Nadine A Kasparian1, Janice M Kan2, Erica Sood3, Jo Wray4, Harold A Pincus5, Jane W Newburger6. 1. Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Cardiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Discipline of Paediatrics, School of Women's and Children's Health, UNSW Medicine, The University of New South Wales (UNSW Sydney), Sydney, Australia. Electronic address: nadine.kasparian@childrens.harvard.edu. 2. Discipline of Paediatrics, School of Women's and Children's Health, UNSW Medicine, The University of New South Wales (UNSW Sydney), Sydney, Australia; Heart Centre for Children, The Sydney Children's Hospitals Network Cardiac Service, Sydney, Australia. 3. Nemours Cardiac Center, Alfred I. duPont Hospital for Children, Wilmington, DE, USA; Department of Pediatrics, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA. 4. Heart and Lung Directorate, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; Institute of Cardiovascular Science, UCL, London, United Kingdom; National Institute of Health Research, Great Ormond Street Hospital Biomedical Research Centre, London, United Kingdom. 5. Department of Psychiatry and Irving Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Columbia University, New York, USA; New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, USA. 6. Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Cardiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Congenital heart disease (CHD) is one of the most common causes of infant admission to pediatric intensive care and is associated with profound psychological stress for mothers, fathers and their infants. Intensive care unit admission represents an opportunity to offer evidence-based strategies to prevent or minimize severe psychological distress and promote secure bonding and attachment, alongside high-quality infant medical care. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to identify, synthesize and critically appraise published evidence on the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of mental health interventions delivered in neonatal, pediatric or cardiac intensive care units for parents of infants with CHD. A secondary goal was to develop recommendations for advancing health policy, practice and research in the field. METHODS: In accordance with a prospectively registered protocol (CRD42019114507), six electronic databases were systematically searched for studies reporting results of a controlled trial of a mental health intervention for parents of infants aged 0-12 months with a congenital anomaly requiring intensive care unit admission. To maximize generalizability of results, trials involving infants with any type of structural congenital anomaly requiring surgery were included. Outcomes included intervention type, process, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness. RESULTS: Across all forms of congenital anomaly, only five trials met inclusion criteria (four in CHD, one in gastrointestinal malformation). All interventions engaged parents face-to-face, but each had a distinct therapeutic approach (parent-infant interaction and bonding, early pediatric palliative care, psycho-education, parenting skills training, and family-centered nursing). Four of the five trials demonstrated efficacy in reducing maternal anxiety, although the quality of evidence was low. Positive results were also found for maternal coping, mother-infant attachment, parenting confidence and satisfaction with clinical care, as well as infant mental (but not psychomotor) development at 6 months. Mixed results were found for maternal depression and infant feeding. No evidence of efficacy was found for improving parent, infant or family quality of life, physical health or length of infant hospital stay, and there were no data on cost-effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS: Stronger evidence for the efficacy of mental health interventions to buffer the effects of intensive care unit admission for parents of infants with CHD is urgently needed. Robust, high-quality trials are lacking, despite the established need and demand, and health policies prioritizing parent mental health care in the context of early childhood adversity are needed.
INTRODUCTION:Congenital heart disease (CHD) is one of the most common causes of infant admission to pediatric intensive care and is associated with profound psychological stress for mothers, fathers and their infants. Intensive care unit admission represents an opportunity to offer evidence-based strategies to prevent or minimize severe psychological distress and promote secure bonding and attachment, alongside high-quality infant medical care. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to identify, synthesize and critically appraise published evidence on the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of mental health interventions delivered in neonatal, pediatric or cardiac intensive care units for parents of infants with CHD. A secondary goal was to develop recommendations for advancing health policy, practice and research in the field. METHODS: In accordance with a prospectively registered protocol (CRD42019114507), six electronic databases were systematically searched for studies reporting results of a controlled trial of a mental health intervention for parents of infants aged 0-12 months with a congenital anomaly requiring intensive care unit admission. To maximize generalizability of results, trials involving infants with any type of structural congenital anomaly requiring surgery were included. Outcomes included intervention type, process, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness. RESULTS: Across all forms of congenital anomaly, only five trials met inclusion criteria (four in CHD, one in gastrointestinal malformation). All interventions engaged parents face-to-face, but each had a distinct therapeutic approach (parent-infant interaction and bonding, early pediatric palliative care, psycho-education, parenting skills training, and family-centered nursing). Four of the five trials demonstrated efficacy in reducing maternal anxiety, although the quality of evidence was low. Positive results were also found for maternal coping, mother-infant attachment, parenting confidence and satisfaction with clinical care, as well as infant mental (but not psychomotor) development at 6 months. Mixed results were found for maternal depression and infant feeding. No evidence of efficacy was found for improving parent, infant or family quality of life, physical health or length of infant hospital stay, and there were no data on cost-effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS: Stronger evidence for the efficacy of mental health interventions to buffer the effects of intensive care unit admission for parents of infants with CHD is urgently needed. Robust, high-quality trials are lacking, despite the established need and demand, and health policies prioritizing parent mental health care in the context of early childhood adversity are needed.
Authors: Abigail C Demianczyk; Colleen F Bechtel Driscoll; Allison Karpyn; Amanda Shillingford; Anne E Kazak; Erica Sood Journal: Child Care Health Dev Date: 2021-10-01 Impact factor: 2.508
Authors: Carolina Ribeiro Anele; Marcelo Zubaran Goldani; Lavínia Schüler-Faccini; Clécio Homrich da Silva Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-07-01 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Amy Jo Lisanti; Abigail Demianczyk; Maria G Vogiatzi; Ryan Quinn; Jesse Chittams; Rebecca Hoffman; Barbara Medoff-Cooper Journal: Biol Res Nurs Date: 2022-03-19 Impact factor: 2.318
Authors: Donna Perazzo; Ryan Moore; Nadine A Kasparian; Megan Rodts; Tzipi Horowitz-Kraus; Lori Crosby; Brian Turpin; Andrew F Beck; John Hutton Journal: Pediatr Res Date: 2022-02-04 Impact factor: 3.953
Authors: Erica Sood; Amy Jo Lisanti; Sarah E Woolf-King; Jo Wray; Nadine Kasparian; Emily Jackson; Mary R Gregory; Keila N Lopez; Bradley S Marino; Trent Neely; Amy Randall; Sinai C Zyblewski; Cheryl L Brosig Journal: Cardiol Young Date: 2021-06-04 Impact factor: 1.093
Authors: Melanie K Franklin; Allison Karpyn; Jennifer Christofferson; Linda G McWhorter; Abigail C Demianczyk; Cheryl L Brosig; Emily A Jackson; Stacey Lihn; Sinai C Zyblewski; Anne E Kazak; Erica Sood Journal: J Child Health Care Date: 2021-12-08 Impact factor: 1.896
Authors: Linda G McWhorter; Jennifer Christofferson; Trent Neely; Aimee K Hildenbrand; Melissa A Alderfer; Amy Randall; Anne E Kazak; Erica Sood Journal: Cardiol Young Date: 2021-08-09 Impact factor: 1.023
Authors: Colette Gramszlo; Allison Karpyn; Jennifer Christofferson; Linda G McWhorter; Abigail C Demianczyk; Stacey L Lihn; Jena Tanem; Sinai Zyblewski; Elizabeth Lucey Boyle; Anne E Kazak; Erica Sood Journal: Cardiol Young Date: 2020-08-06 Impact factor: 1.023