| Literature DB >> 31457278 |
Sangeeta Adhikari1, Archana VijayKumar Charanpahari1, Giridhar Madras1.
Abstract
In the quest for developing novel narrow band gap semiconductor materials, the research in metal chalcogenides has gained a strong attraction. In the present investigation, a surfactant-free hydrothermal route has been followed to design hierarchical self-assembled flower-like ZnIn2S4 structures through control over precursor concentration and hydrothermal processing parameters. Uniform hexagonal marigold flower-like ZnIn2S4 architectures (∼4 μm) were formed with self-assembly of petals (thickness ∼8-12 nm) forming rose-like structures and finally forming marigold flowers in 24 h duration. The hierarchical ZnIn2S4 flower structure has been used as photocatalysts for the degradation of dye and chlorinated phenols. Photodegradation demonstrates that the high surface area from the porous flower architecture (∼72 m2/g) with an enhanced visible light absorption giving low band gap energy (2.15 eV) is responsible for higher photocatalytic performance. Complete degradation of the organic pollutants has been observed within 90 min in the presence of natural sunlight. To understand the participating reactive species contributing to degradation, scavenger studies were performed for deducing the plausible photocatalytic degradation pathways. This study might open new insights into the design of novel hierarchical structures.Entities:
Year: 2017 PMID: 31457278 PMCID: PMC6645120 DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.7b01329
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ACS Omega ISSN: 2470-1343
Figure 1Composite XRD patterns as an effect of (a) thiourea content (parameters: temperature 180 °C and time 24 h); (b) hydrothermal temperature (parameters: thiourea content 2TU and time 24 h); and (c) hydrothermal duration (parameters: temperature 180 °C and thiourea content 2TU).
Figure 2FESEM micrographs of powders synthesized at different hydrothermal duration (a) ZIS-6 h; (b) ZIS-12 h; (c) ZIS-18 h; (d, e) ZIS-24 h; and (f) ZIS-28 h.
Figure 3(a, b) TEM micrographs and (c) SAED pattern of ZIS-24 h.
Figure 4(a) Plot of the F(R)2 vs photon energy for band gap determination and (b) calculated band positions of ZnIn2S4 and a possible mechanism for visible light photocatalysis.
Figure 5(a) Wide survey; (b) Zn-2p core level; (c) In-3d core level; and (d) S-2p core level XPS spectra of ZnIn2S4 flower structures.
Specific Surface Area and Photocatalytic Degradation Results of ZnIn2S4 Sample Series Synthesized Under Different Reaction Conditions
| sample name | surface area (m2/g) | % degradation |
|---|---|---|
| ZIS-3TU | 46 | 75 |
| ZIS-170 | 45 | 68 |
| ZIS-190 | 54 | 79 |
| ZIS-6 h | 19 | 54 |
| ZIS-12 h | 24 | 67 |
| ZIS-18 h | 47 | 78 |
| ZIS-24 h | 72 | 96 |
| ZIS-28 h | 62 | 87 |
Figure 6(a) Degradation profile; (b) kinetic profile (parameters constant: MO concentration 20 ppm, and temperature 25 ± 2 °C); (c) degradation profile with respect to oxidizer H2O2; and (d) first-order rate constant vs oxidizer concentration in control system.
Figure 7(a) Degradation profile; (b) kinetic profile of photochemical reaction carried in the presence of various scavengers (catalyst concentration 50 mg/50 mL 20 ppm MO, temperature 25 ± 2 °C, scavenger concentration 1 mM); (c) catalyst reusability studies; and (d) degradation profile for MO in the presence of natural sunlight (solar).
Comparison of Photocatalytic Performances in Other ZnIn2S4 Structures and This Work
| ZnIn2S4 structures | synthesis route and chemicals | surface area (m2/g) | pollutants concentration | light source | degradation in time | ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZnIn2S4 microspheres | hydrothermal and ZnCl2, InCl3·4H2O, C2H5NS | 85.5 | methyl orange 10 ppm, Congo red 20 ppm, rhodamine B 30 ppm | 500 W W-halogen lamp | 100% in 240 min, 100% in 300 min, 100% in 180 min | ( |
| ZnIn2S4 nano/micropeony | solvothermal and CH3OH, Zn(NO3)2·6H2O, In(NO3)2·5H2O, CS2, CH2Cl2 | 78.2 | methylene blue 50 ppm | 300 W W-halogen lamp | 100% in 90 min | ( |
| ZnIn2S4 microspheres | solvothermal and ZnSO4·7H2O, InCl3·4H2O, CH3CSNH2, C2H5OH | 86.2 | benzyl alcohol | 300 W Xe lamp | 80% selectivity in 120 min | ( |
| ZnIn2S4 nanoparticles | hydrothermal and Zn(NO3)2·6H2O, In(NO3)2·5H2O, C2H5NS | methyl orange 20 ppm | 500 W W-halogen lamp | 52% in 300 min | ( | |
| ZnIn2S4 flower-like microspheres | ZnCl2, InCl3·4H2O, C2H5NS | 100% in 300 min | ||||
| hierarchical ZnIn2S4 flower structure | hydrothermal and Zn(NO3)2·6H2O, In(NO3)2·5H2O, CH4N2S | 72 | methyl orange 20 ppm, 2,4-dichlorophenol (2,4-DCP) 50 ppm, 2,4,6-trichlorophenol (2,4,6-TCP) 50 ppm | natural sunlight | 100% in 90 min, 100% in 120 min, 100% in 75 min | this work |
Figure 8(a) Degradation profile of chlorinated phenols under natural sunlight; (b) schematic photocatalytic mechanism via hierarchical ZnIn2S4 flower structures; and (c) time-resolved total organic carbon (TOC) plot for MO, 2,4-DCP, and 2,4,6-TCP.