| Literature DB >> 31454201 |
Amer Harky1, Matthew Fok2, Holly Fraser3, Callum Howard4, Lara Rimmer3, Mohamad Bashir5.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drainage is a technique that has significantly reduced the incidence of spinal cord ischaemia (SCI). We present results of a systematic review to assess the literature on this topic in relation to thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair (TAAR).Entities:
Keywords: Biomarkers; Cytokines; Lactic Acid; Spinal Cord Ischemia; Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31454201 PMCID: PMC6713370 DOI: 10.21470/1678-9741-2018-0375
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Braz J Cardiovasc Surg ISSN: 0102-7638
Characteristics of studies included.
| Author | Year | Country | Total number of patients | Number of male patients (%) | Average age (range) | Number with neurological deficits | CSF biomarker studied |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lases et al.[ | 2005 | Netherlands | 69 | 26 (55) | 64 (35-89) | 4 (5.8) | S-100B, NSE, LD |
| Casiraghi et al.[ | 2011 | Italy | 16 | 10 (62.5) | 63 (38-75) | 4 (26.7) | Lactate |
| Drenger et al.[ | 1997 | Jerusalem, Baltimore and Nashville | 21 | N/A | 65.3 | 3 (14.3) | Lactate |
| Brunnekreef et al.[ | 2007 | Netherlands | 8 | 3 (37.5) | 68 (58-76) | 0 | S-100B |
| Kunihara et al.[ | 2001 | Japan | 15 | 9 (60) | 60.6 (26-75) | 1 (6.7%) | TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12 |
| van Dongen et al.[ | 1998 | Netherlands | 8 | 7 (87.5) | 63 (35-75) | 1 (12.5) | S-100B |
| Kunihara et al.[ | 2001 | Japan | 23 | 12 (52.2) | 64 | 4 (17.4) | S100-B |
| Anderson et al.[ | 2003 | Sweden | 11 | N/A | 64 | 2 (18.2) | S100-B, NSE, GFAp, lactate |
| Shiiya et al.[ | 2004 | Japan | 28 | 16 | 64 (26-79) | 6 (21.4) | S100-B, Tau |
| Khaladj et al.[ | 2008 | Germany | 13 | 8 | 63 (27-71) | 2 | S100-B, lactate, glucose |
| Hecker et al.[ | 2008 | Philadelphia | 37 | 20 | N/A (40-80) | 14 | HSP70 and HSP27 |
| Brock et al.[ | 1997 | Baltimore | 16 | 6 | 68.5 | 4 (25) | Glutamate, aspartate and glycine |
Studies that have analysed S-100β in CSF as comparative analysis.
| Author | Number of patients | Number with neurological deficit (%) | Mean baseline S100b concentration | Peak S100b concentration in paraplegic group (µg/l-1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lases et al.[ | 69 | 4 (5.8) | 5.625 µg/litre | 10.375 |
| Brunnekreef et al.[ | 8 | 0 | 1.3 µg/litre | n/a |
| van Dongen et al.[ | 8 | 1(12.5) | 1.23 µg/litre | 10.03 |
| Kunihara et al.[ | 23 | 4 (17.4) | 1.5 µg/litre | 275 |
| Anderson et al.[ | 11 | 2 (18.2) | 3.7 (1 [in log ng/l]) | 4.4 (in log ng/l) |
| Shiiya et al.[ | 28 | 6 (21.4) | 1.60 | 42.35 |
| Khaladj et al.[ | 13 | 2 | 1.3 | 19.4[±14] |
Original values 72.2 [±40.8] and 12.5 [±5.5].
Studies that have analysed lactate in CSF as comparative analysis.
| Author | Number of patients | Number with neurological deficit (%) | Mean baseline lactate concentration | Peak lactate concentration in paraplegic group |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lases et al.[ | 69 | 4 (5.8) | 17.75 µg/l | 25.625 µg/l |
| Anderson et al.[ | 11 | 2 (18.2) | 1.5 µg/l | 3 µg/l |
| Khaladj et al.[ | 13 | 2 | 2.2 µg/l | 9.3 µg/l |
Studies that have analysed NSE in CSF as comparative analysis.
| Author | Number of patients | Number with neurological deficit (%) | Mean baseline NSE concentration | Peak NSE concentration in paraplegic group |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lases et al.[ | 69 | 4 (5.8) | 12.625 µg/l | 19 µg/l |
| Anderson et al.[ | 11 | 2 (18.2) | 12 µg/l | 17 µg/l |
Study that have analysed Tau level in CSF as comparative analysis.
| Author | Number of patients | Number with neurological deficit (%) | Mean baseline TAU concentration | Peak Tau concentration in paraplegic group |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shiiya et al.[ | 28 | 6 (21.4) | 134.25 pg/ml | 989 pg/ml (massive confidence intervals) |
Study that have analysed GFAp level in CSF as comparative analysis.
| Author | Number of patients | Number with neurological deficit (%) | Mean baseline GFAp concentration | Peak GFAp concentration in paraplegic group |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anderson et al.[ | 11 | 2 (18.2) | 2.8 | 5 |
| Abbreviations, acronyms & symbols | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CSF | = Cerebrospinal fluid | MeSH | = Medical subject headings | |
| DTAAR | = Descending thoracic aortic aneurysm repair | NSE | = Neuron-specific endolase | |
| GFPa | = Glial fibrillary acidic protein A | OR | = | |
| HSP | = Heat shock protein | SCI | = Spinal cord ischaemia | |
| IONM | = Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring | SSEP | = Somatosensory evoked potentials | |
| LD | = Lactate dehydrogenase | TAAR | = Thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair | |
| MEPs | = Motor evoked potentials | TNF-α | = Tumor necrosis fator-alpha | |
| Author's roles & responsibilities | |
|---|---|
| AH | Substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work; or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work; final approval of the version to be published |
| MF | Substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work; or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work; final approval of the version to be published |
| HF | Substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work; or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work; final approval of the version to be published |
| CH | Substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work; or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work; final approval of the version to be published |
| LR | Substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work; or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work; final approval of the version to be published |
| MB | Substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work; or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work; final approval of the version to be published |