| Literature DB >> 31457955 |
Liang Chen1, Rong Huang1, Ling-Bin Kong1, Jun Lin1, Sheng-Jiao Yan1.
Abstract
A one-step protocol without transition-metal catalysts with simple post-treatment for the synthesis of 1,3-diazaheterocycle-fused [1,2-a]quinoline derivatives via the cascade reaction of 2-fluorobenzaldehyde (1) and heterocyclic ketene aminals (2) was developed. In the one-step cascade reaction, C=C and C-N bonds were constructed, and the targeted compound can be efficiently obtained by filtering without column chromatography. This protocol describes a valuable route to concisely and feasibly obtain 1,3-diazaheterocycle-fused [1,2-a]quinoline derivatives. The synthetic methodology is particularly attractive because of the following features: low-cost solvent, mild temperature, atom economy, high yield, and potential biological activity of the product.Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 31457955 PMCID: PMC6641235 DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.7b01856
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ACS Omega ISSN: 2470-1343
Figure 1Biological activity of quinolines and the targeted compounds.
Scheme 1Strategy for the Cascade Reaction Synthesis of [1,2-a]Quinolines 3 and 4
Optimized Conditions for the Synthesis of [1,2-a]Quinoline 3ada
| entry | solvent | promoter | time (h) | yield | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | rt | 0.5 | n.r. | ||
| 2 | 60 | 0.5 | trace | ||
| 3 | 1,4-dioxane | K2CO3 | reflux | 2 | 23 |
| 4 | 1,4-dioxane | reflux | 2 | 21 | |
| 5 | 1,4-dioxane | reflux | 2 | 19 | |
| 6 | 1,4-dioxane | Et3N | reflux | 2 | 75 |
| 7 | 1,4-dioxane | piperidine | reflux | 2 | 91 |
| 8 | acetonitrile | piperidine | reflux | 2 | 54 |
| 9 | THF | piperidine | reflux | 3 | 68 |
| 10 | DMF | piperidine | 110 | 2 | 40 |
| 11 | EtOH | piperidine | reflux | 2 | 90 |
| 12 | H2O | piperidine | reflux | 5 | 14 |
| 13 | 1,4-dioxane | piperidine | 60 | 2 | 92 |
| 14 | 1,4-dioxane |
Reaction conditions: 1a (1.1 mmol), 2d (1.0 mmol), promoter (1.5 mmol), solvent (15 mL).
Isolated yield based on HKA 2d. n.r. = no reaction.
Cascade Reaction Synthesis of [1,2-a]Quinoline Derivatives 3a
| entry | time (h) | yield | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 60 | 0.5 | 94 | |||
| 2 | 60 | 0.5 | 98 | |||
| 3 | 60 | 0.5 | 97 | |||
| 4 | 60 | 0.5 | 97 | |||
| 5 | 60 | 0.5 | 95 | |||
| 6 | 60 | 0.5 | 93 | |||
| 7 | 60 | 0.5 | 92 | |||
| 8 | 60 | 0.5 | 94 | |||
| 9 | 60 | 0.5 | 96 | |||
| 10 | 60 | 0.5 | 95 | |||
| 11 | 60 | 0.5 | 96 | |||
| 12 | 60 | 0.5 | 92 | |||
| 13 | 60 | 0.5 | 91 | |||
| 14 | 60 | 0.5 | 91 | |||
| 15 | 60 | 0.5 | 93 | |||
| 16 | 60 | 0.5 | 92 | |||
| 17 | 75 | 1 | 95 | |||
| 18 | 75 | 1 | 97 | |||
| 19 | 75 | 1 | 97 | |||
| 20 | 75 | 1 | 95 | |||
| 21 | 75 | 1 | 92 | |||
| 22 | 75 | 1 | 92 | |||
| 23 | 75 | 1 | 93 | |||
| 24 | 75 | 1 | 94 | |||
| 25 | 75 | 1 | 96 | |||
| 26 | 75 | 1 | 95 | |||
| 27 | 75 | 1 | 95 | |||
| 28 | 75 | 1 | 94 | |||
| 29 | 75 | 1 | 93 | |||
| 30 | 75 | 1 | 92 | |||
| 31 | reflux | 2 | 93 | |||
| 32 | reflux | 2 | 95 | |||
| 33 | reflux | 2 | 94 | |||
| 34 | reflux | 2 | 94 | |||
| 35 | reflux | 2 | 92 | |||
| 36 | reflux | 2 | 93 | |||
| 37 | reflux | 2 | 92 | |||
| 38 | reflux | 2 | 92 | |||
| 39 | reflux | 2 | 95 | |||
| 40 | reflux | 2 | 95 | |||
| 41 | reflux | 2 | 94 | |||
| 42 | reflux | 2 | 92 | |||
| 43 | reflux | 2 | 90 | |||
| 44 | reflux | 2 | 91 |
Conditions: 1 (1.1 mmol) and 2 (1.0 mmol) were heated in the solvent 1,4-dioxane (15 mL) with piperidine (1.5 mmol) and CaCl2 (0.5 mmol) as catalysts.
Isolated yield based on HKAs 2.
Cascade Reaction Synthesis of [1,2-a]Quinoline Derivatives 4a,b
Conditions: 1 (1.1 mmol) and 2 (1.0 mmol) were heated in the solvent 1,4-dioxane (15 mL) with piperidine (1.5 mmol) and CaCl2 (0.5 mmol) as catalysts.
Isolated yield based on HKAs 2.
Figure 2ORTEP diagram of 3bf; ellipsoids are drawn at the 30% probability level.
Scheme 2Mechanism Hypotheses for the Synthesis of Target Compounds 3