Literature DB >> 31451130

Comparison of intranasal midazolam, intranasal ketamine, and oral chloral hydrate for conscious sedation during paediatric echocardiography: results of a prospective randomised study.

Hayrullah Alp1, Ahmet M Elmacı2, Esma K Alp3, Bülent Say4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: There are several agents used for conscious sedation by various routes in children. The aim of this prospective randomised study is to compare the effectiveness of three commonly used sedatives: intranasal ketamine, intranasal midazolam, and oral chloral hydrate for children undergoing transthoracic echocardiography.
METHODS: Children who were referred to paediatric cardiology due to a heart murmur for transthoracic echocardiography were prospectively randomised into three groups. Seventy-three children received intranasal midazolam (0.2 mg/kg), 72 children received intranasal ketamine (4 mg/kg), and 72 children received oral chloral hydrate (50 mg/kg) for conscious sedation. The effects of three agents were evaluated in terms of intensity, onset, and duration of sedation. Obtaining high-quality transthoracic echocardiography images (i.e. absence of artefacts) were regarded as successful sedation. Side effects due to medications were also noted.
RESULTS: There was no statistical difference in terms of sedation success rates between three groups (95.9, 95.9, and 94.5%, respectively). The median onset of sedation in the midazolam, ketamine, and chloral hydrate was 14 minutes (range 7-65), 34 minutes (range 12-56), and 40 minutes (range 25-57), respectively (p < 0.001 for all). However, the median duration of sedation in study groups was 68 minutes (range 20-75), 55 minutes (range 25-75), and 61 minutes (range 34-78), respectively (p = 0.023, 0.712, and 0.045). Gastrointestinal side effects such as nausea and vomiting were significantly higher in the chloral hydrate group (11.7 versus 0% for midazolam and 2.8% for ketamine, respectively, p = 0.002).
CONCLUSION: Results of our prospectively randomised study indicate that all three agents provide adequate sedation for successful transthoracic echocardiography. When compared the three sedatives, intranasal midazolam has a more rapid onset of sedation while intranasal ketamine has a shorter duration of sedation. Intranasal ketamine can be used safely with fewer side effects in children undergoing transthoracic echocardiography.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Sedative; chloral hydrate; echocardiography; infant; intranasal; ketamine; midazolam; oral; paediatric

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31451130     DOI: 10.1017/S1047951119001835

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiol Young        ISSN: 1047-9511            Impact factor:   1.093


  3 in total

1.  Preanesthetic nebulized ketamine vs preanesthetic oral ketamine for sedation and postoperative pain management in children for elective surgery: A retrospective analysis for effectiveness and safety.

Authors:  Chun Chen; Xiaolin Cheng; Lei Lin; Fangfang Fu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 2.  Midazolam for sedation before procedures in adults and children: a systematic review update.

Authors:  Aaron Conway; Kristina Chang; Sebastian Mafeld; Joanna Sutherland
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2021-03-05

3.  Rectal chloral hydrate sedation for computed tomography in young children with head trauma.

Authors:  Quanmin Nie; Peiquan Hui; Haitao Ding; Zengwu Wang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 1.817

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.