| Literature DB >> 31455616 |
Tomo Shimizu1, Osamu Miyazaki2, Takeo Iwamoto3, Tomoyuki Usui2, Ryo Sato4,5,6, Chika Hiraishi5,6, Hiroshi Yoshida7,5,6,8.
Abstract
The incidence of cardiovascular events correlates inversely with cholesterol efflux capacity (CEC) more than with HDL-cholesterol level. The measurement of CEC is used to qualify cardiovascular disease risk and is conventionally performed with radioisotope (RI)-labeled cholesterol. Here, we established a CEC measurement technique using stable isotope-labeled cholesterol as an alternative, and we compared the new method with RI and fluorescence (boron dipyrromethene difluoride-cholesterol) methods in cells and in patient serum. We incubated J774 cells labeled with [d 7]cholesterol ([d 7]C) with patient serum depleted of apoB, and [d 7]C extracted from the culture medium was quantified by liquid chromatography/quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry. [d 7]C efflux increased with greater apoB-depleted serum concentration and longer incubation time. The assay coefficient of variation (CV) of five consecutive measurements of three sets of samples ranged from 7.3% to 9.5%, and the interassay CV determined by measuring three samples four times ranged from 4.1% to 8.5%, both indicating good precision. We then measured CEC levels of 41 outpatients with serum HDL-cholesterol levels between 36 and 94 mg/dl (mean: 61.7 ± 18.0 mg/dl); in the presence of cAMP, we observed a significant, positive correlation between CEC levels determined with the stable isotope and RI methods that was stronger than the correlation between measurements obtained by the fluorescence and RI methods (r = 0.73, P < 0.0001 vs. r = 0.55, P < 0.001). Therefore, our stable isotope method can be considered useful as a non-RI method and thus deserves evaluation in future clinical studies.Entities:
Keywords: [d7]cholesterol; apolipoprotein; high density lipoprotein; mass spectrometry; reverse cholesterol transport; stable isotope tracers
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31455616 PMCID: PMC6824490 DOI: 10.1194/jlr.D086884
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Lipid Res ISSN: 0022-2275 Impact factor: 5.922