Davor Lessel1, Christian Kubisch. 1. Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg; Martin Zeitz Center for Rare Diseases, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Segmental progeroid syndromes (SPS) are rare hereditary diseases in which the affected individuals show signs of premature aging in more than one organ or type of tissue. We review the clinical and genetic features of some of these syndromes and discuss the extent to which their study affords a complementary opportunity to study aging processes in general. METHODS: This review is based on publications retrieved by a selective search in PubMed. RESULTS: Segmental progeroid syndromes are a clinically and genetically heterogeneous group of hereditary diseases. They can be categorized, for example, by the age of onset of manifestations (congenital vs. infantile vs. juvenile/adult forms). They are diagnosed on clinical grounds supplemented by genetic testing on the basis of next-generation sequencing, which is of central importance in view of the marked heterogeneity and complexity of their overlapping clinical features. The elucidation of the genetic and molecular causes of these diseases can lead to causally directed treatment, as shown by the initial clinical trials in Hutchinson- Gilford progeria syndrome. The molecular features of SPS are identical in many ways to those of "physiological" aging. Thus, studying the molecular mechanisms of SPS may be helpful for the development of molecularly defined treatment approaches for age-associated diseases in general. CONCLUSION: Segmental progeroid syndromes are a complex group of diseases with overlapping clinical features. Current research efforts focus on the elucidation of the molecular mechanisms of these diseases, most of which are very rare. This should enable the development of treatments that might be applicable to general processes of aging as well.
BACKGROUND: Segmental progeroid syndromes (SPS) are rare hereditary diseases in which the affected individuals show signs of premature aging in more than one organ or type of tissue. We review the clinical and genetic features of some of these syndromes and discuss the extent to which their study affords a complementary opportunity to study aging processes in general. METHODS: This review is based on publications retrieved by a selective search in PubMed. RESULTS: Segmental progeroid syndromes are a clinically and genetically heterogeneous group of hereditary diseases. They can be categorized, for example, by the age of onset of manifestations (congenital vs. infantile vs. juvenile/adult forms). They are diagnosed on clinical grounds supplemented by genetic testing on the basis of next-generation sequencing, which is of central importance in view of the marked heterogeneity and complexity of their overlapping clinical features. The elucidation of the genetic and molecular causes of these diseases can lead to causally directed treatment, as shown by the initial clinical trials in Hutchinson- Gilford progeria syndrome. The molecular features of SPS are identical in many ways to those of "physiological" aging. Thus, studying the molecular mechanisms of SPS may be helpful for the development of molecularly defined treatment approaches for age-associated diseases in general. CONCLUSION: Segmental progeroid syndromes are a complex group of diseases with overlapping clinical features. Current research efforts focus on the elucidation of the molecular mechanisms of these diseases, most of which are very rare. This should enable the development of treatments that might be applicable to general processes of aging as well.
Authors: Davor Lessel; Bidisha Saha; Fuki Hisama; Bahar Kaymakamzade; Gulay Nurlu; Yasemin Gursoy-Özdemir; Holger Thiele; Peter Nürnberg; George M Martin; Christian Kubisch; Junko Oshima Journal: Am J Med Genet A Date: 2014-07-02 Impact factor: 2.802
Authors: Maria Eriksson; W Ted Brown; Leslie B Gordon; Michael W Glynn; Joel Singer; Laura Scott; Michael R Erdos; Christiane M Robbins; Tracy Y Moses; Peter Berglund; Amalia Dutra; Evgenia Pak; Sandra Durkin; Antonei B Csoka; Michael Boehnke; Thomas W Glover; Francis S Collins Journal: Nature Date: 2003-04-25 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Davor Lessel; Ayse Bilge Ozel; Susan E Campbell; Abdelkrim Saadi; Martin F Arlt; Keisha Melodi McSweeney; Vasilica Plaiasu; Katalin Szakszon; Anna Szőllős; Cristina Rusu; Armando J Rojas; Jaime Lopez-Valdez; Holger Thiele; Peter Nürnberg; Deborah A Nickerson; Michael J Bamshad; Jun Z Li; Christian Kubisch; Thomas W Glover; Leslie B Gordon Journal: Hum Genet Date: 2018-11-19 Impact factor: 4.132
Authors: Dayle McClintock; Desiree Ratner; Meepa Lokuge; David M Owens; Leslie B Gordon; Francis S Collins; Karima Djabali Journal: PLoS One Date: 2007-12-05 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Anna Maierhofer; Julia Flunkert; Junko Oshima; George M Martin; Thomas Haaf; Steve Horvath Journal: Aging (Albany NY) Date: 2017-04 Impact factor: 5.682
Authors: Claire Palles; Jean-Baptiste Cazier; Kimberley M Howarth; Enric Domingo; Angela M Jones; Peter Broderick; Zoe Kemp; Sarah L Spain; Estrella Guarino; Estrella Guarino Almeida; Israel Salguero; Amy Sherborne; Daniel Chubb; Luis G Carvajal-Carmona; Yusanne Ma; Kulvinder Kaur; Sara Dobbins; Ella Barclay; Maggie Gorman; Lynn Martin; Michal B Kovac; Sean Humphray; Anneke Lucassen; Christopher C Holmes; David Bentley; Peter Donnelly; Jenny Taylor; Christos Petridis; Rebecca Roylance; Elinor J Sawyer; David J Kerr; Susan Clark; Jonathan Grimes; Stephen E Kearsey; Huw J W Thomas; Gilean McVean; Richard S Houlston; Ian Tomlinson Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2012-12-23 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Julia Schmidt; Jonas Goergens; Tatiana Pochechueva; Annika Kotter; Niko Schwenzer; Maren Sitte; Gesa Werner; Janine Altmüller; Holger Thiele; Peter Nürnberg; Jörg Isensee; Yun Li; Christian Müller; Barbara Leube; H Christian Reinhardt; Tim Hucho; Gabriela Salinas; Mark Helm; Ron D Jachimowicz; Dagmar Wieczorek; Tobias Kohl; Stephan E Lehnart; Gökhan Yigit; Bernd Wollnik Journal: Hum Genet Date: 2021-09-20 Impact factor: 4.132
Authors: Z Belaya; O Golounina; A Nikitin; N Tarbaeva; E Pigarova; E Mamedova; M Vorontsova; I Shafieva; I Demina; W Van Hul Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2020-11-27 Impact factor: 4.507