, H2O) before crystallization (ee
83.1%; Figure S5); [α]D27 −23.2
(c 0.95, H2O) after crystallization (ee
91.6%). The NMR spectra of (±)- and (R)-6 were identical.IR (ATR) of (±)-6 ν: 3500–1700 (very br), 1234, 1186, 1168, 1069, 1040,
978, 960, 913 cm–1. 1HNMR (600.25 MHz,
D2O): δ 4.31–4.23 (m, 1H), 4.15 (td, J = 12.1, 2.5 Hz, 1H), 3.59 (ddd, J = 13.7,
12.3, 2.5 Hz, 1H), 2.22–2.12 (m, 1H), 1.99–1.78 (m,
3H); 13CNMR (150.93 MHz, D2O): δ 71.4,
56.1 (d, J = 134.5 Hz), 21.8 (d, J = 9.8 Hz), 20.8 (d, J = 2.5 Hz); 31PNMR (242.99 MHz, D2O): δ 9.1. Anal. Calcd for C4H10NO4P: C, 28.75; H, 6.03; N, 8.38;
O, 38.30. Found: C, 28.79; H, 5.94; N, 8.21; O, 38.63.
Ethyl 3-chloropropionate (19) (4.097
g, 30 mmol) was dissolved in dry toluene (40 mL) and cooled to −78
°C under argon atmosphere. A solution of DIBALH (33 mL, 1 M,
toluene) was added dropwise over 10 min.[28] After 2 h of additional stirring at −78 °C, diisopropyl
trimethylsilyl phosphite (7.150 g, 30 mmol) was added. The cooling
bath was removed and the reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature
for 18 h. HCl (2 M, 10 mL, exothermic!) was added dropwise, and after
10 min, more HCl (90 mL) was added and stirring was continued for
30 min (TLC: the silylated hydroxyphosphonate should be absent). The
organic phase was separated and the aq one was extracted with EtOAc
(3 × 50 mL). The combined organic layers were washed with brine,
dried (MgSO4), and concentrated under reduced pressure.
The residue was purified by flash chromatography (hexanes/EtOAc, 1:3; Rf 0.24) to give racemic α-hydroxyphosphonate
(±)-20 (6.558 g, 84%) as a colorless oil.IR (ATR) ν: 3272, 2979, 1386, 1376, 1178, 1077, 978 cm–1. 1HNMR (400.27 MHz, CDCl3):
δ 4.90–4.50 (m and br s, 3H), 3.99 (td, J = 9.7, 4.4 Hz, 1H), 3.78–3.65 (m, 2H), 2.18–1.99 (m,
2H), 1.30 (d, J = 6.0 Hz, 3H), 1.29 (d, J = 6.2 Hz, 9H); 13CNMR (100.61 MHz, CDCl3):
δ 71.5 (d, J = 7.4 Hz), 71.3 (d, J = 7.4 Hz), 64.6 (d, J = 165.7 Hz), 41.2 (d, J = 16.7 Hz), 34.4 (d, J = 2.5 Hz), 24.1
(d, J = 3.7 Hz), 24.0 (d, J = 3.8
Hz), 23.9 (d, J = 4.7 Hz, 2C); 31PNMR
(162.04 MHz, CDCl3): δ 22.7. Anal. Calcd for C9H20ClO4P: C, 41.79; H, 7.79; O, 24.74.
Found: C, 41.84; H, 7.76; O, 24.84.
Racemic 3-chloro-1-hydroxypropylphosphonate
(±)-20 (4.967 g, 19.2 mmol) was dissolved in dry
CH2Cl2 (30 mL) under Ar atmosphere. After cooling
to 0 °C, dry pyridine (4.556 g, 57.6 mmol, 4.649 mL, 3 equiv)
was added, and the solution was stirred for 10 min. Chloroacetic anhydride
(4.924 g, 28.8 mmol, 1.5 equiv) dissolved in dry CH2Cl2 (16 mL) was added and stirring was continued at 0 °C.[38] After 2.5 h (TLC monitoring), when the starting
material was consumed, the reaction was quenched with water (4 mL),
and stirring was continued for 5 min before more water (20 mL) was
added. The organic phase was separated, and the aqueous one was extracted
with EtOAc (30 mL). The combined organic phases were washed with HCl
(30 mL, 2 M), water (10 mL), saturated aqueous solution of NaHCO3 (20 mL), dried (MgSO4), and concentrated under
reduced pressure. The residue was purified by flash chromatography
(hexanes/EtOAc, 1:1, Rf 0.33) to give
chloroacetate (±)-21 (5.463 g, 85%) as a colorless
oil.IR (ATR) ν: 2981, 2937, 1768, 1387, 1386, 1376, 1246,
1157, 1103, 979 cm–1. 1HNMR (600.25
MHz, CDCl3): δ 5.42 (td, J = 9.2,
4.5 Hz, 1H), 4.74 (sept, J = 6.2 Hz, 1H), 4.73 (sept, J = 6.2 Hz, 1H), 4.10 (AB system, J = 14.8
Hz, 2H), 3.64–3.58 (m, 1H), 3.50 (ddd, J =
11.2, 8.1, 6.6 Hz, 1H), 2.36–2.23 (m, 2H), 1.32, 1.316, 1.309,
1.299 (4 × d, each J = 6.2 Hz, 3H); 13CNMR (150.93 MHz, CDCl3): δ 166.2 (d, J = 4.9 Hz), 72.2 (d, J = 6.7 Hz), 72.0 (d, J = 7.2 Hz), 67.5 (d, J = 171.4 Hz), 40.5,
40.1 (d, J = 14.4 Hz), 32.6, 24.1 (d, J = 3.5 Hz), 24.0 (d, J = 3.9 Hz), 23.95 (d, J = 5.0 Hz), 23.8 (d, J = 5.1 Hz); 31PNMR (242.99 MHz, CDCl3): δ 16.3. Anal.
Calcd for C11H21Cl2O5P:
C, 39.42; H, 6.32; O, 23.87. Found: C, 39.39; H, 6.23; O, 24.06.
Resolution of Racemic Diisopropyl 3-Chloro-1-(chloroacetoxy)propylphosphonate
[(±)-21]
(±)-3-Chloro-1-(chloroacetoxy)propylphosphonate
(±)-21 (5.463 g, 16.3 mmol) was dissolved in a mixture
of t-BuOMe and hexanes (36 mL, 1:1) and phosphate
buffer (25 mM, 120 mL).[14] After the pH
had been adjusted to 7.0 using the autotitrator, lipase from Thermomyces lanuginosus (0.4 mL, ≥100 000
U/g, [3.1.1.3], Sigma) was added. The mixture was vigorously stirred
at room temperature, and pH of 7.0 was maintained by the addition
of NaOH (0.5 M). At a conversion of 40% by consumption of the base
(13.04 mL), the pH was brought to 4 by the addition of HCl (2 M).
The reaction mixture was extracted with EtOAc (3 × 100 mL). The
combined organic phases were washed with a saturated aq solution of
NaHCO3 (50 mL), dried (MgSO4), and concentrated
under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by flash chromatography
(hexanes/EtOAc, 1:2, chloroacetate: Rf 0.44; hydroxyphosphonate: Rf 0.15) to
give chloroacetate(R)-21 {2.918 g,
53%; [α]D21 −21.4 (c 1.01, acetone)} and hydroxyphosphonate(S)-20 {1.332 g, 5.14 mmol, 63%; [α]D21 +31.7 (c 1.67, acetone)} as colorless liquids. The ee of 97% for
(+)-22 was determined by using(R)-(+)-(t-Bu)(Ph)P(O)(SH) as CSA and 31PNMR spectroscopy:[29,30] major singlet (1.00) at 22.9 ppm and minor one (0.015) at 22.7 ppm.
(±)- and (R)-(−)-Diisopropyl 3-Chloro-1-(phthalimidooxy)propylphosphonate
[(±)- and (R)-22]
Dry
toluene (20 mL) was added to a mixture of (±)-3-chloro-1-hydroxypropylphosphonate
(±)-20 (1.484 g, 5.74 mmol), Ph3P (2.107
g, 8.03 mmol, 1.4 equiv), and N-hydroxyphthalimide
(1.310 g, 8.03 mmol, 1.4 equiv) under argon atmosphere. A solution
of di-tert-butyl azodicarboxylate (1.850 g, 8.03
mmol, 1.4 equiv) in dry THF (6 mL) was dropwise added under cooling
with water at room temperature. After stirring for 2 h, while the
color of the reaction mixture had changed from an intense red brown
to a faint orange brown, water was added (10 drops). Ten minutes later,
the reaction mixture was concentrated under reduced pressure. The
residue was flash-chromatographed (heptanes/EtOAc, 1:1; Rf 0.33) to yield phthalimidooxyphosphonate (±)-22 (2.05 g, 88%) as a colorless heavy oil, which eventually
crystallized; mp 94–95 °C (CH2Cl2/heptanes). Similarly, (S)-3-chloro-1-hydroxypropylphosphonate(S)-20 (575 mg, 2.5 mmol; ee 96%) was
converted to (R)-(−)-3-chloro-1-(phthalimidooxy)propylphosphonate
(R)-22 (727 mg, 72%); [α]D15 −28.8
(c 2.4, acetone); mp 92–93 °C (hexanes/EtOAc);
ee 95%, determined by chiral HPLC (Figure S6). The NMR spectra of (±)- and (R)-22 were identical.IR (ATR) of crystalline (±)-24 ν: 2977, 1788, 1729, 1374, 1358, 1273, 1251, 1188, 1173, 1135,
1123, 1107, 982 cm–1. 1HNMR (400.27
MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.83–7.77 (m, 2H), 7.74–7.68
(m, 2H), 4.98 (septd, J = 7.3, 6.2 Hz, 1H), 4.80–4.67
(m, 2H), 3.95 (td, J = 11.0, 7.3 Hz, 1H), 3.84 (dddd, J = 11.0, 6.7, 5.8, 0.9 Hz, 1H), 2.46–2.29 (m, 2H),
1.38 (d, J = 6.2 Hz, 3H), 1.33 (d, J = 6.2 Hz, 3H), 1.32 (d, J = 6.2 Hz, 3H), 1.31 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 3H); 13CNMR (100.65 MHz, CDCl3): δ 163.0 (2C), 134.5 (2C), 128.9 (2C), 123.6 (2C),
79.3 (d, J = 163.8 Hz), 72.5 (d, J = 6.7 Hz), 71.9 (d, J = 7.1 Hz), 40.7 (d, J = 12.4 Hz), 33.0, 24.249 (d, J = 2.9
Hz), 24.01 (d, J = 3.8 Hz, CH3), 23.98
(d, J = 4.7 Hz), 23.8 (d, J = 5.7
Hz); 31PNMR (162.04 MHz, CDCl3): δ 15.0.
Anal. Calcd for C17H23ClNO6P: C,
50.57; H, 5.74; N, 3.47; O, 23.77. Found: C, 50.69; H, 5.52; N, 3.45;
O, 23.79.
(±)- and (R)-(+)-Isoxazolidin-5-ylphosphonic
Acid [(±)- and (R)-(+)-3]
(±)-3-Chloro-1-(phthalimidooxy)propylphosphonate (±)-22 (848 mg, 2.1 mmol) was converted to (±)-isoxazolidin-5-ylphosphonic
acid (±)-3 (259 mg, 81%) by the same procedure as
used for the preparation of (±)-isoxazolidin-3-ylphosphonic acid
(±)-2 from the respective nosylate (±)-13; mp 173 °C (decomp) (H2O/iPrOH). Similarly, protected (R)-(−)-α-aminooxyphosphonate
(R)-22 (662 mg, 1.64 mmol) was converted
to (R)-(+)-isoxazolidin-5-ylphosphonic acid [(R)-3] (159 mg, 63%); [α]D15 +20.3 (c 1.67, H2O); mp 192 °C (decomp) (H2O/EtOH); ee 97.2% before crystallization (Figure S3). The NMR spectra of (±)- and (R)-(+)-3 were identical.IR (ATR) of (±)-3 ν: 3250–1500 (very br), 1453, 1283, 1240, 1136,
1077, 1024, 949, 928, 907, 890 cm–1. 1HNMR (400.27 MHz, D2O): δ 4.47 (dd, J = 9.5, 7.0 Hz, 1H), 3.84 (ddd, J = 10.9, 8.5, 4.2
Hz, 1H), 3.71 (td, J = 10.9, 8.1 Hz, 1H), 2.89–2.77
(m, 1H), 2.66–2.51 (m, 1H); 13CNMR (150.93 MHz,
D2O): δ 78.4 (d, J = 155.9 Hz),
47.0 (d, J = 7.8 Hz), 30.0; 31PNMR (162.04
MHz, D2O): δ 10.8. Anal. Calcd for C3H8NO6P: C, 23.54; H, 5.27; N, 9.15; O, 41.81. Found:
C, 23.57; H, 5.23; N, 9.01; O, 41.38.
Lipase-Catalyzed
Resolution of Racemic Diisopropyl 3-Bromo-1-(chloroacetoxy)propylphosphonate
[(±)-30]
(±)-3-Bromo-1-(chloroacetoxy)propylphosphonate
(±)-30 (4.144 g, 10.92 mmol) was enzymatically resolved
(15 mL of t-BuOMe, 15 mL of hexanes, 50 mL of 25
mM phosphate buffer pH 7.0, room temperature; stopped after addition
of 8.37 mL of 0.5 M NaOH, corresponding to 40% conversion in 7 h 40
min) using lipase from T. lanuginosus (0.60 mL) by the method used for racemic 1-chloroacetoxy-3-butenylphosphonate
(±)-21. The crude mixture of hydroxyphosphonate
and chloroacetate (molar ratio by 31PNMR: 37:63) was flash-chromatographed
(hexanes/EtOAc, 1:2, chloroacetate: Rf 0.44, hydroxyphosphonate: Rf 0.15) to
give (R)-(−)-chloroacetate(R)-30 {2.40 g, 58%; [α]D26 −24.9 (c 2.04,
acetone)} and (S)-(+)-hydroxyphosphonate(S)-27 {1.171 g, 3.86 mmol, 35%; [α]D26 +29.5 (c 2.37, acetone), 95% ee and (S)-configuration
by 31PNMR spectroscopy of (R)-(+)-Mosher
ester} as colorless oils.
Bis(Boc)-hydrazine[31] (799 mg, 3.42 mmol, 1.5 equiv), Bu4NHSO4 (116 mg, 0.34 mmol, 0.15 equiv), toluene (10 mL),
and NaOH (4 mL, 20 w/v %) were added to mesyloxyphosphonate (±)-28b (870 mg, 2.28 mmol) at 0 °C. The mixture was stirred
vigorously. After 1 h, a sample for the 31PNMR spectrum
was withdrawn and diluted with CDCl3. As only the starting
product was detected, the cooling bath was replaced by a water bath
of 19 °C (the temperature was not allowed to surpass 20 °C).
After 2 h at 19–20 °C, another sample was withdrawn for 31PNMR spectroscopy. This time, beside the resonance for the
starting material (δP 15.3), a new signal (δP 16.1) appeared which was assigned to the hydrazine derivative
(±)-29b (their ratio was 1.0:0.54). Within 5 h at
19–20 °C, the starting material decreased to 1%. Now,
the reaction mixture was worked up. EtOAc (20 mL) and a saturated
aq solution of NaHCO3 (20 mL) were added. The organic phase
was removed, and the aq one was extracted with EtOAc (2 × 10
mL). The combined organic layers were washed with HCl (10 mL, 1 M),
dried (Na2SO4), and concentrated under reduced
pressure. The residue [(±)-25/(±)-29b/unknown compound/(±)-28b = 4:100:16:1, by 31PNMR] was purified by flash chromatography (heptanes/EtOAc,
1:1, Rf 0.15, starting material 0.22)
to give N,N′-bis(Boc)-hydrazinophosphonate
(±)-29b (911 mg, 75%) as a colorless gum.IR (ATR) ν: 3254, 2979, 2935, 1707, 1363, 1248, 1173, 1143,
985, 933 cm–1. 1HNMR (500.32 MHz, toluene-d8, 80 °C): δ 6.26 (br s, 1H), 4.94
(br s, 1H), 4.73–4.51 (m, 2H), 3.83–3.71 (m, 1H), 3.67–3.57
(m, 1H), 2.77–2.70 (m, 3H), 2.43–2.30 (m, 1H), 2.20–2.08
(m, 1H), 1.45–1.40 (m, 9H), 1.40–1.36 (m, 9H), 1.21–1.07
(m, 12H); 31PNMR (202.53 MHz, toluene-d8, 80 °C): δ 16.1, 15.2; ratio: 91:9. Anal.
Calcd for C20H41N2O10PS:
C, 45.10; H, 7.76; N, 5.26; O, 30.04; S, 6.02. Found: C, 44.71; H,
8.10; N, 4.94; O, 29.59; S, 5.76.
(±)-Diisopropyl 1,2-(Bis-tert-butoxycarbonyl)pyrazolidin-3-ylphosphonate
[(±)-25] from (±)-29b
Bu4NHSO4 (64 mg, 0.19 mmol, 0.15 equiv), toluene
(5 mL), and NaOH (2 mL, 20 w/v %) were added to 3-hydrazinophosphonate
(±)-29b (666 mg, 1.25 mmol). The mixture was heated
at 80 °C and stirred vigorously. After 3 h, the mixture was cooled
and diluted with EtOAc (20 mL) and water (8 mL). The organic phase
was separated, and the aq one was extracted with EtOAc (2 × 15
mL). The combined organic layers were washed with HCl (10 mL, 1 M),
dried (Na2SO4), and concentrated under reduced
pressure. The residue was flash-chromatographed (heptanes/EtOAc, 1:2, Rf 0.29) to furnish protected pyrazolidinylphosphonate
(±)-25 (411 mg, 75%) as a colorless, very viscous
oil.IR (ATR) of (±)-25 ν: 2977, 1702,
1366, 1252, 1166, 1141, 986 cm–1. 1HNMR (400.13 MHz, CDCl3, 50 °C): δ 4.84 (oct, J = 6.2 Hz, 1H), 4.71 (sepd, J = 7.3, 6.2
Hz, 1H), 4.42 (td, J = 9.6, 3.3 Hz, 1H), 3.97 (td, J = 9.5, 7.1 Hz, 1H), 3.21 (td, J = 9.8,
5.3 Hz, 1H), 2.44–2.30 (m, 1H), 2.30–2.11 (m, 1H), 1.46
(s, 9H), 1.45 (s, 9H), 1.31 (d, J = 6.2 Hz, 3H),
1.30 (d, J = 6.2 Hz, 6H), 1.29 (d, J = 6.2 Hz, 3H); 13CNMR (100.61 MHz, CDCl3,
50 °C): δ 156.6, 156.5, 81.8, 80.7, 72.0 (d, J = 7.0 Hz), 70.8 (d, J = 7.2 Hz), 54.1 (d, J = 173.3 Hz), 45.3 (br s), 28.3 (3C), 28.1 (3C), 27.2 (d, J = 1.1 Hz), 24.4 (d, J = 2.4 Hz), 24.1
(d, J = 4.8 Hz), 24.0 (d, J = 3.6
Hz), 23.7 (d, J = 6.1 Hz); 31PNMR (162.04
MHz, CDCl3, 50 °C): δ 21.8. Anal. Calcd for
C19H37N2O7P: C, 52.28;
H, 8.54; N, 6.42. Found: C, 51.99; H, 8.40; N, 6.34.
(±)-
and (R)-(−)-Diisopropyl 1,2-(Bis-tert-butoxycarbonyl)pyrazolidin-3-ylphosphonate
[(±)- and (R)-25] from 28c
Method A
(±)-3-Bromo-1-(4-nitrobenzenesulfonyloxy)propylphosphonate
(±)-28c (1.465 g, 3 mmol) was dissolved in toluene
(10 mL) under Ar. An aq solution of NaOH (6 mL, 20 w/v %), BocNH–NHBoc
(1.394 g, 6 mmol) and Bu4NHSO4 (290 mg, 0.9
mmol, dissolved in 5 mL of toluene) was added at room temperature.
The reaction mixture was vigorously stirred and heated at 50 °C
for 7 h. After cooling to room temperature, the reaction mixture was
diluted with EtOAc (10 mL) and neutralized with HCl (2 M). The organic
phase was separated, and the aq one was extracted with EtOAc (2 ×
20 mL). The combined organic layers were washed with brine, dried
(MgSO4), and concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue
was purified by flash chromatography (hexanes/EtOAc, 1:1, Rf 0.15) to yield pyrazolidin-3-ylphosphonate
(±)-25 (728 mg, 56%) as a yellowish gum.
Method
B
BocNH–NHBoc (1.237 g, 5 mmol, 2.5 equiv)
and KOtBu (561 mg, 5 mmol, 2.5 equiv) were dissolved
in dry DMF (5 mL) under Ar atmosphere. A solution of (±)-3-bromo-1-(4-nitrobenzenesulfonyloxy)propylphosphonate
(±)-28c (977 mg, 2 mmol) in dry DMF (5 mL) was added
at 0 °C. The reaction mixture was stirred for 1.5 h at 0 °C
and at room temperature until the starting material was virtually
consumed (1.5 h). Acetic acid (6 drops) was added, and the volatile
components were removed under reduced pressure (0.5 mbar). The residue
was taken up in H2O/EtOAc (30 mL, 1:1). The organic phase
was separated, and the aq one was extracted with EtOAc (2 × 10
mL). The combined organic phases were washed with brine, dried (MgSO4), and concentrated under reduced pressure. Flash chromatography
(hexanes/EtOAc, 3:2, Rf 0.23) of the residue
gave the desired racemicpyrazolidin-3-ylphosphonate (±)-25 (570 mg, 65%) as a yellowish oil.
Cyclization
by Method B with Alternative Work Up
(±)-Bromonosylate
(±)-28c (2.300 g, 4.71 mmol) was converted to protected
pyrazolidin-3-ylphosphonate (±)-25. When cyclization
was finished, the reaction mixture was cooled to room temperature,
and HCl (2 M, 25 mL) and water (25 mL) were added (color changed from
dark red/brown to yellow). The mixture was extracted with EtOAc (4
× 25 mL). The combined organic phases were washed with HCl (1
M, 2 × 20 mL), NaHCO3 (saturated aq solution, 10 mL),
dried (MgSO4), and concentrated under reduced pressure.
Flash chromatography of the residue gave the desired (±)-pyrazolidin-3-ylphosphonate
(±)-25 (1.250 g, 61%) as a yellowish oil.(S)-(+)-Bromonosylate(S)-28c {1.464 g, 3 mmol; [α]D23 +19.7 (c 1.86, acetone);
ee 96% by chiral HPLC} was converted to protected (R)-(−)-pyrazolidin-3-ylphosphonate(R)-25 {635 mg, 49%; [α]D26 −25.5 (c 1.40, acetone)}
by method A. The spectroscopic data were identical to those of the
racemate.
(±)- and (R)-(+)-Pyrazolidin-3-ylphosphonic
Acid [(±)- and (R)-4]
AllylTMS (1.333 g, 1.85 mL, 11.67 mmol, 3 equiv) and TMSBr (5.955
g, 5.13 mL, 38.9 mmol, 10 equiv) were added to a solution of protected
(±)-pyrazolidin-3-ylphosphonate (±)-25 (1.700 g, 3.89 mmol) in dry DCE (20 mL) under Ar atmosphere.[26] After stirring at 50 °C for 14 h and cooling
to room temperature, volatile components were removed under reduced
pressure (0.5 mbar). The residue was dissolved in DCE (10 mL), and
the solvent was again removed under reduced pressure (0.5 mbar). Water
(20 mL) was added to the residue, and the mixture was stirred for
10 min before it was extracted with EtOAc (2 × 15 mL). The aq
phase was concentrated (5 mL) and applied to a column filled with
Dowex 50W × 8, H+ (o. d. 1.5 × 14 cm, water as
eluent, fractions of 25 mL). Fractions containing the product (TLC: Rf 0.42) were pooled and concentrated under reduced
pressure to give (±)-pyrazolidinylphosphonic acid [(±)-4] (323 mg, 55%); mp 129–131 °C (H2O/EtOH). Similarly, protected (R)-(−)-pyrazolidin-3-ylphosphonate(R)-25 {739 mg, 1.69 mmol; [α]D26 −25.5
(c 1.40, acetone)} was converted to (R)-(+)-pyrazolidin-3-ylphosphonic acid [(R)-4] {136 mg, 53%; [α]D18 +5.09 (c 0.51, H2O)} by the procedure used for the racemiccompound; mp 118–119
°C (H2O/EtOH); ee 92.2% before crystallization, after
crystallization 98.8% ee (Figure S4). The
NMR data of (±)-and (R)-4 were
identical.IR (ATR) of (±)-4 ν: 3277,
1626, 1446, 1234, 1190, 1145, 1028, 957, 924, 894 cm–1. 1HNMR (400.13 MHz, D2O): δ 3.56 (ddd, J = 11.3, 9.2, 4.6 Hz, 1H), 3.53 (td, J = 8.8, 8.0 Hz, 1H), 3.45 (td, J = 11.3, 8.2 Hz,
1H), 2.56–2.44 (m, 1H), 2.34–2.19 (m, 1H); 13CNMR (100.61 MHz, D2O): δ 56.6 (d, J = 151.2 Hz), 47.3 (d, J = 8.1 Hz), 28.327; 31PNMR (161.98 MHz, D2O): δ 16.13. Anal.
Calcd for C3H9N2O3P: C,
23.69; H, 5.96; N, 18.42. Found for (±)-4: C, 23.60;
H, 5.70; N, 18.34.
P5C Reductase Purification and Assay
A. thalianaP5C reductase was purified
from a suspension
of cultured cells, as previously described.[34] Enzyme activity was measured at 35 °C as the P5C-dependent
oxidation of NADH. The assay mixture contained 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer,
pH 7.5, 0.4 mM NADH, 2 mM dl–P5C and 1 mM MgCl2 in a final volume of 1 mL. A limiting amount of enzyme (about
0.2 nkat) was added to the prewarmed mixture, and the decrease in
absorbance at 340 nm was determined for up to 10 min by continuous
monitoring of the sample. Activity was calculated on the assumption
of an extinction coefficient for NADH of 6220 M–1 cm–1. The concentrations causing 50% inhibition
(IC50) of P5C reductase activity and their confidence intervals
were estimated by nonlinear regression analysis using Prism 6 for
Windows (version 6.07; GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA).