| Literature DB >> 31451117 |
Ines Schreiver1, Bernhard Hesse2,3, Christian Seim3,4,5, Hiram Castillo-Michel2, Lars Anklamm6, Julie Villanova2, Nadine Dreiack7, Adrien Lagrange3,8, Randolph Penning9, Christa De Cuyper10, Remi Tucoulou2, Wolfgang Bäumler11, Marine Cotte2,12, Andreas Luch7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Allergic reactions to tattoos are amongst the most common side effects occurring with this permanent deposition of pigments into the dermal skin layer. The characterization of such pigments and their distribution has been investigated in recent decades. The health impact of tattoo equipment on the extensive number of people with inked skin has been the focus of neither research nor medical diagnostics. Although tattoo needles contain high amounts of sensitizing elements like nickel (Ni) and chromium (Cr), their influence on metal deposition in skin has never been investigated.Entities:
Keywords: Allergy; Metallic wear; Nickel; Synchrotron; Tattoo; Titanium dioxide; XRF
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31451117 PMCID: PMC6710876 DOI: 10.1186/s12989-019-0317-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Part Fibre Toxicol ISSN: 1743-8977 Impact factor: 9.400
Fig. 1Synchrotron nano-X-ray fluorescence (XRF) and nano- X-ray absorption near-edge structure (XANES) analysis of representative skin and lymph node sections. a XRF elemental maps of donor 1 of titanium (Ti) from titanium dioxide, copper (Cu) from copper phthalocyanine, iron (Fe), chromium (Cr) and nickel (Ni) from steel debris, acquired at beamline ID16B with a resolution of 50 nm. Arrows point the regions where XANES spectra were acquired. b Cr and Ni K-edge XANES spectra of skin and lymph node samples mainly show metal Ni and a mixture of metal Cr(0) and ionic Cr (III) when compared to reference spectra
XRF evaluation of particle sizes and elemental co-localization in skin and lymph node tissues from human donors (corpses)
| Sample | NP size range in nm | Co-localizations |
|---|---|---|
| Donor 1 skin | Fe-Cr-Ni particles (50–1000), Cu (100–700), Ti (100–500), Fe (150–300) | yes: Fe-Cr-Ni, no: some Fe particles w/o Ni |
| Donor 1 LN | Fe-Cr-Ni particles (50–1000), Cu (100–1000), Ti (100–500) | yes: Fe-Cr-Ni no: Cu, Fe, Ti |
| Donor 2 skin left | Fe-Cr-Ni particles (50–500), Cu (100–250), Ti (200–250) | yes: Fe-Cr-Ni no: Cu, Fe, Ti |
| Donor 2 LN left | Fe-Cr-Ni particles (50–4000), Cu (100–250), Ti (200–250), | yes: Fe-Cr-Ni no: Cu, Fe, Ti |
| Donor 2 skin right | Fe-Cr-Ni particles (50–1400), Cu (100–300), Ti (200–300) | yes: Fe-Cr-Ni no: Cu, Fe, Ti |
| Donor 2 LN right | Fe-Cr-Ni particles (50–1500), Cu (100–300), Ti (200–300) | yes: Fe-Cr-Ni no: Cu, Fe, Ti |
| Donor 3 skin red | Fe-Cr-Ni particles (50–350), Cu (100–300), Ti (200–300) | yes: Fe-Cr-Ni no: Cu, Fe, Ti |
| Donor 3 skin green | Fe-Cr-Ni particles (100–650), Cu (100–800), Ti (200–400) | yes: Fe-Cr-Ni no: Cu, Fe, Ti |
| Donor 3 LN | Fe-Cr-Ni particles (50–500), Cu (100–300), Ti (200–300) | yes: Fe-Cr-Ni no: Cu, Fe, Ti |
| Allergy biopsy | Fe-Cr-Ni particles (50–300), Fe (300–450), Cu (100–1400), Ti (200–300) | yes: Fe-Cr-Ni no: Cu, Fe, Ti |
Abbreviations: LN lymph node, NP nanoparticle, Fe iron, Cr chromium, Ni nickel, Ti titanium, Cu copper
Fig. 2Nano-X-ray fluorescence (XRF) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analyses of pig skin tattooed with carbon black or titanium dioxide (TiO2) inks. a, b Zoom-in nano-XRF maps of tattooed pig skin sections recorded at beamline ID21 show a higher deposition of iron-chromium-nickel (Fe-Cr-Ni) particles with white TiO2 ink (b) than with carbon black (a). Maximal (max.) intensities of elements are given for each element. c SEM images of nine tattoo needles unused and after tattooing of pig skin with carbon black and TiO2 ink. Polished needle surfaces appear only after tattooing with TiO2 ink. d Table-top XRF spectra of tattoo needle and microtome knife. e Quantity of Ni and Cr per weight of tissue in pig skin after tattooing with carbon black, TiO2 or without (w/o) ink, analyzed by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) and estimated calc. TiO2 ink (see text for explanations). Worst case concentrations of highly contaminated brown iron oxide ink [9] were calculated in the same manner (calc. iron oxide ink). Asterisks indicate significances as identified by a two-way ANOVA with a Tukeys multiple comparison test using all tattooed samples and calc. TiO2 ink. Significant differences of pig skin tattooed with TiO2 ink compared to calc. TiO2 ink are displayed (*** = p < 0.001; **** = p < 0.0001). Data are displayed as mean of three distinct samples ± SD. Abbreviations: P = phosphorus
Fig. 3Allergic reaction to a red-brown tattoo of a patient sensitized to nickel. a Skin section nano-X-ray fluorescence (XRF) image recorded at beamline ID16B with distinct areas of iron (Fe) pigments (region 2) and smaller Fe-chromium-nickel (Fe-Cr-Ni) particles (region 1) in titanium (Ti)-rich regions. b Photography of the skin’s reaction to the tattoo before removal by dermabrasion. c Normalized XRF spectra in Fe pixels extracted from regions 1 and 2, as indicated in the Fe XRF image in (a). Abbreviations: Cu = copper
Fig. 4Tattoo needle wear biodistribution and supposed contribution to allergy formation. Nickel and chromium containing wear particles are abraded by titanium dioxide containing inks. The steel used to manufacture tattoo needles contains 6-8% nickel and 15-20% chromium. Pigments and wear particles are inserted into the dermal part of the skin. Both are passively and actively transported to the draining lymph nodes where Ni2+ ions as sensitizing species of nickel can be released. Antigen presentation to T-cells takes place in the lymph nodes as part of the adaptive immune response which is an obligatory process for sensitization and thus type IV allergy formation in the skin