| Literature DB >> 31455804 |
Hongliang Chen1, Mingliang Li1, Zheyu Lu2, Xiaoge Wang1, Junsheng Yang3, Zhe Wang2, Fei Zhang1, Chunhui Gu1, Weining Zhang1, Yujie Sun3, Junliang Sun4, Wenguang Zhu5, Xuefeng Guo6,7.
Abstract
Molecular self-assembly into crystallised films or wires on surfaces produces a big family of motifs exhibiting unique optoelectronic properties. However, little attention has been paid to the fundamental mechanism of molecular crystallisation. Here we report a biomimetic design of phosphonate engineered, amphiphilic organic semiconductors capable of self-assembly, which enables us to use real-time in-situ scanning probe microscopy to monitor the growth trajectories of such organic semiconducting films as they nucleate and crystallise from amorphous solid states. The single-crystal film grows through an evolutionary selection approach in a two-dimensional geometry, with five distinct steps: droplet flattening, film coalescence, spinodal decomposition, Ostwald ripening, and self-reorganised layer growth. These sophisticated processes afford ultralong high-density microwire arrays with high mobilities, thus promoting deep understanding of the mechanism as well as offering important insights into the design and development of functional high-performance organic optoelectronic materials and devices through molecular and crystal engineering.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31455804 PMCID: PMC6711996 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-11887-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Commun ISSN: 2041-1723 Impact factor: 14.919
Fig. 1Five-step biomimetic self-assembly trajectories of C7P-BTBT on the SiO2 surface. a Classical monomer-by-monomer addition (left) and the structure of CP-BTBT (n = 3–11) (right). b Nonclassical two-step coalescence mechanism. c Plots of the free energy change as a function of reaction coordinate in classical (orange), nonclassical (green) and evolutionary selection (purple) growth models. d Evolutionary selection growth approach and time-lapse sequence of representative AFM images showing the morphological evolution of the precursors on the SiO2 surface. From left to right, the images were taken at 0 h (as-spin coated liquid-like droplets), 0.07 h (droplets flattened into pancake-like nanoplates), 0.22 h (nanoplates collapsed into fully covered base film), 2.32 h (base films demixed into thick islands and thin islands), 12.08 h (thin islands shrank while thick islands grew) and 18.13 h (thick islands grew vertically into a crystallised film). Scale bar: 2 µm
Fig. 2Time-resolved film self-growth kinetics at different stages. a Flattening of liquid-like droplet into pancake-like films. Scale bar: 2 µm. b Spinodal decomposition. Scale bar: 5 µm. c Ostwald ripening of a thick film to grow laterally. Scale bar: 2 µm. d Disappearance of a thin film. Scale bar: 2 µm. e Layer and lateral growth occurring simultaneously. Scale bar: 2 µm. f Self-organised layer growth: lateral self-etching for layer growth. Scale bar: 2.5 µm. (35:41 means growth time t = 35 h 41 min)
Fig. 3Quantitative growth kinetics of the biomimetic self-assembly trajectories. a Plots of the domain area as a function of the growth time. These domains are highlighted in Fig. 2a, c, d and 2e; Supplementary Figs. 15, 24, 26 and 30. b Area ratio of the upper layer (N + 1) and the base layer (N) during the layer growth mode. Inset shows a constant area portion of ~2.2%. Error bars represent the standard deviations from an average of three samples. c Time evolution of film X-ray diffraction patterns showing the transition of crystalline phases in a 1 mg/mL C7P–BTBT film sample at room temperature (25 °C). Right inset: Magnified lattice evolutions of the decreasing peak at ~12.6° and two newly produced peaks at ~13.0°. Colour scales from blue (low intensity) to red (high intensity). d Peak intensity evolutions extracted from the peaks of ~12.6° and ~13.0°, which can be divided into three stages (Stage 1: light blue; Step 2: orange; Step 3: green)
Fig. 4Experimental evolution of C7P-BTBT islands in comparison with kinetic Monte Carlo simulations. a, b Comparison between simulated (a) and experimental (b) time-dependent number evolutions of total islands. c, d Comparison between simulated (c) and experimental (d) time-dependent evolutions of the island area. e Schematic illustration showing the nanocluster-involved nonclassical nucleation mechanism. f–m High-resolution AFM images showing evidence of the spherical molecular cluster as mass transport carriers on the surface (green and red arrows marked two nanoclusters; white dash arrows marked the moving directions). Scale bar: 50 nm. n Single-crystal structure of C7P-BTBT showing the BTBT-core π–π interaction and phosphonate–phosphonate coupling (top), and the compressed π–π stacking distance of 3.42 Å (bottom). o Binding energy calculation results for CnP-BTBT (n = 3–11) (pink triangle), C-BTBT (n = 8 and 9) (blue triangle) and corresponding growth rates of CP-BTBT (n = 5–11) (red circle). Error bars are standard deviations of migration speed measured from multiple samples
Fig. 5Formation of single-crystal microwires from solid films. a SEM image showing that an ultralong organic microwire crystallises from solid films with the prolonged growth time. Scale bar: 5 µm. b Optical image showing a high-density oriented microwire array. Scale bar: 400 µm. c Synchrotron radiation grazing incident X-ray diffraction of single-crystal film/microwire hybrids. More details about unit cell parameters can be found in the Supplementary Table 5. d Output characteristics of a microwire single-crystal OFET. Inset shows the polarised optical image of the device. L = 30 μm and W = 1.5 μm. Gate voltage (VGS) ranged from 10 to −95 V in −15 V steps. Scale bar: 10 μm. e Transfer characteristics with the source-drain voltage (VDS) of −50 V