Literature DB >> 31456110

Adjusted mitochondrial DNA quantification in human embryos may not be applicable as a biomarker of implantation potential.

Yi-Xuan Lee1,2, Chi-Huang Chen2,3, Shyr-Yeu Lin2,3, Yi-Hui Lin4,5, Chii-Ruey Tzeng6,7,8.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility of adjusted mitochondrial DNA quantification in human embryos as a biomarker for implantation potential.
DESIGN: Double-blind, observational, prospective analysis of an Asian population in a single university-affiliated in vitro fertilization center. A total of 1617 embryos derived from 380 infertile couples were collected. The DNA from blastomere biopsy (n = 99) or trophectoderm biopsy (n = 1518) were analyzed with next-generation sequencing.
RESULTS: The adjusted mtDNA quantification followed a non-normal distribution in both types of the embryos. When stratified by ploidy status, the adjusted mtDNA quantification was significantly higher in aneuploid trophectoderm than in euploid cells, but not in blastomeres. The adjusted mtDNA quantification of embryos showed significant but very weak positive correlation in total trophectoderm cells with maternal age (Spearman's correlation, r = 0.095, p = 0.0028) but neither in blastomeres nor stratified by ploidy status. The median adjusted mtDNA quantification was also significantly higher in aneuploid blastocysts than in euploid ones while corrected with embryo morphology. Viable embryos did not contain significantly different quantities of adjusted mtDNA compared with nonviable embryos (implanted n = 103, non-implanted n = 164; median 0.00097 vs. 0.00088, p = 0.21) in 267 transferred blastocysts.
CONCLUSION: Quantification of adjusted mitochondria DNA in human embryos was significantly lower in euploid blastocysts than in aneuploid blastocysts. However, no statistically significant differences regarding implantation outcome were evident. To our best knowledge, this study provides the largest scale and the first correlation data between mitochondria copy number and human embryo implantation potential in Asians.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomarker; Correction factors; IVF; Mitochondrial DNA copy number; PGT-A

Year:  2019        PMID: 31456110      PMCID: PMC6730736          DOI: 10.1007/s10815-019-01542-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  8 in total

1.  Does Trophectoderm Mitochondrial DNA Content Affect Embryo Developmental and Implantation Potential?

Authors:  Krzysztof Lukaszuk; Amira Podolak
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 6.208

Review 2.  Qualitative and Quantitative Ovarian and Peripheral Blood Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) Alterations: Mechanisms and Implications for Female Fertility.

Authors:  Andrea Busnelli; Annalisa Navarra; Paolo Emanuele Levi-Setti
Journal:  Antioxidants (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-05

3.  Comparative analysis of cell-free DNA content in culture medium and mitochondrial DNA copy number in porcine parthenogenetically activated embryos.

Authors:  Mitsuru Kobayashi; Jun Ito; Koumei Shirasuna; Takehito Kuwayama; Hisataka Iwata
Journal:  J Reprod Dev       Date:  2020-09-08       Impact factor: 2.214

Review 4.  The Role of Mitochondria in Human Fertility and Early Embryo Development: What Can We Learn for Clinical Application of Assessing and Improving Mitochondrial DNA?

Authors:  Amira Podolak; Izabela Woclawek-Potocka; Krzysztof Lukaszuk
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 6.600

5.  Mitochondrial DNA Content May Not Be a Reliable Screening Biomarker for Live Birth After Single Euploid Blastocyst Transfer.

Authors:  Xuanyou Zhou; Xueli Liu; Weihui Shi; Mujin Ye; Songchang Chen; Chenming Xu
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-11-16       Impact factor: 5.555

6.  Mitochondrial DNA Levels in Trophectodermal Cells Show No Association with Blastocyst Development and Pregnancy Outcomes.

Authors:  G Ritu; Geetha Veerasigamani; Mohammed C Ashraf; Sankalp Singh; Saniya Laheri; Stacy Colaco; Deepak Modi
Journal:  J Hum Reprod Sci       Date:  2022-03-31

Review 7.  Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Chromosomal Abnormalities: Aneuploidy, Mosaicism, and Structural Rearrangements.

Authors:  Manuel Viotti
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 4.096

8.  Mitochondrial reactive oxygen species regulate mitochondrial biogenesis in porcine embryos.

Authors:  Mio Kageyama; Jun Ito; Koumei Shirasuna; Takehito Kuwayama; Hisataka Iwata
Journal:  J Reprod Dev       Date:  2021-02-20       Impact factor: 2.214

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.