| Literature DB >> 31453173 |
Anguara Khatun1, Sachchidananda Das Chowdhury1, Bibek Chandra Roy1, Bapon Dey1, Azimul Haque2, Bakthavachalam Chandran2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The experiment was conducted to investigate the comparative effects of inorganic trace minerals (ITM) and three forms of organic trace minerals (OTM) (propionate, metho-chelated, and proteinate) on growth performance, edible meat yield, immunity, and profitability of commercial broilers.Entities:
Keywords: Cobb 500; inorganic trace mineral; meat yield; performance; profitability
Year: 2019 PMID: 31453173 PMCID: PMC6702935 DOI: 10.5455/javar.2019.f313
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Adv Vet Anim Res ISSN: 2311-7710
Ingredient and nutrient composition of control diets (100 kg).
| Ingredients | Starter diet | Grower diet |
|---|---|---|
| Corn | 51.16 | 61.45 |
| Soybean meal, 44% | 41.71 | 31.63 |
| Soybean oil | 3.38 | 3.1 |
| Dicalcium phosphate | 1.63 | 1.725 |
| Calcium carbonate | 0.953 | 0.94 |
| Sodium chloride | 0.273 | 0.273 |
| Sodium bicarbonate | 0.23 | 0.23 |
| DL-methionine | 0.305 | 0.252 |
| L-lys-HCl | 0.08 | 0.11 |
| L-threonine | 0.03 | 0.04 |
| Vitamin-mineral premix | 0.25 | 0.25 |
| Inorganic minerals | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| ME, kcal/kg | 2900 | 3000 |
| Crude Protein, % | 22.7 | 19.2 |
| Ca, % | 0.90 | 0.86 |
| Av. P % | 0.40 | 0.39 |
| Lysine % | 1.41 | 1.17 |
| Methionine % | 0.68 | 0.58 |
T1=0.1kg ITM/100 kg of feed; T2=0.06 kg prpopinate minerals/100 kg of feed; T3=0.05 kg methochelated minerals-225 gm metheonine/100 kg of feed; T4=0.05 kg proteinate minerals /100 kg of feed; ME = metabolizable energy; kcal = kilo calorie; kg = kilogram; Lys = Lysine; Ca = Calcium; Av. = available phosphorus; % = percentage.
Performance of commercial broilers fed inorganic and different forms of organic trace minerals.
| Variables | Dietary treatments | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inorganic (T1) | Propionate (T2) | Metho-chelated (T3) | Proteinate (T4) | ||
| ILW (gm/b) | 45 ± 0.61 | 45 ± 0.45 | 45 ± 0.30 | 45 ± 0.83 | 0.80 |
| FLW (gm/b) | 1,762 ± 31.7 | 1,790 ± 20.3 | 1,785 ± 24.0 | 1,810 ± 24.8 | 0.63 |
| LWG (gm/b) | 1,717 ± 31.7 | 1,745 ± 20.4 | 1,740 ± 23.9 | 1,765 ± 24.8 | 0.63 |
| FC (gm/b) | 2,888 ± 27.8 | 2,882 ± 25.88 | 2,913 ± 14.16 | 2,908 ± 23.6 | 0.75 |
| FCR | 1.68 ± 0.03 | 1.65 ± 0.03 | 1.67 ± 0.03 | 1.65 ± 0.02 | 0.61 |
| Sur (%) | 98.88 ± 0.08 | 99.94 ± 0.06 | 99.94 ± 0.06 | 99.89 ± 0.07 | 0.56 |
T1 = inorganic trace minerals; T2 = propionate minerals; T3 = metho-chelated; T4 = proteinate trace minerals; ILW = initial live weight; FLW = final live weight; LWG = live weight gain; FC = feed consumption; FCR = feed conversion ratio; Sur = survivability; gm/b = gram per bird; ± Indicates standard error of mean (SEM).
Effects of inorganic and organic trace minerals on meat yield characteristics.
| Variables | Dietary treatments | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 | ||
| Dressing (%) | 69 ± 1.3 | 69.4 ± 0.8 | 70.7 ± 0.2 | 70.0 ± 0.9 | 0.5 |
| Thigh (%) | 8.2 ± 0.04 | 8.4 ± 0.2 | 8.2 ± 0.2 | 8.5 ± 0.24 | 0.6 |
| Drumstick (%) | 7.0 ± 0.2 | 7.1 ± 0.09 | 6.8 ± 0.2 | 6.7 ± 0.12 | 0.3 |
| Breast (%) | 28.6 ± 0.26 | 29.9 ± 0.5 | 29.7 ± 0.6 | 29.1 ± 0.85 | 0.5 |
| Wing meat (%) | 5.2 ± 0.07 | 5.2 ± 0.09 | 4.6 ± 0.1 | 5.3 ± 0.15 | 0.08 |
| Heart (%) | 0.7 ± 0.02 | 0.6 ± 0.01 | 0.6 ± 0.01 | 0.6 ± 0.03 | 0.09 |
| Liver (%) | 3.5 ± 0.12 | 3.4 ± 0.14 | 3.4 ± 0.2 | 3.33 ± 0.17 | 0.85 |
| Gizzard (%) | 2.6 ± 0.11 | 2.54 ± 0.11 | 2.6 ± 0.12 | 2.6 ± 0.22 | 0.98 |
| Giblet (%) | 6.5 ± 0.02 | 6.5 ± 0.25 | 6.6 ± 0.11 | 6.5 ± 0.29 | 0.96 |
T1 = inorganic trace minerals; T2 = propionate minerals; T3 = metho-chelated; T4 = proteinate trace minerals; ± Indicates standard error of mean (SEM); % = percentage.
Figure 1.AT against IBD as obtained by ELISA test at different ages (A–D), where T1: Inorganic; T2: Propionate; T3: Metho-chelated; and T4: Proteinate. There were no significant differences in the IBD titre at day 6 and day 35 among dietary treatment groups (A and D). The inorganic group had significantly lower IBD titre level than other treatment groups in 10 days of birds age (B). On the other hand, inorganic and propionate groups had significantly lower titre level than other two treatment groups at 17 days of bird age (C). *** = highly significant.
Cost benefit analysis for feeding different forms of organic trace minerals to broilers.
| Items | T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feed intake (kg/bird) | 2.89 | 2.88 | 2.91 | 2.91 |
| Final weight (kg/bird) | 1.76 | 1.79 | 1.79 | 1.81 |
| Feed price (kg) | 35.95 | 35.96 | 35.94 | 35.93 |
| Inorganic at Tk.190/kg | 0.19 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Propionate at Tk.210/kg | 0.00 | 0.125 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Metho-chelated at Tk.225/kg | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.113 | 0.00 |
| Proteinate at Tk.225/kg | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.113 |
| Feed cost/kg | 36.14 | 36.08 | 36.05 | 36.04 |
| Feed cost/bird | 104.44 | 103.94 | 104.91 | 104.88 |
| Others (Chicks, vaccines, litter, disinfectants, transport, labor etc.) | 65.00 | 65.00 | 65.00 | 65.00 |
| Total cost production Tk./broiler | 169.44 | 168.94 | 169.91 | 169.88 |
| Total cost of production Tk./kg | 96.27 | 94.38 | 94.92 | 93.86 |
| Sale price Tk. /broiler at 120/kg | 211.20 | 214.80 | 214.80 | 217.20 |
| Profit Tk./broiler | 41.76 | 45.86 | 44.89 | 47.32 |
| Profit Tk./kg | 23.72 | 25.62 | 25.08 | 26.14 |
| Profit Tk./kg (over control) | 0.00 | 1.90 | 1.36 | 2.72 |
T1 = inorganic trace minerals; T2 = propionate minerals; T3 = metho-chelated; T4 = proteinate trace minerals; kg = kilogram; Tk. = Taka, / = per.