Literature DB >> 31456021

Leaf longevity in temperate evergreen species is related to phylogeny and leaf size.

Linnea Smith1, Richard B Primack2, Lucy Zipf1, Sarah Pardo1, Amanda S Gallinat1,3, Zoe A Panchen4.   

Abstract

Leaf longevity (LL), the amount of time a photosynthetically active leaf remains on a plant, is an important trait of evergreen species, affecting physiological ecology and ecosystem processes. A long LL gives leaves more time to fix carbon but carries higher construction costs, while a short LL allows plants to respond more rapidly to changing environmental conditions. For many evergreen taxa, LL data are not readily available, and it is not known if LL is phylogenetically conserved. To address this gap, we measured LL for 169 temperate and boreal evergreen woody species at the Arnold Arboretum, a botanical garden in Boston, Massachusetts, along with metrics of leaf size and number known to be related to LL. We hypothesized that LL is phylogenetically conserved, and that longer LL is associated with a greater numbers of leaves, smaller leaves, and a colder hardiness zone of the species' native range. We found that average LL ranged from 1.4 years in Rhododendron tomentosum to 10.5 years in Abies cilicia. LL was phylogenetically conserved, with some genera, such as Abies and Picea, exhibiting long LL (> 3 years) and others, such as Ilex and Rhododendron, exhibiting short LL (< 3 years). Leaf length was negatively correlated with LL in conifers, due to differences between Pinus and other genera; however, there was no correlation between LL and number of leaves. This study highlights the considerable variation and phylogenetic pattern in LL among temperate evergreen species, which has implications for carbon budgets and ecosystem models.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Leaf aging; Leaf lifespan; Leaf senescence

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31456021     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-019-04492-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  16 in total

1.  Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: behavioral traits are more labile.

Authors:  Simon P Blomberg; Theodore Garland; Anthony R Ives
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.694

2.  Inferring the historical patterns of biological evolution.

Authors:  M Pagel
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-10-28       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Influence of nitrogen and potassium fertilization on leaf lifespan and allocation of above-ground growth in Eucalyptus plantations.

Authors:  Jean-Paul Laclau; Julio C R Almeida; José Leonardo M Gonçalves; Laurent Saint-André; Marcelo Ventura; Jacques Ranger; Rildo M Moreira; Yann Nouvellon
Journal:  Tree Physiol       Date:  2008-12-05       Impact factor: 4.196

4.  The generality of leaf size versus number trade-off in temperate woody species.

Authors:  Dongmei Yang; Guoyong Li; Shucun Sun
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 4.357

Review 5.  Simultaneous inference in general parametric models.

Authors:  Torsten Hothorn; Frank Bretz; Peter Westfall
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.207

6.  Effects of plant growth rate and leaf lifetime on the amount and type of anti-herbivore defense.

Authors:  P D Coley
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Leaf age and seasonal effects on light, water, and nitrogen use efficiency in a California shrub.

Authors:  C Field; H A Mooney
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Evidence that longer needle retention of spruce and pine populations at high elevations and high latitudes is largely a phenotypic response.

Authors:  P B Reich; J Oleksyn; J Modrzynski; M G Tjoelker
Journal:  Tree Physiol       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 4.196

9.  Revisiting phylogenetic signal; strong or negligible impacts of polytomies and branch length information?

Authors:  Rafael Molina-Venegas; Miguel Á Rodríguez
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 3.260

10.  Mega-phylogeny approach for comparative biology: an alternative to supertree and supermatrix approaches.

Authors:  Stephen A Smith; Jeremy M Beaulieu; Michael J Donoghue
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2009-02-11       Impact factor: 3.260

View more
  1 in total

1.  Putative biotic drivers of plant phenology: With special reference to pathogens and deciduousness.

Authors:  Rowland D Burdon; Michael J Bartlett
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 3.167

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.