Literature DB >> 31454493

Impact of a real-time automatic quality control system on colorectal polyp and adenoma detection: a prospective randomized controlled study (with videos).

Jing-Ran Su1, Zhen Li1, Xue-Jun Shao2, Chao-Ran Ji1, Rui Ji1, Ru-Chen Zhou1, Guang-Chao Li1, Guan-Qun Liu1, Yi-Shan He1, Xiu-Li Zuo1, Yan-Qing Li1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Quality control can decrease variations in the performance of colonoscopists and improve the effectiveness of colonoscopy to prevent colorectal cancers. Unfortunately, routine quality control is difficult to carry out because a practical method is lacking. The aim of this study was to develop an automatic quality control system (AQCS) and assess whether it could improve polyp and adenoma detection in clinical practice.
METHODS: First, we developed AQCS based on deep convolutional neural network models for timing of the withdrawal phase, supervising withdrawal stability, evaluating bowel preparation, and detecting colorectal polyps. Next, consecutive patients were prospectively randomized to undergo routine colonoscopies with or without the assistance of AQCS. The primary outcome of the study was the adenoma detection rate (ADR) in the AQCS and control groups.
RESULTS: A total of 659 patients were enrolled and randomized. A total of 308 and 315 patients were analyzed in the AQCS and control groups, respectively. AQCS significantly increased the ADR (0.289 vs 0.165, P < .001) and the mean number of adenomas per procedure (0.367 vs 0.178, P < .001) compared with the control group. A significant increase was also observed in the polyp detection rate (0.383 vs 0.254, P = .001) and the mean number of polyps detected per procedure (0.575 vs 0.305, P < .001). In addition, the withdrawal time (7.03 minutes vs 5.68 minutes, P < .001) and adequate bowel preparation rate (87.34% vs 80.63%, P = .023) were superior for the AQCS group.
CONCLUSIONS: AQCS could effectively improve the performance of colonoscopists during the withdrawal phase and significantly increase polyp and adenoma detection. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT03622281.).
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31454493     DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.08.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  48 in total

1.  Welcoming new guidelines for AI clinical research.

Authors:  Eric J Topol
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 53.440

2.  UEG Week 2020 Poster Presentations.

Authors: 
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 4.623

Review 3.  Artificial Intelligence in Endoscopy.

Authors:  Alexander Hann; Alexander Meining
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2021-11-01

Review 4.  Current status and limitations of artificial intelligence in colonoscopy.

Authors:  Alexander Hann; Joel Troya; Daniel Fitting
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 4.623

5.  Application of Artificial Intelligence to Clinical Practice in Inflammatory Bowel Disease - What the Clinician Needs to Know.

Authors:  David Chen; Clifton Fulmer; Ilyssa O Gordon; Sana Syed; Ryan W Stidham; Niels Vande Casteele; Yi Qin; Katherine Falloon; Benjamin L Cohen; Robert Wyllie; Florian Rieder
Journal:  J Crohns Colitis       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 10.020

Review 6.  Current Status and Future Perspectives of Artificial Intelligence in Colonoscopy.

Authors:  Yu Kamitani; Kouichi Nonaka; Hajime Isomoto
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-05-22       Impact factor: 4.964

Review 7.  Scoping out the future: The application of artificial intelligence to gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Authors:  Scott B Minchenberg; Trent Walradt; Jeremy R Glissen Brown
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2022-05-15

Review 8.  Reporting guidelines for clinical trial reports for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the CONSORT-AI extension.

Authors:  Xiaoxuan Liu; Samantha Cruz Rivera; David Moher; Melanie J Calvert; Alastair K Denniston
Journal:  Lancet Digit Health       Date:  2020-09-09

9.  A Gratifying Step forward for the Application of Artificial Intelligence in the Field of Endoscopy: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Yixin Xu; Yulin Tan; Yibo Wang; Jie Gao; Dapeng Wu; Xuezhong Xu
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 1.719

Review 10.  Guidelines for clinical trial protocols for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the SPIRIT-AI extension.

Authors:  Samantha Cruz Rivera; Xiaoxuan Liu; An-Wen Chan; Alastair K Denniston; Melanie J Calvert
Journal:  Lancet Digit Health       Date:  2020-09-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.