Literature DB >> 31456072

Cardiac output estimation using multi-beat analysis of the radial arterial blood pressure waveform: a method comparison study in patients having off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery using intermittent pulmonary artery thermodilution as the reference method.

Bernd Saugel1,2, Julia Heeschen3, Alexander Hapfelmeier4, Stefano Romagnoli5,6, Gillis Greiwe3.   

Abstract

Pulse wave analysis enables stroke volume to be estimated from an arterial blood pressure waveform. Multi-beat analysis is a novel pulse wave analysis method. We aimed to investigate cardiac output (CO) estimations using multi-beat analysis of the radial arterial blood pressure waveform in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery (OPCAB) using intermittent pulmonary artery thermodilution (PATD) as the reference method. This was a prospective clinical method comparison study. In 58 patients, we measured CO using PATD (PATD-CO; reference method) and simultaneously recorded the radial arterial blood pressure waveform that we used for off-line estimation of CO based on multi-beat analysis (MBA-CO; test method) using the Argos CO monitor (Retia Medical; Valhalla, NY, USA). The final analysis was performed using 572 paired CO measurements. We performed Bland-Altman analysis accounting for multiple observations per patient. To describe the ability of the test method to track changes in CO over time we computed four-quadrant plots using a central exclusion zone of 15% and calculated the concordance rate. Mean PATD-CO was 4.13 ± 1.26 L/min and mean MBA-CO was 4.31 ± 1.25 L/min. The mean of the differences between PATD-CO and MBA-CO was - 0.20 L/min with a standard deviation of ± 1.14 L/min and 95% limits of agreement of - 2.48 to + 2.08 L/min. The concordance rate for CO changes between PATD-CO and MBA-CO was 89%. CO estimations using multi-beat analysis (Argos monitor) show reasonable agreement and trending ability compared with PATD-CO as the reference method in adult patients during OPCAB.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anesthesia; Cardiovascular dynamics; Hemodynamic monitoring; Hemodynamics; Pulmonary artery catheter; Pulse contour analysis; Pulse wave analysis; Swan-Ganz catheter

Year:  2019        PMID: 31456072     DOI: 10.1007/s10877-019-00375-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput        ISSN: 1387-1307            Impact factor:   2.502


  4 in total

1.  [Comparison of pulse pressure variation, stroke volume variation, and plethysmographic variability index in pediatric patients undergoing craniotomy].

Authors:  Y F Liu; L L Song; M W Xing; L X Cai; D X Wang
Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2021-10-18

Review 2.  What is new in hemodynamic monitoring and management?

Authors:  Moritz Flick; Alina Bergholz; Pawel Sierzputowski; Simon T Vistisen; Bernd Saugel
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 1.977

3.  Invasive and noninvasive cardiovascular monitoring options for cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Dominic P Recco; Nathalie Roy; Alexander J Gregory; Kevin W Lobdell
Journal:  JTCVS Open       Date:  2022-04-11

4.  Comparison of accuracy of two uncalibrated pulse contour cardiac output monitors in off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery patients using pulmonary artery catheter-thermodilution as a reference.

Authors:  Ramakrishna Mukkamala; Benjamin A Kohl; Aman Mahajan
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2021-07-10       Impact factor: 2.217

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.