Literature DB >> 31457109

Scaffold-free bioprinting of mesenchymal stem cells using the Regenova printer: Spheroid characterization and osteogenic differentiation.

Izath Nizeet Aguilar1, David J Olivos2, Alexander Brinker1, Marta B Alvarez1, Lester J Smith3,4, Tien-Min Gabriel Chu1,5,6, Melissa A Kacena1, Diane R Wagner1,7.   

Abstract

Limitations in scaffold material properties, such as sub-optimal degradation time, highlight the need for alternative approaches to engineer de novo tissues. One emerging solution for fabricating tissue constructs is scaffold-free tissue engineering. To facilitate this approach, three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting technology (Regenova Bio 3D Printer) has been developed to construct complex geometric shapes from discrete cellular spheroids without exogenous scaffolds. Optimizing spheroid fabrication and characterizing cellular behavior in the spheroid environment are important first steps prior to printing larger constructs. Here, we characterized spheroids of immortalized mouse bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs) that were differentiated to the osteogenic lineage. Immortalized BMSCs were seeded in low attachment 96-well plates in various numbers to generate self-aggregated spheroids either under the force of gravity or centrifugation. Cells were cultured in control or osteogenic media for up to 28 days. Spheroid diameter, roundness and smoothness were measured. Cell viability, DNA content and alkaline phosphatase activity were assessed at multiple time points. Additionally, expression of osteogenic markers was determined using real time qPCR. Spheroids formed under gravity with 20 K, 30 K and 40 K cells had average diameters of 498.5 ± 8.3 μm, 580.0 ± 32.9 μm and 639.2 ± 54.0 μm, respectively, while those formed under 300G centrifugation with the same numbers of cells had average diameters of 362.3 ± 3.5 μm, 433.1 ± 6.4 μm and 491.2 ± 8.0 μm. Spheroids formed via centrifugation were superior to those formed by gravity, as evidenced by better roundness and smoothness and double the retention of DNA (cellular) content. Cells in spheroids exhibited a robust osteogenic response to the differentiation medium, including higher mRNA expression of alkaline phosphatase, collagen type I, and osteocalcin than those cultured in control medium, as well as greater alkaline phosphatase activity. The optimal spheroid fabrication technique from this study was to aggregate 40K cells under 150-300G centrifugation. In future investigations, these spheroids will be 3D printed into larger tissue constructs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bioprinting; Mesenchymal stem cells; Osteogenesis; Regenova; Scaffold-free; Spheroid formation; Tissue engineering

Year:  2019        PMID: 31457109      PMCID: PMC6711199          DOI: 10.1016/j.bprint.2019.e00050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioprinting        ISSN: 2405-8866


  8 in total

1.  The potential role of 3D-bioprinting in xenotransplantation.

Authors:  Ping Li; Wenjun Zhang; Lester J Smith; David Ayares; David K C Cooper; Burcin Ekser
Journal:  Curr Opin Organ Transplant       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 2.640

Review 2.  Engineered Microsystems for Spheroid and Organoid Studies.

Authors:  Sung-Min Kang; Daehan Kim; Ji-Hoon Lee; Shuichi Takayama; Joong Yull Park
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2020-11-13       Impact factor: 9.933

Review 3.  Machine intelligence for nerve conduit design and production.

Authors:  Caleb E Stewart; Chin Fung Kelvin Kan; Brody R Stewart; Henry W Sanicola; Jangwook P Jung; Olawale A R Sulaiman; Dadong Wang
Journal:  J Biol Eng       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 4.355

Review 4.  3D Printing and Bioprinting Nerve Conduits for Neural Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Xiaoling Yu; Tian Zhang; Yuan Li
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 4.329

5.  Emergence of FRESH 3D printing as a platform for advanced tissue biofabrication.

Authors:  Daniel J Shiwarski; Andrew R Hudson; Joshua W Tashman; Adam W Feinberg
Journal:  APL Bioeng       Date:  2021-02-16

Review 6.  Additive Manufactured Polymers in Dentistry, Current State-of-the-Art and Future Perspectives-A Review.

Authors:  Codruta Victoria Tigmeanu; Lavinia Cosmina Ardelean; Laura-Cristina Rusu; Meda-Lavinia Negrutiu
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-03       Impact factor: 4.967

7.  Computational fluid dynamic analysis of bioprinted self-supporting perfused tissue models.

Authors:  T J Sego; Matthew Prideaux; Jane Sterner; Brian Paul McCarthy; Ping Li; Lynda F Bonewald; Burcin Ekser; Andres Tovar; Lester Jeshua Smith
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  3D Bioprinted Osteogenic Tissue Models for In Vitro Drug Screening.

Authors:  Erick Breathwaite; Jessica Weaver; Justin Odanga; Myra Dela Pena-Ponce; Jung Bok Lee
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 4.411

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.