Literature DB >> 3145858

Comparison of four commercial microdilution systems for susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria.

W Heizmann1, H Werner, B Herb.   

Abstract

The reliability of four commercially available broth microdilution systems (ATB ANA, MHK-Anaerob-Biotest, Dynatech MIC system, Sceptor Anaerobe MIC system) for routine susceptibility testing was evaluated using agar dilution and broth macrodilution as reference methods. Using the categories "susceptible", "moderately susceptible" and "resistant", the rate of essential agreement (complete agreement plus minor errors) of all four systems compared to the two reference methods was satisfactory, ranging from 93% (Dynatech system and agar dilution) to 98% (Sceptor system and agar dilution). The rate of complete agreement compared to the agar dilution and broth dilution method respectively was 61% and 60% for the MHK-Anaerob-Biotest, 65% and 63% for the Dynatech system, 72% and 72% for ATB ANA, and 85% and 80% for the Sceptor system. The Sceptor system was thus superior to the other systems. The systems were easy to operate and inoculate, although arrangement of antimicrobial agents in the Dynatech panels was apt to be confusing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3145858     DOI: 10.1007/bf01975043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN: 0934-9723            Impact factor:   3.267


  4 in total

1.  Medium for use in antibiotic susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria.

Authors:  T D Wilkins; S Chalgren
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1976-12       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Collaborative evaluation of the micro-media systems anaerobe susceptibility panel: comparisons with reference methods and test reproducibility.

Authors:  R N Jones; A L Barry; J L Cotton; V L Sutter; J M Swenson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Comparison of anaerobic susceptibility results obtained by different methods.

Authors:  J E Rosenblatt; P R Murray; A C Sonnenwirth; J L Joyce
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  In vitro activity of ampicillin plus sulbactam against anaerobes compared to ampicillin and cefoxitin.

Authors:  W Heizmann; F Heilmann; H Werner
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.553

  4 in total
  3 in total

Review 1.  Susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria: myth, magic, or method?

Authors:  H M Wexler
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 2.  Review of methods for susceptibility testing of anaerobes.

Authors:  R J Zabransky
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 3.267

3.  Susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria: evaluation of the redesigned (Version 96) bioMérieux ATB ANA device.

Authors:  L Dubreuil; I Houcke; E Singer
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 5.948

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.