Samuel L Skulsky1, Jerry T Dang2, Adrian Battiston1, Noah J Switzer3, Daniel W Birch3, Arya M Sharma4, Shahzeer Karmali3. 1. Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada. 2. Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada. dang2@ualberta.ca. 3. Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada. 4. Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Edmonton Obesity Staging System (EOSS) is a staging system describing comorbidities and functional limitations associated with obesity, thus facilitating the prioritization of patients for bariatric surgery. Our objective was to elucidate any associations of EOSS scores with major complications after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB). METHODS: A retrospective chart review examined patients who received primary LRYGB from 2009 to 2015 at a single center. Collected data included patient comorbidities, preoperative EOSS stage, body mass index (BMI), age, percent excess weight loss, and 1-year major complications. Major complications were defined by a Clavien-Dindo classification ≥ IIIa. RESULTS: 378 patients (81.7% female) receiving primary LRYGB were reviewed with the following EOSS stages: 0 (3.7%), 1 (10.8%), 2 (78.6%), 3 (6.9%), and 4 (0.0%). The mean preoperative BMI was 45.9 (SD 6.3) kg/m2. The overall major complication rate was 9.3%. Major complication rates for EOSS stages 0, 1, 2, and 3 were 7.1%, 4.9%, 8.8%, and 23.1%, respectively. Follow-up rates at 12 months were 76.6% with a mean overall follow-up of 10.9 (2.1) months. Multivariable analysis showed that patients undergoing LRYGB with an EOSS of 3 were more likely to experience major complications (OR 2.94; CI 1.04 to 8.35, p = 0.043). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that undergoing LRYGB with EOSS stage 3 has increased odds of major complications. As such, the EOSS demonstrates utility in identifying bariatric surgery candidates at risk of major postoperative morbidity. Further studies are required to assess the applicability of the EOSS for patients undergoing other forms of bariatric surgery.
BACKGROUND: The Edmonton Obesity Staging System (EOSS) is a staging system describing comorbidities and functional limitations associated with obesity, thus facilitating the prioritization of patients for bariatric surgery. Our objective was to elucidate any associations of EOSS scores with major complications after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB). METHODS: A retrospective chart review examined patients who received primary LRYGB from 2009 to 2015 at a single center. Collected data included patient comorbidities, preoperative EOSS stage, body mass index (BMI), age, percent excess weight loss, and 1-year major complications. Major complications were defined by a Clavien-Dindo classification ≥ IIIa. RESULTS: 378 patients (81.7% female) receiving primary LRYGB were reviewed with the following EOSS stages: 0 (3.7%), 1 (10.8%), 2 (78.6%), 3 (6.9%), and 4 (0.0%). The mean preoperative BMI was 45.9 (SD 6.3) kg/m2. The overall major complication rate was 9.3%. Major complication rates for EOSS stages 0, 1, 2, and 3 were 7.1%, 4.9%, 8.8%, and 23.1%, respectively. Follow-up rates at 12 months were 76.6% with a mean overall follow-up of 10.9 (2.1) months. Multivariable analysis showed that patients undergoing LRYGB with an EOSS of 3 were more likely to experience major complications (OR 2.94; CI 1.04 to 8.35, p = 0.043). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that undergoing LRYGB with EOSS stage 3 has increased odds of major complications. As such, the EOSS demonstrates utility in identifying bariatric surgery candidates at risk of major postoperative morbidity. Further studies are required to assess the applicability of the EOSS for patients undergoing other forms of bariatric surgery.
Authors: Samuel L Skulsky; Jerry T Dang; Noah J Switzer; Arya M Sharma; Shahzeer Karmali; Daniel W Birch Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2020-11-05 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Raymond Kodsi; Ritesh Chimoriya; David Medveczky; Kathy Grudzinskas; Evan Atlantis; Abd A Tahrani; Nic Kormas; Milan K Piya Journal: Nutrients Date: 2022-02-24 Impact factor: 5.717
Authors: Marc Beisani; Ramon Vilallonga; Carlos Petrola; Asunción Acosta; José Antonio Casimiro Pérez; Amador García Ruiz de Gordejuela; Carlos Fernández Quesada; Oscar Gonzalez; Arturo Cirera de Tudela; Enric Caubet; Manel Armengol; José Manuel Fort Journal: Langenbecks Arch Surg Date: 2020-11-26 Impact factor: 3.445
Authors: Rukia Swaleh; Taylor McGuckin; Tyler W Myroniuk; Donna Manca; Karen Lee; Arya M Sharma; Denise Campbell-Scherer; Roseanne O Yeung Journal: CMAJ Open Date: 2021-12-07