| Literature DB >> 31451496 |
Kathryn W Woodburn1, L Edward Clemens2, Jesse Jaynes3, Lydia-Marie Joubert4,5, Alfred Botha4, Hasan Nazik6,7, David A Stevens6,7.
Abstract
Recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis (RVVC) is a widespread chronic infection that has a substantial negative impact on work and quality of life. The development of antimicrobial resistance and biofilm formation are speculated to contribute to Candida pathogenicity and treatment ineffectiveness. Designed antimicrobial peptides (dAMPs) are chemically modified from endogenous antimicrobial peptides that provide the first line of defense against pathogens. The goal here is to identify a dAMP for the topical treatment of RVVC. The dAMP MICs were determined for 46 fluconazole-susceptible and fluconazole-resistant Candida spp. clinical isolates. The possibility of inducing dAMP drug resistance and comparison of dAMP and fluconazole activity against preformed Candida biofilm and biofilm formation were evaluated. Assessment of mammalian cell viability was determined using bioluminescent human keratinocytes. The dAMP effect on fungus was probed via scanning electron microscopy, and topically applied dAMP activity was evaluated in a rodent vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC) infection model. dAMPs demonstrated broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity against common causative clinical Candida isolates, reduced preformed biofilm, and inhibited biofilm formation. An evaluated dAMP did not induce resistance after repeated exposure of Candida tropicalis The dAMPs were selective for Candida cells with limited mammalian cytotoxicity with substantial activity in a rodent VVC model. dAMPs are described as having potent antifungal and antibiofilm activity, likely direct membrane action with selectivity for Candida cells, with limited resistance development. Combined with activity in a rodent VVC model, the data support clinical evaluation of dAMPs for topical treatment of VCC and recurrent VVC infections.Entities:
Keywords: antifungal activity; antifungals; antimicrobial peptides; biofilm; fungicidal activity; vulvovaginal candidiasis
Year: 2019 PMID: 31451496 PMCID: PMC6811422 DOI: 10.1128/AAC.02690-18
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother ISSN: 0066-4804 Impact factor: 5.191
dAMPs evaluated in support of RVVC treatment evaluation
| Peptide | Amino acid sequence | Length (aa) |
|---|---|---|
| RP504 | FOIOAOLGGCLGOFCGGIOAOLOF-NH2; disulfide bridge: C10–C15 | 24 |
| RP554 | FOLOAOIOVOLOAOIOL-NH2 | 17 |
| RP556 | RWCFKVCYKGICYKKCK-NH2; disulfide bridge: C3–C16, C7–C12 | 17 |
| RP557 | RFCWKVCYKGICFKKCK-NH2; disulfide bridge: C3–C16, C7–C12 | 17 |
aa, amino acids.
MICs against fluconazole-resistant and sensitive Candida
| MIC for (μM [μg/ml]): | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RP504 | RP554 | RP556 | RP557 | Fluconazole | |
| Resistant | |||||
| | 6.5 (1), 13 (2), >13 (7) [16 (1), 32 (2), >32 (7)] | 8.5 (4), 17 (5), >17 (1) [16 (4), 32 (5), >32 (1)] | 3.7 (2), 7.4 (5), 14.8 (3) [8 (2), 16 (5), 32 (3)] | 7.5 (2), 15 (5), >15 (3) [16 (2), 32 (5), >32 (3)] | ≥26 [≥8] |
| | >13 (4) [>32 (4)] | 17 (3), >17 (1) [32 (3), >32 (1)] | 15 (4) [32 (4)] | 15 (2), >15 (2) [32 (2), >32 (2)] | ≥209 [≥64] |
| | 1.6 (2) [4 (2)] | 1.1 (1), 2.1 (1) [2 (1), 4 (1)] | 0.93 (2) [2 (2)] | 1.9 (2) [4 (2)] | ≥26 [≥8] |
| | >13 [>32] | 17 [32] | 15 [32] | >15 [>32] | ≥26 [≥8] |
| | >13 (3) [>32 (3)] | 8.5 (2), 17 (1) [16 (2), 32 (1)] | 3.7 (1), 7.4 (2) [8 (1), 16 (2)] | 7.5 (1), 15 (2) [16 (1), 32 (2)] | |
| Susceptible | |||||
| | 13 (5) [32 (5)] | 8.5 (4), 17 (1) [16 (4), 32 (1)] | 7.4 (4), 15 (1) [16 (4), 32 (1)] | 15 (4), >15 (1) [32 (4), >32 (1)] | ≤6.5 [≤2] |
| | 13 (1), >13 (4) [32 (1), >32 (4)] | 17 (5) [32 (5)] | 7.4 (2), 15 (3) [16 (2), 32 (3)] | 15 (4), >15 (1) [32 (4), >32 (1)] | |
| | 1.6 (4), 3.3 (1) [4(4), 8 (1)] | 1.1 (1), 2.1 (4) [2 (1), 4 (4)] | 0.93 (4), 1.9 (1) [2 (4), 4 (1)] | 1.9 (3), 3.7 (2) [4 (3), 8 (2)] | ≤6.5 [≤2] |
| | 3.3 (1), 13 (1), >13 (3) [8 (1), 32 (1), >32 (3)] | 1.1 (1), 2.1 (1), 8.5 (3) [2 (1), 4 (1), 16 (3)] | 3.7 (2), 15 (3) [8 (2), 32 (3)] | 3.7 (1), 15 (1), >15 (3) [8 (1), 32 (1), >32 (3)] | ≤6.5 [≤2] |
| | 1.6 (1), 3.3 (1) [4 (1), 8 (1)] | 2.1 (2) [4 (2)] | 0.93 (1), 1.9 (1) [2 (1), 4 (1)] | 1.9 (1), 3.7 (1) [4 (1), 8 (1)] | >3.3 [>1] |
| | 1.6 [4] | 1.1 [2] | 3.7 [8] | 3.7 [8] | >6.5 [>2] |
| | 9.6 [32] | 4.3 [8] | 3.7 [8] | 7.5 [16] | >1.6 [>0.5] |
| | 6.5 [16] | 4.3 [8] | 1.9 [4] | 3.7 [8] | |
| | 3.3 [8] | 2.1 [4] | 7.4 [16] | 7.5 [16] | |
Clinical breakpoints taken from 2017 CLSI recommendations (37) and Pfaller and Diekema (42). Molecular weights are as follows: RP504, 2,455 amu; RP554, 1,884 amu; RP556, 2,157 amu; RP557, 2,136 amu; and fluconazole, 306 amu.
Isolates of C. krusei are intrinsically resistant to fluconazole (37).
Inhibition of planktonic growth was assessed using current CLSI methodology (37). Numbers in parenthesis indicate the number of strains with the MICs shown.
Susceptibility of dAMPs and fluconazole against planktonic yeasts, biofilm formation, and preformed biofilm for C. albicans isolate 17-88
| Agent | MIC (μM [μg/ml]) | Biofilm formation Inhibition | Biofilm formation activity quotient | Preformed biofilm inhibition | Preformed biofilm activity quotient |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fluconazole | 3.3 [1.0] | 209 [64] | 64 | 209 [64] | 64 |
| RP504 | 13 [32] | >26 [>64] | >2 | 26 [64] | 2 |
| RP554 | 8.5 [16] | 17 [32] | 2 | 4.3 [8] | 0.5 |
| RP556 | 7.4 [16] | 15 [32] | 2 | 15 [32] | 2 |
| RP557 | 15 [32] | 7.5 [16] | 0.5 | 1.9 [4] | 0.125 |
Lowest concentration with statistically significant inhibition.
Ratio of biofilm activity endpoint, statistically significant difference, to MIC.
FIG 1dAMPs effectively inhibit fluconazole-resistant C. albicans preformed fungal biofilm. Fluconazole and dAMPs were added to C. albicans 17-88 preformed biofilm for 24 h, and biofilm inhibition was evaluated via metabolic evaluation using XTT (39). Data represent the mean ± standard deviation (SD) of 3 to 4 measurements, with RP554 and RP557 evaluated in two independent experiments; statistical significance, compared to control, was determined by one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test (*, P < 0.05; ***, P < 0.001; ****, P < 0.0001).
FIG 2Damage of C. albicans biofilm by RP554. Scanning electron micrographs of C. albicans 17-88 biofilm incubated with test article for 24 h. (A) Control (no treatment); (B) 64 μg/ml fluconazole; (C to E) 16, 32, and 64 μg/ml RP554. Rows i to iii represent micrographs captured at ×1,000, ×5,000, and ×10,000 magnification; refer to scale bars for actual size range. The black arrows indicate cell wall indentations and cell membrane damage, and white arrows indicate surface coating with extracellular matrix residue.
FIG 3RP556 and RP557 exhibit minimal mammalian cell toxicity. Cellular toxicity was noninvasively assayed using bioluminescent human keratinocytes and viability was assayed using an IVIS Lumina imaging system. Cells were plated at 1 × 104 cells/well, adhered overnight, dAMPs added, and bioluminescence evaluated over 8 h. Concentrations were performed in triplicate, and data is from two independent experiments.
FIG 4dAMP topical treatment reduces vulvovaginal candidiasis in a rodent model. Effects of miconazole (2%, n = 10), RP504 (2%, n = 5), RP554 (2%, n = 5), and RP557 (0.2%, n = 5; 1%, n = 5; 2%, n = 10) were evaluated and compared to those of the controls (n = 10). The C. albicans (ATCC 44858) vaginal infection model involved oophorohysterectomized Wistar rats with CFU evaluated at day 5. On day 0, the animals were inoculated IVG with C. albicans at 1.5 × 107 CFU/rat (0.1 ml/rat). dAMPs and miconazole were administered IVG at 0.1 ml/rat BID at 8-h intervals starting from 48 h after infection for a total of three sequential days. CFU were evaluated on day 5 with the limit of detection (LOD, dashed lines) being 0.7 CFU/rat. Data represent mean ± standard error (SE) with significant difference defined as P < 0.0001 (****) compared to that of the control as determined by one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test.