| Literature DB >> 31453240 |
Chai Ling Lim1, King-Hwa Ling2,3, Pike-See Cheah1,3.
Abstract
Satellite cells are myogenic cells responsible for muscle growth shortly after birth and muscle repair/regeneration during adulthood. Therapies based on satellite cells hold promise for treating muscular dysfunctions. Studying satellite cells is technically challenging owing to their low abundance, small size and anatomical dispersed location between the basal lamina and the sarcolemma of myofibers. In this article, we present three improved protocol strategies for studying the properties of satellite cells of the mouse during the different stages of muscle regeneration: (1) immunostaining of freshly isolated single myofibers to facilitate the study of quiescent satellite cells, (2) cultivation of single myofibers on Matrigel®-coated dish to study the myogenesis programs initiated by satellite cell activation, and (3) cultivation of single myofibers in floating conditions to analyze activated satellite cells or the doubling time of satellite cells in myofibers. In brief, when compared to previously published protocols, this article presented an improved protocol that requires shorter experimental time and less laborious approach for higher yield of intact single myofibers for downstream analyses.Entities:
Keywords: adult stem cell; myofibers; myogenic differentiation 1; paired box family of transcription factors; satellite cell
Year: 2018 PMID: 31453240 PMCID: PMC6706169 DOI: 10.14440/jbm.2018.219
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Biol Methods ISSN: 2326-9901
Comparisons of the refined protocol and the previously published protocols for the isolation and immunocytochemistry staining of freshly isolated single myofibers.
| Criteria | Refined protocol | Published protocols [ |
|---|---|---|
| Tediousness | Simple | Laborious |
| Total time required | 1/3 shorter | |
| Yields | Higher (400 to 500 intact myofibers) | Lower (50 to 100 intact myofibers) |
Comparisons of the refined protocol and the previously published protocols for the isolation and cultivation of single myofibers.
| Criteria | Refined protocol | Published protocols [ |
|---|---|---|
| Yields | Higher (200 to 300 live myofibers) | Lower (50 to 100 live myofibers) |
| Simplicity to release single myofibers during trituration | Easier | More difficult |
| Survivability of myofibers during isolation | Better | Lower |
| Quality of the isolated myofibers | More isolated myofibers presented with straight, intact and non fragmented morphology | More isolated myofibers are bent and fragmented |
Troubleshooting.
| Step | Problems | Probable causes | Suggestions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5.2.3. | Myofiber release during trituration is sub-optimal |
Muscle is under-digested | Increase the collagenase incubation time |
| 5.2.5. | Low yield of intact myofibers; high numbers of hypercontracted myofibers and high amounts of debris | Muscle was damaged Muscle was over-digested | Dissect muscle from tendon-to-tendon Decrease the collagenase incubation time |
| 5.2.12. | Myofibers do not survive after myofiber plating | The selected myofibers were not healthy and were partially contracted | Select only straight and healthy myofibers and avoid transferring partially contracted myofibers |
| 5.2.12. | Fibroblasts are growing together with myofibers in the culture dish | The selected myofibers are contaminated with debris An inadequate number of washes | Selected debris-free myofibers Increase the number of washes |