Effect of Differential Self-Assembly on Mechanochromic Luminescence of Fluorene-Benzothiadiazole-Based Fluorophores.

Supramolecular self-assembly is an excellent tool for controlling the optical and electronic properties of chromophore-based molecular systems. Herein, we demonstrate how differential self-assembly affects mechanoresponsive luminescence of fluorene-benzothiadiazole-based fluorophores. We have synthesized two donor-acceptor-donor-type conjugated oligomers consisting of fluorene as the donor and benzothiadiazole as the acceptor. For facile self-assembly, both molecules are end-functionalized with hydrogen-bonding amide groups. Differential self-assembly was induced by attaching alkyl chains of different lengths onto the fluorene moiety: hexyl (FB-C6) and dodecyl (FB-C12). The molecules self-assemble to form well-defined nanostructures in nonpolar solvents and solvent mixtures. Although their optical properties in solution are not affected by the alkyl chain length, significant effects were observed in the self-assembled state, particularly in the excitation energy migration properties. As a result, remarkable differences were observed in the mechanochromic luminescence properties of the molecules. A precise structure-property correlation is made using UV-visible absorption and fluorescence spectroscopy, time-correlated single-photon counting analysis, scanning electron microscopy, and X-ray diffraction spectroscopy.

Introduction

Organic molecules exhibiting excellent luminescence in the solid state are attracting immense scientific interest because of their potential applications in advanced optical and electronic devices.[1−7] The luminescence properties of the molecules in the solid state are dependent on the intermolecular interactions and hence affected by the self-assembly or stacking mode of the chromophores.[8−13] Thus, control over interchromophore interactions results in materials with interesting stimuli-responsive properties and is a key of many optical and electronic applications of materials based on π-conjugated systems.[14−20] Among various stimuli-responsive materials, mechanochromic luminescent (MCL) materials attract special interest because of their fundamental and technological relevances.[21−32] These materials have the potential for applications in sensors, optical information storage, and as security inks.[33−40] Nevertheless, they are still at relatively incipient stages of investigation compared with other kinds of stimuli-responsive (photo-, thermo-, and electro-responsive) materials. This could be attributed to the inherent complexities associated with the molecular structural factors and intermolecular interactions, which make it difficult to design an MCL material. Therefore, fundamental understanding of the role of intermolecular interactions, self-assembly, and the underlying photophysical properties is essential for further development in this area.

In the present work, we study the self-assembly behavior of fluorene-benzothiadiazole-based fluorophores (Scheme ) containing two different alkyl chains and the consequent effect on the optical properties, particularly the MCL properties of the resulting assembly. Although fluorene is a well-studied luminophore, only a few reports have been published on fluorene-based MCL materials.[41−44] Phase changes associated with mechanical grinding were cited as the reason for luminescence changes in those reports. Although this reasoning is correct in the bulk form, variations in the chromophore–chromophore interactions at the molecular level and the resulting changes in the photophysical properties such as excitation energy migration (EEM) at the supramolecular level should also be considered. However, such information is missing in most of the reports on organic-based MCL materials, including the above-mentioned reports.[45−47] Herein, we try to understand the correlation among self-assembly, EEM, and MCL properties in two structurally similar donor–acceptor–donor-type fluorene-benzothiadiazole derivatives. Both molecules consist of a benzothiadiazole (acceptor) unit sandwiched between two fluorene (donor) derivatives. They were end-functionalized with hydrogen-bonding amide groups for facile self-assembly. These two molecules differ only by the side alkyl chains length on the fluorene, which is hexyl in FB-C6 and dodecyl in FB-C12. Our studies revealed that the difference in alkyl chain length forced the molecules to adopt different nanostructures on self-assembly, which in turn affected the emission, excitation energy migration, and mechanochromic luminescence switching properties of the resulting assembly.

Scheme 1

Chemical Structures of FB-C6 and FB-C12

Results and Discussion

Photophysical Properties in Solution

The UV–vis absorption and fluorescence properties of FB-C6 and FB-C12 were recorded in different solvents with increasing polarity (toluene, tetrahydrofuran (THF), and dimethylformamide (DMF); concn = 10–5 M; l = 10 mm; λex = 430 nm for fluorescence studies and 410 nm for lifetime measurements; Figure S1, Supporting Information (SI)), and the observed photophysical parameters are summarized in Table . Both molecules showed similar absorption and fluorescence characteristics in the above-mentioned solvents, implying that their optical properties at the molecular level are not affected by the alkyl chain length. No significant shift in the absorption maxima was observed with varying solvents, indicating that the dipole moments of the molecules in the ground state were fairly insensitive to solvent polarity. In contrast, emission spectra were red-shifted on increasing the solvent polarity (toluene, λem = 545 nm; and DMF, λem = 595 nm). This could be attributed to the internal charge transfer (ICT) nature of the molecules in the excited state, that is, the dipole moment of the emissive state is higher than that of the ground state. Excited-state lifetime was obtained from time-correlated single-photon counting analysis; both compounds exhibited monoexponential decay in solution. The lifetime was found to increase slightly with an increase in solvent polarity, which could be attributed to the stabilization of the emissive polar excited state in polar solvents, usually observed in compounds having ICT characteristics.[48,49]

Table 1

Absorption Maximum, Emission Maximum, Extinction Coefficient (ε), Fluorescence Quantum Yield (ϕF), and Average Fluorescence Lifetime (τ) of FB-C6 and FB-C12 in Various Solvents

		absorption		emission
compounds	solvent	λabs (nm)	ε × 104 cm–1	λem (nm)	ϕf (%)a	τ (ns)
FB-C6	toluene	332, 430	5.3, 2.3	545	87	4.34
	THF	334, 434	5.3, 2.3	567	72	5.24
	DMF	334, 434	5.5, 2.3	597	43	5.52
FB-C12	toluene	332, 430	5.1, 2.2	547	90	4.33
	THF	334, 434	5.1, 2.1	567	73	5.24
	DMF	334, 434	5.1, 2.1	595	57	5.57

Quinine sulfate in 0.1 M H2SO4 (ϕF = 0.546) was used as the standard for quantum yield measurement, error limit ±5%.

Aggregation in the DMF–Water Mixture

To study the emission properties on aggregation, emission spectra of FB-C6 and FB-C12 were recorded in different DMF–water fractions (Figure a,d). DMF solutions of both compounds emit strong fluorescence with quantum yields of 43 and 57%, respectively. Upon addition of increasing amounts of water to the DMF solution, initially the emission was quenched and the maximum was blue-shifted. On further addition of water, the emission intensity was gradually increased along with a red shift in the maximum. Interestingly, the emission changes on addition of water were remarkably different for FB-C6 and FB-C12. The blue shift of the maximum was gradual in the former (Figure b), whereas it was spontaneous in the latter (Figure e). A maximum blue shift of 58 nm was achieved in FB-C6 when the water fraction reached 40%. On the other hand, the maximum blue shift (55 nm) happened in FB-C12 on the first addition itself (10%). It was also observed that quenching was lower in FB-C6 (56%; Figure c) than that in FB-C12 (78%; Figure f). On further addition of water, a remarkable red shift was observed in the former (35 nm), whereas only marginal changes were observed for the latter (14 nm). Emission was recovered to nearly 82 and 73% of the initial intensities in FB-C6 and FB-C12, respectively, at higher water fractions (70–80%). These changes could be attributed to the formation of aggregates by the addition of water to the DMF solution. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of the aggregates are shown in Figure . A further increase in water fraction (>80% in FB-C6 and >70% in FB-C12) results in the decrease of the emission intensity probably because the aggregates attained a critical size and began precipitation. The visual changes to the DMF solutions under UV light in the presence of various amounts of water fractions are shown in Figure c,d, respectively.

Figure 1

Emission spectral changes of (a) FB-C6 and (d) FB-C12 in the DMF–water mixture at a concentration of 2 × 10–5 M (λex = 430 nm, l = 10 mm); the plots of shifts in the emission maximum (Δλ) versus water fractions of (b) FB-C6 and (e) FB-C12. Relative changes in the emission intensities of (c) FB-C6 and (f) FB-C12 as a function of water fraction in the DMF–water mixture.

Figure 2

SEM image of the aggregates of (a) FB-C6 and (b) FB-C12 from the 90% water–DMF mixture. Photographs of (c) FB-C6 and (d) FB-C12 solutions with different water fractions under 365 nm UV illumination.

Self-assembly is a sensitive property, which is affected by the nature of the molecules as well as the microenvironment. Among the various factors, the polarity of the molecules as well as the medium plays a key role in the self-assembly process. To understand the difference in the aggregation/self-assembly properties of FB-C6 and FB-C12 in the DMF–water mixture, it is important to consider these aspects. The polarity index of DMF is 6.4 and that of water is 10.2, implying that increasing the water fraction obviously increases the polarity of the medium. On the other hand, considering the structure of the molecules, the presence of four C12 chains makes FB-C12 more nonpolar than FB-C6 containing C6 chains. This made the former respond faster to the addition of water and exhibit different emission colors at different water fractions when compared to that in the latter. It was obvious that the addition of water forces the molecules to aggregate, which would result in lesser number of molecules exposed to the polar solvent medium, leading to the blue shift of the emission maximum. The proximity of the chromophores due to aggregation also facilitates nonradiative decay of the excited state (Figure S3, SI), which could be attributed to the quenching of fluorescence. A further increase of water fraction in the medium could facilitate the formation of tightly packed aggregates, which may improve the chromophores’ planarity and electronic communication within the assembly, resulting in a red shift in the emission relative to the initial aggregate emission. Tighter packing may also hinder the rotational diffusion of the molecules, hence improving the radiative decay of the excited state. This effect might be enough to offset the emission quenching induced by the tighter packing of the chromophores, thus resulting in an overall enhancement of the emission intensity. The difference in the red shift at a higher water percentage can also be explained in terms of alkyl chain length. Owing to the presence of short alkyl chains, better packing would be possible in FB-C6, resulting in better planarity and more red shift. On the other hand, longer alkyl chains hinder the tight packing in FB-C12, leading to less red shift. It must be noted that addition of water into the DMF solution of both molecules does not induce red shift of the emission maximum, particularly at the initial water fraction (i.e., before the onset of aggregation), indicating that the molecules are already in a charge transfer state in DMF and no further polarization can happen on a further increase in the polarity of the medium.

Self-Assembly Properties

Both molecules contain amide functionalities at terminal positions, and it is well established that molecules appended with amide groups usually form self-assembled structures through one-dimensional hydrogen bonding in nonpolar solvents.[50,51] The one-dimensional assemblies of the molecules under study were expected to undergo hierarchical self-assembly assisted by π–π stacking between the chromophore backbone and van der Waals interaction between the alkyl chains to form three-dimensional nanostructures. To study the self-assembly properties, the molecules were dissolved in toluene by gentle heating (∼50 °C), followed by slow cooling to room temperature. The resulting precipitate was analyzed through a scanning electron microscope (SEM). The SEM images revealed the formation of self-assembled aggregates having hexagonal bricklike structures in the case of FB-C6 (Figure a) and flat, rodlike structures for FB-C12 (Figure b). Although the exact reason for the difference in morphology is not known, it could be assumed that the alkyl chains have a remarkable effect on chromophore packing. For instance, the van der Waals interaction would be less efficient in FB-C6 than that in FB-C12. On the other hand, steric effects would be more in the latter, which may hinder the efficient π–π stacking between the chromophores. In other words, the difference in alkyl chain length, which does not have any effect on the molecular level properties, has a significant effect on the supramolecular properties.

Figure 3

SEM images of the self-assembled aggregates of (a) FB-C6 and (b) FB-C12 from toluene.

Mechanoresponsive Luminescence Properties

The pristine powder samples of FB-C6 and FB-C12 obtained by precipitation from cold toluene were yellow. The former showed a yellow fluorescence (561 nm), whereas the latter showed a yellowish-green fluorescence (538 nm) upon irradiation with UV light (365 nm). Hexyl-chain-substituted FB-C6 showed more red-shifted emission compared to that of dodecyl-substituted FB-C12. As explained in the previous section, the C6 chain exerts less steric hindrance than that of the C12 chains, and as a result, more planar packing would be possible in the former than that in the latter, which is in accordance with the observation in the solvent mixture. The absolute fluorescence quantum yield in the solid state was 56% for FB-C6 and 55% for FB-C12. Although the molecules exhibited different emission colors in the pristine state, the color became same (yellowish-orange) upon grinding (emission maxima of FB-C6 and FB-C12 were shifted 583 and 585 nm, respectively) and the fluorescence quantum yields of both samples were reduced slightly. Interestingly, the emission features could be reverted to those of the initial state upon solvent (toluene) fuming. The emission spectral changes and the corresponding photographs of the samples on grinding followed by solvent exposure are shown in Figure . The fluorescence switching process could be repeated for several cycles for both samples (Figure c,f), indicating the absence of any chemical changes on applying mechanical force and exposing to solvent vapors. The reversibility and reproducibility of the transition have great significance for the application of these materials in sensors. No noticeable changes were observed in the absorption spectra corresponding to the π–π* transition (around 430 nm) of the samples before and after grinding (Figure S4, SI).

Figure 4

Photoluminescence spectra of (a) FB-C6 and (d) FB-C12 under different conditions (λex = 430 nm). Photographs of pristine and ground samples of (b) FB-C6 and (e) FB-C12 under a 365 nm UV lamp. Repeated switching of the emission maximum by the grinding–fuming cycle in (c) FB-C6 and (f) FB-C12.

Powder X-ray diffraction analysis was carried out to observe the changes in diffraction patterns upon grinding and solvent vapor exposure. Owing to the presence of alkyl chains, both molecules were relatively amorphous in nature, resulting in only weak diffraction signals (particularly for FB-C12) even for the pristine samples (see Figure S5, SI). The peak intensities were further diminished on grinding, as observed in several other MCL materials.[52−57] Reappearance of the peaks upon fuming with toluene vapors signifies the recovery of the initial states. To obtain a better understanding about the underlying photophysical phenomenon associated with fluorescence switching on applying mechanical force, time-resolved fluorescence lifetimes of the materials in the pristine, ground, and fumed states were monitored (Figure ). The pristine samples of FB-C6 and FB-C12 exhibited biexponential decay with average fluorescence lifetimes of 3.35 and 2.87 ns, respectively. Interestingly, the decay becomes triexponential and the average lifetimes were increased to 4.48 ns for FB-C6 and 4.43 ns for FB-C12 upon grinding. It is a well-known fact that organic π-conjugated molecules exhibit efficient excitation energy migration in the self-assembled state similar to that in natural-light-harvesting systems.[1,58−60] Literature reports suggest that a higher red shift of emission occurs in self-assembled systems (compared to that in the corresponding monomers) with efficient EEM.[58−60] This is attributed to the substantial loss of energy of the excitons during migration through several chromophores. Furthermore, efficient EEM also results in a relatively higher lifetime because the delocalized excitons take more time for radiative recombination. On the other hand, emission red shift and lifetime enhancement were found to be minimum in systems with less efficient EEM. In the present case, more red-shifted emission and higher lifetime (Δτ = 17%) of pristine FB-C6 clearly indicate that excitation energy migration is more efficient in it than that in FB-C12. However, after grinding, both emission maxima and lifetimes (Δτ = 1%) become comparable.

Figure 5

Time-resolved fluorescence decay profiles of (a) FB-C6 and (b) FB-C12 (instrument response factor).

Although both derivatives form self-assembled nanostructures because of the cooperative interaction of hydrogen bonding, π–π stacking, and van der Waals forces at the molecular level, the emission, fluorescence lifetime, and morphology analysis revealed that the basic chromophore packing differs at the supramolecular level. From the studies, it was assumed that FB-C6 is more planar in the self-assembled solid state with strong chromophore–chromophore interactions, whereas FB-C12 exhibits a weak chromophore interaction because of the presence of longer alkyl chains. As a result, better excitation energy migration would be possible within stacks of the former, resulting in a higher red shift and longer lifetime. On the other hand, energy migration is found to be less efficient in the latter. The grinding obviously causes the disruption of the supramolecular packing of the chromophores but forces them to have a stronger interaction because of the close proximity. This situation facilitates the excitons to travel further before decaying radiatively, leading to a longer lifetime and further red shift. Because this is a forced packing, the effect of alkyl chains is absent, yielding comparable emission maximum and fluorescence lifetime. The difference in chromophore interaction and energy migration before and after grinding is schematically illustrated in Figure .

Figure 6

Schematic representation of molecular packing and energy migration of FB-C6 and FB-C12 before and after grinding. The green arrows indicate excitation energy migration.

Even though a large number of organic compounds exhibit MCL properties, our study illustrates how small structural changes in the molecules influence the intermolecular interactions, self-assembly, and optical properties, thus affecting mechanically induced luminescence behavior. Most of the reports on MCL materials attribute phase changes associated with mechanical grinding to luminescence switching. However, our studies revealed the importance of considering the variation in excitation energy migration properties associated with structural changes in explaining MCL behavior of chromophore assemblies.

Conclusions

In summary, we have designed and synthesized two mechanoresponsive luminescent chromophores, which consist of benzothiadiazole and alkylated fluorenes end-functionalized with amide groups. These molecules differ only in the length of alkyl side chains incorporated on the fluorene units. Both luminophores are highly emissive in solution and solid states. Their optical properties at the molecular level were not affected by the alkyl chain length. However, significant differences were observed in the self-assembly and optical properties of the resulting solid samples. The differences in the emission and mechanoresponsive behaviors of the samples were well correlated to the variation in excitation energy migration in the self-assembled state. Our results demonstrated that subtle manipulation in the molecular structure could lead to differential self-assembly, resulting in interesting stimuli-responsive behaviors.

Experimental Section

Materials

Reagents and solvents for synthesis were purchased from either local suppliers or Sigma-Aldrich or Alfa Aesar and used as received. Air- and water-sensitive synthetic procedures were conducted in an inert atmosphere using standard Schlenk techniques.

Measurements

Melting points were measured using a Mel-Temp-II melting point apparatus, and these are uncorrected. Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra were recorded on a Shimadzu IRPrestige-21 Fourier transform infrared spectrophotometer. 1H and 13C NMR spectra of the compounds were recorded on a 500 MHz Bruker Avance II spectrometer. All of the chemical shifts were referenced to (CH3)4Si (TMS; δ = 0 ppm) for 1H or to CDCl3 (δ = 77 ppm) for 13C. High-resolution mass spectral analysis was carried out using a JEOL JM AX 505 HA instrument.

Absorption and Fluorescence Spectroscopies

Absorption spectra were recorded by a Shimadzu UV–visible-3101 PC near-infrared scanning spectrophotometer using a quartz cell with 1 cm path length. Fluorescence spectra were recorded using a SPEX-Fluorolog F112X spectrofluorometer equipped with a 450 W xenon arc lamp. The spectra were corrected using the program installed by the manufacturer. Solid-state UV–vis absorption spectra of pristine and ground samples were recorded on a Shimadzu UV-2600 UV–vis spectrophotometer. For the measurement, the samples were kept in between two transparent quartz plates and measured in the reflectance mode. The reflectance spectra were converted into absorption spectra using the Kubelka–Munk function.

Fluorescence Quantum Yield and Lifetime

The fluorescence quantum yields in the solution state were determined relative to standard compounds (quinine sulfate in 0.1 M H2SO4; ϕF = 0.546) taking optically matching solutions. The fluorescence quantum yield of the powder samples was calculated using a calibrated integrating sphere in a SPEX-Fluorolog spectrofluorimeter. Samples were excited at 430 nm using a Xe-arc lamp, and the absolute quantum yield was determined by the de Mello method.[61] Fluorescence lifetimes were determined using an IBH (FluoroCube) time-correlated picosecond single-photon counting system. Samples were excited at a wavelength of 410 nm (NanoLED-11) with a repetition rate of 1 MHz using a pulsed diode laser (<100 ps pulse duration).

Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)

For SEM measurements, samples were drop-cast and air-dried on a SEM brass grid and subjected to thin gold coating using a JEOL JFC-1200 fine coater. The samples were analyzed with a JEOL JSM-5600 LV scanning electron microscope.

XRD Measurements

Wide-angle X-ray diffraction patterns of the samples were recorded using the Cu Kα radiation (1.542 Å) on a Philips X’pert PRO X-ray diffractometer.

Synthesis and Characterization

The synthetic routes for FB-C6 and FB-C12 are shown in Scheme S1 in SI. The intermediate compounds, 1–3, were synthesized by previously reported procedures.[62,63] Syntheses of FB-C6 and FB-C12 and the corresponding amines (4 and 5) were carried out as follows.

Synthesis of 7,7′-(Benzo[c][1,2,5]thiadiazole-4,7-diyl)bis(9,9-dihexyl-9H-fluorene-2-amine) (4)

4,7-Bis(4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-1,3,2-dioxaborolan-2-yl)benzo[c][1,2,5]thiadiazole (150.0 mg, 0.39 mmol, 1.0 equiv), 7-bromo-9,9-dihexyl-9H-fluoren-2-amine (367.6 mg, 0.86 mmol, 2.2 equiv), and K2CO3 (538.9 mg, 3.90 mmol, 10.0 equiv) were weighed in a two-necked round-bottom flask. Air was removed from the flask, argon (Ar) gas was filled using the freeze–thaw–pump method, and the process was repeated three times. Pd(PPh3)4 (45.0 mg, 0.04 mmol, 0.1 equiv) was added under Ar counterflow, followed by the addition of the degassed THF/H2O (2:1) mixture (20 mL). The reaction mixture was refluxed at 70 °C for 2 days, and then it was poured into water. The extraction was carried out with chloroform (CHCl3). The organic fraction was dried over anhydrous Na2SO4 and evaporated to dryness under reduced pressure. The crude product was purified by column chromatography (silica gel, 50% CHCl3–hexane). The product obtained was an orange viscous liquid. Yield: 71%; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ [ppm] 7.94 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 7.87 (d, J = 8 Hz, 1H), 7.81 (s, 1H), 7.70 (d, J = 8 Hz, 1H), 7.64 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.60 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 6.69 (d, J = 7 Hz, 2H), 1.94 (m, 2H), 2.06 (m, 2H), 1.31 (m, 3H), 1.17 (m, 10H), 1.17 (m, 10H), 0.78 (m, 9H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ [ppm] = 14.18, 22.77, 23.97, 29.95, 31.67, 40.71, 55.09, 109.95, 114.18, 118.47, 120.94, 123.76, 127.77, 128.18, 132.14, 133.63, 134.71, 141.93, 146.33, 150.28, 153.49, 154.57. Electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) m/z = 831.5414 (calcd = 830.53).

Synthesis of 7,7′-(Benzo[c][1,2,5]thiadiazole-4,7-diyl)bis(9,9-didodecyl-9H-fluoren-2-amine) (5)

The above procedure was adopted for the synthesis of 5 using 4,7-bis(4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-1,3,2-dioxaborolan-2-yl)benzo[c][1,2,5]thiadiazole (200.0 mg, 0.52 mmol, 1.0 equiv), 7-bromo-9,9-didodecyl-9H-fluoren-2-amine (682.0 mg, 1.14 mmol, 2.2 equiv), K2CO3 (718.0 mg, 5.20 mmol, 10.0 equiv), Pd(PPh3)4 (61.0 mg, 0.05 mmol, 0.1 equiv), and THF/H2O (2:1) mixture (20 mL). The product obtained was an orange-red viscous liquid. Yield: 76%; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ [ppm] 7.96 (d, J = 8, 2H), 7.872 (s, 2H), 7.844 (s, 2H), 7.70 (d, J = 8 Hz, 2H), 7.54 (d, J = 8 Hz, 2H), 6.70 (s, 2H), 6.69 (s, 2H), 3.80 (br, 4H), 1.99 (m, 4H), 1.87 (m, 4H), 1.09–1.28 (m, 68H), 0.78–0.86 (m, 20H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ [ppm] = 14.25, 22.81, 24.04, 29.46, 29.75, 29.80, 30.32, 32.03, 40.70, 55.51, 110.06, 114.27, 118.49, 120.95, 123.73, 127.77, 128.20, 132.27, 133.64, 134.74, 141.91, 146.15, 150.33, 153.50, 154.57. ESI-MS m/z = 1167.9148 (calcd = 1166.91).

Synthesis of N,N′-(Benzo[c][1,2,5]thiadiazole-4,7-diylbis(9,9-dihexyl-9H-fluorene-7,2-diyl))diacetamide (FB-C6)

To a solution of 7,7′-(benzo[c][1,2,5]thiadiazole-4,7-diyl)bis(9,9-dihexyl-9H-fluoren-2-amine) (125.0 mg, 0.10 mmol, 1.0 equiv) in anhydrous dichloromethane (DCM) (5 mL) at room temperature under an inert atmosphere, acetic acid (0.14 mL, 0.26 mmol, 2.5 equiv) and diisopropylethylamine (0.04 mL, 0.26 mmol, 2.5 equiv) were added. The reaction temperature was lowered to 0 °C using an ice–salt bath. 2-(1H-7-Azabenzotriazol-1-yl)-1,1,3,3 tetramethyl-uraniumhexafluorophosphate (HATU) (98.85 mg, 1.30 mmol, 3.0 equiv) was added to it, and the temperature was slowly allowed to rise to room temperature. After stirring for 8 h, the mixture was poured into water and extracted with DCM. The combined organic extracts were dried over anhydrous Na2SO4 and evaporated to dryness under reduced pressure. The resulting mixture was purified by column chromatography (silica gel, 10% MeOH–DCM). The pure product was obtained as a yellow powder. Yield: 87%; mp: 245 °C; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ [ppm] 7.99 (d, J = 7 Hz, 2H), 7.92 (s, 2H), 7.87 (s, 2H), 7.80 (d, 2H), 7.69 (d, 2H), 7.61 (s, 2H), 7.46 (d, J = 7 Hz, 2H), 7.27 (s, 2H), 2.72 (s, 6H), 1.97–2.06 (m, 8H), 1.08–1.15 (m, 26H), 0.75–0.78 (m, 18H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ [ppm] 14.03, 22.61, 23.87, 24.82, 29.75, 31.52, 40.34, 55.41, 114.45, 118.54, 119.35, 120.33, 123.85, 127.84, 128.20, 133.55, 135.80, 136.98, 137.35, 136.98, 137.35, 140.90, 151.03, 152.54, 154.36, 168.12. ESI-MS m/z = 915.5607 (calcd = 914.55). FTIR (KBr) νmax: 818, 889, 1006, 1284, 1374, 1415, 1463, 1544, 1598, 1670, 2857, 2925, 3311 cm–1.

Synthesis of N,N′-(Benzo[c][1,2,5]thiadiazole-4,7-diylbis(9,9-didodecyl-9H-fluorene-7,2-diyl))diacetamide (FB-C12)

Synthesis of FB-C12 was achieved by following the same synthetic route adopted for preparing FB-C6 using 7,7′-(benzo[c][1,2,5]thiadiazole-4,7-diyl)bis(9,9-didodecyl-9H-fluoren-2-amine) (125.0 mg, 0.10 mmol, 1.0 equiv), acetic acid (0.14 mL, 0.26 mmol, 2.5 equiv), diisopropylethylamine (0.04 mL, 0.26 mmol, 2.5 equiv), HATU (98.85 mg, 1.30 mmol, 3.0 equiv), and anhydrous DCM (5 mL). The product was obtained as a yellow solid. Yield: 93%; mp: 205 °C; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ [ppm] 8.01 (d, J = 8 Hz, 2H), 7.92 (s, 2H), 7.87 (s, 2H), 7.80 (d, J = 8 Hz, 2H), 7.69 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 7.60 (s, 2H), 7.47 (d, J = 8 Hz, 2H), 7.27 (s, 2H), 2.23 (s, 6H), 1.98–2.0 (m, 4H), 1.08–1.25 (m, 72H), 0.76–0.85 (m, 20H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ [ppm] 14.24, 22.80, 24.07, 24.96, 29.46, 29.74, 29.75, 29.76, 30.25, 32.03, 40.47, 55.55, 114.57, 118.66, 119.48, 120.47, 123.96, 127.97, 128.35, 133.68, 135.93, 137.11, 137.52, 141.06, 151.18, 152.67, 154.50, 168.23. ESI-MS m/z = 1252.9447 (calcd = 1250.93). FTIR (KBr) νmax: 818, 889, 1015, 1257, 1365, 1428, 1463, 1544, 1598, 1670, 2853, 2925, 3311 cm–1.