Literature DB >> 31454295

Response adaptive randomization procedures in seamless phase II/III clinical trials.

Hongjian Zhu1, Jin Piao2, J Jack Lee3, Feifang Hu4, Lixin Zhang5.   

Abstract

It is desirable to work efficiently and cost effectively to evaluate new therapies in a time-sensitive and ethical manner without compromising the integrity and validity of the development process. The seamless phase II/III clinical trial has been proposed to meet this need, and its efficient, ethical and economic advantages can be strengthened by its combination with innovative response adaptive randomization (RAR) procedures. In particular, well-designed frequentist RAR procedures can target theoretically optimal allocation proportions, and there are explicit asymptotic results. However, there has been little research into seamless phase II/III clinical trials with frequentist RAR because of the difficulty in performing valid statistical inference and controlling the type I error rate. In this paper, we propose the framework for a family of frequentist RAR designs for seamless phase II/III trials, derive the asymptotic distribution of the parameter estimators using martingale processes and offer solutions to control the type I error rate. The numerical studies demonstrate our theoretical findings and the advantages of the proposed methods.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Response adaptive randomization; seamless clinical trials; type I error

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31454295      PMCID: PMC6957739          DOI: 10.1080/10543406.2019.1657439

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biopharm Stat        ISSN: 1054-3406            Impact factor:   1.051


  38 in total

1.  An improved method of evaluating drug effect in a multiple dose clinical trial.

Authors:  L Shen
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2001-07-15       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Sequential designs for phase III clinical trials incorporating treatment selection.

Authors:  Nigel Stallard; Susan Todd
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2003-03-15       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 3.  Seamless phase II/III designs.

Authors:  Nigel Stallard; Susan Todd
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 3.021

4.  Bayesian adaptive biased-coin designs for clinical trials with normal responses.

Authors:  Anthony C Atkinson; Atanu Biswas
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Drop-the-losers design: normal case.

Authors:  Allan R Sampson; Michael W Sill
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.207

6.  Unbiased estimation of selected treatment means in two-stage trials.

Authors:  Jack Bowden; Ekkehard Glimm
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.207

7.  Selection and bias--two hostile brothers.

Authors:  Peter Bauer; Franz Koenig; Werner Brannath; Martin Posch
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 8.  Clinical trial designs--made to order.

Authors:  J S Andersen
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 1.051

Review 9.  Adaptive Designs for Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Deepak L Bhatt; Cyrus Mehta
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Statistical inference for response adaptive randomization procedures with adjusted optimal allocation proportions.

Authors:  Hongjian Zhu
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2017-01-19       Impact factor: 1.051

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.