Probing the Aggregation and Signaling Behavior of Some Twisted 9,9'-Bianthryl Derivatives: Observation of Aggregation-Induced Blue-Shifted Emission.

With an aim to understand the photophysical behavior of twisted organic fluorescent molecules in their aggregated state, two twisted biaryl molecules, namely, 9,9'-bianthryl and 10,10'-dicyano-9,9'-bianthryl, have been synthesized and characterized by conventional spectroscopic methods. To understand the role of C-C bond twisting on the photophysical response of biaryl aggregates, monoaryl counterparts (anthracene and 9-anthracenecarbonitrile) of the biaryl systems are also investigated. Photophysical behaviors of these systems along with their monoaryl counterpart are investigated in both solution and aggregated state. Investigations reveal that fluorescence spectra of the biaryl compounds show blue-shifted emission upon aggregation. Interestingly, no blue shift of the emission has been observed for monoaryl aggregates. Photophysical data of biaryl systems compared to monoaryl unit reveal that change in geometry, during self-assembly process, disfavors the formation of charge-transfer state, which eventually causes blue shift in the emission upon aggregation. In addition to this, potential of these systems toward signaling of nitroaromatic explosive has also been explored. Among all of the nitroaromatics, the highest fluorescence quenching is observed for nitrophenols (say picric acid (PA)). The investigation also reveals that compared to monoaryl systems, biaryl systems are more responsive to fluorescence quenching by nitroaromatics. Perrin's model of quenching sphere action has been attributed to nitrophenol (PA) selective signaling behavior of biaryl systems.

Introduction

In recean class="Chemical">nt times, both organic and inorganic solid-state luminescepan> class="Chemical">nt materials have attracted considerable attention as they have potential to be used in display, optoelean class="Chemical">ctronic devices, sensor applications, etc.[1−4] Among these, organic nanoparticles have certain advantages over inorganic ones in terms of low cost, easy synthesis, and structural variability.[4,5] These advantages are thought to be helpful in fabricating a number of functionalized organic nanomaterials having desirable optical properties.[3,6] Since majority of the organic optoelectronic devices function in solid state,[7−10] it is of paramount importance to understand the underlying mechanism of photophysical responses of such systems so that a more efficient system having suitable properties is designed and developed.

The photophysical behavior of an aggregated solid-state material can be very differean class="Chemical">nt from its monomeric form in solution state. Differepan> class="Chemical">nt structural arrangement and intermolecular interaction in solid-state material (compared to the monomeric form) can lead to changes in the optical behavior of these systems.[9,11−13] Organic molecules usually upon aggregation exhibit red shift in the absorption and emission spectra.[14] Molecules upon aggregation usually also cause quenching of fluorescence.[15−17] Recently, Tang and co-workers[18,19] have developed some silole-based organic fluorophore molecules, which show aggregation-induced emission property. We note that blue shift in the emission spectrum upon aggregation is an uncommon phenomenon. Observation of blue-shifted emission upon aggregation is very interesting and is known as aggregation-induced blue-shifted emission (AIBSE).[20−23] It has been shown by Yang and co-workers[24−26] that several substituted anthracene (AN) molecules at the 9,10-positions in solid state can also exhibit blue-shifted emission band. However, aggregation-induced red-shifted emission is attributed to factors such as (1) excitonic coupling, (2) increase in charge transfer (CT) character due to geometry change, (3) J-aggregate formation, and (4) change in the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO)–lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) gap.[27a−27d] The underlying mechanism for AIBSE is still hazy. Only few studies have been carried out on this aspect. It is also noteworthy to mention in this context that a recent study based on quantum mechanical calculation (quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics (QM/MM)) has shown that lower reorganization energy in aggregate compared to the solution can also cause a blue-shifted emission band.[28] The above discussion tells us that studies, particularly experimental studies, which are focused on understanding the mechanism of AIBSE process are rather limited. Outcomes of such studies are expected to be useful as they provide clue to tune the optical properties of organic aggregates.

In this coan class="Chemical">ntext, molecules having twisted struan class="Chemical">cture that possess two an class="Chemical">anthracene rings connected through C–C bond could be an interesting research target. Photophysical studies on these systems in their molecular and aggregated forms are expected to provide valuable information on structure–optical property correlation, which, in turn, may be useful to understand photoprocesses such as AIBSE. Note that it has been well established that twisted biaryl system exhibits some interesting photophysical behavior.[29−31] Several studies have explored the excited-state behavior and dynamical processes of biaryl derivatives.[32] One such interesting system is 9,9′-bianthryl (BA), as this molecule in the ground state contains two mutually perpendicular anthracene rings connected through C–C bond. It undergoes symmetry breaking upon excitation, and its fluorescence spectra show a distinct charge transfer (CT) character, especially in the polar solvents.[33] Although extensive studies on molecular forms of bianthryl systems have been done by several research groups,[32,34,35] the photophysical behavior of these systems in aggregated state has not been studied.

Since an class="Chemical">bianthryl derivatives having conjugated elean class="Chemical">ctronic π-clouds have some ian class="Chemical">nteresting optical properties, such as high quantum yield (QY), good photostability, etc., they are suitable for fluorescence signaling behavior. Moreover, organic fluorophores having extended π-cloud are known to be quite useful for the detection of nitroaromatics (NACs).[36,37] We have also explored the BA system for signaling of nitroaromatics. Additionally, we have also tried to understand the mechanism of fluorescence signaling behavior of the BA system toward nitroaromatics.

Considering the above-mean class="Chemical">ntioned faan class="Chemical">cts, in the presean class="Chemical">nt study, we have synthesized two twisted molecules, namely, 9,9′-bianthryl (BA) and 10,10′-dicyano-9,9′-bianthryl (DCBA), and investigated the photophysical behaviors of these two fluorescent molecules, in both molecular and aggregated forms, and the obtained data are compared to those of their monomeric unit anthracene (AN) and 9-anthracenecarbonitrile (CA), respectively (Chart ). Photophysical data reveal that only biaryl systems exhibit a blue shift in the emission upon aggregation, whereas monoaryl systems do not. The observation indicates that change in geometry of the concerned bianthryl derivatives during the self-assembly process could be responsible for AIBSE process.

Chart 1

Molecular Diagrams of Anthracene (AN), 9-Anthracenecarbonitrile (CA), 9,9′-Bianthryl (BA), and 10,10′-Dicyano-9,9′-bianthryl (DCBA)

During the signaling evean class="Chemical">ntpan>, fluorescence response of an class="Chemical">biaryl systems in the presence of an class="Chemical">nitroaromatics is observed to be different from that observed for monoaryl systems. Both biaryl systems (BA and DCBA) exhibit high selectivity toward nitrophenols. The “sphere of action” quenching mechanism is found to be primarily responsible for the nitrophenol (picric acid (PA)) signaling event. The present study reveals that biaryl systems can effectively be used for the detection of explosive nitroaromatics.

Results and Discussion

9,9′-an class="Chemical">Bianthryl (BA), 10,10′-dicyano-9,9′-an class="Chemical">bianthryl (DCBA), and their respean class="Chemical">ctive monomeric counterparts, namely, anthracene (AN) and 9-anthracenecarbonitrile (CA), are investigated in both molecular and aggregated forms using steady-state absorption, emission, and time-resolved fluorescence studies.

Photophysical Behaviors of AN, BA, CA, and DCBA in Molecular Form

Before studying the aggregation behavior of BA systems, we have studied the photophysical behavior of an class="Chemical">AN, BA, CA, and pan> class="Chemical">DCBA in their molecular form in some selected solvean class="Chemical">nts of varying polarity. The representative absorption spectra of BA and DCBA are shown in Figure . The corresponding absorption spectra of AN and CA are shown in Figure S1 (Supporting Information). From Figures and S1, it can be observed that the vibrational structure and peak position of the absorption band of all of the four compounds do not change much with change in the polarity of solvent from nonpolar cyclohexane to polar acetonitrile.[32] The similarity in the nature of the spectra of the biaryl compounds (BA and DCBA) in the ground state to that of only anthracene moiety indicates that the origin of absorption is mainly π–π* transition in all cases.[38] These data also show that in the ground state, two anthracene units of biaryl systems are electronically decoupled as they remain in mutually perpendicular orientation.[32]

Figure 1

Normalized absorbance spectra of (a) BA and (b) DCBA in some selected solvents of varying polarity.

Normalized absorbance spepan class="Chemical">an class="Chemical">ctra of (a) BA anpan>d (b) an class="Chemical">DCBA in some selean class="Chemical">cted solvents of varying polarity.

The emission spean class="Chemical">ctra for all of the presean class="Chemical">nt an class="Chemical">monoaryl and biaryl systems (AN, CA, BA, and DCBA) in some selected solvents are shown in Figure . The data corresponding to absorption and emission maxima of the compounds in some selected solvents are listed in Table . Unlike absorption spectra of the above compounds, which do not depend much on solvent polarity, the fluorescence spectra of these compounds are observed to be highly dependent on solvent polarity.[32,34,39] It can be seen from Figure that with increase in the polarity of solvents, the fluorescence spectra become broadened and show considerable red shift of emission band. Interestingly, one can also see from Figure and Table that as we move from nonpolar cyclohexane to polar acetonitrile, the extent of red shift in the emission maxima is much higher for biaryl systems than for their parent monomeric units. For example, upon going from cyclohexane to acetonitrile, BA shows a 57 nm red shift in the emission, whereas AN shows only a 6 nm red shift. Also DCBA shows a 72 nm red shift in the emission maxima as we move from nonpolar cyclohexane to polar acetonitrile, whereas its monomeric unit CA shows a 21 nm red shift. Schneider and Lippert[40,41] previously observed the solvent-polarity-dependent emission behavior of bianthryl systems. Both broadening and red shift of emission spectra for bianthryl systems with increasing the polarity of solvents indicate the formation of charge transfer (CT) state in the polar media upon excitation. Interestingly, when we compare the fluorescence spectra of all monoaryl and biaryl systems in a given solvent dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) (Figure ), fluorescence spectra of biaryl systems are observed to be broadened (structureless) and more red-shifted compared to their respective monoaryl systems. This observation clearly suggests that in a polar solvent, biaryl systems emit from the polar CT state.

Figure 2

Normalized emission spectra of (a) AN, (b) BA, (c) CA, and (d) DCBA in some selected solvents of varying polarity at λexc = 375 nm.

Table 1

Absorption and Emission Maxima of AN, BA, CA, and DCBA in Solvents with Varying Polarity

	AN		BA		CA		DCBA
solventsa	λmaxabs (nm)	λmaxemi (nm)	λmaxabs (nm)	λmaxemi (nm)	λmaxabs (nm)	λmaxemi (nm)	λmaxabs (nm)	λmaxemi (nm)
cyclohexane (30.9)	376	399	389	414	378	428	413	439
toluene (33.9)	378	403	392	418	383	437	417	449
dichloromethane (DCM, 41.1)	378	403	391	448	383	440	417	458
tetrahydrofuran (THF, 37.4)	377	401	390	433	382	437	416	459
acetonitrile (45.6)	375	401	389	467	381	440	414	498
DMSO (45.0)	380	405	393	473	388	449	420	511

In parentheses, solvent polarity parameter ET (30) values are given from ref (42).

Figure 3

Normalized fluorescence spectra of 2 × 10–6 M solutions of AN (blue), BA (black), CA (green), and DCBA (red) in DMSO at λexc = 375 nm.

Normalized emission spean class="Chemical">ctpan>ra of (a) an class="Chemical">AN, (b) BA, (c) CA, and (d) an class="Chemical">DCBA in some selected solvents of varying polarity at λexc = 375 nm.

Normalized fluorescence spean class="Chemical">ctpan>ra of 2 × 10–6 M solutions of an class="Chemical">AN (blue), BA (black), CA (green), and an class="Chemical">DCBA (red) in DMSO at λexc = 375 nm.

In parean class="Chemical">ntpan>heses, solvean class="Chemical">nt polarity parameter ET (30) values are given from ref (42).

It is pertinean class="Chemical">nt to mean class="Chemical">ntion in this coan class="Chemical">ntext that the fluorescence of BA and its derivative are strongly dependent on the polarity of the solvent and are linked to two different excited states, namely, a locally excited (LE) state and an intramolecular charge transfer (CT) state.[43−45] Several research groups have studied the nature of the emitting states for BA systems. Iwakura and co-workers[46] depicted that in polar solvents, the CT state predominates, which is formed from the LE state by one-electron oxidation–reduction of the two anthracene rings. Warman and co-workers[32] demonstrated that an unstable CT state induces a rapid flip-flop of dipole between two anthracene rings and remains in LE state in nonpolar solvent. Some of the recent studies on bianthryl derivatives have also revealed that the CT state originates from the LE state and there exists an equilibrium between the exchange process of the LE and CT states at the picosecond scale depending on the solvent polarity.[47−54] A recent study by Hashimoto et al.[46] established that polar solvent facilitates the formation of the excited CT state, which is produced from the LE state through intramolecular charge-transfer process. In polar solvents, due to solvent relaxation, there occurs rearrangement of the electrons between the two anthracene rings of BA with subsequent formation of polar charge transfer (CT) state.[48] While working on BA systems, Iwata and co-workers[33] showed that internal rotation that occurs through the C–C bond of two anthracene ring plays an important role in governing the photophysical properties of twisted BA systems.

Photophysical Behavior of AN, CA, BA, and DCBA in Aggregated Form

UV–vis absorption and fluorescence studies on the well-charapan class="Chemical">an class="Chemical">cterized aggregates of class="Chemical">pan> class="Chemical">AN, BA, CA, and DCBA have been carried out and the obtained results are compared to those in their respective molecular form. The absorption spectra of biaryl systems, BA and DCBA, in their molecular and aggregated forms are provided in Figure . The absorption spectra for monoaryl systems, AN and CA, are also provided in the Supporting Information (Figure S2). As can be seen from the absorption spectra, the absorption maxima of all of the compounds in aggregated form are red-shifted compared to those in their molecular form. Photophysical data corresponding to the absorption behavior of monoaryl and biaryl systems in their molecular and aggregated forms are provided in Table . Interestingly, we have also observed that the shift in the absorption maximum upon aggregation is less for biaryl systems (BA and DCBA) than for their respective monomeric counterparts (AN and CA). For example, in the case of biaryl systems, the extents of red shift in the absorption maximum of BA and DCBA aggregates are 8 and 18 nm, respectively, whereas monoaryl systems, AN and CA, show 19 and 38 nm red shift, respectively, in absorption maxima upon aggregation (Table ).

Figure 4

Normalized absorption spectra of (a) BA in molecular form (2 × 10–6 M solution in DMSO) and aggregated form (water–DMSO mixture) and (b) DCBA in molecular form (2 × 10–6 M solution in DMSO) and aggregated form (water–DMSO mixture). λexc = 375 nm.

Table 2

Absorption and Emission Maxima, Fluorescence Lifetime (τf), and Quantum Yield (ϕf) for the Concerned Systems in Molecular and Aggregated Formsa

systems	λmaxabs (nm)	λmaxemi (nm)	τf (ns)	ϕf
AN molecule	380	405	3.3	0.20
AN aggregate	399	418	2.0	0.12
BA molecule	393	471	30.1	0.25
BA aggregate	401	459	0.7	0.09
CA molecule	388	449	14.9	0.75
CA aggregate	426	494	10.0	0.42
DCBA molecule	420	511	19.9	0.18
DCBA aggregate	438	509	2.9	0.04

λexc = 375 nm.

Normalized absorption spean class="Chemical">ctpan>ra of (a) BA in molecular form (2 × 10–6 M solution in an class="Chemical">DMSO) and aggregated form (an class="Chemical">water–DMSO mixture) and (b) DCBA in molecular form (2 × 10–6 M solution in DMSO) and aggregated form (water–DMSO mixture). λexc = 375 nm.

This larger red shift in the aggregated state of an class="Chemical">monoarylpan> systems (an class="Chemical">AN and CA) can be attributed to relatively more lowering of the HOMO–LUMO energy gap in the aggregates of an class="Chemical">monoaryl systems.[55,56] This is indicative of better electronic coupling between the smaller molecules (AN and CA) in the aggregated state compared to that of relatively larger BA and DCBA.[55,56] The absorption, emission maxima, fluorescence lifetime, and quantum yield values of the concerned systems in both molecular and aggregated forms are provided in Table .

To confirm that the shift in the absorption maxima of the concerned systems upon aggregation (in an class="Chemical">DMSO–an class="Chemical">water mixture) is not due to the solvean class="Chemical">nt polarity-induced change of monomeric molecules, we have recorded the absorption spectra of the compounds in methanol–water system, whose polarity is maintained close to that of the DMSO–water system. The shift in the absorption maxima of the molecules in methanol–water system is found to be less (ca. 2 nm) in all cases compared to that observed for the present aggregates (in DMSO–water system). This observation confirms that this red shift in the absorption maxima is due to the J-aggregation of the particles and not due to the change in solvent polarity. As stated in Experimental Section (vide infra), the formation of aggregates is also confirmed through dynamic light scattering (DLS) and field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) studies. Also note that the appearance of long tail absorbance for the aggregates at the longer wavelength region (at around 450–500 nm) indicates the Mie-scattering effect,[57,58] which is also indicative of the formation of a strongly coupled aggregated system.

The excited state of the aggregates is investigated by exploiting steady-state and time-resolved fluorescence spean class="Chemical">ctroscopy. Figure shows the emission spean class="Chemical">ctra of BA and DCBA aggregates along with their monomeric form. The emission spectra for monoaryl systems (AN and CA) in their molecular and aggregated forms are provided in the Supporting Information (Figure S3). It can be seen that like absorption, the emission maxima of aggregates of monoaryl systems (AN, CN) are red-shifted compared to their respective monomeric form. However, more interestingly, for biaryl systems (BA and DCBA), upon aggregation, a blue shift in the emission maximum of the aggregates compared to their respective monomeric form is observed (Figure ). This blue-shifted emission in the present case is an interesting observation, as red shift in the emission spectra with quenching of fluorescence intensity upon aggregation is a very common phenomenon, but blue shift of emission due to the formation of aggregates with quenching of fluorescence intensity is uncommon. This process is known as the aggregation-induced blue-shifted emission (AIBSE) phenomenon.[18,20,21,59−65] Even though the observation of the AIBSE phenomenon is quite interesting, the actual reason behind this process is still unclear. Upon a careful look at Figure , one can also see that upon aggregation, the emission spectral profiles of the aggregates become more structured compared to their monomeric form. The appearance of structured (less broadened) emission band upon aggregation perhaps also arises due to the reduction in the solute–solvent interaction as the solvent molecules will be dislodged from the surrounding of the BA system during the self-assembly of two aromatic moieties. To confirm the aggregation-induced quenching of fluorescence intensity for the aggregates, we have studied the concentration-dependent fluorescence properties of the biaryl systems (Figure ). It has been found that on increasing the concentration of both BA and DCBA solutions from 10–7 to 10–4 M, a sharp increase in the emission intensity of the solutions occurs. Interestingly, upon further increase in the concentration of the biaryl systems (5 × 10–4 and 10–3 M), the fluorescence intensity of the solutions is observed to decrease significantly for both the systems. This significant quenching of fluorescence of BA and DCBA systems at higher concentration clearly proves that the aggregation-induced quenching process is primarily responsible for the quenching of fluorescence of the concerned systems upon aggregation. Note that similar arguments have also been provided by Yang and co-workers[66] in the case of aggregation-induced quenching study of bis[2-(9-anthracenyl)vinyl]benzene.

Figure 5

Emission spectra of (a) BA and (b) DCBA in molecular form of 2 × 10–5 M solution in DMSO (black) and aggregated form in DMSO–water mixture (red). The inset provides the normalized emission spectra of BA and DCBA in its molecular and aggregated states at λexc = 375 nm.

Figure 6

Emission spectra of (a) BA and (b) DCBA in DMSO solutions with different concentrations at λexc = 375 nm.

Emission spean class="Chemical">ctra of (a) BA and (b) an class="Chemical">DCBA in molecular form of 2 × 10–5 M solution in DMSO (black) and aggregated form in an class="Chemical">DMSO–water mixture (red). The inset provides the normalized emission spectra of BA and DCBA in its molecular and aggregated states at λexc = 375 nm.

Emission spean class="Chemical">ctpan>ra of (a) BA and (b) an class="Chemical">DCBA in DMSO solutions with differean class="Chemical">nt concentrations at λexc = 375 nm.

The emission spean class="Chemical">ctpan>ra of the two compounds in the an class="Chemical">DMSO and an class="Chemical">DMSO/H2O mixture with increasing water content have also been recorded. From Figure , we can say that with increasing the volume percentage of water up to 80% in the DMSO solutions of BA and DCBA, the fluorescence intensities of the aggregates are found to decrease about 25.8 and 24.2 times, respectively, with a concomitant shift of the emission maxima toward the shorter (blue) wavelength region. From this observation, it can be clearly said that addition of a large volume of water induces aggregation.

Figure 7

Emission spectra of (a) BA and (b) DCBA in DMSO–water mixture with increasing water content up to 80% by volume at λexc = 375 nm.

Emission spean class="Chemical">ctpan>ra of (a) BA and (b) an class="Chemical">DCBA in DMSO–an class="Chemical">water mixture with increasing water content up to 80% by volume at λexc = 375 nm.

Note that in the presean class="Chemical">nt study, this blue-shifted emission occurs only in C–C bond coan class="Chemical">ntaining an class="Chemical">biaryl systems, not in monoaryl systems, where C–C bond is absent. Therefore, this observation certainly indicates that in biaryl systems, C–C bond, which holds the two aryl ring together, plays an important role in determining the photophysical properties of these systems in the aggregated state. Previous studies have demonstrated that in the solid state of biaryl systems, two anthracene moieties remain in mutually perpendicular position.[46] It has also been demonstrated that in a polar medium, emission of BA system takes place from a twisted intramolecular charge transfer (TICT) state, where two rings of bianthryl systems remain in a somewhat planar (nonperpendicular) conformation and the angle between the two rings of BA and DCBA becomes nearly 60o.[46] Now, if during the aggregation process the biaryl systems somehow attain a geometry that disfavors the formation of TICT state through restricted rotation around central C–C bond, then this (restricted C–C bond rotation due to geometry change upon aggregation) could be one of the probable reasons for which BA and DCBA upon aggregation can exhibit a blue-shifted emission.

It is pertinean class="Chemical">nt to mean class="Chemical">ntion here that recean class="Chemical">ntly Shuai and co-workers[28] have studied the aggregation behaviors of three organic molecules, namely, 9,10-distyrylanthracene, 2,3-dicyano-5,6-diphenylpyrazine, and cis,cis-1,2,3,4-tetraphenyl-1,3-butadiene through theoretical (QM/MM) studies and made an attempt to understand the AIBSE phenomenon. During the study, they stated that change in solvent reorganization energy from solution to solid state and freezing of low-frequency vibrational modes in aggregated state can cause AIBSE. However, we would like to stress here that since no blue shift in the emission of the aggregates of monoaryl systems AN and CA is observed in the present study (Figure S3), we can say that in the case of BA and DCBA aggregates, geometric restriction (due to aggregation) plays a more important role in the AIBSE behavior rather than in the freezing of low-frequency vibration mode. Interestingly, when we compare the emission spectra of the bianthryl derivatives in solution with the solid-state emission (Figure S4), it is found that the emission of BA in solid state is blue-shifted compared to that of BA in solution phase.

Here, we note that organic nano-/microcrystals usually formed due to the self-assembly of individual monomeric units and the struan class="Chemical">cture property correlation of such systems canpan> be realized by following the gradual evolution of crystal from a nanoscopic site domain to microcrystalline and bulk solid.[67,68] Therefore, when we look at the optical output signals of solution, colloid, and solid forms of presepan> class="Chemical">nt biaryl and an class="Chemical">monoaryl systems, we can perhaps say that in colloidal state, these systems attain a twisted geometry (dihedral angle ∼ 90°), where CT transition is not favorable, and consequently due to this reason, for BA systems, a blue-shifted emission upon aggregation is observed. Therefore, the present study points out that the change in geometry during the self-assembly process can also be an important factor causing the AIBSE process.

Time-resolved fluorescence measuremean class="Chemical">nt reveals that upon aggregation, lifetime values (from Table ) decrease for both an class="Chemical">monoaryl and an class="Chemical">biaryl systems. The representative fluorescence intensity decay profiles of both monoaryl and biaryl systems in molecular and aggregated states are provided in Figure S5. To throw more light on the fluorescence quenching process of the aggregates, we have calculated the nonradiative decay rate constants corresponding to the aggregates and their respective monomers using the equation knr = (1 – ϕf)/τf, where knr is the nonradiative rate constant, ϕf is the quantum yield, and τf is the fluorescence lifetime. The nonradiative decay rate constants for BA and DCBA in molecular form are obtained as 2.5 × 107 and 4.1 × 107 s–1, whereas those for aggregated state are obtained as 1.3 × 109 and 3.3 × 108 s–1, respectively. Similarly, the nonradiative decay rate constants for AN and CA in molecular form are obtained as 2.4 × 108 and 1.7 × 107 s–1, whereas those for aggregated state are obtained as 4.4 × 108 and 5.8 × 107 s–1, respectively. The decrease in fluorescence lifetime in aggregated state compared to monomeric form can be attributed to the aggregation-induced quenching of the excited states, which, in turn, occurs because of increase in the nonradiative decay pathways in the aggregated state.[18,69]

Crystallographic Analysis of BA System

To understand the aggregation behavior of an class="Chemical">biaryl systems better, we have analyzed the packing of BA molecules in its crystal struan class="Chemical">cture. The crystal struan class="Chemical">cture of BA (CCDC 123938) was reported by Bell and Waring.[81] The space group reported for the given crystal is P21/n (monoclinic). From the packing diagram of BA molecule (Figure ), it can be realized that the molecules in the solid state are self-assembled primarily through C–H···π interactions. The intermolecular C–H···π interactions (C2–H2···π, 2.969 Å; C19–H19···π, 2.988 Å), observed in the crystal packing of BA molecules, are shown by the dotted red line (Figure ). From these, it is now reasonable to assume that the colloidal aggregates of BA molecules are also formed through the self-assembly of BA molecules mediated by C–H···π interactions. Similar arguments can be made for the structurally similar DCBA molecule.

Figure 8

(a) Molecular structure and (b) crystal packing of BA from single-crystal X-ray analysis (crystal structure taken from ref (69), CCDC 123938). H atoms except those involved in C–H···π interaction are omitted for clarity.

(a) Molecular struan class="Chemical">cture and (b) crystal packing of BA from single-crystal X-ray analysis (crystal strupan> class="Chemical">cture taken from ref (69), CCDC 123938). H atoms except those involved in C–H···π interaan class="Chemical">ction are omitted for clarity.

Signaling Behavior for Nitroaromatics

We have further studied the signaling behavior of an class="Chemical">monoaryl and an class="Chemical">biaryl systems (AN, CA, BA, and an class="Chemical">DCBA) toward nitroaromatics. The signaling of nitroaromatics explosives has been carried out by gradually adding some of the well-known representatives of explosive molecules such as p-nitrotoluene (NT), 2,4-dinitrotoluene (DNT), nitrobenzene (NB), 4-nitrophenol (NP), 2,4-dinitrophenol (DNP) and picric acid (PA) to all monoaryl and biaryl systems independently. We have measured the steady-state absorption spectra for the monoaryl and biaryl systems in the presence of all of the quencher molecules by gradually adding them into the solutions of the studied fluorophore. Representative absorption spectra are provided in Figure .

Figure 9

Absorption spectra of AN (12 μM) in the presence of 24 μM solution of (a) DNP and (b) DNT and absorption spectra of BA (12 μM) in the presence of 24 μM solution of (c) DNP and (d) DNT. The inset in (c) shows the absorption of only DNP in DMSO.

Absorption spean class="Chemical">ctpan>ra of an class="Chemical">AN (12 μM) in the presence of 24 μM solution of (a) an class="Chemical">DNP and (b) DNT and absorption spectra of BA (12 μM) in the presence of 24 μM solution of (c) DNP and (d) DNT. The inset in (c) shows the absorption of only DNP in DMSO.

It can be seen from Figure that the absorbance of an class="Chemical">AN and BA increases in the presence of an class="Chemical">DNP and DNT. Note that the DNP alone exhibits absorption maxima at 430 nm (inset of Figure c). Therefore, the increase in optical density (OD) of AN and BA in the presence of DNP and the appearance of a new band at around 430 nm can be thought to arise due to the presence of DNP in the system. Similar observations have been found for other nitrophenol derivatives (PA and NP). The present data do not clearly indicate the ground-state complex formation. In the present case, interaction between the fluorophore and quencher molecule is likely nonspecific in nature.[70] Cyano derivatives (CA and DCBA) have also exhibited a similar trend of the absorption profiles of the fluorophores in the presence of nitrophenol and nitrotoluene derivatives. Further, fluorescence responses of monoaryl (AN and CA) and biaryl (BA and DCBA) systems in the absence and presence of various nitroaromatic systems have been investigated by gradually adding nitroaromatics to the monoaryl and biaryl derivatives independently. During the titration, fluorescence quenching of all of the monoaryl and biaryl fluorophores has been observed. However, the extent of fluorescence quenching is observed to be different for different quenchers. Figure represents the fluorescence quenching of biaryl systems (BA and DCBA) in the presence of different nitroaromatics. For better comparison, the fluorescence quenching events for BA and DCBA with various nitroaromatics are shown in a bar diagram (Figure ). The similar bar diagram for fluorescence quenching events of monoaryl systems (AN and CA) in the presence of different nitroaromatics is provided in Figure S6. From Figure , it can be said quite clearly that a significant quenching for both biaryl systems (BA and DCBA) has been observed in the presence of nitrophenol derivatives, whereas nitrotoluenes and nitrobenzene could not appreciably quench the fluorescence intensity of these systems. Note that greater quenching of fluorescence for monoaryl system is also observed for nitrophenol derivatives than for other nitroaromatics employed in this study (Figure S6).

Figure 10

Fluorescence spectra of (a) BA and (b) DCBA (12 μM solution) in the presence of different nitroaromatics (24 μM solution) at λexc = 350 and 375 nm, respectively.

Figure 11

Percentage quenching efficiency of 12 μM solution of (a) BA and (b) DCBA in the presence of 24 μM solutions of different nitroaromatics.

Fluorescence spean class="Chemical">ctpan>ra of (a) BA and (b) an class="Chemical">DCBA (12 μM solution) in the presence of different an class="Chemical">nitroaromatics (24 μM solution) at λexc = 350 and 375 nm, respectively.

Percean class="Chemical">ntpan>age quenching efficiency of 12 μM solution of (a) BA and (b) an class="Chemical">DCBA in the presence of 24 μM solutions of different an class="Chemical">nitroaromatics.

an class="Chemical">Anpan>other ian class="Chemical">nteresting aspean class="Chemical">ct of this signaling study is that the extent of quenching of fluorescence intensity of monoaryl systems by nitroaromatic derivative (say PA) is significantly less compared to that of biaryl systems (Figures and S6). Keeping the above observation in mind, the signaling behavior of the biaryl systems with nitrophenol derivatives is investigated further so as to understand the signaling mechanism of this quenching event.

Represean class="Chemical">ntative absorption spean class="Chemical">ctra of BA and an class="Chemical">DCBA in the absence and presence of picric acid (PA) are shown in Figure . From the representative steady-state absorption spectra, it can be observed that the optical density (OD) of BA and DCBA increases in the entire range of concentration of PA. This is not surprising as nitrophenols such as PA and DNP themselves have absorption in that region.[71] A similar observation in the absorption behavior of the BA and DCBA system has been made in the presence of other nitrophenol derivatives (DNP and NP).

Figure 12

UV–vis absorption spectra of 12 μM solution of sensor molecules (a) BA and (b) DCBA in the presence of 24 μM picric acid (PA).

UV–vis absorption spean class="Chemical">ctpan>ra of 12 μM solution of sensor molecules (a) BA and (b) an class="Chemical">DCBA in the presence of 24 μM picric acid (PA).

The fluorescence titration experimean class="Chemical">nts have also been carried out by taking BA and pan> class="Chemical">DCBA solutions independently with gradual addition of an class="Chemical">nitrophenol derivatives (PA, DNP, and NP). Fluorescence of BA and DCBA is found to be significantly quenched by all of the nitrophenol derivatives. The change in fluorescence spectra of BA and DCBA with PA is shown in Figure . The spectra corresponding to fluorescence titration of BA and DCBA with other nitrophenols (DNP and NP) are provided in Figure S7 (Supporting Information). Interestingly, the quenching of fluorescence intensity of BA and DCBA is found to be highest for PA. This fact can be more clearly realized by looking at the bar diagram (Figure ), which also indicates the highest response for PA. Note that the signaling behavior of monoaryl systems (AN and CA) toward nitrophenols has also been studied (Figure S8). From Figure S8, it is evident that for monoaryl derivatives, the quenching efficiency is also highest for PA, followed by DNP. However, as stated earlier, for a particular quencher, fluorescence quenching is always found to be higher for biaryl systems than that for monoaryl systems.

Figure 13

Fluorescence titration of 12 μM solutions of (a) BA and (b) DCBA with increasing concentration (0–24 μM) of PA.

Fluorescence titration of 12 μM solutions of (a) BA and (b) pan class="Chemical">an class="Chemical">DCBA with increasing conceclass="Chemical">pan> class="Chemical">ntration (0–24 μM) of PA.

To understand the quenching mechanism better, the fluorescence response of BA and an class="Chemical">DCBA in the presence of pan> class="Chemical">nitrophenol system has been analyzed further in the light of the classical Stern–Volmer (S–V) equation,[70,72] which is shown below (eq ).where F0 and F denote the fluorescence intensities before and after the addition of quencher [Q], respectively, kq is the bimolecular quenching constant, τ0 is the lifetime of the fluorophore in the absence of quencher, [Q] is the quencher concentration, and KSV is the Stern–Volmer constant. Representative S–V plots for quenching of fluorescence intensity of BA and DCBA with nitrophenol derivatives are given in Figures and 15. The classical S–V plots that are obtained for the fluorescence quenching event of both BA and DCBA with DNP and NP exhibit a linear correlation of F0/F versus [Q] data for the entire concentration range of the concerned quencher (Figure a,b). However, in the case of fluorescence quenching of BA and DCBA by PA, the S–V plot demonstrates a linear correlation of F0/F versus [Q] data up to a certain concentration level (ca. 10 μM) (Figure a,b). Above this concentration limit, the F0/F versus [Q] data suddenly show an upward deviation (Figure a,b). The linear S–V plots in the case of DNP and NP indicate only one type of quenching process, i.e., either pure static or pure dynamic quenching,[67] but the nonlinear S–V plot (upward curvature toward F0/F axis) in the case of PA indicates that the quenching mechanism is entirely different from the other quenchers and both static and dynamic quenching processes can be operational during the quenching event. Note that in the absence of dynamic quenching, the upward curvature in the classical S–V plot that has been observed for PA system in the present study can also be explained by employing static quenching with “sphere of action” model.[70,72−74] In this context, it may be noted that the measurement of fluorescence lifetime can often help to distinguish between static and dynamic fluorescence quenching processes.[70] In the case of pure dynamic quenching process, the fluorescence lifetime (τ) decreases continuously with gradual addition of quencher, which eventually gives a linear correlation of τ0/τ with quencher concentration. However, if the quenching process is purely static, then the fluorophore lifetime practically remains unaffected with the addition of quencher.[70] To throw more light on this aspect for the present study, fluorescence lifetimes of both BA and DCBA have been measured in the presence and absence of variable amounts of all nitrophenol derivatives. Representative τ0/τ versus quencher concentration plots (presented in Figure S9) indicate that the lifetime values of BA and DCBA remain almost unaltered with the addition of nitrophenol derivatives, which essentially rules out the involvement of any collisional encounter between the excited fluorophore and the nitrophenol derivatives (i.e., dynamic quenching process) during the signaling event. Since there is some spectral overlap between the emission spectra of biaryl derivatives (BA and DCBA) and absorption spectra of nitrophenols (Figure S10), there could also be a possibility of energy transfer from BA and DCBA to nitrophenols for which quenching can be observed. However, since no change of lifetime values of BA and DCBA (here donor) could be observed with successive addition of quencher concentration, the possibility of energy transfer process in the present event is also ruled out.

Figure 14

S–V plots of F0/F vs [Q] for (a) BA fluorescence quenching by DNP and NP and (b) DCBA fluorescence quenching by DNP and NP.

Figure 15

S–V plots of F0/F vs [Q] for (a) BA fluorescence quenching by PA and (b) DCBA fluorescence quenching by PA.

S–V plots of F0/F vs [Q] for (a) BA fluorescence quenching by an class="Chemical">DNPpan> and an class="Chemical">NP and (b) DCBA fluorescence quenching by an class="Chemical">DNP and NP.

S–V plots of F0/F vs [Q] for (a) BA fluorescence quenching by PA pan class="Chemical">and (b) an class="Chemical">DCBA fluorescence quenching by PA.

The above discussion poian class="Chemical">nts out that the quenching mechanisms of BA and pan> class="Chemical">DCBA by DNP and NP (where no upward curvature could be observed) are purely static in nature. For BA derivative, the quenching constaan class="Chemical">nts for DNP and NP are estimated (from the S–V plots) to be 3.75 × 105 and 1.27 × 105 M–1, respectively. Similarly for the DCBA system, the quenching constants for DNP and NP are estimated to be 4.81 × 105 and 1.64 × 104 M–1, respectively. Since no dynamic quenching process could be found for the quenching of BA and DCBA by PA, the upward curvature (Figure a,b) corresponding to this quenching event is analyzed further by invoking Perrin’s model of quenching sphere of action,[70,72] which is represented by eq where Kp is the quenching constant related to the linear portion of the S–V plot, Vq is the volume of quenching sphere in which quenching occurs without diffusion of the quencher molecule, RS is the radius of the quenching sphere, and NA is Avogadro’s constant. As can be seen from Figure , the data corresponding to F0/F and [Q] can now be fitted nicely by employing eq . This observation clearly indicates that the quenching of BA and DCBA by picric acid (PA) follows the quenching sphere of action model. The quenching constants (Kp) corresponding to quenching of BA and DCBA by PA are estimated to be 1.41 × 105 and 1.26 × 105 M–1, respectively. The corresponding quenching sphere radii (RS) for BA and DCBA are estimated to be 29.22 and 33.73 Å, respectively. Hence, we can say that in the case of PA, due to the formation of quenching sphere near the vicinity of fluorophore molecule, the highest (ca. 95%) efficiency for the quenching event is observed.

Note that the fluorescence quenching evean class="Chemical">nt of an class="Chemical">monoaryl systems (an class="Chemical">AN and CA) with nitrophenol derivatives exhibits no upward curvature in the F0/F versus [Q] plot for the entire concentration range of the concerned quenchers (Figure S11). No change in the fluorescence lifetime values of AN and CA with the addition of the quencher molecules has been observed. The linear S–V plots in the case of PA and DNP for monoaryl system indicate that pure static quenching process is operating in these quenching events. The quenching constants for AN are estimated to be 5.69 × 104 and 5.48 × 104 M–1 for PA and DNP, respectively, whereas quenching constants for CA are estimated to be 4.1 × 104 and 4.31 × 104 M–1 for PA and DNP, respectively.

More ian class="Chemical">nterestingly, we note here that among the an class="Chemical">nitrophenols, the quenching efficiency follows the order PA > an class="Chemical">DNP > NP. Various factors such as hyperpolarizability, dipole moment, π–π stacking, and weak interactions like intermolecular hydrogen bond are known to play an important role during fluorescence quenching of organic fluorophore by nitroaromatics.[75−77] The observation of the aforementioned trend is attributed mainly to the π–π interaction between π-conjugated molecules (used in this study) and electron-deficient nitrophenol molecules.[78] It is highly likely that PA being the most electron-deficient among the three nitrophenols (PA, DNP, and NP), the quenching efficiency is observed to be the highest for PA with all of the studied fluorophore. We would like to stress that recently, Patra and co-workers[78] have demonstrated that intermolecular interactions such as O–H···π between π-conjugated molecule and nitrophenols can be responsible for nitroaromatics-induced fluorescence quenching of organic fluorophores. Considering this fact, in the present study, we can perhaps say that O–H···π interaction can also play an important role for the formation of quenching sphere around BA and DCBA molecules, which eventually facilitates the quenching process. The higher quenching of fluorescence intensity of DCBA by PA than that of BA is an interesting observation. Note that phenolic hydrogen of PA is sufficiently acidic[79] (pKa = −1.9 in DMSO), and so it can additionally form intermolecular H-bond with the −CN group of DCBA.[80] This additional (O–H···CN) interaction between nitrophenol and DCBA could be responsible for higher quenching of DCBA by PA. The observation of larger quenching for biaryl compared to monoaryl by nitroaromatic quenchers can be attributed to the presence of two anthracene rings in the case of biaryls. Fluorophore–quencher interactions are expected to be more for biaryl systems as two anthryl rings could facilitate more interactions (short contacts) with the studied quencher molecules.

Conclusions

In summary, two twisted an class="Chemical">biaryl molecules, namely, 9,9′-an class="Chemical">bianthryl (BA) and 10,10′-dicyano-9,9′-an class="Chemical">bianthryl (DCBA), have been synthesized and characterized by conventional spectroscopy methods. The photophysical properties of these systems are investigated in both solution and aggregated state and are compared to those of their respective monoaryl counterparts (AN and CA). A clear blue shift in the emission is observed for twisted biaryl systems upon aggregation. It is interesting to note here that no blue shift of emission has been observed for the aggregates of monoaryl compounds. A careful analysis of the photophysical data for biaryl systems reveals that the change in geometry during the self-assembly process disfavors the formation of CT state, which eventually causes the blue shift in the emission upon aggregation. This effect is totally absent in the case of monoaryl systems. Additionally, the potential of these systems toward signaling of nitroaromatics explosive has also been explored. The signaling event is monitored by looking at the quenching of fluorescence intensities of different monoaryl and biaryl systems in the presence of various nitroaromatics independently. Several interesting aspects with regard to nitroaromatics signaling behavior by organic fluorophores have emerged during the signaling event. Among the nitroaromatics studied, the highest fluorescence quenching of the concerned fluorophore is observed by picric acid (PA). The study also reveals that quenching of fluorescence by PA is more for cyano-substituted BA derivative (DCBA) than for BA. Perrin’s model of quenching sphere action has been employed to explain the nitrophenol selective signaling behavior of biaryl systems. Interactions such as π···π, O–H···π, etc. between biaryl and nitrophenols is thought to be responsible for the observed fluorescence quenching of biaryl systems by nitrophenol derivatives. Due to highly acidic nature of nitrophenols, additional (−OH···CN) H-bonding interaction could be possible in DCBA, which, in turn, could be responsible for facilitating the quenching process. Interestingly, larger quenching for biaryl systems compared to monoaryl systems has been observed. Fluorophore–quencher interaction is expected to be more for biaryl derivatives due to the presence of two anthryl ring in biaryl systems.

Experimental Section

Materials

an class="Chemical">Anthracene, an class="Chemical">9-anthracenecarbonitrile, an class="Chemical">anthrone, acetic acid, dimethylformamide (DMF), copper(I) cyanide, granulated zinc, and chloroform were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich and used without further purification. Concentrated hydrochloric acid was purchased from Nice Chemicals. Magnesium(II) sulfate and iron(III) chloride were obtained from TCI and used as received. Hexane and ethyl acetate used for column chromatography were received from Finar and used without further purification. Anhydrous solvents cyclohexane, toluene, dichloromethane, tetrahydrofuran, acetonitrile, and dimethyl sulfoxide used for photophysical studies were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich and used without further purification. CDCl3 was also procured from Sigma-Aldrich for recording NMR spectra. 4-Nitrophenol, 2,4-dinitrophenol, 2,4,6-trinitrophenol, 4-nitrotoluene, 2,4-dinitrotoluene, and nitrobenzene were purchased from Alfa Aesar and used for sensing study.

Instrumentation

an class="Chemical">1H NMR spean class="Chemical">ctra were obtained on a Bruker Bioan class="Gene">Spin 400 MHz spectrometer at ambient temperature using tetramethylsilane as an internal standard. A Bruker micrOTOF-Q11 mass spectrometer was employed for the measurements of mass spectra. UV/vis and fluorescence spectra were recorded using a Cary 100 Bio UV/vis spectrophotometer and a Cary Eclipse fluorescence spectrophotometer, respectively. Time-resolved fluorescence measurements were carried out by using a time-correlated single-photon counting spectrometer (Edinburgh, OB920). A light-emitting diode laser, EPL 375 nm, was used to excite the molecule, and an MCP photomultiplier (Hamamatsu R3809U-50) was used as the detector (response time, 40 ps). The lamp profile was recorded by using a scatterer (dilute ludox solution in water) in place of the sample. Decay curves were analyzed by a nonlinear least-squares iteration procedure using the F900 decay analysis software. The quality of the fit was judged by the chi-squared (χ2) values and visual inspection of weighted deviations of residuals. In particular, a field emission scanning electron microscope from ZEISS was used to capture the images of organic aggregates. The aggregate sizes were determined through the dynamic light scattering (DLS) method using Malvern Zetasizer instrument.

Synthesis and Characterization

Synthesis of 9,9′-Bianthryl (BA)

9,9′-an class="Chemical">Bianthrylpan> was syan class="Chemical">nthesized using a method reported in the literature.[81] Typically 20 g of an class="Chemical">anthrone, 20 g of granulated zinc, and 100 cc of acetic acid were loaded in a two-neck RB flask and then heated under reflux for 8–9 h with dropwise addition of fuming HCl for the first 5 h only. Pale yellow crystals of 9,9′-bianthryl started to precipitate after a few hours. Then, the obtained compound was filtered and purified using column chromatography on silica using hexane and ethyl acetate (3:1) as the eluent. The yield of the obtained product was 75%. The compound was characterized using NMR and mass spectroscopy. 1H NMR: (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.03 (d, 4H), 7.13 (d, 4H), 7.45 (d, 4H), 8.16 (d, 4H), 8.71 (s, 2H). Electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS): 354.41 (M+).

Synthesis of 10,10′-Dicyano-9,9′-bianthryl (DCBA)

10,10′-Dicyano-9,9′-pan class="Chemical">an class="Chemical">bianthryl (class="Chemical">pan> class="Chemical">DCBA) was synthesized using a method published by Mueller and Baumgarten.[82] It was synthesized by taking a suspension of 2 g of 10,10′-dibromo-9,9′-bianthryl and 1 g of CuCN in freshly distilled DMF and then refluxed for 3–4 h under an inert atmosphere. After that, the reaction mixture was cooled down and poured into a 1 M FeCl3 solution, which was then repeatedly extracted with CHCl3, and MgSO4 was used for drying. After that, the solution was concentrated and then the residue was chromatographed over silica gel with hexane and ethyl acetate (3:1) as eluent. The obtained product (yield 78%) was characterized using 1H NMR and mass spectroscopy. 1H NMR: (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.64 (dd, 4H), 7.74 (m, 4H), 7.31 (m, 4H), 7.09 (dd, 4H). ESI-MS: 404.43 (M+).

Fabrication of Organic Aggregates

The aggregates of an class="Chemical">AN, BA, CA, and pan> class="Chemical">DCBA were prepared using a well-known reprecipitation method.[83,84] In short, 30 μL of a solution of each compound in DMSO (0.01 M) was rapidly injean class="Chemical">cted through a syringe into 3 mL of Milli-Q water separately under vigorous stirring. The stirring was continued for about 20 min. The clear solution turns hazy, indicating the formation of aggregates. The formation of aggregates was confirmed by UV–vis absorption spectroscopy, FESEM images, and DLS method. To prepare the samples for FESEM study, freshly prepared diluted solutions of the aggregates were drop-cast on a clean silicon wafer surface and kept under vacuum for drying.

Determination of Fluorescence Quantum Yield

Quaan class="Chemical">ntpan>um yields (QYs) of an class="Chemical">AN, BA, CA, and an class="Chemical">DCBA in molecular and aggregated forms were measured following the standard procedure with quinine sulfate in 0.1 M H2SO4 (QY 0.54) as the reference compound.[85] During QY measurement, the absorbances of both quinine sulfate dissolved in 0.1 M H2SO4 and the solutions of AN, BA, CA, and DCBA in DMSO were kept below 0.1 at the excitation wavelength of 350 nm. Optically matched solutions of reference and sample were used for measurement. Quantum yield was measured using the following equation (eq )where QY is the quantum yield, I is the fluorescence intensity, A is the absorbance, and n is the refractive index of the medium. The subscripts “sam” and “ref“ represent sample studied and the reference used, respectively.

Characterization of Aggregates

The prepared aggregates were charaan class="Chemical">cterized using UV–vis spean class="Chemical">ctroscopy, FESEM, and dynamic light scattering (DLS) techniques. During UV–vis spean class="Chemical">ctroscopy, a red shift in the absorption spectra of the colloidal solution was observed. This observation is indicative of aggregate formation. Figure shows the FESEM images of AN, BA, CA, and DCBA aggregates. The formation of aggregate and their size calculation were also investigated by dynamic light scattering (DLS) measurements (Figure ).

Figure 16

FESEM images of (a) AN, (b) BA, (c) CA, and (d) DCBA aggregates at room temperature.

Figure 17

DLS plots of AN, CA, BA, and DCBA aggregates at room temperature.

FESEM images of (a) an class="Chemical">ANpan>, (b) BA, (c) CA, and (d) an class="Chemical">DCBA aggregates at room temperature.

DLS plots of an class="Chemical">ANpan>, CA, BA, and an class="Chemical">DCBA aggregates at room temperature.

The sizes calculated from DLS measuremean class="Chemical">ntpan>s are given in Table . It is observed that with increasing the size of the molecules, the hydrodynamic radius decreases, which is consistean class="Chemical">nt with the literature reported data on some organic aggregated systems.[86] The relatively larger size of smaller an class="Chemical">AN and CA molecules compared to larger molecules BA and DCBA is probably due to better packing of the AN and CA molecules in the aggregated state.

Table 3

DLS Data of AN, BA, CA, and DCBA in Aggregated form at Room Temperature

system	particle size (nm)
AN aggregate	250
BA aggregate	220
CA aggregate	230
DCBA aggregate	180