| Literature DB >> 31456753 |
Patrícia Maria Wiziack Zago1, Simeone Júlio Dos Santos Castelo Branco2, Letícia de Albuquerque Bogéa Fecury2, Letícia Torres Carvalho2, Cláudia Quintino Rocha3, Petrus Levid Barros Madeira2, Eduardo Martins de Sousa4, Fabiana Suelen Figuerêdo de Siqueira2, Marco Aurélio Benini Paschoal5, Rafael Soares Diniz2, Letícia Machado Gonçalves2.
Abstract
Considering the challenge to control Candida-associated denture stomatitis, the search for antifungal substances derived from natural sources has become a trend in the literature. In this study the following effects of Chenopodium ambrosioides extract (CAE) were investigated: action against biofilms of Candida albicans, its cytotoxic potential, and changes caused in acrylic resin. The CAE was characterized by High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC). The susceptibility of C. albicans to CAE was investigated by Minimum Inhibitory Concentration and Minimum Fungicidal Concentration (MIC and MFC) tests. Acrylic resin disks were fabricated, and C. albicans biofilms were developed on these for 48 h. Afterward the disks were immersed for 10 min in: PBS (Negative Control); 1% Sodium Hypochlorite (1% SH, Positive Control) or CAE at MIC or 5xMIC. The biofilms were investigated relative to counts and metabolic activity. The cytotoxic potential in keratinocytes and fibroblasts was verified by MTT test. Change in color and roughness of the acrylic resin was analyzed after 28 days of immersion in CAE. The data were analyzed by the ANOVA considering a 5% level of significance. The main compounds detected by HPLC were kaempferol and quercetin. Both MIC and MFC obtained the value of 0.25 mg/mL. The MIC was sufficient to significantly reduce the counts and activity of the biofilm cells (p < 0.0001), while 5xMIC resulted in almost complete eradication, similar to 1% SH. Keratinocytes and fibroblasts exposed to the MIC and 5xMIC presented cell viability similar to that of the Control Group (p > 0.05). No important changes in acrylic resin color and roughness were detected, even after 28 days. It could be concluded that the immersion of acrylic resin in C. ambrosioides extract in its minimum inhibitory concentration was effective for the reduction of C. albicans biofilms without any evidence of cytotoxic effects or changes in roughness and color of this substrate.Entities:
Keywords: C. albicans; biofilms; candidosis; denture; natural products
Year: 2019 PMID: 31456753 PMCID: PMC6701195 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01724
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Description of compounds obtained after chemical characterization of C. ambrosioides by HPLC.
| 1 | 285 | 257 | Kaempferol |
| 2 | 313 | 295 | 3′,4′-dimethoxyluteolin |
| 3 | 363 | 295; 277; 171 | NI |
| 4 | 387 | 163 | |
| 5 | 391 | 387;163 | |
| 6 | 295 | 162 | NI |
| 7 | 301 | 285; 267; 241; 173 | Hesperetin |
| 8 | 431 | 385; 285; 152 | Kaempferol 3- |
| 9 | 433 | 387; 295 | Narirutin |
| 10 | 463 | 301 | Quercetin-3-glucoside |
| 11 | 495 | 431; 343 | Digalloyl quinic acid |
| 12 | 499 | 431; 421; 385; 285 | 3,4-O-(E)- |
| 13 | 531 | 417; 285 | NI |
| 14 | 563 | 431; 285; 151 | Kaempferol- |
| 15 | 577 | 431;285 | Kaempferol dirhamnoside- |
| 16 | 579 | 447; 301 | Naringin |
| 17 | 593 | 285 | Kaempferol-3-glucoside-3″-rhamnoside |
| 18 | 595 | 301; 151 | Quercetina-3- |
| 19 | 613 | 591 | NI |
| 20 | 623 | 447; 301 | Quercetin (acyl) glucoronide-o-rhaminoside |
| 21 | 695 | 593; 549; 430; 285 | NI |
FIGURE 1Effect of CAE on cell counts of C. albicans biofilm. Different symbols (*, ∗∗, ∗∗∗) indicate statistically significant difference among the groups (one-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey test, p < 0.05).
FIGURE 2Effect of CAE on metabolic activity of C. albicans biofilm. Different symbols (*, ∗∗, ∗∗∗) indicate statistically significant difference among the groups (one-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey test, p < 0.05).
FIGURE 3Cytotoxic activity of CAE in different concentrations on keratinocytes after (A) 24 h and (B) 48 h of exposure. Cytotoxic activity of CAE in different concentrations on fibroblasts after (C) 24 h and (D) 48 h of exposure. Different symbols (*, ∗∗) indicate statistically significant difference among the groups (one-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey test, p < 0.05).
Change in color (ΔE) of acrylic resin after immersion in CAE in different time intervals (mean ± SD, n = 9).
| Distilled water | 1.09 ± 0.33 (A,a) | 1.45 ± 0.27 (A,a) | 1.54 ± 0.51 (A,a) | 1.60 ± 0.24 (A,a) |
| 1% SH | 3.12 ± 0.52 (B,a) | 3.22 ± 0.87 (B,a) | 3.89 ± 0.58 (B,b) | 4.05 ± 0.99 (B,b) |
| CAE at MIC | 2.46 ± 0.38 (C,a) | 2.41 ± 0.56 (C,a) | 2.53 ± 0.69 (C,a) | 2.79 ± 0.76 (C,a) |
| CAE at 5xMIC | 2.42 ± 0.45 (C,a) | 2.70 ± 0.61 (C,a) | 2.88 ± 0.77 (C,a) | 3.13 ± 0.57 (C,b) |
Change in surface roughness (ΔRa) of acrylic resin after immersion in CAE in different time intervals (mean ± SD, n = 9).
| Distilled water | 0.09 ± 0.01 (A,a) | 0.11 ± 0.03 (A,a) | 0.11 ± 0.05 (A,a) | 0.11 ± 0.04 (A,a) |
| 1% SH | 0.10 ± 0.03 (A,a) | 0.14 ± 0.09 (A,a) | 0.25 ± 0.06 (B,b) | 0.27 ± 0.07 (B,b) |
| CAE at MIC | 0.09 ± 0.03 (A,a) | 0.10 ± 0.04 (A,a) | 0.11 ± 0.03 (A,a) | 0.11 ± 0.05 (A,a) |
| CAE at 5xMIC | 0.09 ± 0.02 (A,a) | 0.13 ± 0.05 (A,a) | 0.12 ± 0.07 (A,a) | 0.12 ± 0.09 (A,a) |