Literature DB >> 31453607

Uncertainties in contact angle goniometry.

Maja Vuckovac1, Mika Latikka1, Kai Liu1, Tommi Huhtamäki1, Robin H A Ras2.   

Abstract

The most widely used method to quantify the wetting properties of surfaces is by measuring contact angles. Even though contact angle goniometry is a powerful technique for characterizing wetting properties, it is not accurate for very hydrophobic surfaces. As the technique relies on image processing, it has inherent errors due to optical limitations, especially near the three-phase contact line. This leads to uncertainties in the positioning of the baseline, which can cause large errors in the measured contact angles. In this paper, we systematically evaluate these errors both theoretically and experimentally, focusing on the importance of image resolution. For ∼9 microliter droplet, displacement of the baseline by a single pixel leads to errors of approximately ±0.5° to ±1° for contact angles up to 150°, and errors increase rapidly in the superhydrophobic regime, up to ±8°. The error in the contact angle can be slightly reduced by increasing the image resolution, but cannot be eliminated entirely.

Year:  2019        PMID: 31453607     DOI: 10.1039/c9sm01221d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soft Matter        ISSN: 1744-683X            Impact factor:   3.679


  6 in total

1.  Preparation and application of a thidiazuron·diuron ultra-low-volume spray suitable for plant protection unmanned aerial vehicles.

Authors:  Qin Liu; Kun Wei; Liyun Yang; Weiming Xu; Wei Xue
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Hydrogels as Corneal Stroma Substitutes for In Vitro Evaluation of Drug Ocular Permeation.

Authors:  Susi Burgalassi; Erica Zucchetti; Leonardo Ling; Patrizia Chetoni; Silvia Tampucci; Daniela Monti
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 6.525

Review 3.  The Power of Assemblies at Interfaces: Nanosensor Platforms Based on Synthetic Receptor Membranes.

Authors:  Tsukuru Minamiki; Yuki Ichikawa; Ryoji Kurita
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 3.576

4.  Contact-Angle Hysteresis and Contact-Line Friction on Slippery Liquid-like Surfaces.

Authors:  Hernán Barrio-Zhang; Élfego Ruiz-Gutiérrez; Steven Armstrong; Glen McHale; Gary G Wells; Rodrigo Ledesma-Aguilar
Journal:  Langmuir       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 3.882

5.  A Modified Contact Angle Measurement Process to Suppress Oil Drop Spreading and Improve Precision.

Authors:  Xiao Deng; Xianmin Zhou; Muhammad Shahzad Kamal; Syed Muhammad Shakil Hussain; Mohamed Mahmoud; Shirish Patil
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 4.411

6.  New Simple and Robust Method for Determination of Polarity of Deep Eutectic Solvents (DESs) by Means of Contact Angle Measurement.

Authors:  Łukasz Cichocki; Dorota Warmińska; Justyna Łuczak; Andrzej Przyjazny; Grzegorz Boczkaj
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 4.927

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.