Literature DB >> 31453590

Assessing the performance of the MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods. 10. Impacts of enhanced sampling and variable dielectric model on protein-protein Interactions.

Ercheng Wang1, Gaoqi Weng1, Huiyong Sun1, Hongyan Du1, Feng Zhu1, Fu Chen1, Zhe Wang1, Tingjun Hou2.   

Abstract

Enhanced sampling has been extensively used to capture the conformational transitions in protein folding, but it attracts much less attention in the studies of protein-protein recognition. In this study, we evaluated the impact of enhanced sampling methods and solute dielectric constants on the overall accuracy of the molecular mechanics/Poisson-Boltzmann surface area (MM/PBSA) and molecular mechanics/generalized Born surface area (MM/GBSA) approaches for the protein-protein binding free energy calculations. Here, two widely used enhanced sampling methods, including aMD and GaMD, and conventional molecular dynamics (cMD) simulations with two AMBER force fields (ff03 and ff14SB) were used to sample the conformations for 21 protein-protein complexes. The MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA calculation results illustrate that the standard MM/GBSA based on the cMD simulations yields the best Pearson correlation (rp = -0.523) between the predicted binding affinities and the experimental data, which is much higher than that given by MM/PBSA (rp = -0.212). Two enhanced sampling methods (aMD and GaMD) are indeed more efficient for conformational sampling, but they did not improve the binding affinity predictions for protein-protein systems, suggesting that the aMD or GaMD sampling (at least in short timescale simulations) may not be a good choice for the MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA predictions of protein-protein complexes. The solute dielectric constant of 1.0 is recommended to MM/GBSA, but a higher solute dielectric constant is recommended to MM/PBSA, especially for the systems with higher polarity on the protein-protein binding interfaces. Then, a preliminary assessment of the MM/GBSA calculations based on a variable dielectric generalized Born (VDGB) model was conducted. The results highlight the potential power of VDGB in the free energy predictions for protein-protein systems, but more thorough studies should be done in the future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31453590     DOI: 10.1039/c9cp04096j

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys        ISSN: 1463-9076            Impact factor:   3.676


  13 in total

1.  Deciphering the selective binding mechanisms of anaplastic lymphoma kinase-derived neuroblastoma tumor neoepitopes to human leukocyte antigen.

Authors:  Wenchao Tian; Xianxian Liu; Lulu Wang; Bufeng Zheng; Kun Jiang; Guoyong Fu; Wenyu Feng
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 1.810

2.  In silico binding profile characterization of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and its mutants bound to human ACE2 receptor.

Authors:  Yuzhao Zhang; Xibing He; Jingchen Zhai; Beihong Ji; Viet Hoang Man; Junmei Wang
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2021-11-05       Impact factor: 13.994

3.  Conformational Selection Mechanism Provides Structural Insights into the Optimization of APC-Asef Inhibitors.

Authors:  Xinheng He; Ning Huang; Yuran Qiu; Jian Zhang; Yaqin Liu; Xiao-Lan Yin; Shaoyong Lu
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-02-11       Impact factor: 4.411

4.  Site Density Functional Theory and Structural Bioinformatics Analysis of the SARS-CoV Spike Protein and hACE2 Complex.

Authors:  Nitesh Kumawat; Andrejs Tucs; Soumen Bera; Gennady N Chuev; Marat Valiev; Marina V Fedotova; Sergey E Kruchinin; Koji Tsuda; Adnan Sljoka; Amit Chakraborty
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 4.411

5.  Protein-Protein Binding Free Energy Predictions with the MM/PBSA Approach Complemented with the Gaussian-Based Method for Entropy Estimation.

Authors:  Shailesh Kumar Panday; Emil Alexov
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2022-03-22

6.  Calculating the absolute binding free energy of the insulin dimer in an explicit solvent.

Authors:  Qiankun Gong; Haomiao Zhang; Haozhe Zhang; Changjun Chen
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 4.036

7.  Insight into the drug resistance mechanisms of GS-9669 caused by mutations of HCV NS5B polymerase via molecular simulation.

Authors:  Di Han; Huiqun Wang; Baerlike Wujieti; Beibei Zhang; Wei Cui; Bo-Zhen Chen
Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 7.271

8.  Fast Identification of Possible Drug Treatment of Coronavirus Disease -19 (COVID-19) Through Computational Drug Repurposing Study.

Authors:  Junmei Wang
Journal:  ChemRxiv       Date:  2020-02-21

9.  Discovery of a novel nonsteroidal selective glucocorticoid receptor modulator by virtual screening and bioassays.

Authors:  Jin-Ping Pang; Xue-Ping Hu; Yun-Xia Wang; Jia-Ning Liao; Xin Chai; Xu-Wen Wang; Chao Shen; Jia-Jia Wang; Lu-Lu Zhang; Xin-Yue Wang; Feng Zhu; Qin-Jie Weng; Lei Xu; Ting-Jun Hou; Dan Li
Journal:  Acta Pharmacol Sin       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 7.169

10.  Computational research of mTORC1 inhibitor on cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury.

Authors:  Hui Li; Wenzhuo Yang; Zhenhua Wang; Xu Wang; Yulei Hao; Jianxin Xi; Han Lu; Zhishan Du; Jiachun Feng; Bao Zhang; Di Ma
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 5.682

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.