Literature DB >> 31452012

Practice advisory on the bleeding risks for peripheral nerve and interfascial plane blockade: evidence review and expert consensus.

Ban C H Tsui1, Kyle Kirkham2, M Kwesi Kwofie3, De Q Tran4, Patrick Wong5, Ki Jinn Chin2, Rakesh V Sondekoppam6.   

Abstract

The risk of bleeding complications during regional anesthesia procedures is a significant patient safety consideration. Nevertheless, existing literature provides limited guidance on the stratification of bleeding risk for peripheral nerve and newly described interfascial plane blocks. Our objective was to produce an evidence-based consensus advisory that classifies bleeding risks in patients undergoing regional peripheral nerve and interfascial plane block procedures. This advisory is intended to facilitate clinical decision-making in conjunction with national or local guidelines and to guide consideration for appropriate alterations to anticoagulation regimens before specific regional anesthesia procedures. In pursuit of this goal, the Regional Anesthesia and Acute Pain Section of the Canadian Anesthesiologists Society (CAS) assembled a panel of seven Canadian experts to classify the risk of bleeding complications associated with regional peripheral nerve and interfascial plane blocks. At the 75th annual meeting of the CAS in June 2018, the panel's expert opinion was finalized and the published literature was quantified within an organized framework. All common peripheral nerve and interfascial plane blocks were categorized into "low risk", "intermediate risk", and "high risk" based on the literature evidence, bleeding risk scores, and consensus opinion (in that order of priority). Clinical data is often limited, so readers of this consensus report should be reminded that these recommendations are mostly based on expert consensus. Hence, this advisory should not to be defined as a standard of care but rather serve as a resource for clinicians assessing the risk and benefits of regional anesthesia in management of their patients.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31452012     DOI: 10.1007/s12630-019-01466-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Anaesth        ISSN: 0832-610X            Impact factor:   5.063


  5 in total

1.  Critical structures in the needle path of the costoclavicular brachial plexus block: a cadaver study.

Authors:  Jonathan G Bailey; Sean Donald; M Kwesi Kwofie; Robert Sandeski; Vishal Uppal
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 5.063

2.  Pain management using a novel hybrid technique of perineural stimulation combined with regional anaesthesia through a stimulating perineural catheter for below knee amputation.

Authors:  V H Y Ip; R V Sondekoppam; B C H Tsui
Journal:  Anaesth Rep       Date:  2021-04-21

Review 3.  Regional anaesthesia in patients at risk of bleeding.

Authors:  T Ashken; S West
Journal:  BJA Educ       Date:  2021-01-26

4.  Effects of Anesthetic Techniques on the Risk of Postoperative Complications Following Lower Extremity Amputation in Diabetes Patients with Coagulation Abnormalities: A Retrospective Cohort Study Using Propensity Score Analysis.

Authors:  Hye Jin Kim; Chun-Gon Park; Yong Seon Choi; Yong Suk Lee; Hyun-Jeong Kwak
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-11-28       Impact factor: 4.241

5.  Comparison of the analgesic effect of ultrasound-guided paravertebral block and ultrasound-guided retrolaminar block in Uniportal video-assisted Thoracoscopic surgery: a prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  Qiang Wang; Shijing Wei; Shuai Li; Jie Yu; Guohua Zhang; Cheng Ni; Li Sun; Hui Zheng
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-11-16       Impact factor: 4.430

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.