| Literature DB >> 31450701 |
Francisco Mederos-Henry1, Julien Mahin1,2, Benoit P Pichon3, Marinela M Dîrtu1,4, Yann Garcia1, Arnaud Delcorte5, Christian Bailly5, Isabelle Huynen6, Sophie Hermans7.
Abstract
Electronic systems and telecommunication devices based on low-power microwaves, ranging from 2 to 40 GHz, have massively developed in the last decades. Their extensive use has contributed to the emergence of diverse electromagnetic interference (EMI) phenomena. Consequently, EMI shielding has become a ubiquitous necessity and, in certain countries, a legal requirement. Broadband absorption is considered the only convincing EMI shielding solution when the complete disappearance of the unwanted microwave is required. In this study, a new type of microwave absorber materials (MAMs) based on reduced graphene oxide (rGO) decorated with zero-valent Fe@γ-Fe2O3 and Fe/Co/Ni carbon-protected alloy nanoparticles (NPs) were synthesized using the Pechini sol-gel method. Synthetic parameters were varied to determine their influence on the deposited NPs size and spatial distribution. The deposited superparamagnetic nanoparticles were found to induce a ferromagnetic resonance (FMR) absorption process in all cases. Furthermore, a direct relationship between the nanocomposites' natural FMR frequency and their composition-dependent saturation magnetization (Ms) was established. Finally, the microwave absorption efficiency (0.4 MHz to 20 GHz) of these new materials was found to range from 60% to 100%, depending on the nature of the metallic particles grafted onto rGO.Entities:
Keywords: electromagnetic interference shielding; magnetic nanoparticles; microwave absorbing materials; nanocomposites; reduced graphene oxide
Year: 2019 PMID: 31450701 PMCID: PMC6780371 DOI: 10.3390/nano9091196
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.076
ZVI (zero-valent iron) NPs (nanoparticles) size distributions obtained using different CA:M (citric acid to metal precursor) and CA:EG (citric acid to ethylene glycol) ratios.
| CA:M Ratio | ||
|---|---|---|
| CA:EG Ratio | 3:1 | 6:1 |
| 1:1 | 16.8 ± 6.5 nm | 14.8 ± 4.7 nm |
| 1:1.5 | 17.9 ± 8.1 nm | 14.3 ± 7.2 nm |
| 1:11 | 18.3 ± 9.6 nm | 19.7 ± 10.4 nm |
Figure 1XRPD diffractograms of the different ZVI@rGO nanocomposites obtained at 1:1, 1:1.5, 1:11 CA:EG and a 6:1 CA:M ratios.
57Fe Mössbauer parameters for ZVI and Fe/Co/Ni alloy nanoparticles deposited on rGO (reduced graphene oxide).
| Nanocomposite | T |
|
|
| Relative Area | Sites | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [K] | [mm/s] | [mm/s] | [Tesla] | [mm/s] | [%] | ||
| ZVI@rGO | 77 | 0.05(1) | – | – | 0.18 * | 4 | |
| 0.11(1) | 0 | 34.1 | 0.21(1) | 86 | |||
| 0.43(1) | 0 | 39 | 0.28 * | 10 | |||
| FeCo@rGO | 77 | 0.12(1) | 0 | 34.6 | 0.22(1) | 100 | FeCo alloy |
| FeNi@rGO | 77 | 0.16(1) | 0.35(1) | – | 0.15 * | 6 | superparamagnetic phase |
| 0.027(1) | −0.018(1) | 34.1 | 0.20(1) | 24 | FeNi (fcc) alloy | ||
| FeCoNi@rGO | 77 | 0.35(1) | −0.07(1) | 21.2 | 0.40(1) | 30 | Fe carbide |
| 0.15(1) | −0.05(1) | 32 | 0.17(1) | 70 | FeCoNi (fcc) alloy |
(1) δ: isomer shift (with respect to α-Fe at r.t.); ε, ΔEQ: quadrupole splitting; Γ/2: half-width at half maximum. * Fixed parameters.
Figure 2XPS Fe2p3/2 peak region showing metallic (Fe0) and oxidized (FeOx+FeOx_sat) components (comp.) in (a) ZVI, (b) FeCo, (c) FeNi, and (d) FeCoNi alloy NPs (nanoparticles) deposited on rGO (reduced graphene oxide).
Figure 3TEM and high-resolution TEM (HRTEM) (inset, upper left corner) images of a ZVI@rGO nanocomposite prepared with 1:1.5 CA:M and 3:1 CA:EG ratios. ZVI: zero-valent iron.
Figure 4Electron diffractograms collected during HRTEM observation of the different nanocomposites. Calculated lattice spacing (in Angstroms, Å) and their corresponding (hkl) indices are included for each product.
Figure 5Alloy NPs size distribution histograms (from TEM images given in SM, Figure S6).
Elemental mass composition (wt.%) for the different alloy nanocomposites determined by EDX and ICP.
| EDX | ICP | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alloy NPs | % Fe | % Co | % Ni | % Fe | % Co | % Ni |
| FeCo | 47 ± 4 | 53 ± 6 | – | 49 | 51 | – |
| FeNi | 48 ± 3 | – | 52 ± 3 | 52 | – | 48 |
| FeCoNi | 30 ± 8 | 36 ± 5 | 34 ± 6 | 32 | 34 | 34 |
Figure 6XRPD diffractograms of the different alloy nanocomposites obtained at 1:1.5 CA:EG and 6:1 CA:M ratios.
Magnetic properties of the ZVI and Fe/Co/Ni alloy nanocomposites. A loading rate of 50 wt.% was aimed at in all cases.
| Nanocomposite | SPL [ | % NPs < SPL | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZVI@rGO | ~14 | 75% | 91 | 20 | 265 |
| FeCo@rGO | ~22 | 90% | 205 | 24 | 141 |
| FeNi@rGO | ~30 | 84% | 124 | 11 | 78 |
| FeCoNi@rGO | N.D. | – | 187 | 4 | 21 |
Figure 7Dispersion relation between the different nanocomposites’ natural ferromagnetic resonance frequency and saturation magnetization.
Figure 8FMR (ferromagnetic resonance) absorption processes in the absence of an applied magnetic field for the different nanocomposites. A loading rate of 50 wt.% was aimed at in all cases.
Figure 9The percentage absorption rate of the incoming microwave by the different nanocomposites. A loading rate of 50 wt.% was aimed at in all cases.