| Literature DB >> 31453086 |
Larson Boundenga1, Barthélemy Ngoubangoye1, Stephan Ntie2, Nancy-Diamella Moukodoum1, François Renaud3, Virginie Rougeron3, Franck Prugnolle3.
Abstract
Malaria parasites infect a wide range of vertebrate hosts, such as reptiles, birds and mammals (i.e., primates, ungulates, bats, and rodents). Four Plasmodium species and their subspecies infect African Muridae. Since their discoveries in the 1940s, these rodent Plasmodium species have served as biological models to explore many aspects of the biology of malaria agents and their interactions with their hosts. Despite that, surprisingly, little is known about their ecology, natural history and evolution. Most field studies on these parasites, performed from the 1940s to the early 1980s, showed that all rodent Plasmodium species infect only one main host species, the thicket rat. In the present study, we re-explored the diversity of Plasmodium parasites infecting rodent species living in peridomestic habitats in Gabon, Central Africa. Using molecular approaches, we found that at least two Plasmodium species (Plasmodium vinckei and Plasmodium yoelii) circulated among five rodent species (including the invasive species Mus musculus). This suggests that the host range of these parasites might be larger than previously considered. Our results also showed that the diversity of these parasites could be higher than currently recognized, with the discovery of a new phylogenetic lineage that could represent a new species of rodent Plasmodium.Entities:
Keywords: Central Africa; Host range; Malaria; Mus musculus; Plasmodium; Rodent
Year: 2019 PMID: 31453086 PMCID: PMC6702409 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijppaw.2019.07.010
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl ISSN: 2213-2244 Impact factor: 2.674
Fig. 1Location of the provinces of Gabon where rodent samples were collected. The map shows the sites where rodents were captured (in red) and the site where some Anopheles infected with rodent malaria parasites were found in a previous study (in green) (Makanga et al., 2016). The number of individuals collected in each province is indicated between brackets. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)
Description of the rodent species analysed in this study. The table shows the number of samples collected per species and the infection rate by Plasmodium agents.
| Year of samples collection | |||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Province | Sites | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | Total of samples | |||||||||
| Blood (n/N) | Organ (n/N) | Blood (n/N) | Organ (n/N) | Blood (n/N) | Organ (n/N) | Blood (n/N) | Organ (n/N) | Blood (n/N) | Organ (n/N) | Blood (n/N) | Organ (n/N) | Blood (n/N) | Organ (n/N) | Blood (n/N) | Organ (n/N) | (n/N) | |||
| – | 16 | – | 15 | – | – | – | – | – | 1/10 | – | – | 10 | 9 | 3/71 | |||||
| – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 9 | 2/20 | – | – | 10 | 3 | 2/42 | |||
| – | 5 | – | 1/17 | – | – | – | 2/19 | – | – | – | – | – | – | 3/41 | |||||
| – | – | – | – | – | – | 20 | – | 12 | – | 1/30 | 1/62 | ||||||||
| – | – | – | 15 | – | – | – | – | – | 10 | 10 | – | – | 1/58 | ||||||
| – | – | – | – | 15 | – | – | 9 | 14 | – | 1/7 | – | – | 3/71 | ||||||
| Total of samples | 21 | 30 | 6 | 32 | 10 | 10 | 48 | 24 | 36 | 21 | 47 | 18 | 42 | ||||||
Fig. 2Phylogenetic relationships between the CYTB sequences of Plasmodium parasites obtained in our study (in colour) and the sequences obtained from existing databases (in black). The tree was built using partial CYTB sequences (700 bp-long). The names of our isolates (for instance, n14GB-Ron48_Mus musculus-DJM) include: 1) the year and country of collection (n14GB: n14: 2014 and GB: Gabon); 2) the sample number (Ron48: Rodent number 48); 3) the rodent species and 4) the abbreviation of the sample site (FCV: Franceville; MIM: Mimongo, LEK: Lekoni, DJM: Djoumou; MKK: Makokou; KLM: Koulamoutou). The name of isolates clustering with Plasmodium yoelii is in green, and of isolates clustering with Plasmodium vinckei is in blue. CAM: Cameroon and CAR: Central African Republic. In our study we called P. sp. GAB the new Plasmodium lineage found in some Gabonese rodents. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)
Fig. 3Map of malaria parasite distribution for each host species and infection rate for each Plasmodium species or lineage (Plasmodium yoelii spp, Plasmodium vinckei lentum, and Plasmodium sp GAB). a) for Mus musculus; b) for Lemniscomys striatus; c) for Mastomys natalensis; d) for Praomys sp. and e) for Grammomys poensis. Plasmodium sp GAB (P. sp. GAB) corresponds to the new phylogenetic lineage of rodent Plasmodium described in our study.
Fig. 4Map showing the distribution of rodent malaria parasite species in Central Africa. This map is based on the data provided in Landau and Chabau (1994) (blue) and the data obtained in our study (red). P. v.: Plasmodium vinckei; P. y.: Plasmodium yoelii; P. c: Plasmodium chabaudi; P. v: Plasmodium vinckei; P. berghei: Plasmodium berghei and P. sp. GAB: Plasmodium sp GAB. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)