| Literature DB >> 31452670 |
Ke Wu1,2, Changwen Du1,2, Fei Ma1, Yazhen Shen1, Dong Liang1,2, Jianmin Zhou1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: An effective and expeditious approach to assess plant nitrogen status is urgently needed in rice production and management as the conventional chemical methods are laborious and time-consuming.Entities:
Keywords: Amides; FTIR-PAS; Nitrogen status diagnosis; Rice leaves
Year: 2019 PMID: 31452670 PMCID: PMC6699123 DOI: 10.1186/s13007-019-0482-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plant Methods ISSN: 1746-4811 Impact factor: 4.993
Cultivars, treatments and fertilizer rate at each station in the experimental years
| Experimental station | Seasons | Cultivars | Treatments | Fertilizer rate (kg ha−1) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | P2O5 | K2O | ||||
| Tangquan | CO | – | – | – | ||
| 2015 | Nanjing 46 | CF | 240 | 60 | 120 | |
| OF | 240 | 60 | 120 | |||
| CO | – | – | – | |||
| 2016 | Nanjing 46 | CF | 240 | 60 | 120 | |
| OF | 240 | 60 | 120 | |||
| CO | – | – | – | |||
| 2017 | Nanjing 46 | CF | 240 | 60 | 120 | |
| OF | 240 | 60 | 120 | |||
| CO | – | – | – | |||
| 2018 | Wuyunjing 23 | CF | 240 | 60 | 120 | |
| OF | 240 | 60 | 120 | |||
| Jiangning | CO | – | – | – | ||
| 2018 | Nanjing 5055 | CF | 255 | 64 | 76.5 | |
| OF | 192 | 64 | 76.5 | |||
Fig. 1FTIR-PAS of leaves from different Rice stages with different treatments in 2015 growth season. a Tillering stage, b jointing stage, c full panicle stage, d mature stage
Fig. 2Deconvolution Curve-fitting with different treatments at four stages in 2015 growth season. a Tillering stage, b jointing stage, c full panicle stage, d mature stage; CO control with no fertilization application, CF conventional fertilization, OF optimized fertilization
Effect of N application on rice yield with different treatments in different growth seasons
| Experimental station | Seasons | Rice yield (kg ha−1) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CO | CF | OF | ||
| Tangquan | 2015 | 7575 ± 282.2b | 9432 ± 345.6a | 9872 ± 297.5a |
| 2016 | 6385 ± 255.5b | 8633 ± 246.3a | 9155 ± 392.5a | |
| 2017 | 4095 ± 195.7b | 5844 ± 246.8a | 6297 ± 268.5a | |
| 2018 | 6887 ± 323.7b | 8925 ± 267.5a | 9375 ± 422.9a | |
| Jiangning | 2018 | 7212 ± 258.6b | 11077 ± 532.7a | 11515 ± 478.7a |
Data are expressed as the means of four replications. Significant differences (P ≤ 0.05) among treatments within each line are indicated with different letters
Effect of N application on total N concentration of rice leaves with different treatments in different growth seasons
| Experimental station | Seasons | Treatments | Total N (g kg−1) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tillering stage | Jointing stage | Panicle stage | Mature stage | |||
| Tangquan | CO | 10.58 ± 0.52b | 9.95 ± 0.37b | 10.52 ± 0.55b | 9.97 ± 0.47b | |
| 2015 | CF | 24.98 ± 0.75a | 22.00 ± 0.59a | 29.11 ± 0.77a | 12.45 ± 0.35a | |
| OF | 28.65 ± 0.68a | 26.61 ± 0.85a | 25.13 ± 0.65a | 12.05 ± 0.38a | ||
| CO | – | – | – | 10.49 ± 0.20b | ||
| 2016 | CF | – | – | – | 12.31 ± 0.30a | |
| OF | – | – | – | 12.40 ± 0.55a | ||
| CO | – | – | – | 10.23 ± 0.26b | ||
| 2017 | CF | – | – | – | 11.87 ± 0.65a | |
| OF | – | – | – | 11.90 ± 0.46a | ||
| CO | – | – | – | 9.86 ± 0.0.57b | ||
| 2018 | CF | – | – | – | 11.81 ± 0.44a | |
| OF | – | – | – | 11.09 ± 0.25 | ||
| Jiangning | 2018 | CO | – | – | – | 9.51 ± 0.32b |
| CF | – | – | – | 11.28 ± 0.36a | ||
| OF | – | – | – | 10.68 ± 0.35a | ||
Data are expressed as the means of four replications. Significant differences (P ≤ 0.05) among treatments within each column are indicated with different letters
Fig. 3The photoacoustic intensity ratio of amide II to amide I. CO Control with no fertilization application, CF Conventional Fertilization, OF Optimized Fertilization. a The ratio of amide II to amide I in different treatments at four growth stages in the 2015 growth season, b the ratio of amide II to amide I in different treatments at mature stage in the 2015, 2016, 2017 and 2018 growth seasons. Bars are the standard error of the means. Different letters above the bars indicate a significant difference at P < 0.05 according to the Duncan test
Fig. 4Linear regression between the total N concentration of rice leaves and the ratio of amide II to amide I. a The 2015 growth season for the first three stages only excluding the mature stage. b Only at the maturity from all growth seasons. c All growth stages in the 2015 season. d 2015, 2016, 2017 and 2018 growth seasons. The linear functions and the square of the Correlation Coefficient (R2) are shown in the each plot