Literature DB >> 31454159

Five years follow-up of mandibular 2-implant overdentures on locator or ball abutments: Implant results, patient-related outcome, and prosthetic aftercare.

Carine Matthys1, Stijn Vervaeke2, Jos Besseler3, Ron Doornewaard2, Melissa Dierens4, Hugo De Bruyn2,5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It is uncertain, which is the optimal attachment for a mandibular 2-implant overdenture (2IOD).
PURPOSE: To assess 5 years clinical implant outcome, prosthetic maintenance, cost, and PROMs of two cohorts receiving 2IOD on ball or stud abutments in a comparative study.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ninety edentulous individuals were treated with balls (n = 34) or locator (n = 56). Implant survival, bone-to-implant level, prosthetic outcome, technical maintenance, and OHIP-14 were assessed. Statistics to compare between baseline and 1/5 years and between groups were t-test or Mann-Whitney (P < .05); chi-square was adopted to analyze plaque and technical maintenance or interventions between groups.
RESULTS: Five years implant survival was 98.7%, irrespective of attachment. Overall mean bone loss was 1.1 mm, probing pocket depth 1.92 mm, bleeding score 0.60, plaque score 1. Plaque accumulated more on locators (P = .023). OHIP-14 declined from 18.1 to 2.7 irrespective of attachment. Retention for balls was better (P < .005), locators required more maintenance (P < .001), caused by retention-adjustment (P < .001) or ulcers/pain (P = .014). Five years maintenance-cost was 11% of initial cost, irrespective of attachment.
CONCLUSIONS: Balls and locators yield stable 5-years implant outcome and improved Oral Health Related Quality of Life (OHRQoL). Locators required more maintenance and resulted in a lower retention. Maintenance costs are minimal but may affect OHRQoL at least for stud abutments.
© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  abutments; ball attachments; clinical study; edentulous mandible; implant survival; marginal bone loss; overdenture; patient satisfaction

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31454159     DOI: 10.1111/cid.12840

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res        ISSN: 1523-0899            Impact factor:   3.932


  4 in total

1.  Circumferential bone level and bone remodeling in the posterior mandible of edentulous mandibular overdenture wearers: influence of mandibular bone atrophy in a 3-year cohort study.

Authors:  Alessandra Julie Schuster; Anna Paula da Rosa Possebon; André Ribeiro Schinestsck; Otacílio Luiz Chagas-Júnior; Fernanda Faot
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Immediate versus Delayed Attachment Incorporation Impact on Prosthetic Aftercare among Mandibular Implant-Supported Overdenture Wearers.

Authors:  Eran Zenziper; Ofir Rosner; Oded Ghelfan; Joseph Nissan; Sigalit Blumer; Gil Ben-Izhack; Moshe Davidovich; Liat Chaushu; Adrian Kahn; Sarit Naishlos
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-06-19       Impact factor: 4.964

3.  Patients' Satisfaction and Oral Health-Related Quality of Life of Edentulous Patients Using Conventional Complete Dentures and Implant-Retained Overdentures in Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Salwa Omar Bajunaid; Abdullah S Alshahrani; Ahad A Aldosari; Atheer N Almojel; Rehab S Alanazi; Tala M Alsulaim; Syed Rashid Habib
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 4.  Oral health-related quality of life of patients rehabilitated with fixed and removable implant-supported dental prostheses.

Authors:  Ho-Yan Duong; Andrea Roccuzzo; Alexandra Stähli; Giovanni E Salvi; Niklaus P Lang; Anton Sculean
Journal:  Periodontol 2000       Date:  2022-02       Impact factor: 12.239

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.