| Literature DB >> 31454905 |
Kinga Jaworska1, Dagmara Hering2, Grażyna Mosieniak3, Anna Bielak-Zmijewska3, Marta Pilz4, Michał Konwerski5, Aleksandra Gasecka5, Agnieszka Kapłon-Cieślicka5, Krzysztof Filipiak5, Ewa Sikora3, Robert Hołyst4, Marcin Ufnal6.
Abstract
Trimethylamine-N-oxide (TMAO) has been suggested as a marker and mediator of cardiovascular diseases. However, data are contradictory, and the mechanisms are obscure. Strikingly, the role of the TMAO precursor trimethylamine (TMA) has not drawn attention in cardiovascular studies even though toxic effects of TMA were proposed several decades ago. We assessed plasma TMA and TMAO levels in healthy humans (HH) and cardiovascular patients qualified for aortic valve replacement (CP). The cytotoxicity of TMA and TMAO in rat cardiomyocytes was evaluated using an MTT test. The effects of TMA and TMAO on albumin and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) were assessed using fluorescence correlation spectroscopy. In comparison to HH, CP had a two-fold higher plasma TMA (p < 0.001) and a trend towards higher plasma TMAO (p = 0.07). In CP plasma, TMA was inversely correlated with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR, p = 0.002). TMA but not TMAO reduced cardiomyocytes viability. Incubation with TMA but not TMAO resulted in the degradation of the protein structure of LDH and albumin. In conclusion, CP show increased plasma TMA, which is inversely correlated with eGFR. TMA but not TMAO exerts negative effects on cardiomyocytes, likely due to its disturbing effect on proteins. Therefore, TMA but not TMAO may be a toxin and a marker of cardiovascular risk.Entities:
Keywords: TMAO; bacterial metabolites; biomarkers; trimethylamine
Year: 2019 PMID: 31454905 PMCID: PMC6784008 DOI: 10.3390/toxins11090490
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Toxins (Basel) ISSN: 2072-6651 Impact factor: 4.546
Demographics and plasma level of TMA and TMAO in the healthy group and in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS). TMA—trimethylamine, TMAO—trimethylamine N-oxide.
| Characteristic | Healthy Group (n = 9) | AS Group (n = 19) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ethnicity (Caucasian/other) | 9/0 | 19/0 | - |
| Male/Female | 5/4 | 11/8 | - |
| Age (years) | 38.9 ± 4.8 | 74.5 ± 2.3 | <0.001 |
| eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m²) | 101.5 ± 6.3 | 57.4 ± 5.45 | <0.001 |
| Plasma TMA (µmol/L) | 23.2 ± 2.1 | 59.5 ± 3.9 | <0.001 |
| Plasma TMAO (µmol/L) | 3.6 ± 0.4 | 5.5 ± 0.6 | 0.07 |
Figure 1Correlation of plasma (A) TMA and (B) TMAO levels (µmol/L) with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (mL/min/1.73 m²). r—Pearson correlation coefficient; TMA—trimethylamine; and TMAO—trimethylamine N-oxide.
Figure 2The influence of TMA and TMAO on cardiomyocytes in vitro. Comparison of the viability of cardiomyocytes (H9c2) treated with TMA or TMAO at increasing concentrations from 0.1 to 100 mmol/L and concomitant treatment with TMA and TMAO, 10/10 (10 mmol/L TMA/10 mmol/L TMAO), 10/100 (10 mmol/L TMA/100 mmol/L TMAO). An MTT test was performed after 24 and 72 h of treatment, measurement was performed in three independent experiments, and results for each experiment were normalized to the control (untreated) cells; graphs show mean ± SE, * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001, by a t-test. TMA—trimethylamine; TMAO—trimethylamine N-oxide.
Figure 3Representative pictures showing changes in the number and morphology of cells after 72 hours of treatment with (A) TMA and (B) TMAO—bar 100 µm. ctrl.—control; TMA—trimethylamine; and TMAO—trimethylamine N-oxide.
Figure 4Representative pictures showing morphology of cells after (A) 72 hours and (B) 10 days of treatment with TMAO or TMA or the mixture of both compounds—bar 100 µm. ctrl.—control; TMA—trimethylamine; and TMAO—trimethylamine N-oxide.
Figure 5Diffusion coefficient obtained for (A) albumin and (B) LDH after 24-hour incubation with either PBS (control), TMA, or TMAO at increasing concentrations (n = 6). With protein degradation, the biomolecule diffusion coefficient increases. D—diffusion coefficient; LDH—lactate dehydrogenase; PBS—phosphate-buffered; TMA—trimethylamine; and TMAO—trimethylamine N-oxide.